Power guidelines for process monitoring
We present a process for designing monitoring procedures that includes practical power guidelines. These guidelines are based upon the average run length (ARL). The specific guideline metric is the ratio of the in-control ARL (ARL ic ) to the out-of-control ARL (ARL oc ). Our recommended design proc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quality engineering 2023-01, Vol.35 (1), p.130-141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 141 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 130 |
container_title | Quality engineering |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Davis, Darwin J. Lucas, James M. Saniga, Erwin M. Saccucci, Michael S. |
description | We present a process for designing monitoring procedures that includes practical power guidelines. These guidelines are based upon the average run length (ARL). The specific guideline metric is the ratio of the in-control ARL (ARL
ic
) to the out-of-control ARL (ARL
oc
). Our recommended design process uses that ARL Ratio, in combination with the ARL
ic
, ARL
oc
, and ARL curve, to design effective process monitoring procedures. For adequate power, we generally recommend an ARL Ratio of 20 or more and argue that monitoring procedures with ARL Ratios less than 10 should usually be avoided. An area of caution lies between ARL Ratios of 10 and 20, allowing us to propose a stoplight type model for use in monitoring procedure design. We also discuss exceptions to these guidelines as well as a methodology to incorporate power considerations in other approaches to control chart design. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/08982112.2022.2098763 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08982112_2022_2098763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2791494950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-72064dafe2f1b8c1c33cec4d03b3e623b5aff2c880924c36940d968258e85d3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIAy4cDX15CQzTXZK8QYFXeg6pLmUlOmkJjOUvr0ztG7dnLP5_nP5CLmlMKMg4AGEFEgpzhBwLFLMa3ZGJrRiWHJEPCeTkSlH6JJc5bwBoEJINiH3n3HvUrHug3VNaF0ufEzFLkXjci62sQ1dTKFdX5MLr5vsbk59Sr5fnr8Wb-Xy4_V98bQsDYq6K-cINbfaO_R0JQw1jBlnuAW2Yq5Gtqq092iEAIncsFpysLIWWAknKsssm5K749zhhJ_e5U5tYp_aYaXCuaRcclnBQFVHyqSYc3Je7VLY6nRQFNToRP05UaMTdXIy5B6PudAOb271PqbGqk4fmph80q0JWbH_R_wCBf9m-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791494950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Power guidelines for process monitoring</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Davis, Darwin J. ; Lucas, James M. ; Saniga, Erwin M. ; Saccucci, Michael S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Darwin J. ; Lucas, James M. ; Saniga, Erwin M. ; Saccucci, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><description>We present a process for designing monitoring procedures that includes practical power guidelines. These guidelines are based upon the average run length (ARL). The specific guideline metric is the ratio of the in-control ARL (ARL
ic
) to the out-of-control ARL (ARL
oc
). Our recommended design process uses that ARL Ratio, in combination with the ARL
ic
, ARL
oc
, and ARL curve, to design effective process monitoring procedures. For adequate power, we generally recommend an ARL Ratio of 20 or more and argue that monitoring procedures with ARL Ratios less than 10 should usually be avoided. An area of caution lies between ARL Ratios of 10 and 20, allowing us to propose a stoplight type model for use in monitoring procedure design. We also discuss exceptions to these guidelines as well as a methodology to incorporate power considerations in other approaches to control chart design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08982112.2022.2098763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milwaukee: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>average run length (ARL) ; Control charts ; CUSUM control chart ; Guidelines ; Monitoring ; power ; process monitoring Shewhart control chart</subject><ispartof>Quality engineering, 2023-01, Vol.35 (1), p.130-141</ispartof><rights>2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2022</rights><rights>2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-72064dafe2f1b8c1c33cec4d03b3e623b5aff2c880924c36940d968258e85d3d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Darwin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saniga, Erwin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saccucci, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><title>Power guidelines for process monitoring</title><title>Quality engineering</title><description>We present a process for designing monitoring procedures that includes practical power guidelines. These guidelines are based upon the average run length (ARL). The specific guideline metric is the ratio of the in-control ARL (ARL
ic
) to the out-of-control ARL (ARL
oc
). Our recommended design process uses that ARL Ratio, in combination with the ARL
ic
, ARL
oc
, and ARL curve, to design effective process monitoring procedures. For adequate power, we generally recommend an ARL Ratio of 20 or more and argue that monitoring procedures with ARL Ratios less than 10 should usually be avoided. An area of caution lies between ARL Ratios of 10 and 20, allowing us to propose a stoplight type model for use in monitoring procedure design. We also discuss exceptions to these guidelines as well as a methodology to incorporate power considerations in other approaches to control chart design.</description><subject>average run length (ARL)</subject><subject>Control charts</subject><subject>CUSUM control chart</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>power</subject><subject>process monitoring Shewhart control chart</subject><issn>0898-2112</issn><issn>1532-4222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIAy4cDX15CQzTXZK8QYFXeg6pLmUlOmkJjOUvr0ztG7dnLP5_nP5CLmlMKMg4AGEFEgpzhBwLFLMa3ZGJrRiWHJEPCeTkSlH6JJc5bwBoEJINiH3n3HvUrHug3VNaF0ufEzFLkXjci62sQ1dTKFdX5MLr5vsbk59Sr5fnr8Wb-Xy4_V98bQsDYq6K-cINbfaO_R0JQw1jBlnuAW2Yq5Gtqq092iEAIncsFpysLIWWAknKsssm5K749zhhJ_e5U5tYp_aYaXCuaRcclnBQFVHyqSYc3Je7VLY6nRQFNToRP05UaMTdXIy5B6PudAOb271PqbGqk4fmph80q0JWbH_R_wCBf9m-A</recordid><startdate>20230102</startdate><enddate>20230102</enddate><creator>Davis, Darwin J.</creator><creator>Lucas, James M.</creator><creator>Saniga, Erwin M.</creator><creator>Saccucci, Michael S.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230102</creationdate><title>Power guidelines for process monitoring</title><author>Davis, Darwin J. ; Lucas, James M. ; Saniga, Erwin M. ; Saccucci, Michael S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-72064dafe2f1b8c1c33cec4d03b3e623b5aff2c880924c36940d968258e85d3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>average run length (ARL)</topic><topic>Control charts</topic><topic>CUSUM control chart</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>power</topic><topic>process monitoring Shewhart control chart</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Darwin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saniga, Erwin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saccucci, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Quality engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Darwin J.</au><au>Lucas, James M.</au><au>Saniga, Erwin M.</au><au>Saccucci, Michael S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Power guidelines for process monitoring</atitle><jtitle>Quality engineering</jtitle><date>2023-01-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>130-141</pages><issn>0898-2112</issn><eissn>1532-4222</eissn><abstract>We present a process for designing monitoring procedures that includes practical power guidelines. These guidelines are based upon the average run length (ARL). The specific guideline metric is the ratio of the in-control ARL (ARL
ic
) to the out-of-control ARL (ARL
oc
). Our recommended design process uses that ARL Ratio, in combination with the ARL
ic
, ARL
oc
, and ARL curve, to design effective process monitoring procedures. For adequate power, we generally recommend an ARL Ratio of 20 or more and argue that monitoring procedures with ARL Ratios less than 10 should usually be avoided. An area of caution lies between ARL Ratios of 10 and 20, allowing us to propose a stoplight type model for use in monitoring procedure design. We also discuss exceptions to these guidelines as well as a methodology to incorporate power considerations in other approaches to control chart design.</abstract><cop>Milwaukee</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/08982112.2022.2098763</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-2112 |
ispartof | Quality engineering, 2023-01, Vol.35 (1), p.130-141 |
issn | 0898-2112 1532-4222 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08982112_2022_2098763 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | average run length (ARL) Control charts CUSUM control chart Guidelines Monitoring power process monitoring Shewhart control chart |
title | Power guidelines for process monitoring |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T13%3A53%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Power%20guidelines%20for%20process%20monitoring&rft.jtitle=Quality%20engineering&rft.au=Davis,%20Darwin%20J.&rft.date=2023-01-02&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=130-141&rft.issn=0898-2112&rft.eissn=1532-4222&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08982112.2022.2098763&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2791494950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791494950&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |