Motivating the Motivationally Diverse Crowd: Social Value Orientation and Reward Structure in Crowd Idea Generation
Some people contribute ideas for prosocial reasons in crowdsourcing; others do so for selfish reasons. Extending the theory of motivated information processing, the research posits that prosocial and proself individuals respond differently to reward structures in crowd idea generation. Two online ex...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of management information systems 2022-10, Vol.39 (4), p.1064-1088 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1088 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1064 |
container_title | Journal of management information systems |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Yan, Bei Hollingshead, Andrea B. |
description | Some people contribute ideas for prosocial reasons in crowdsourcing; others do so for selfish reasons. Extending the theory of motivated information processing, the research posits that prosocial and proself individuals respond differently to reward structures in crowd idea generation. Two online experiments measured participants' prosocial versus proself orientation and manipulated whether participants received a competitive or cooperative reward structure. Study 2 also manipulated whether participants viewed an original or a common peer idea. Proselfs produced more ideas when receiving competitive rewards; the idea generation of prosocials was not affected by the reward structure. This interaction effect was mediated by task effort and moderated the impact of peer ideas. Proselfs generated the most ideas when viewing an original peer idea and receiving competitive rewards; this effect was not observed for prosocials. The study contributes to crowdsourcing research by demonstrating that participants' response to reward structures depends on their social value orientation. The implication is that crowdsourcing organizers should design tasks and rewards so they motivate participants with both prosocial and proself orientations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/07421222.2022.2127451 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07421222_2022_2127451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2749287028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a5a77ce09a2348716b68c11fbc0dcd1932d13f368bdfb746fac6573a09e278b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1L3TAYgINssDPnTxgEvK7LR9u0u1LOnBMUwS-8C2-T1EVqom9SD-ffr7XK7rxJCDzP-5KHkO-cHXDWsB9MlYILIQ4Emw8uVFnxHbLiVaWKVjR3n8hqZooZ-kK-pvTAGOOtaFckncfsXyD7cE_zX0ffnzHAMGzpL__iMDm6xrixP-lVNB4GegvD6OgFehfyK0shWHrpNoCWXmUcTR7RUR8Wj55aB_TEBYev9DfyuYchub23e5fc_D6-Xv8pzi5OTtdHZ4UpS5ELqEAp41gLQpaN4nVXN4bzvjPMGstbKSyXvaybzvadKuseTF0pCax1QjWdkLtkf5n7hPF5dCnrhzji9LGkp0RTGMVEM1HVQhmMKaHr9RP6R8Ct5kzPffV7Xz331W99J48unjMx-PTfaqSQbdWW5YQcLogPfcRH2EQcrM6wHSL2CMFMmvx4yz_KnYz3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2749287028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Motivating the Motivationally Diverse Crowd: Social Value Orientation and Reward Structure in Crowd Idea Generation</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Yan, Bei ; Hollingshead, Andrea B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yan, Bei ; Hollingshead, Andrea B.</creatorcontrib><description>Some people contribute ideas for prosocial reasons in crowdsourcing; others do so for selfish reasons. Extending the theory of motivated information processing, the research posits that prosocial and proself individuals respond differently to reward structures in crowd idea generation. Two online experiments measured participants' prosocial versus proself orientation and manipulated whether participants received a competitive or cooperative reward structure. Study 2 also manipulated whether participants viewed an original or a common peer idea. Proselfs produced more ideas when receiving competitive rewards; the idea generation of prosocials was not affected by the reward structure. This interaction effect was mediated by task effort and moderated the impact of peer ideas. Proselfs generated the most ideas when viewing an original peer idea and receiving competitive rewards; this effect was not observed for prosocials. The study contributes to crowdsourcing research by demonstrating that participants' response to reward structures depends on their social value orientation. The implication is that crowdsourcing organizers should design tasks and rewards so they motivate participants with both prosocial and proself orientations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-1222</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-928X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2022.2127451</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Crowdsourcing ; crowdsourcing motivation ; Data processing ; Idea generation ; Information processing ; motivated information processing ; Orientation ; Prosocial behavior ; prosocial motivation ; Rewards ; Social value orientation ; Value orientations</subject><ispartof>Journal of management information systems, 2022-10, Vol.39 (4), p.1064-1088</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a5a77ce09a2348716b68c11fbc0dcd1932d13f368bdfb746fac6573a09e278b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a5a77ce09a2348716b68c11fbc0dcd1932d13f368bdfb746fac6573a09e278b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9737-5308</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yan, Bei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingshead, Andrea B.</creatorcontrib><title>Motivating the Motivationally Diverse Crowd: Social Value Orientation and Reward Structure in Crowd Idea Generation</title><title>Journal of management information systems</title><description>Some people contribute ideas for prosocial reasons in crowdsourcing; others do so for selfish reasons. Extending the theory of motivated information processing, the research posits that prosocial and proself individuals respond differently to reward structures in crowd idea generation. Two online experiments measured participants' prosocial versus proself orientation and manipulated whether participants received a competitive or cooperative reward structure. Study 2 also manipulated whether participants viewed an original or a common peer idea. Proselfs produced more ideas when receiving competitive rewards; the idea generation of prosocials was not affected by the reward structure. This interaction effect was mediated by task effort and moderated the impact of peer ideas. Proselfs generated the most ideas when viewing an original peer idea and receiving competitive rewards; this effect was not observed for prosocials. The study contributes to crowdsourcing research by demonstrating that participants' response to reward structures depends on their social value orientation. The implication is that crowdsourcing organizers should design tasks and rewards so they motivate participants with both prosocial and proself orientations.