Thailand and the Responsibility to Protect

The paper reviews Thailand's position on RtoP through in-depth interviews with those currently working most closely with RtoP-related issues within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the National Human Rights Commission, the Armed Forces and NGOs. The interview results reveal that Thailand's...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacific review 2012-03, Vol.25 (1), p.1-25
1. Verfasser: Kraisoraphong, Keokam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Pacific review
container_volume 25
creator Kraisoraphong, Keokam
description The paper reviews Thailand's position on RtoP through in-depth interviews with those currently working most closely with RtoP-related issues within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the National Human Rights Commission, the Armed Forces and NGOs. The interview results reveal that Thailand's position on RtoP is mixed. While the country is willing to support the international community implementing RtoP through UN humanitarian operations, it is inclined not to define any of its own internal security problems as an RtoP-type situation. The paper highlights the challenges posed by separatist insurgents in Southern Thailand, and the recent violent political confrontation during April and May 2010, two internal security cases viewed by some observers as RtoP-type situations. But from Thailand's perspectives, almost all those interviewed insist that these situations are matters of internal security affairs. In addition, the preventive dimension of RtoP has not received much attention and has rather been challenged as to how such measures for the prevention of RtoP crimes differ from those more broadly undertaken to achieve the same goals as RtoP, but are not being called as such. Therefore, given the present context, Thailand's position on RtoP will unlikely change for the better if RtoP continues to be advocated as a concept in its current state.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09512748.2011.632960
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09512748_2011_632960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1283635927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-2d2924499fb8143d6077823d73374a8f3ce2faec8f81dcda640493d3892d8ff93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wMXsFGFqXpPHSqT4goIidR3SPGhkOqlJivTfO8Potri4nM13DpcPgEsEZwgKeAtlgzCnYoYhQjNGsGTwCEwQ5bBGhOBjMBmQemBOwVnOnxBCwho-ATfLtQ6t7mw1XFm76t3lbexyWIU2lH1VYvWWYnGmnIMTr9vsLn5zCj4eH5bz53rx-vQyv1_UhsKm1NhiiSmV0q8EosQyyLnAxHJCONXCE-Ow184IL5A1VjMKqSSWCImt8F6SKbgad7cpfu1cLmoTsnFt_6WLu6wk5kxg2PCevD5IIo4Faxr8HxQLwkjTb_coHVGTYs7JebVNYaPTXiGoBt_qz7cafKvRd1-7G2uh8zFt9HdMrVVF79uYfNKdCVmRgws_asWEAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1283635927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thailand and the Responsibility to Protect</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Kraisoraphong, Keokam</creator><creatorcontrib>Kraisoraphong, Keokam</creatorcontrib><description>The paper reviews Thailand's position on RtoP through in-depth interviews with those currently working most closely with RtoP-related issues within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the National Human Rights Commission, the Armed Forces and NGOs. The interview results reveal that Thailand's position on RtoP is mixed. While the country is willing to support the international community implementing RtoP through UN humanitarian operations, it is inclined not to define any of its own internal security problems as an RtoP-type situation. The paper highlights the challenges posed by separatist insurgents in Southern Thailand, and the recent violent political confrontation during April and May 2010, two internal security cases viewed by some observers as RtoP-type situations. But from Thailand's perspectives, almost all those interviewed insist that these situations are matters of internal security affairs. In addition, the preventive dimension of RtoP has not received much attention and has rather been challenged as to how such measures for the prevention of RtoP crimes differ from those more broadly undertaken to achieve the same goals as RtoP, but are not being called as such. Therefore, given the present context, Thailand's position on RtoP will unlikely change for the better if RtoP continues to be advocated as a concept in its current state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-2748</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09512748.2011.632960</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Armed forces ; Commissions ; Conflict ; Foreign policy ; Geopolitics ; Human rights ; Humanitarian intervention ; Insurgency ; Internal security ; International Relations ; National Security ; Nongovernmental organizations ; political conflict ; Political conflicts ; Political doctrines ; Prevention ; RtoP ; Security ; Separatism ; Thailand ; United Nations</subject><ispartof>Pacific review, 2012-03, Vol.25 (1), p.1-25</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-2d2924499fb8143d6077823d73374a8f3ce2faec8f81dcda640493d3892d8ff93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-2d2924499fb8143d6077823d73374a8f3ce2faec8f81dcda640493d3892d8ff93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kraisoraphong, Keokam</creatorcontrib><title>Thailand and the Responsibility to Protect</title><title>Pacific review</title><description>The paper reviews Thailand's position on RtoP through in-depth interviews with those currently working most closely with RtoP-related issues within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the National Human Rights Commission, the Armed Forces and NGOs. The interview results reveal that Thailand's position on RtoP is mixed. While the country is willing to support the international community implementing RtoP through UN humanitarian operations, it is inclined not to define any of its own internal security problems as an RtoP-type situation. The paper highlights the challenges posed by separatist insurgents in Southern Thailand, and the recent violent political confrontation during April and May 2010, two internal security cases viewed by some observers as RtoP-type situations. But from Thailand's perspectives, almost all those interviewed insist that these situations are matters of internal security affairs. In addition, the preventive dimension of RtoP has not received much attention and has rather been challenged as to how such measures for the prevention of RtoP crimes differ from those more broadly undertaken to achieve the same goals as RtoP, but are not being called as such. Therefore, given the present context, Thailand's position on RtoP will unlikely change for the better if RtoP continues to be advocated as a concept in its current state.</description><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Commissions</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Humanitarian intervention</subject><subject>Insurgency</subject><subject>Internal security</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>National Security</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>political conflict</subject><subject>Political conflicts</subject><subject>Political doctrines</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>RtoP</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Separatism</subject><subject>Thailand</subject><subject>United Nations</subject><issn>0951-2748</issn><issn>1470-1332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wMXsFGFqXpPHSqT4goIidR3SPGhkOqlJivTfO8Potri4nM13DpcPgEsEZwgKeAtlgzCnYoYhQjNGsGTwCEwQ5bBGhOBjMBmQemBOwVnOnxBCwho-ATfLtQ6t7mw1XFm76t3lbexyWIU2lH1VYvWWYnGmnIMTr9vsLn5zCj4eH5bz53rx-vQyv1_UhsKm1NhiiSmV0q8EosQyyLnAxHJCONXCE-Ow184IL5A1VjMKqSSWCImt8F6SKbgad7cpfu1cLmoTsnFt_6WLu6wk5kxg2PCevD5IIo4Faxr8HxQLwkjTb_coHVGTYs7JebVNYaPTXiGoBt_qz7cafKvRd1-7G2uh8zFt9HdMrVVF79uYfNKdCVmRgws_asWEAg</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Kraisoraphong, Keokam</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Thailand and the Responsibility to Protect</title><author>Kraisoraphong, Keokam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-2d2924499fb8143d6077823d73374a8f3ce2faec8f81dcda640493d3892d8ff93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Commissions</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Humanitarian intervention</topic><topic>Insurgency</topic><topic>Internal security</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>National Security</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>political conflict</topic><topic>Political conflicts</topic><topic>Political doctrines</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>RtoP</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Separatism</topic><topic>Thailand</topic><topic>United Nations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kraisoraphong, Keokam</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Pacific review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kraisoraphong, Keokam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thailand and the Responsibility to Protect</atitle><jtitle>Pacific review</jtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>1-25</pages><issn>0951-2748</issn><eissn>1470-1332</eissn><abstract>The paper reviews Thailand's position on RtoP through in-depth interviews with those currently working most closely with RtoP-related issues within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the National Human Rights Commission, the Armed Forces and NGOs. The interview results reveal that Thailand's position on RtoP is mixed. While the country is willing to support the international community implementing RtoP through UN humanitarian operations, it is inclined not to define any of its own internal security problems as an RtoP-type situation. The paper highlights the challenges posed by separatist insurgents in Southern Thailand, and the recent violent political confrontation during April and May 2010, two internal security cases viewed by some observers as RtoP-type situations. But from Thailand's perspectives, almost all those interviewed insist that these situations are matters of internal security affairs. In addition, the preventive dimension of RtoP has not received much attention and has rather been challenged as to how such measures for the prevention of RtoP crimes differ from those more broadly undertaken to achieve the same goals as RtoP, but are not being called as such. Therefore, given the present context, Thailand's position on RtoP will unlikely change for the better if RtoP continues to be advocated as a concept in its current state.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/09512748.2011.632960</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-2748
ispartof Pacific review, 2012-03, Vol.25 (1), p.1-25
issn 0951-2748
1470-1332
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09512748_2011_632960
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete
subjects Armed forces
Commissions
Conflict
Foreign policy
Geopolitics
Human rights
Humanitarian intervention
Insurgency
Internal security
International Relations
National Security
Nongovernmental organizations
political conflict
Political conflicts
Political doctrines
Prevention
RtoP
Security
Separatism
Thailand
United Nations
title Thailand and the Responsibility to Protect
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A50%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thailand%20and%20the%20Responsibility%20to%20Protect&rft.jtitle=Pacific%20review&rft.au=Kraisoraphong,%20Keokam&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=1-25&rft.issn=0951-2748&rft.eissn=1470-1332&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09512748.2011.632960&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1283635927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1283635927&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true