Machine learning models predicting undertriage in telephone triage
Undertriaged patients have worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients. Machine learning provides better triage prediction than conventional triage in emergency departments, but no machine learning-based undertriage prediction models have yet been developed for prehospital telephone triage. W...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of medicine (Helsinki) 2022-12, Vol.54 (1), p.2989-2996 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2996 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 2989 |
container_title | Annals of medicine (Helsinki) |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Inokuchi, Ryota Iwagami, Masao Sun, Yu Sakamoto, Ayaka Tamiya, Nanako |
description | Undertriaged patients have worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients. Machine learning provides better triage prediction than conventional triage in emergency departments, but no machine learning-based undertriage prediction models have yet been developed for prehospital telephone triage. We developed and validated machine learning models for telephone triage.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study with the largest after-hour house-call (AHHC) service dataset in Japan. Participants were ≥16 years and used the AHHC service between 1 November 2018 and 31 January 2021. We developed five prediction models based on support vector machine (SVM), lasso regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient-boosted decision tree (XGB), and deep neural network (DNN). The primary outcome was undertriage, and predictors were telephone triage level and routinely available telephone-based data, including age, sex, 80 chief complaint categories and 10 comorbidities. We measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for all the models.
We identified 15,442 eligible patients (age: 38.4 ± 16.6, male: 57.2%), including 298 (1.9%; age: 58.2 ± 23.9, male: 55.0%) undertriaged patients. RF and XGB outperformed the other models, with the AUROC values (95% confidence interval; 95% CI) of the SVM, LR, RF, XGB and DNN for undertriage being 0.62 (0.55-0.69), 0.79 (0.74-0.83), 0.81 (0.76-0.86), 0.80 (0.75-0.84) and 0.77 (0.73-0.82), respectively.
We found that RF and XGB outperformed other models. Our findings suggest that machine learning models can facilitate the early detection of undertriage and early intervention to yield substantially improved patient outcomes.
KEY MESSAGES
Undertriaged patients experience worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients; thus, we developed machine learning models for predicting undertriage in the prehospital setting. In addition, we identified the predictors of risk factors associated with undertriage.
Random forest and gradient-boosted decision tree models demonstrated better prediction performance, and the models identified the risk factors associated with undertriage.
Machine learning models aid in the early detection of undertriage, leading to significantly improved patient outcomes and identifying undertriage-associated risk factors, including chief complaint categories, could help prioritize conventional telephone triage protocol revision. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/07853890.2022.2136402 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07853890_2022_2136402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f9d5818dbcce4efda2c6a1d0a468b4e4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2729025621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-74eb7cf88add3e79e68a50b9e5ac72428a4c3fbf6cf53b0be55135611c1a6b843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAURS0EotPCJ4CyZJPBdmLH2SCgglKpiA2srRf7ecaVYw92BtS_JyHTim5Y2Xo-9zxLl5BXjG4ZVfQt7ZRoVE-3nHK-5ayRLeVPyGa-iJpTSZ-SzcLUC3RGzku5pZTyjtHn5KyRXMm2lxvy8SuYvY9YBYQcfdxVY7IYSnXIaL2ZlskxWsxT9rDDysdqwoCHfZoz6-wFeeYgFHx5Oi_Ij8-fvl9-qW--XV1ffripjaBqqrsWh844pcDaBrsepQJBhx4FmI63XEFrGjc4aZxoBjqgEKwRkjHDQA6qbS7I9eq1CW71IfsR8p1O4PXfQco7DXnyJqB2vRWKKTsYgy06C9xIYJZCK9XQ4uJ6t7oOx2FEazBOGcIj6eOX6Pd6l37pXnLGBZ8Fb06CnH4esUx69MVgCBAxHYvmHe8pFzM9o2JFTU6lZHQPaxjVS5f6vku9dKlPXc651__-8SF1X94MvF8BH13KI_xOOVg9wV1I2WWIxhfd_H_HH1fMsBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2729025621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine learning models predicting undertriage in telephone triage</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Inokuchi, Ryota ; Iwagami, Masao ; Sun, Yu ; Sakamoto, Ayaka ; Tamiya, Nanako</creator><creatorcontrib>Inokuchi, Ryota ; Iwagami, Masao ; Sun, Yu ; Sakamoto, Ayaka ; Tamiya, Nanako</creatorcontrib><description>Undertriaged patients have worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients. Machine learning provides better triage prediction than conventional triage in emergency departments, but no machine learning-based undertriage prediction models have yet been developed for prehospital telephone triage. We developed and validated machine learning models for telephone triage.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study with the largest after-hour house-call (AHHC) service dataset in Japan. Participants were ≥16 years and used the AHHC service between 1 November 2018 and 31 January 2021. We developed five prediction models based on support vector machine (SVM), lasso regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient-boosted decision tree (XGB), and deep neural network (DNN). The primary outcome was undertriage, and predictors were telephone triage level and routinely available telephone-based data, including age, sex, 80 chief complaint categories and 10 comorbidities. We measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for all the models.
We identified 15,442 eligible patients (age: 38.4 ± 16.6, male: 57.2%), including 298 (1.9%; age: 58.2 ± 23.9, male: 55.0%) undertriaged patients. RF and XGB outperformed the other models, with the AUROC values (95% confidence interval; 95% CI) of the SVM, LR, RF, XGB and DNN for undertriage being 0.62 (0.55-0.69), 0.79 (0.74-0.83), 0.81 (0.76-0.86), 0.80 (0.75-0.84) and 0.77 (0.73-0.82), respectively.
We found that RF and XGB outperformed other models. Our findings suggest that machine learning models can facilitate the early detection of undertriage and early intervention to yield substantially improved patient outcomes.
KEY MESSAGES
Undertriaged patients experience worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients; thus, we developed machine learning models for predicting undertriage in the prehospital setting. In addition, we identified the predictors of risk factors associated with undertriage.
Random forest and gradient-boosted decision tree models demonstrated better prediction performance, and the models identified the risk factors associated with undertriage.
Machine learning models aid in the early detection of undertriage, leading to significantly improved patient outcomes and identifying undertriage-associated risk factors, including chief complaint categories, could help prioritize conventional telephone triage protocol revision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0785-3890</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2136402</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36286496</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Adult ; after-hours house-call medical service ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Emergency Medicine ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Humans ; Machine Learning ; Middle Aged ; out-of-hour service ; prediction ; Prehospital ; Retrospective Studies ; Telephone ; Triage - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Annals of medicine (Helsinki), 2022-12, Vol.54 (1), p.2989-2996</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2022 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-74eb7cf88add3e79e68a50b9e5ac72428a4c3fbf6cf53b0be55135611c1a6b843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-74eb7cf88add3e79e68a50b9e5ac72428a4c3fbf6cf53b0be55135611c1a6b843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621252/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621252/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,27507,27929,27930,53796,53798,59148,59149</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36286496$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Inokuchi, Ryota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwagami, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Ayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamiya, Nanako</creatorcontrib><title>Machine learning models predicting undertriage in telephone triage</title><title>Annals of medicine (Helsinki)</title><addtitle>Ann Med</addtitle><description>Undertriaged patients have worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients. Machine learning provides better triage prediction than conventional triage in emergency departments, but no machine learning-based undertriage prediction models have yet been developed for prehospital telephone triage. We developed and validated machine learning models for telephone triage.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study with the largest after-hour house-call (AHHC) service dataset in Japan. Participants were ≥16 years and used the AHHC service between 1 November 2018 and 31 January 2021. We developed five prediction models based on support vector machine (SVM), lasso regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient-boosted decision tree (XGB), and deep neural network (DNN). The primary outcome was undertriage, and predictors were telephone triage level and routinely available telephone-based data, including age, sex, 80 chief complaint categories and 10 comorbidities. We measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for all the models.
We identified 15,442 eligible patients (age: 38.4 ± 16.6, male: 57.2%), including 298 (1.9%; age: 58.2 ± 23.9, male: 55.0%) undertriaged patients. RF and XGB outperformed the other models, with the AUROC values (95% confidence interval; 95% CI) of the SVM, LR, RF, XGB and DNN for undertriage being 0.62 (0.55-0.69), 0.79 (0.74-0.83), 0.81 (0.76-0.86), 0.80 (0.75-0.84) and 0.77 (0.73-0.82), respectively.
We found that RF and XGB outperformed other models. Our findings suggest that machine learning models can facilitate the early detection of undertriage and early intervention to yield substantially improved patient outcomes.
KEY MESSAGES
Undertriaged patients experience worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients; thus, we developed machine learning models for predicting undertriage in the prehospital setting. In addition, we identified the predictors of risk factors associated with undertriage.
Random forest and gradient-boosted decision tree models demonstrated better prediction performance, and the models identified the risk factors associated with undertriage.
Machine learning models aid in the early detection of undertriage, leading to significantly improved patient outcomes and identifying undertriage-associated risk factors, including chief complaint categories, could help prioritize conventional telephone triage protocol revision.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>after-hours house-call medical service</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>out-of-hour service</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Prehospital</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><subject>Triage - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0785-3890</issn><issn>1365-2060</issn><issn>1365-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAURS0EotPCJ4CyZJPBdmLH2SCgglKpiA2srRf7ecaVYw92BtS_JyHTim5Y2Xo-9zxLl5BXjG4ZVfQt7ZRoVE-3nHK-5ayRLeVPyGa-iJpTSZ-SzcLUC3RGzku5pZTyjtHn5KyRXMm2lxvy8SuYvY9YBYQcfdxVY7IYSnXIaL2ZlskxWsxT9rDDysdqwoCHfZoz6-wFeeYgFHx5Oi_Ij8-fvl9-qW--XV1ffripjaBqqrsWh844pcDaBrsepQJBhx4FmI63XEFrGjc4aZxoBjqgEKwRkjHDQA6qbS7I9eq1CW71IfsR8p1O4PXfQco7DXnyJqB2vRWKKTsYgy06C9xIYJZCK9XQ4uJ6t7oOx2FEazBOGcIj6eOX6Pd6l37pXnLGBZ8Fb06CnH4esUx69MVgCBAxHYvmHe8pFzM9o2JFTU6lZHQPaxjVS5f6vku9dKlPXc651__-8SF1X94MvF8BH13KI_xOOVg9wV1I2WWIxhfd_H_HH1fMsBQ</recordid><startdate>20221231</startdate><enddate>20221231</enddate><creator>Inokuchi, Ryota</creator><creator>Iwagami, Masao</creator><creator>Sun, Yu</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Ayaka</creator><creator>Tamiya, Nanako</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221231</creationdate><title>Machine learning models predicting undertriage in telephone triage</title><author>Inokuchi, Ryota ; Iwagami, Masao ; Sun, Yu ; Sakamoto, Ayaka ; Tamiya, Nanako</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-74eb7cf88add3e79e68a50b9e5ac72428a4c3fbf6cf53b0be55135611c1a6b843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>after-hours house-call medical service</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>out-of-hour service</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Prehospital</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><topic>Triage - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Inokuchi, Ryota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwagami, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Ayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamiya, Nanako</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Annals of medicine (Helsinki)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Inokuchi, Ryota</au><au>Iwagami, Masao</au><au>Sun, Yu</au><au>Sakamoto, Ayaka</au><au>Tamiya, Nanako</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine learning models predicting undertriage in telephone triage</atitle><jtitle>Annals of medicine (Helsinki)</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Med</addtitle><date>2022-12-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2989</spage><epage>2996</epage><pages>2989-2996</pages><issn>0785-3890</issn><issn>1365-2060</issn><eissn>1365-2060</eissn><abstract>Undertriaged patients have worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients. Machine learning provides better triage prediction than conventional triage in emergency departments, but no machine learning-based undertriage prediction models have yet been developed for prehospital telephone triage. We developed and validated machine learning models for telephone triage.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study with the largest after-hour house-call (AHHC) service dataset in Japan. Participants were ≥16 years and used the AHHC service between 1 November 2018 and 31 January 2021. We developed five prediction models based on support vector machine (SVM), lasso regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient-boosted decision tree (XGB), and deep neural network (DNN). The primary outcome was undertriage, and predictors were telephone triage level and routinely available telephone-based data, including age, sex, 80 chief complaint categories and 10 comorbidities. We measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for all the models.
We identified 15,442 eligible patients (age: 38.4 ± 16.6, male: 57.2%), including 298 (1.9%; age: 58.2 ± 23.9, male: 55.0%) undertriaged patients. RF and XGB outperformed the other models, with the AUROC values (95% confidence interval; 95% CI) of the SVM, LR, RF, XGB and DNN for undertriage being 0.62 (0.55-0.69), 0.79 (0.74-0.83), 0.81 (0.76-0.86), 0.80 (0.75-0.84) and 0.77 (0.73-0.82), respectively.
We found that RF and XGB outperformed other models. Our findings suggest that machine learning models can facilitate the early detection of undertriage and early intervention to yield substantially improved patient outcomes.
KEY MESSAGES
Undertriaged patients experience worse outcomes than appropriately triaged patients; thus, we developed machine learning models for predicting undertriage in the prehospital setting. In addition, we identified the predictors of risk factors associated with undertriage.
Random forest and gradient-boosted decision tree models demonstrated better prediction performance, and the models identified the risk factors associated with undertriage.
Machine learning models aid in the early detection of undertriage, leading to significantly improved patient outcomes and identifying undertriage-associated risk factors, including chief complaint categories, could help prioritize conventional telephone triage protocol revision.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>36286496</pmid><doi>10.1080/07853890.2022.2136402</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0785-3890 |
ispartof | Annals of medicine (Helsinki), 2022-12, Vol.54 (1), p.2989-2996 |
issn | 0785-3890 1365-2060 1365-2060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07853890_2022_2136402 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult after-hours house-call medical service Aged Aged, 80 and over Emergency Medicine Emergency Service, Hospital Humans Machine Learning Middle Aged out-of-hour service prediction Prehospital Retrospective Studies Telephone Triage - methods Young Adult |
title | Machine learning models predicting undertriage in telephone triage |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T05%3A51%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20learning%20models%20predicting%20undertriage%20in%20telephone%20triage&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20medicine%20(Helsinki)&rft.au=Inokuchi,%20Ryota&rft.date=2022-12-31&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2989&rft.epage=2996&rft.pages=2989-2996&rft.issn=0785-3890&rft.eissn=1365-2060&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07853890.2022.2136402&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2729025621%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2729025621&rft_id=info:pmid/36286496&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f9d5818dbcce4efda2c6a1d0a468b4e4&rfr_iscdi=true |