Ante-natal HIV testing: An observational study of HIV test discussion in maternity care

There has been a vociferous call for ante-natal HIV testing but low uptake persists in the UK despite DOH guidelines. The reasons for this are complex, with many studies examining intention, offer and uptake of HIV test but few observing the process to understand the nature of HIV discussion with pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Counselling psychology quarterly 2001-06, Vol.14 (2), p.129-138
Hauptverfasser: Sherr, L., Bergenstrom, A., Bell, E., McCann, E., Hudson, C. N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 138
container_issue 2
container_start_page 129
container_title Counselling psychology quarterly
container_volume 14
creator Sherr, L.
Bergenstrom, A.
Bell, E.
McCann, E.
Hudson, C. N
description There has been a vociferous call for ante-natal HIV testing but low uptake persists in the UK despite DOH guidelines. The reasons for this are complex, with many studies examining intention, offer and uptake of HIV test but few observing the process to understand the nature of HIV discussion with pregnant women. A field observational study was undertaken where researchers attended 154 ante-natal consultations. These were selected in rotation during ante-natal visits by women at four London hospital based ante-natal clinics. A standardized checklist was utilized to monitor information on HIV. A mean of 1.73 minutes was spent discussing HIV infection and testing during ante-natal consultations which lasted for a mean of 33.1 minutes. Risk factors for HIV were mentioned infrequently. When mentioned they concentrated on sexual behaviour which was raised in 11.7% of the consultations. Potential interventions to reduce vertical transmission were discussed with no more than one in five women and possible adverse implications of HIV testing with fewer than one in ten, the only exception being the implications of a positive diagnosis for the baby. Discussion of interventions was associated with HIV test uptake, but risk discussion was not. The short time spent on discussing HIV testing, combined with paucity of mention of information relevant to pregnancy are issues for concern and probably help to explain the level of uptake in the UK.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09515070126332
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09515070126332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57772282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-f7817716d810fc58da08fc7ef48bd274669c3074bfe6cfba0c16e19b644a77f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EEqWwMntAbCl2nNgJW1UBrVSJhY_RchwbGSV2sR0g_55ELaAOiOkN95yrqwfAOUYzjAp0hcoc54ghnFJC0gMwwRktE0JZdggmY5iM6TE4CeEVIZTmLJ2A57mNKrEiigYuV08wqhCNfbmGcwtdFZR_F9E4O6QhdnUPnf7BYG2C7EIYYmgsbEVU3prYQym8OgVHWjRBne3uFDze3jwslsn6_m61mK8TSRCLiWYFZgzTusBIy7yoBSq0ZEpnRVWnLKO0HMGs0opKXQkkMVW4rGiWCcY0IlNwue3dePfWDat4O6xSTSOscl3gOWMsTYt0AGdbUHoXgleab7xphe85Rnz8H9__3yBc7JpFkKLRXlhpwq-FCSlLMmDZFjNWO9-KD-ebmkfRN85_O_vNPH7GQSv_1cgfy74A9B-S7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57772282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ante-natal HIV testing: An observational study of HIV test discussion in maternity care</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Sherr, L. ; Bergenstrom, A. ; Bell, E. ; McCann, E. ; Hudson, C. N</creator><creatorcontrib>Sherr, L. ; Bergenstrom, A. ; Bell, E. ; McCann, E. ; Hudson, C. N</creatorcontrib><description>There has been a vociferous call for ante-natal HIV testing but low uptake persists in the UK despite DOH guidelines. The reasons for this are complex, with many studies examining intention, offer and uptake of HIV test but few observing the process to understand the nature of HIV discussion with pregnant women. A field observational study was undertaken where researchers attended 154 ante-natal consultations. These were selected in rotation during ante-natal visits by women at four London hospital based ante-natal clinics. A standardized checklist was utilized to monitor information on HIV. A mean of 1.73 minutes was spent discussing HIV infection and testing during ante-natal consultations which lasted for a mean of 33.1 minutes. Risk factors for HIV were mentioned infrequently. When mentioned they concentrated on sexual behaviour which was raised in 11.7% of the consultations. Potential interventions to reduce vertical transmission were discussed with no more than one in five women and possible adverse implications of HIV testing with fewer than one in ten, the only exception being the implications of a positive diagnosis for the baby. Discussion of interventions was associated with HIV test uptake, but risk discussion was not. The short time spent on discussing HIV testing, combined with paucity of mention of information relevant to pregnancy are issues for concern and probably help to explain the level of uptake in the UK.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-5070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-3674</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09515070126332</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPQUEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Counselling ; England ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Interventions ; London ; Maternal health care ; Medical sciences ; Pregnant women ; Prevention and actions ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Screening ; Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</subject><ispartof>Counselling psychology quarterly, 2001-06, Vol.14 (2), p.129-138</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2001</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-f7817716d810fc58da08fc7ef48bd274669c3074bfe6cfba0c16e19b644a77f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-f7817716d810fc58da08fc7ef48bd274669c3074bfe6cfba0c16e19b644a77f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1133993$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sherr, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergenstrom, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCann, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, C. N</creatorcontrib><title>Ante-natal HIV testing: An observational study of HIV test discussion in maternity care</title><title>Counselling psychology quarterly</title><description>There has been a vociferous call for ante-natal HIV testing but low