Explaining Conflict Transformation: How Jerusalem Became Negotiable
How can intractable conflicts become negotiable after decades of bloodshed and disagreement? The question is addressed using two lenses-one conceptual, the so-called conflict transformation approach set out in the research literature, and one empirical, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict over Jerusale...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge review of international affairs 2005-10, Vol.18 (3), p.339-355 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 355 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 339 |
container_title | Cambridge review of international affairs |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Albin, Cecilia |
description | How can intractable conflicts become negotiable after decades of bloodshed and disagreement? The question is addressed using two lenses-one conceptual, the so-called conflict transformation approach set out in the research literature, and one empirical, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict over Jerusalem. The article discusses turning points in the transformation of Jerusalem from an intractable dispute to an intensively negotiated issue with the contours of a possible agreement emerging. It examines how far the conflict transformation approach helps to explain this critical development, as well as how Jerusalem points to areas in need of further development. The conflict over Jerusalem has become tractable through profound structural and relational change. However, this change is not necessarily permanent. A useful approach to conflict transformation needs to illuminate underlying causes better, and be able to explain relapses into intractability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09557570500237870 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09557570500237870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>59692206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-95c848d19b3cba94431c9529748f55082aa69211c622dbdebf04423e9fa73b963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EEqXwA9gysQX8GceIBaJCQRUsRWKLHMeujJy42K7a_ntSyoZEpxvuvTvpAXCJ4DWCJbyBgjHOOGQQYsJLDo_ACFFOc0rFxzEY7fb5AKBTcBbjJ4SIEChGoJpslk7a3vaLrPK9cValbB5kH40PnUzW97fZ1K-zFx1WUTrdZQ9ayU5nr3rhk5WN0-fgxEgX9cXvHIP3x8m8muazt6fn6n6WK4JJygVTJS1bJBqiGikoJUgJhgWnpWEMlljKQmCEVIFx27S6MZBSTLQwkpNGFGQMrvZ3l8F_rXRMdWej0s7JXvtVrJkYfAwPg6TgAlJBBxDtQRV8jEGbehlsJ8O2RrDeda3_dB2cu71j-59Eax9cWye5dT6YIZyyw4P_dH5Q_2PVaZPIN6EKjxY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>36790494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Explaining Conflict Transformation: How Jerusalem Became Negotiable</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Albin, Cecilia</creator><creatorcontrib>Albin, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><description>How can intractable conflicts become negotiable after decades of bloodshed and disagreement? The question is addressed using two lenses-one conceptual, the so-called conflict transformation approach set out in the research literature, and one empirical, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict over Jerusalem. The article discusses turning points in the transformation of Jerusalem from an intractable dispute to an intensively negotiated issue with the contours of a possible agreement emerging. It examines how far the conflict transformation approach helps to explain this critical development, as well as how Jerusalem points to areas in need of further development. The conflict over Jerusalem has become tractable through profound structural and relational change. However, this change is not necessarily permanent. A useful approach to conflict transformation needs to illuminate underlying causes better, and be able to explain relapses into intractability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-7571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-449X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09557570500237870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Arab Israeli Relations ; Arab-Israeli conflict ; Cities ; Conflict Resolution ; Foreign relations ; International Conflict ; International relations ; Israel ; Jerusalem ; Jerusalem, Israel ; Palestinians ; Sovereignty ; Territory</subject><ispartof>Cambridge review of international affairs, 2005-10, Vol.18 (3), p.339-355</ispartof><rights>Copyright Centre of International Studies 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-95c848d19b3cba94431c9529748f55082aa69211c622dbdebf04423e9fa73b963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-95c848d19b3cba94431c9529748f55082aa69211c622dbdebf04423e9fa73b963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Albin, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><title>Explaining Conflict Transformation: How Jerusalem Became Negotiable</title><title>Cambridge review of international affairs</title><description>How can intractable conflicts become negotiable after decades of bloodshed and disagreement? The question is addressed using two lenses-one conceptual, the so-called conflict transformation approach set out in the research literature, and one empirical, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict over Jerusalem. The article discusses turning points in the transformation of Jerusalem from an intractable dispute to an intensively negotiated issue with the contours of a possible agreement emerging. It examines how far the conflict transformation approach helps to explain this critical development, as well as how Jerusalem points to areas in need of further development. The conflict over Jerusalem has become tractable through profound structural and relational change. However, this change is not necessarily permanent. A useful approach to conflict transformation needs to illuminate underlying causes better, and be able to explain relapses into intractability.