Power guidelines for process monitoring

We present a process for designing monitoring procedures that includes practical power guidelines. These guidelines are based upon the average run length (ARL). The specific guideline metric is the ratio of the in-control ARL (ARL ic ) to the out-of-control ARL (ARL oc ). Our recommended design proc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality engineering 2023-01, Vol.35 (1), p.130-141
Hauptverfasser: Davis, Darwin J., Lucas, James M., Saniga, Erwin M., Saccucci, Michael S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue 1
container_start_page 130
container_title Quality engineering
container_volume 35
creator Davis, Darwin J.
Lucas, James M.
Saniga, Erwin M.
Saccucci, Michael S.
description We present a process for designing monitoring procedures that includes practical power guidelines. These guidelines are based upon the average run length (ARL). The specific guideline metric is the ratio of the in-control ARL (ARL ic ) to the out-of-control ARL (ARL oc ). Our recommended design process uses that ARL Ratio, in combination with the ARL ic , ARL oc , and ARL curve, to design effective process monitoring procedures. For adequate power, we generally recommend an ARL Ratio of 20 or more and argue that monitoring procedures with ARL Ratios less than 10 should usually be avoided. An area of caution lies between ARL Ratios of 10 and 20, allowing us to propose a stoplight type model for use in monitoring procedure design. We also discuss exceptions to these guidelines as well as a methodology to incorporate power considerations in other approaches to control chart design.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/08982112.2022.2098763
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08982112_2022_2098763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2791494950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-72064dafe2f1b8c1c33cec4d03b3e623b5aff2c880924c36940d968258e85d3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIAy4cDX15CQzTXZK8QYFXeg6pLmUlOmkJjOUvr0ztG7dnLP5_nP5CLmlMKMg4AGEFEgpzhBwLFLMa3ZGJrRiWHJEPCeTkSlH6JJc5bwBoEJINiH3n3HvUrHug3VNaF0ufEzFLkXjci62sQ1dTKFdX5MLr5vsbk59Sr5fnr8Wb-Xy4_V98bQsDYq6K-cINbfaO_R0JQw1jBlnuAW2Yq5Gtqq092iEAIncsFpysLIWWAknKsssm5K749zhhJ_e5U5tYp_aYaXCuaRcclnBQFVHyqSYc3Je7VLY6nRQFNToRP05UaMTdXIy5B6PudAOb271PqbGqk4fmph80q0JWbH_R_wCBf9m-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791494950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Power guidelines for process monitoring</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Davis, Darwin J. ; Lucas, James M. ; Saniga, Erwin M. ; Saccucci, Michael S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Darwin J. ; Lucas, James M. ; Saniga, Erwin M. ; Saccucci, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><description>We present a process for designing monitoring procedures that includes practical power guidelines. These guidelines are based upon the average run length (ARL). The specific guideline metric is the ratio of the in-control ARL (ARL ic ) to the out-of-control ARL (ARL oc ). Our recommended design process uses that ARL Ratio, in combination with the ARL ic , ARL oc , and ARL curve, to design effective process monitoring procedures. For adequate power, we generally recommend an ARL Ratio of 20 or more and argue that monitoring procedures with ARL Ratios less than 10 should usually be avoided. An area of caution lies between ARL Ratios of 10 and 20, allowing us to propose a stoplight type model for use in monitoring procedure design. We also discuss exceptions to these guidelines as well as a methodology to incorporate power considerations in other approaches to control chart design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08982112.2022.2098763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milwaukee: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>average run length (ARL) ; Control charts ; CUSUM control chart ; Guidelines ; Monitoring ; power ; process monitoring Shewhart control chart</subject><ispartof>Quality engineering, 2023-01, Vol.35 (1), p.130-141</ispartof><rights>2022 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2022</rights><rights>2022 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-72064dafe2f1b8c1c33cec4d03b3e623b5aff2c880924c36940d968258e85d3d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Darwin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saniga, Erwin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saccucci, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><title>Power guidelines for process monitoring</title><title>Quality engineering</title><description>We present a process for designing monitoring procedures that includes practical power guidelines. These guidelines are based upon the average run length (ARL). The specific guideline metric is the ratio of the in-control ARL (ARL ic ) to the out-of-control ARL (ARL oc ). Our recommended design process uses that ARL Ratio, in combination with the ARL ic , ARL oc , and ARL curve, to design effective process monitoring procedures. For adequate power, we generally recommend an ARL Ratio of 20 or more and argue that monitoring procedures with ARL Ratios less than 10 should usually be avoided. An area of caution lies between ARL Ratios of 10 and 20, allowing us to propose a stoplight type model for use in monitoring procedure design. We also discuss exceptions to these guidelines as well as a methodology to incorporate power considerations in other approaches to control chart design.</description><subject>average run length (ARL)</subject><subject>Control charts</subject><subject>CUSUM control chart</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>power</subject><subject>process monitoring Shewhart control chart</subject><issn>0898-2112</issn><issn>1532-4222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIAy4cDX15CQzTXZK8QYFXeg6pLmUlOmkJjOUvr0ztG7dnLP5_nP5CLmlMKMg4AGEFEgpzhBwLFLMa3ZGJrRiWHJEPCeTkSlH6JJc5bwBoEJINiH3n3HvUrHug3VNaF0ufEzFLkXjci62sQ1dTKFdX5MLr5vsbk59Sr5fnr8Wb-Xy4_V98bQsDYq6K-cINbfaO_R0JQw1jBlnuAW2Yq5Gtqq092iEAIncsFpysLIWWAknKsssm5K749zhhJ_e5U5tYp_aYaXCuaRcclnBQFVHyqSYc3Je7VLY6nRQFNToRP05UaMTdXIy5B6PudAOb271PqbGqk4fmph80q0JWbH_R_wCBf9m-A</recordid><startdate>20230102</startdate><enddate>20230102</enddate><creator>Davis, Darwin J.</creator><creator>Lucas, James M.</creator><creator>Saniga, Erwin M.</creator><creator>Saccucci, Michael S.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230102</creationdate><title>Power guidelines for process monitoring</title><author>Davis, Darwin J. ; Lucas, James M. ; Saniga, Erwin M. ; Saccucci, Michael S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-72064dafe2f1b8c1c33cec4d03b3e623b5aff2c880924c36940d968258e85d3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>average run length (ARL)</topic><topic>Control charts</topic><topic>CUSUM control chart</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>power</topic><topic>process monitoring Shewhart control chart</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Darwin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saniga, Erwin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saccucci, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Quality engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Darwin J.</au><au>Lucas, James M.</au><au>Saniga, Erwin M.</au><au>Saccucci, Michael S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Power guidelines for process monitoring</atitle><jtitle>Quality engineering</jtitle><date>2023-01-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>130-141</pages><issn>0898-2112</issn><eissn>1532-4222</eissn><abstract>We present a process for designing monitoring procedures that includes practical power guidelines. These guidelines are based upon the average run length (ARL). The specific guideline metric is the ratio of the in-control ARL (ARL ic ) to the out-of-control ARL (ARL oc ). Our recommended design process uses that ARL Ratio, in combination with the ARL ic , ARL oc , and ARL curve, to design effective process monitoring procedures. For adequate power, we generally recommend an ARL Ratio of 20 or more and argue that monitoring procedures with ARL Ratios less than 10 should usually be avoided. An area of caution lies between ARL Ratios of 10 and 20, allowing us to propose a stoplight type model for use in monitoring procedure design. We also discuss exceptions to these guidelines as well as a methodology to incorporate power considerations in other approaches to control chart design.</abstract><cop>Milwaukee</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/08982112.2022.2098763</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2112
ispartof Quality engineering, 2023-01, Vol.35 (1), p.130-141
issn 0898-2112
1532-4222
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08982112_2022_2098763
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects average run length (ARL)
Control charts
CUSUM control chart
Guidelines
Monitoring
power
process monitoring Shewhart control chart
title Power guidelines for process monitoring
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T13%3A53%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Power%20guidelines%20for%20process%20monitoring&rft.jtitle=Quality%20engineering&rft.au=Davis,%20Darwin%20J.&rft.date=2023-01-02&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=130-141&rft.issn=0898-2112&rft.eissn=1532-4222&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08982112.2022.2098763&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2791494950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791494950&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true