uptake persists in the UK despite DOH guidelines. The reasons for this are complex, with many studies examining intention, offer and uptake of HIV test but few observing the process to understand the nature of HIV discussion with pregnant women. A field observational study was undertaken where researchers attended 154 ante-natal consultations. These were selected in rotation during ante-natal visits by women at four London hospital based ante-natal clinics. A standardized checklist was utilized to monitor information on HIV. A mean of 1.73 minutes was spent discussing HIV infection and testing during ante-natal consultations which lasted for a mean of 33.1 minutes. Risk factors for HIV were mentioned infrequently. When mentioned they concentrated on sexual behaviour which was raised in 11.7% of the consultations. Potential interventions to reduce vertical transmission were discussed with no more than one in five women and possible adverse implications of HIV testing with fewer than one in ten, the only exception being the implications of a positive diagnosis for the baby. Discussion of interventions was associated with HIV test uptake, but risk discussion was not. The short time spent on discussing HIV testing, combined with paucity of mention of information relevant to pregnancy are issues for concern and probably help to explain the level of uptake in the UK.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Counselling</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Interventions</subject><subject>London</subject><subject>Maternal health care</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</subject><issn>0951-5070</issn><issn>1469-3674</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EEqWwMntAbCl2nNgJW1UBrVSJhY_RchwbGSV2sR0g_55ELaAOiOkN95yrqwfAOUYzjAp0hcoc54ghnFJC0gMwwRktE0JZdggmY5iM6TE4CeEVIZTmLJ2A57mNKrEiigYuV08wqhCNfbmGcwtdFZR_F9E4O6QhdnUPnf7BYG2C7EIYYmgsbEVU3prYQym8OgVHWjRBne3uFDze3jwslsn6_m61mK8TSRCLiWYFZgzTusBIy7yoBSq0ZEpnRVWnLKO0HMGs0opKXQkkMVW4rGiWCcY0IlNwue3dePfWDat4O6xSTSOscl3gOWMsTYt0AGdbUHoXgleab7xphe85Rnz8H9__3yBc7JpFkKLRXlhpwq-FCSlLMmDZFjNWO9-KD-ebmkfRN85_O_vNPH7GQSv_1cgfy74A9B-S7w</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Sherr, L.</creator><creator>Bergenstrom, A.</creator><creator>Bell, E.</creator><creator>McCann, E.</creator><creator>Hudson, C. N</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Ante-natal HIV testing: An observational study of HIV test discussion in maternity care</title><author>Sherr, L. ; Bergenstrom, A. ; Bell, E. ; McCann, E. ; Hudson, C. N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-f7817716d810fc58da08fc7ef48bd274669c3074bfe6cfba0c16e19b644a77f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Counselling</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Interventions</topic><topic>London</topic><topic>Maternal health care</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sherr, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergenstrom, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCann, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, C. N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Counselling psychology quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sherr, L.</au><au>Bergenstrom, A.</au><au>Bell, E.</au><au>McCann, E.</au><au>Hudson, C. N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ante-natal HIV testing: An observational study of HIV test discussion in maternity care</atitle><jtitle>Counselling psychology quarterly</jtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>129-138</pages><issn>0951-5070</issn><eissn>1469-3674</eissn><coden>CPQUEZ</coden><abstract>There has been a vociferous call for ante-natal HIV testing but low uptake persists in the UK despite DOH guidelines. The reasons for this are complex, with many studies examining intention, offer and uptake of HIV test but few observing the process to understand the nature of HIV discussion with pregnant women. A field observational study was undertaken where researchers attended 154 ante-natal consultations. These were selected in rotation during ante-natal visits by women at four London hospital based ante-natal clinics. A standardized checklist was utilized to monitor information on HIV. A mean of 1.73 minutes was spent discussing HIV infection and testing during ante-natal consultations which lasted for a mean of 33.1 minutes. Risk factors for HIV were mentioned infrequently. When mentioned they concentrated on sexual behaviour which was raised in 11.7% of the consultations. Potential interventions to reduce vertical transmission were discussed with no more than one in five women and possible adverse implications of HIV testing with fewer than one in ten, the only exception being the implications of a positive diagnosis for the baby. Discussion of interventions was associated with HIV test uptake, but risk discussion was not. The short time spent on discussing HIV testing, combined with paucity of mention of information relevant to pregnancy are issues for concern and probably help to explain the level of uptake in the UK.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/09515070126332</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-5070
ispartof Counselling psychology quarterly, 2001-06, Vol.14 (2), p.129-138
issn 0951-5070
1469-3674
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09515070126332
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Counselling
England
Human immunodeficiency virus
Interventions
London
Maternal health care
Medical sciences
Pregnant women
Prevention and actions
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Screening
Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)
title Ante-natal HIV testing: An observational study of HIV test discussion in maternity care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T21%3A34%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ante-natal%20HIV%20testing:%20An%20observational%20study%20of%20HIV%20test%20discussion%20in%20maternity%20care&rft.jtitle=Counselling%20psychology%20quarterly&rft.au=Sherr,%20L.&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=129-138&rft.issn=0951-5070&rft.eissn=1469-3674&rft.coden=CPQUEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09515070126332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57772282%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57772282&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true