</description><subject>Arab Israeli Relations</subject><subject>Arab-Israeli conflict</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Conflict Resolution</subject><subject>Foreign relations</subject><subject>International Conflict</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Israel</subject><subject>Jerusalem</subject><subject>Jerusalem, Israel</subject><subject>Palestinians</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Territory</subject><issn>0955-7571</issn><issn>1474-449X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EEqXwA9gysQX8GceIBaJCQRUsRWKLHMeujJy42K7a_ntSyoZEpxvuvTvpAXCJ4DWCJbyBgjHOOGQQYsJLDo_ACFFOc0rFxzEY7fb5AKBTcBbjJ4SIEChGoJpslk7a3vaLrPK9cValbB5kH40PnUzW97fZ1K-zFx1WUTrdZQ9ayU5nr3rhk5WN0-fgxEgX9cXvHIP3x8m8muazt6fn6n6WK4JJygVTJS1bJBqiGikoJUgJhgWnpWEMlljKQmCEVIFx27S6MZBSTLQwkpNGFGQMrvZ3l8F_rXRMdWej0s7JXvtVrJkYfAwPg6TgAlJBBxDtQRV8jEGbehlsJ8O2RrDeda3_dB2cu71j-59Eax9cWye5dT6YIZyyw4P_dH5Q_2PVaZPIN6EKjxY</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Albin, Cecilia</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Explaining Conflict Transformation: How Jerusalem Became Negotiable</title><author>Albin, Cecilia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-95c848d19b3cba94431c9529748f55082aa69211c622dbdebf04423e9fa73b963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Arab Israeli Relations</topic><topic>Arab-Israeli conflict</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Conflict Resolution</topic><topic>Foreign relations</topic><topic>International Conflict</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Israel</topic><topic>Jerusalem</topic><topic>Jerusalem, Israel</topic><topic>Palestinians</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Territory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Albin, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Cambridge review of international affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Albin, Cecilia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Explaining Conflict Transformation: How Jerusalem Became Negotiable</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge review of international affairs</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>339-355</pages><issn>0955-7571</issn><eissn>1474-449X</eissn><abstract>How can intractable conflicts become negotiable after decades of bloodshed and disagreement? The question is addressed using two lenses-one conceptual, the so-called conflict transformation approach set out in the research literature, and one empirical, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict over Jerusalem. The article discusses turning points in the transformation of Jerusalem from an intractable dispute to an intensively negotiated issue with the contours of a possible agreement emerging. It examines how far the conflict transformation approach helps to explain this critical development, as well as how Jerusalem points to areas in need of further development. The conflict over Jerusalem has become tractable through profound structural and relational change. However, this change is not necessarily permanent. A useful approach to conflict transformation needs to illuminate underlying causes better, and be able to explain relapses into intractability.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/09557570500237870</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0955-7571 |
ispartof | Cambridge review of international affairs, 2005-10, Vol.18 (3), p.339-355 |
issn | 0955-7571 1474-449X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09557570500237870 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | Arab Israeli Relations Arab-Israeli conflict Cities Conflict Resolution Foreign relations International Conflict International relations Israel Jerusalem Jerusalem, Israel Palestinians Sovereignty Territory |
title | Explaining Conflict Transformation: How Jerusalem Became Negotiable |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A10%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explaining%20Conflict%20Transformation:%20How%20Jerusalem%20Became%20Negotiable&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20review%20of%20international%20affairs&rft.au=Albin,%20Cecilia&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=339-355&rft.issn=0955-7571&rft.eissn=1474-449X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09557570500237870&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E59692206%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=36790494&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |