Motivating the Motivationally Diverse Crowd: Social Value Orientation and Reward Structure in Crowd Idea Generation

Some people contribute ideas for prosocial reasons in crowdsourcing; others do so for selfish reasons. Extending the theory of motivated information processing, the research posits that prosocial and proself individuals respond differently to reward structures in crowd idea generation. Two online ex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of management information systems 2022-10, Vol.39 (4), p.1064-1088
Hauptverfasser: Yan, Bei, Hollingshead, Andrea B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1088
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1064
container_title Journal of management information systems
container_volume 39
creator Yan, Bei
Hollingshead, Andrea B.
description Some people contribute ideas for prosocial reasons in crowdsourcing; others do so for selfish reasons. Extending the theory of motivated information processing, the research posits that prosocial and proself individuals respond differently to reward structures in crowd idea generation. Two online experiments measured participants' prosocial versus proself orientation and manipulated whether participants received a competitive or cooperative reward structure. Study 2 also manipulated whether participants viewed an original or a common peer idea. Proselfs produced more ideas when receiving competitive rewards; the idea generation of prosocials was not affected by the reward structure. This interaction effect was mediated by task effort and moderated the impact of peer ideas. Proselfs generated the most ideas when viewing an original peer idea and receiving competitive rewards; this effect was not observed for prosocials. The study contributes to crowdsourcing research by demonstrating that participants' response to reward structures depends on their social value orientation. The implication is that crowdsourcing organizers should design tasks and rewards so they motivate participants with both prosocial and proself orientations.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/07421222.2022.2127451
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07421222_2022_2127451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2749287028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a5a77ce09a2348716b68c11fbc0dcd1932d13f368bdfb746fac6573a09e278b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1L3TAYgINssDPnTxgEvK7LR9u0u1LOnBMUwS-8C2-T1EVqom9SD-ffr7XK7rxJCDzP-5KHkO-cHXDWsB9MlYILIQ4Emw8uVFnxHbLiVaWKVjR3n8hqZooZ-kK-pvTAGOOtaFckncfsXyD7cE_zX0ffnzHAMGzpL__iMDm6xrixP-lVNB4GegvD6OgFehfyK0shWHrpNoCWXmUcTR7RUR8Wj55aB_TEBYev9DfyuYchub23e5fc_D6-Xv8pzi5OTtdHZ4UpS5ELqEAp41gLQpaN4nVXN4bzvjPMGstbKSyXvaybzvadKuseTF0pCax1QjWdkLtkf5n7hPF5dCnrhzji9LGkp0RTGMVEM1HVQhmMKaHr9RP6R8Ct5kzPffV7Xz331W99J48unjMx-PTfaqSQbdWW5YQcLogPfcRH2EQcrM6wHSL2CMFMmvx4yz_KnYz3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2749287028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Motivating the Motivationally Diverse Crowd: Social Value Orientation and Reward Structure in Crowd Idea Generation</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Yan, Bei ; Hollingshead, Andrea B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yan, Bei ; Hollingshead, Andrea B.</creatorcontrib><description>Some people contribute ideas for prosocial reasons in crowdsourcing; others do so for selfish reasons. Extending the theory of motivated information processing, the research posits that prosocial and proself individuals respond differently to reward structures in crowd idea generation. Two online experiments measured participants' prosocial versus proself orientation and manipulated whether participants received a competitive or cooperative reward structure. Study 2 also manipulated whether participants viewed an original or a common peer idea. Proselfs produced more ideas when receiving competitive rewards; the idea generation of prosocials was not affected by the reward structure. This interaction effect was mediated by task effort and moderated the impact of peer ideas. Proselfs generated the most ideas when viewing an original peer idea and receiving competitive rewards; this effect was not observed for prosocials. The study contributes to crowdsourcing research by demonstrating that participants' response to reward structures depends on their social value orientation. The implication is that crowdsourcing organizers should design tasks and rewards so they motivate participants with both prosocial and proself orientations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-1222</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-928X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2022.2127451</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Crowdsourcing ; crowdsourcing motivation ; Data processing ; Idea generation ; Information processing ; motivated information processing ; Orientation ; Prosocial behavior ; prosocial motivation ; Rewards ; Social value orientation ; Value orientations</subject><ispartof>Journal of management information systems, 2022-10, Vol.39 (4), p.1064-1088</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC. 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a5a77ce09a2348716b68c11fbc0dcd1932d13f368bdfb746fac6573a09e278b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a5a77ce09a2348716b68c11fbc0dcd1932d13f368bdfb746fac6573a09e278b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9737-5308</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yan, Bei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingshead, Andrea B.</creatorcontrib><title>Motivating the Motivationally Diverse Crowd: Social Value Orientation and Reward Structure in Crowd Idea Generation</title><title>Journal of management information systems</title><description>Some people contribute ideas for prosocial reasons in crowdsourcing; others do so for selfish reasons. Extending the theory of motivated information processing, the research posits that prosocial and proself individuals respond differently to reward structures in crowd idea generation. Two online experiments measured participants' prosocial versus proself orientation and manipulated whether participants received a competitive or cooperative reward structure. Study 2 also manipulated whether participants viewed an original or a common peer idea. Proselfs produced more ideas when receiving competitive rewards; the idea generation of prosocials was not affected by the reward structure. This interaction effect was mediated by task effort and moderated the impact of peer ideas. Proselfs generated the most ideas when viewing an original peer idea and receiving competitive rewards; this effect was not observed for prosocials. The study contributes to crowdsourcing research by demonstrating that participants' response to reward structures depends on their social value orientation. The implication is that crowdsourcing organizers should design tasks and rewards so they motivate participants with both prosocial and proself orientations.</description><subject>Crowdsourcing</subject><subject>crowdsourcing motivation</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Idea generation</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>motivated information processing</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Prosocial behavior</subject><subject>prosocial motivation</subject><subject>Rewards</subject><subject>Social value orientation</subject><subject>Value orientations</subject><issn>0742-1222</issn><issn>1557-928X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1L3TAYgINssDPnTxgEvK7LR9u0u1LOnBMUwS-8C2-T1EVqom9SD-ffr7XK7rxJCDzP-5KHkO-cHXDWsB9MlYILIQ4Emw8uVFnxHbLiVaWKVjR3n8hqZooZ-kK-pvTAGOOtaFckncfsXyD7cE_zX0ffnzHAMGzpL__iMDm6xrixP-lVNB4GegvD6OgFehfyK0shWHrpNoCWXmUcTR7RUR8Wj55aB_TEBYev9DfyuYchub23e5fc_D6-Xv8pzi5OTtdHZ4UpS5ELqEAp41gLQpaN4nVXN4bzvjPMGstbKSyXvaybzvadKuseTF0pCax1QjWdkLtkf5n7hPF5dCnrhzji9LGkp0RTGMVEM1HVQhmMKaHr9RP6R8Ct5kzPffV7Xz331W99J48unjMx-PTfaqSQbdWW5YQcLogPfcRH2EQcrM6wHSL2CMFMmvx4yz_KnYz3</recordid><startdate>20221002</startdate><enddate>20221002</enddate><creator>Yan, Bei</creator><creator>Hollingshead, Andrea B.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9737-5308</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221002</creationdate><title>Motivating the Motivationally Diverse Crowd: Social Value Orientation and Reward Structure in Crowd Idea Generation</title><author>Yan, Bei ; Hollingshead, Andrea B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a5a77ce09a2348716b68c11fbc0dcd1932d13f368bdfb746fac6573a09e278b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Crowdsourcing</topic><topic>crowdsourcing motivation</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Idea generation</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>motivated information processing</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Prosocial behavior</topic><topic>prosocial motivation</topic><topic>Rewards</topic><topic>Social value orientation</topic><topic>Value orientations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yan, Bei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingshead, Andrea B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of management information systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yan, Bei</au><au>Hollingshead, Andrea B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Motivating the Motivationally Diverse Crowd: Social Value Orientation and Reward Structure in Crowd Idea Generation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of management information systems</jtitle><date>2022-10-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1064</spage><epage>1088</epage><pages>1064-1088</pages><issn>0742-1222</issn><eissn>1557-928X</eissn><abstract>Some people contribute ideas for prosocial reasons in crowdsourcing; others do so for selfish reasons. Extending the theory of motivated information processing, the research posits that prosocial and proself individuals respond differently to reward structures in crowd idea generation. Two online experiments measured participants' prosocial versus proself orientation and manipulated whether participants received a competitive or cooperative reward structure. Study 2 also manipulated whether participants viewed an original or a common peer idea. Proselfs produced more ideas when receiving competitive rewards; the idea generation of prosocials was not affected by the reward structure. This interaction effect was mediated by task effort and moderated the impact of peer ideas. Proselfs generated the most ideas when viewing an original peer idea and receiving competitive rewards; this effect was not observed for prosocials. The study contributes to crowdsourcing research by demonstrating that participants' response to reward structures depends on their social value orientation. The implication is that crowdsourcing organizers should design tasks and rewards so they motivate participants with both prosocial and proself orientations.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/07421222.2022.2127451</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9737-5308</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0742-1222
ispartof Journal of management information systems, 2022-10, Vol.39 (4), p.1064-1088
issn 0742-1222
1557-928X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07421222_2022_2127451
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Crowdsourcing
crowdsourcing motivation
Data processing
Idea generation
Information processing
motivated information processing
Orientation
Prosocial behavior
prosocial motivation
Rewards
Social value orientation
Value orientations
title Motivating the Motivationally Diverse Crowd: Social Value Orientation and Reward Structure in Crowd Idea Generation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T12%3A40%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Motivating%20the%20Motivationally%20Diverse%20Crowd:%20Social%20Value%20Orientation%20and%20Reward%20Structure%20in%20Crowd%20Idea%20Generation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20management%20information%20systems&rft.au=Yan,%20Bei&rft.date=2022-10-02&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1064&rft.epage=1088&rft.pages=1064-1088&rft.issn=0742-1222&rft.eissn=1557-928X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07421222.2022.2127451&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2749287028%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2749287028&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true