Machine learning models predicting undertriage in telephone triage

Undertriaged patients have worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients. Machine learning provides better triage prediction than conventional triage in emergency departments, but no machine learning-based undertriage prediction models have yet been developed for prehospital telephone triage. W...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of medicine (Helsinki) 2022-12, Vol.54 (1), p.2989-2996
Hauptverfasser: Inokuchi, Ryota, Iwagami, Masao, Sun, Yu, Sakamoto, Ayaka, Tamiya, Nanako
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2996
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2989
container_title Annals of medicine (Helsinki)
container_volume 54
creator Inokuchi, Ryota
Iwagami, Masao
Sun, Yu
Sakamoto, Ayaka
Tamiya, Nanako
description Undertriaged patients have worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients. Machine learning provides better triage prediction than conventional triage in emergency departments, but no machine learning-based undertriage prediction models have yet been developed for prehospital telephone triage. We developed and validated machine learning models for telephone triage. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with the largest after-hour house-call (AHHC) service dataset in Japan. Participants were ≥16 years and used the AHHC service between 1 November 2018 and 31 January 2021. We developed five prediction models based on support vector machine (SVM), lasso regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient-boosted decision tree (XGB), and deep neural network (DNN). The primary outcome was undertriage, and predictors were telephone triage level and routinely available telephone-based data, including age, sex, 80 chief complaint categories and 10 comorbidities. We measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for all the models. We identified 15,442 eligible patients (age: 38.4 ± 16.6, male: 57.2%), including 298 (1.9%; age: 58.2 ± 23.9, male: 55.0%) undertriaged patients. RF and XGB outperformed the other models, with the AUROC values (95% confidence interval; 95% CI) of the SVM, LR, RF, XGB and DNN for undertriage being 0.62 (0.55-0.69), 0.79 (0.74-0.83), 0.81 (0.76-0.86), 0.80 (0.75-0.84) and 0.77 (0.73-0.82), respectively. We found that RF and XGB outperformed other models. Our findings suggest that machine learning models can facilitate the early detection of undertriage and early intervention to yield substantially improved patient outcomes. KEY MESSAGES Undertriaged patients experience worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients; thus, we developed machine learning models for predicting undertriage in the prehospital setting. In addition, we identified the predictors of risk factors associated with undertriage. Random forest and gradient-boosted decision tree models demonstrated better prediction performance, and the models identified the risk factors associated with undertriage. Machine learning models aid in the early detection of undertriage, leading to significantly improved patient outcomes and identifying undertriage-associated risk factors, including chief complaint categories, could help prioritize conventional telephone triage protocol revision.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/07853890.2022.2136402
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07853890_2022_2136402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f9d5818dbcce4efda2c6a1d0a468b4e4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2729025621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-74eb7cf88add3e79e68a50b9e5ac72428a4c3fbf6cf53b0be55135611c1a6b843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAURS0EotPCJ4CyZJPBdmLH2SCgglKpiA2srRf7ecaVYw92BtS_JyHTim5Y2Xo-9zxLl5BXjG4ZVfQt7ZRoVE-3nHK-5ayRLeVPyGa-iJpTSZ-SzcLUC3RGzku5pZTyjtHn5KyRXMm2lxvy8SuYvY9YBYQcfdxVY7IYSnXIaL2ZlskxWsxT9rDDysdqwoCHfZoz6-wFeeYgFHx5Oi_Ij8-fvl9-qW--XV1ffripjaBqqrsWh844pcDaBrsepQJBhx4FmI63XEFrGjc4aZxoBjqgEKwRkjHDQA6qbS7I9eq1CW71IfsR8p1O4PXfQco7DXnyJqB2vRWKKTsYgy06C9xIYJZCK9XQ4uJ6t7oOx2FEazBOGcIj6eOX6Pd6l37pXnLGBZ8Fb06CnH4esUx69MVgCBAxHYvmHe8pFzM9o2JFTU6lZHQPaxjVS5f6vku9dKlPXc651__-8SF1X94MvF8BH13KI_xOOVg9wV1I2WWIxhfd_H_HH1fMsBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2729025621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine learning models predicting undertriage in telephone triage</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Inokuchi, Ryota ; Iwagami, Masao ; Sun, Yu ; Sakamoto, Ayaka ; Tamiya, Nanako</creator><creatorcontrib>Inokuchi, Ryota ; Iwagami, Masao ; Sun, Yu ; Sakamoto, Ayaka ; Tamiya, Nanako</creatorcontrib><description>Undertriaged patients have worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients. Machine learning provides better triage prediction than conventional triage in emergency departments, but no machine learning-based undertriage prediction models have yet been developed for prehospital telephone triage. We developed and validated machine learning models for telephone triage. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with the largest after-hour house-call (AHHC) service dataset in Japan. Participants were ≥16 years and used the AHHC service between 1 November 2018 and 31 January 2021. We developed five prediction models based on support vector machine (SVM), lasso regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient-boosted decision tree (XGB), and deep neural network (DNN). The primary outcome was undertriage, and predictors were telephone triage level and routinely available telephone-based data, including age, sex, 80 chief complaint categories and 10 comorbidities. We measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for all the models. We identified 15,442 eligible patients (age: 38.4 ± 16.6, male: 57.2%), including 298 (1.9%; age: 58.2 ± 23.9, male: 55.0%) undertriaged patients. RF and XGB outperformed the other models, with the AUROC values (95% confidence interval; 95% CI) of the SVM, LR, RF, XGB and DNN for undertriage being 0.62 (0.55-0.69), 0.79 (0.74-0.83), 0.81 (0.76-0.86), 0.80 (0.75-0.84) and 0.77 (0.73-0.82), respectively. We found that RF and XGB outperformed other models. Our findings suggest that machine learning models can facilitate the early detection of undertriage and early intervention to yield substantially improved patient outcomes. KEY MESSAGES Undertriaged patients experience worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients; thus, we developed machine learning models for predicting undertriage in the prehospital setting. In addition, we identified the predictors of risk factors associated with undertriage. Random forest and gradient-boosted decision tree models demonstrated better prediction performance, and the models identified the risk factors associated with undertriage. Machine learning models aid in the early detection of undertriage, leading to significantly improved patient outcomes and identifying undertriage-associated risk factors, including chief complaint categories, could help prioritize conventional telephone triage protocol revision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0785-3890</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2136402</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36286496</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Adult ; after-hours house-call medical service ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Emergency Medicine ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Humans ; Machine Learning ; Middle Aged ; out-of-hour service ; prediction ; Prehospital ; Retrospective Studies ; Telephone ; Triage - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Annals of medicine (Helsinki), 2022-12, Vol.54 (1), p.2989-2996</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2022 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-74eb7cf88add3e79e68a50b9e5ac72428a4c3fbf6cf53b0be55135611c1a6b843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-74eb7cf88add3e79e68a50b9e5ac72428a4c3fbf6cf53b0be55135611c1a6b843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621252/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621252/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,27507,27929,27930,53796,53798,59148,59149</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36286496$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Inokuchi, Ryota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwagami, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Ayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamiya, Nanako</creatorcontrib><title>Machine learning models predicting undertriage in telephone triage</title><title>Annals of medicine (Helsinki)</title><addtitle>Ann Med</addtitle><description>Undertriaged patients have worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients. Machine learning provides better triage prediction than conventional triage in emergency departments, but no machine learning-based undertriage prediction models have yet been developed for prehospital telephone triage. We developed and validated machine learning models for telephone triage. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with the largest after-hour house-call (AHHC) service dataset in Japan. Participants were ≥16 years and used the AHHC service between 1 November 2018 and 31 January 2021. We developed five prediction models based on support vector machine (SVM), lasso regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient-boosted decision tree (XGB), and deep neural network (DNN). The primary outcome was undertriage, and predictors were telephone triage level and routinely available telephone-based data, including age, sex, 80 chief complaint categories and 10 comorbidities. We measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for all the models. We identified 15,442 eligible patients (age: 38.4 ± 16.6, male: 57.2%), including 298 (1.9%; age: 58.2 ± 23.9, male: 55.0%) undertriaged patients. RF and XGB outperformed the other models, with the AUROC values (95% confidence interval; 95% CI) of the SVM, LR, RF, XGB and DNN for undertriage being 0.62 (0.55-0.69), 0.79 (0.74-0.83), 0.81 (0.76-0.86), 0.80 (0.75-0.84) and 0.77 (0.73-0.82), respectively. We found that RF and XGB outperformed other models. Our findings suggest that machine learning models can facilitate the early detection of undertriage and early intervention to yield substantially improved patient outcomes. KEY MESSAGES Undertriaged patients experience worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients; thus, we developed machine learning models for predicting undertriage in the prehospital setting. In addition, we identified the predictors of risk factors associated with undertriage. Random forest and gradient-boosted decision tree models demonstrated better prediction performance, and the models identified the risk factors associated with undertriage. Machine learning models aid in the early detection of undertriage, leading to significantly improved patient outcomes and identifying undertriage-associated risk factors, including chief complaint categories, could help prioritize conventional telephone triage protocol revision.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>after-hours house-call medical service</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>out-of-hour service</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Prehospital</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><subject>Triage - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0785-3890</issn><issn>1365-2060</issn><issn>1365-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAURS0EotPCJ4CyZJPBdmLH2SCgglKpiA2srRf7ecaVYw92BtS_JyHTim5Y2Xo-9zxLl5BXjG4ZVfQt7ZRoVE-3nHK-5ayRLeVPyGa-iJpTSZ-SzcLUC3RGzku5pZTyjtHn5KyRXMm2lxvy8SuYvY9YBYQcfdxVY7IYSnXIaL2ZlskxWsxT9rDDysdqwoCHfZoz6-wFeeYgFHx5Oi_Ij8-fvl9-qW--XV1ffripjaBqqrsWh844pcDaBrsepQJBhx4FmI63XEFrGjc4aZxoBjqgEKwRkjHDQA6qbS7I9eq1CW71IfsR8p1O4PXfQco7DXnyJqB2vRWKKTsYgy06C9xIYJZCK9XQ4uJ6t7oOx2FEazBOGcIj6eOX6Pd6l37pXnLGBZ8Fb06CnH4esUx69MVgCBAxHYvmHe8pFzM9o2JFTU6lZHQPaxjVS5f6vku9dKlPXc651__-8SF1X94MvF8BH13KI_xOOVg9wV1I2WWIxhfd_H_HH1fMsBQ</recordid><startdate>20221231</startdate><enddate>20221231</enddate><creator>Inokuchi, Ryota</creator><creator>Iwagami, Masao</creator><creator>Sun, Yu</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Ayaka</creator><creator>Tamiya, Nanako</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221231</creationdate><title>Machine learning models predicting undertriage in telephone triage</title><author>Inokuchi, Ryota ; Iwagami, Masao ; Sun, Yu ; Sakamoto, Ayaka ; Tamiya, Nanako</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-74eb7cf88add3e79e68a50b9e5ac72428a4c3fbf6cf53b0be55135611c1a6b843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>after-hours house-call medical service</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>out-of-hour service</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Prehospital</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><topic>Triage - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Inokuchi, Ryota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwagami, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Ayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamiya, Nanako</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Annals of medicine (Helsinki)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Inokuchi, Ryota</au><au>Iwagami, Masao</au><au>Sun, Yu</au><au>Sakamoto, Ayaka</au><au>Tamiya, Nanako</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine learning models predicting undertriage in telephone triage</atitle><jtitle>Annals of medicine (Helsinki)</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Med</addtitle><date>2022-12-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2989</spage><epage>2996</epage><pages>2989-2996</pages><issn>0785-3890</issn><issn>1365-2060</issn><eissn>1365-2060</eissn><abstract>Undertriaged patients have worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients. Machine learning provides better triage prediction than conventional triage in emergency departments, but no machine learning-based undertriage prediction models have yet been developed for prehospital telephone triage. We developed and validated machine learning models for telephone triage. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with the largest after-hour house-call (AHHC) service dataset in Japan. Participants were ≥16 years and used the AHHC service between 1 November 2018 and 31 January 2021. We developed five prediction models based on support vector machine (SVM), lasso regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient-boosted decision tree (XGB), and deep neural network (DNN). The primary outcome was undertriage, and predictors were telephone triage level and routinely available telephone-based data, including age, sex, 80 chief complaint categories and 10 comorbidities. We measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for all the models. We identified 15,442 eligible patients (age: 38.4 ± 16.6, male: 57.2%), including 298 (1.9%; age: 58.2 ± 23.9, male: 55.0%) undertriaged patients. RF and XGB outperformed the other models, with the AUROC values (95% confidence interval; 95% CI) of the SVM, LR, RF, XGB and DNN for undertriage being 0.62 (0.55-0.69), 0.79 (0.74-0.83), 0.81 (0.76-0.86), 0.80 (0.75-0.84) and 0.77 (0.73-0.82), respectively. We found that RF and XGB outperformed other models. Our findings suggest that machine learning models can facilitate the early detection of undertriage and early intervention to yield substantially improved patient outcomes. KEY MESSAGES Undertriaged patients experience worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients; thus, we developed machine learning models for predicting undertriage in the prehospital setting. In addition, we identified the predictors of risk factors associated with undertriage. Random forest and gradient-boosted decision tree models demonstrated better prediction performance, and the models identified the risk factors associated with undertriage. Machine learning models aid in the early detection of undertriage, leading to significantly improved patient outcomes and identifying undertriage-associated risk factors, including chief complaint categories, could help prioritize conventional telephone triage protocol revision.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>36286496</pmid><doi>10.1080/07853890.2022.2136402</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0785-3890
ispartof Annals of medicine (Helsinki), 2022-12, Vol.54 (1), p.2989-2996
issn 0785-3890
1365-2060
1365-2060
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07853890_2022_2136402
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
after-hours house-call medical service
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Emergency Medicine
Emergency Service, Hospital
Humans
Machine Learning
Middle Aged
out-of-hour service
prediction
Prehospital
Retrospective Studies
Telephone
Triage - methods
Young Adult
title Machine learning models predicting undertriage in telephone triage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T05%3A51%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20learning%20models%20predicting%20undertriage%20in%20telephone%20triage&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20medicine%20(Helsinki)&rft.au=Inokuchi,%20Ryota&rft.date=2022-12-31&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2989&rft.epage=2996&rft.pages=2989-2996&rft.issn=0785-3890&rft.eissn=1365-2060&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07853890.2022.2136402&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2729025621%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2729025621&rft_id=info:pmid/36286496&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f9d5818dbcce4efda2c6a1d0a468b4e4&rfr_iscdi=true