</description><subject>Crowdsourcing</subject><subject>crowdsourcing motivation</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Idea generation</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>motivated information processing</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Prosocial behavior</subject><subject>prosocial motivation</subject><subject>Rewards</subject><subject>Social value orientation</subject><subject>Value orientations</subject><issn>0742-1222</issn><issn>1557-928X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1L3TAYgINssDPnTxgEvK7LR9u0u1LOnBMUwS-8C2-T1EVqom9SD-ffr7XK7rxJCDzP-5KHkO-cHXDWsB9MlYILIQ4Emw8uVFnxHbLiVaWKVjR3n8hqZooZ-kK-pvTAGOOtaFckncfsXyD7cE_zX0ffnzHAMGzpL__iMDm6xrixP-lVNB4GegvD6OgFehfyK0shWHrpNoCWXmUcTR7RUR8Wj55aB_TEBYev9DfyuYchub23e5fc_D6-Xv8pzi5OTtdHZ4UpS5ELqEAp41gLQpaN4nVXN4bzvjPMGstbKSyXvaybzvadKuseTF0pCax1QjWdkLtkf5n7hPF5dCnrhzji9LGkp0RTGMVEM1HVQhmMKaHr9RP6R8Ct5kzPffV7Xz331W99J48unjMx-PTfaqSQbdWW5YQcLogPfcRH2EQcrM6wHSL2CMFMmvx4yz_KnYz3</recordid><startdate>20221002</startdate><enddate>20221002</enddate><creator>Yan, Bei</creator><creator>Hollingshead, Andrea B.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9737-5308</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221002</creationdate><title>Motivating the Motivationally Diverse Crowd: Social Value Orientation and Reward Structure in Crowd Idea Generation</title><author>Yan, Bei ; Hollingshead, Andrea B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a5a77ce09a2348716b68c11fbc0dcd1932d13f368bdfb746fac6573a09e278b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Crowdsourcing</topic><topic>crowdsourcing motivation</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Idea generation</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>motivated information processing</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Prosocial behavior</topic><topic>prosocial motivation</topic><topic>Rewards</topic><topic>Social value orientation</topic><topic>Value orientations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yan, Bei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingshead, Andrea B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of management information systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yan, Bei</au><au>Hollingshead, Andrea B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Motivating the Motivationally Diverse Crowd: Social Value Orientation and Reward Structure in Crowd Idea Generation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of management information systems</jtitle><date>2022-10-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1064</spage><epage>1088</epage><pages>1064-1088</pages><issn>0742-1222</issn><eissn>1557-928X</eissn><abstract>Some people contribute ideas for prosocial reasons in crowdsourcing; others do so for selfish reasons. Extending the theory of motivated information processing, the research posits that prosocial and proself individuals respond differently to reward structures in crowd idea generation. Two online experiments measured participants' prosocial versus proself orientation and manipulated whether participants received a competitive or cooperative reward structure. Study 2 also manipulated whether participants viewed an original or a common peer idea. Proselfs produced more ideas when receiving competitive rewards; the idea generation of prosocials was not affected by the reward structure. This interaction effect was mediated by task effort and moderated the impact of peer ideas. Proselfs generated the most ideas when viewing an original peer idea and receiving competitive rewards; this effect was not observed for prosocials. The study contributes to crowdsourcing research by demonstrating that participants' response to reward structures depends on their social value orientation. The implication is that crowdsourcing organizers should design tasks and rewards so they motivate participants with both prosocial and proself orientations.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/07421222.2022.2127451</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9737-5308</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0742-1222 |
ispartof | Journal of management information systems, 2022-10, Vol.39 (4), p.1064-1088 |
issn | 0742-1222 1557-928X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07421222_2022_2127451 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Crowdsourcing crowdsourcing motivation Data processing Idea generation Information processing motivated information processing Orientation Prosocial behavior prosocial motivation Rewards Social value orientation Value orientations |
title | Motivating the Motivationally Diverse Crowd: Social Value Orientation and Reward Structure in Crowd Idea Generation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T12%3A40%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Motivating%20the%20Motivationally%20Diverse%20Crowd:%20Social%20Value%20Orientation%20and%20Reward%20Structure%20in%20Crowd%20Idea%20Generation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20management%20information%20systems&rft.au=Yan,%20Bei&rft.date=2022-10-02&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1064&rft.epage=1088&rft.pages=1064-1088&rft.issn=0742-1222&rft.eissn=1557-928X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07421222.2022.2127451&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2749287028%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2749287028&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |