Combining Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis Data with Experimentally Measured Data

This article presents an approach to reducing the time and cost of experimentation in large wind tunnels, such as the 10 × 10 ft. supersonic wind tunnel at NASA Glenn Research Center, by combining computer simulations of test models from Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes analysis with small sets of wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality engineering 2011-01, Vol.23 (1), p.46-58
Hauptverfasser: Anderson, Bernhard H., Haller, Harold S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 58
container_issue 1
container_start_page 46
container_title Quality engineering
container_volume 23
creator Anderson, Bernhard H.
Haller, Harold S.
description This article presents an approach to reducing the time and cost of experimentation in large wind tunnels, such as the 10 × 10 ft. supersonic wind tunnel at NASA Glenn Research Center, by combining computer simulations of test models from Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes analysis with small sets of wind tunnel data. To demonstrate the viability of the approach, the impact of microramp flow control on the shock wave boundary layer interaction using paired sets of data from both computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis and experimental measurements was compared. By combining the CFD results consisting of 15 central composite face-centered (CCF) simulations with a smaller subset of four/five experimental wind tunnel cases, augmented, interlocking combined data sets were generated from which models were developed that allow the prediction of wind tunnel results. No statistically significant differences were found to exist between the predictions from models generated using the augmented interlocking data sets and the models generated using the complete set of 15 wind tunnel cases based on a paired t-test. From an engineering perspective, the same optimal microramp configuration was obtained using models derived from the combined data set as obtained with the complete set of experimental wind tunnel data.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/08982112.2010.505221
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08982112_2010_505221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2219520711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-157abc254511f57704eb5a4b02b007d4468829c0d129bee1abd25ad8d7e783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1r3DAQBmBRGug26T_owfTSk5MZ2VpJpxA2n5AQKKVXMbblVkG2NpJN4n8fbba95JCeRgzPDIxexr4iHCMoOAGlFUfkxxxyS4DgHD-wFYqKlzXn_CNb7Ui5M5_Y55QeAFApXa3Yr00YGje68XeRX9t5osmFkXxx6WfXFefLSINrU3GWe0tyqTiniYonN_0pLp63NrrBjhN5vxR3ltIcbfcqjthBTz7ZL3_rIftxefFzc13e3l_dbM5uy7bSaipRSGpaLmqB2AspobaNoLoB3gDIrq7XSnHdQodcN9YiNR0X1KlOWqmqQ_Z9v3Qbw-Ns02QGl1rrPY02zMlowLUALeG_Uuk1B1mtZZbf3siHMMd8fEaoJVa1xozqPWpjSCna3mzzR1BcDILZJWL-JWJ2iZh9InnsdD_mxj7EgZ5C9J2ZaPEh9pHG1iVTvbvhBaTIkR0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>819713491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combining Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis Data with Experimentally Measured Data</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Anderson, Bernhard H. ; Haller, Harold S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Bernhard H. ; Haller, Harold S.</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents an approach to reducing the time and cost of experimentation in large wind tunnels, such as the 10 × 10 ft. supersonic wind tunnel at NASA Glenn Research Center, by combining computer simulations of test models from Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes analysis with small sets of wind tunnel data. To demonstrate the viability of the approach, the impact of microramp flow control on the shock wave boundary layer interaction using paired sets of data from both computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis and experimental measurements was compared. By combining the CFD results consisting of 15 central composite face-centered (CCF) simulations with a smaller subset of four/five experimental wind tunnel cases, augmented, interlocking combined data sets were generated from which models were developed that allow the prediction of wind tunnel results. No statistically significant differences were found to exist between the predictions from models generated using the augmented interlocking data sets and the models generated using the complete set of 15 wind tunnel cases based on a paired t-test. From an engineering perspective, the same optimal microramp configuration was obtained using models derived from the combined data set as obtained with the complete set of experimental wind tunnel data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08982112.2010.505221</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milwaukee: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>CFD ; Comparative analysis ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; D-optimal ; data scaling ; DOE ; Flow control ; Fluid dynamics ; interlocking DOE ; Locking ; Mathematical models ; multiple regression ; Navier-Stokes equations ; Reynolds number ; scale-up ; Studies ; Wind tunnel testing ; Wind tunnels</subject><ispartof>Quality engineering, 2011-01, Vol.23 (1), p.46-58</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. Jan 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-157abc254511f57704eb5a4b02b007d4468829c0d129bee1abd25ad8d7e783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-157abc254511f57704eb5a4b02b007d4468829c0d129bee1abd25ad8d7e783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Bernhard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, Harold S.</creatorcontrib><title>Combining Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis Data with Experimentally Measured Data</title><title>Quality engineering</title><description>This article presents an approach to reducing the time and cost of experimentation in large wind tunnels, such as the 10 × 10 ft. supersonic wind tunnel at NASA Glenn Research Center, by combining computer simulations of test models from Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes analysis with small sets of wind tunnel data. To demonstrate the viability of the approach, the impact of microramp flow control on the shock wave boundary layer interaction using paired sets of data from both computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis and experimental measurements was compared. By combining the CFD results consisting of 15 central composite face-centered (CCF) simulations with a smaller subset of four/five experimental wind tunnel cases, augmented, interlocking combined data sets were generated from which models were developed that allow the prediction of wind tunnel results. No statistically significant differences were found to exist between the predictions from models generated using the augmented interlocking data sets and the models generated using the complete set of 15 wind tunnel cases based on a paired t-test. From an engineering perspective, the same optimal microramp configuration was obtained using models derived from the combined data set as obtained with the complete set of experimental wind tunnel data.</description><subject>CFD</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>D-optimal</subject><subject>data scaling</subject><subject>DOE</subject><subject>Flow control</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>interlocking DOE</subject><subject>Locking</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>multiple regression</subject><subject>Navier-Stokes equations</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>scale-up</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wind tunnel testing</subject><subject>Wind tunnels</subject><issn>0898-2112</issn><issn>1532-4222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U1r3DAQBmBRGug26T_owfTSk5MZ2VpJpxA2n5AQKKVXMbblVkG2NpJN4n8fbba95JCeRgzPDIxexr4iHCMoOAGlFUfkxxxyS4DgHD-wFYqKlzXn_CNb7Ui5M5_Y55QeAFApXa3Yr00YGje68XeRX9t5osmFkXxx6WfXFefLSINrU3GWe0tyqTiniYonN_0pLp63NrrBjhN5vxR3ltIcbfcqjthBTz7ZL3_rIftxefFzc13e3l_dbM5uy7bSaipRSGpaLmqB2AspobaNoLoB3gDIrq7XSnHdQodcN9YiNR0X1KlOWqmqQ_Z9v3Qbw-Ns02QGl1rrPY02zMlowLUALeG_Uuk1B1mtZZbf3siHMMd8fEaoJVa1xozqPWpjSCna3mzzR1BcDILZJWL-JWJ2iZh9InnsdD_mxj7EgZ5C9J2ZaPEh9pHG1iVTvbvhBaTIkR0</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Anderson, Bernhard H.</creator><creator>Haller, Harold S.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Combining Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis Data with Experimentally Measured Data</title><author>Anderson, Bernhard H. ; Haller, Harold S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-157abc254511f57704eb5a4b02b007d4468829c0d129bee1abd25ad8d7e783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>CFD</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>D-optimal</topic><topic>data scaling</topic><topic>DOE</topic><topic>Flow control</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>interlocking DOE</topic><topic>Locking</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>multiple regression</topic><topic>Navier-Stokes equations</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>scale-up</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wind tunnel testing</topic><topic>Wind tunnels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Bernhard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, Harold S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Quality engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, Bernhard H.</au><au>Haller, Harold S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combining Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis Data with Experimentally Measured Data</atitle><jtitle>Quality engineering</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>46-58</pages><issn>0898-2112</issn><eissn>1532-4222</eissn><abstract>This article presents an approach to reducing the time and cost of experimentation in large wind tunnels, such as the 10 × 10 ft. supersonic wind tunnel at NASA Glenn Research Center, by combining computer simulations of test models from Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes analysis with small sets of wind tunnel data. To demonstrate the viability of the approach, the impact of microramp flow control on the shock wave boundary layer interaction using paired sets of data from both computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis and experimental measurements was compared. By combining the CFD results consisting of 15 central composite face-centered (CCF) simulations with a smaller subset of four/five experimental wind tunnel cases, augmented, interlocking combined data sets were generated from which models were developed that allow the prediction of wind tunnel results. No statistically significant differences were found to exist between the predictions from models generated using the augmented interlocking data sets and the models generated using the complete set of 15 wind tunnel cases based on a paired t-test. From an engineering perspective, the same optimal microramp configuration was obtained using models derived from the combined data set as obtained with the complete set of experimental wind tunnel data.</abstract><cop>Milwaukee</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/08982112.2010.505221</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2112
ispartof Quality engineering, 2011-01, Vol.23 (1), p.46-58
issn 0898-2112
1532-4222
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08982112_2010_505221
source Business Source Complete
subjects CFD
Comparative analysis
Computational fluid dynamics
Computer simulation
D-optimal
data scaling
DOE
Flow control
Fluid dynamics
interlocking DOE
Locking
Mathematical models
multiple regression
Navier-Stokes equations
Reynolds number
scale-up
Studies
Wind tunnel testing
Wind tunnels
title Combining Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis Data with Experimentally Measured Data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A29%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combining%20Computational%20Fluid%20Dynamics%20Analysis%20Data%20with%20Experimentally%20Measured%20Data&rft.jtitle=Quality%20engineering&rft.au=Anderson,%20Bernhard%20H.&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=46-58&rft.issn=0898-2112&rft.eissn=1532-4222&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08982112.2010.505221&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2219520711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=819713491&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true