Resisting the Exploitation of Contingent Faculty Labor in the Neoliberal University: The Challenge of Building Solidarity between Tenured and Non-Tenured Faculty

This article explores why tenured faculty, particularly at major public and private research universities, often have failed to engage in collective resistance to the rise of the neoliberal university and the exploitation of "casualized" academic labor. Thirty years of steady federal and s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New political science 2014-10, Vol.36 (4), p.504-522
1. Verfasser: Schwartz, Joseph M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 522
container_issue 4
container_start_page 504
container_title New political science
container_volume 36
creator Schwartz, Joseph M.
description This article explores why tenured faculty, particularly at major public and private research universities, often have failed to engage in collective resistance to the rise of the neoliberal university and the exploitation of "casualized" academic labor. Thirty years of steady federal and state cuts in the funding of higher education have led to the quasi-privatization of public higher education, with both public and private universities viewing themselves as corporate entities that must maximize student tuition and corporate and philanthropic revenues while minimizing costs. This has led to a massive increase in the number of exploited contingent faculty whose precarious working conditions are akin to those of low-wage, temporary workers in the rest of the economy. This article explores various reasons behind the failure of most tenured faculty-particularly the eighty percent not in faculty unions-to engage in overt, sustained protest at the radical expansion in casualized faculty labor. The article also examines the rise of professional administrators as the new governing class of neoliberal universities which compete for "student customers" on the basis of amenities and "student life" rather than on the basis of educational quality. These administrators' drive for "measurable metrics" has contributed to an increase in self-interested behavior on the part of a tenured faculty who are increasingly rewarded on the basis of "research productivity." While in the short run such a retreat from public life by tenured faculty may be rational, in the long run such behavior threatens the future existence of tenure, except in the most prestigious and well-endowed of private and public institutions. Thus those remaining tenured faculty committed to higher education providing a quality intellectual experience for all students must work politically to ensure that all faculty have humane and secure working conditions and manageable teaching loads. In short, tenured faculty committed to a future for democratic public education must take up the challenge of building solidarity across faculty rank and status.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/07393148.2014.954803
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07393148_2014_954803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1680145966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ea57c4d37726e0eb0a73b4edcd0e76c3cff87a28a2193f9fb3974a9846e2b9093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EEqHwBiy8ZDPBHjv-YYMgammlqEhturY8njvUyLGD7WnJ4_CmzDTtturq6up855zFQegjJUtKFPlMJNOMcrVsCeVLveKKsFdoQbnQjZ6U12gxI83MvEXvSvlNCFWE6wX6dwXFl-rjL1xvAZ_-3Yfkq60-RZwGvE5x1iBWfGbdGOoBb2yXMvbxgb-EFHwH2QZ8E_0d5OLr4QveTtL61oYAk3fO-T760M8l1xPf2zxRuIN6DxDxFuKYocc29vgyxebpfyx8j94MNhT48HhP0M3Z6XZ93mx-_rhYf9s0jhNRG7Ar6XjPpGwFEOiIlazj0LuegBSOuWFQ0rbKtlSzQQ8d05JbrbiAttNEsxP06Zi7z-nPCKWanS8OQrAR0lgMFYrQFVXihShfaSFegLZSEsLYnMqPqMuplAyD2We_s_lgKDHzzuZpZzPvbI47T7avR5uPQ8o7e59y6E21h5DykG10vhj2bMJ_lC6xHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1627700339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resisting the Exploitation of Contingent Faculty Labor in the Neoliberal University: The Challenge of Building Solidarity between Tenured and Non-Tenured Faculty</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Schwartz, Joseph M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores why tenured faculty, particularly at major public and private research universities, often have failed to engage in collective resistance to the rise of the neoliberal university and the exploitation of "casualized" academic labor. Thirty years of steady federal and state cuts in the funding of higher education have led to the quasi-privatization of public higher education, with both public and private universities viewing themselves as corporate entities that must maximize student tuition and corporate and philanthropic revenues while minimizing costs. This has led to a massive increase in the number of exploited contingent faculty whose precarious working conditions are akin to those of low-wage, temporary workers in the rest of the economy. This article explores various reasons behind the failure of most tenured faculty-particularly the eighty percent not in faculty unions-to engage in overt, sustained protest at the radical expansion in casualized faculty labor. The article also examines the rise of professional administrators as the new governing class of neoliberal universities which compete for "student customers" on the basis of amenities and "student life" rather than on the basis of educational quality. These administrators' drive for "measurable metrics" has contributed to an increase in self-interested behavior on the part of a tenured faculty who are increasingly rewarded on the basis of "research productivity." While in the short run such a retreat from public life by tenured faculty may be rational, in the long run such behavior threatens the future existence of tenure, except in the most prestigious and well-endowed of private and public institutions. Thus those remaining tenured faculty committed to higher education providing a quality intellectual experience for all students must work politically to ensure that all faculty have humane and secure working conditions and manageable teaching loads. In short, tenured faculty committed to a future for democratic public education must take up the challenge of building solidarity across faculty rank and status.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0739-3148</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9931</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07393148.2014.954803</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NPSCD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Academic Tenure ; Administrators ; College Faculty ; College Students ; Exploitation ; Higher Education ; Labour ; Neoliberalism ; Productivity ; Public Buildings ; Public education ; Resistance ; Solidarity ; Students ; Universities ; Work Environment ; Working Conditions</subject><ispartof>New political science, 2014-10, Vol.36 (4), p.504-522</ispartof><rights>2014 Caucus for a New Political Science 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ea57c4d37726e0eb0a73b4edcd0e76c3cff87a28a2193f9fb3974a9846e2b9093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><title>Resisting the Exploitation of Contingent Faculty Labor in the Neoliberal University: The Challenge of Building Solidarity between Tenured and Non-Tenured Faculty</title><title>New political science</title><description>This article explores why tenured faculty, particularly at major public and private research universities, often have failed to engage in collective resistance to the rise of the neoliberal university and the exploitation of "casualized" academic labor. Thirty years of steady federal and state cuts in the funding of higher education have led to the quasi-privatization of public higher education, with both public and private universities viewing themselves as corporate entities that must maximize student tuition and corporate and philanthropic revenues while minimizing costs. This has led to a massive increase in the number of exploited contingent faculty whose precarious working conditions are akin to those of low-wage, temporary workers in the rest of the economy. This article explores various reasons behind the failure of most tenured faculty-particularly the eighty percent not in faculty unions-to engage in overt, sustained protest at the radical expansion in casualized faculty labor. The article also examines the rise of professional administrators as the new governing class of neoliberal universities which compete for "student customers" on the basis of amenities and "student life" rather than on the basis of educational quality. These administrators' drive for "measurable metrics" has contributed to an increase in self-interested behavior on the part of a tenured faculty who are increasingly rewarded on the basis of "research productivity." While in the short run such a retreat from public life by tenured faculty may be rational, in the long run such behavior threatens the future existence of tenure, except in the most prestigious and well-endowed of private and public institutions. Thus those remaining tenured faculty committed to higher education providing a quality intellectual experience for all students must work politically to ensure that all faculty have humane and secure working conditions and manageable teaching loads. In short, tenured faculty committed to a future for democratic public education must take up the challenge of building solidarity across faculty rank and status.</description><subject>Academic Tenure</subject><subject>Administrators</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Labour</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Public Buildings</subject><subject>Public education</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Solidarity</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Work Environment</subject><subject>Working Conditions</subject><issn>0739-3148</issn><issn>1469-9931</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EEqHwBiy8ZDPBHjv-YYMgammlqEhturY8njvUyLGD7WnJ4_CmzDTtturq6up855zFQegjJUtKFPlMJNOMcrVsCeVLveKKsFdoQbnQjZ6U12gxI83MvEXvSvlNCFWE6wX6dwXFl-rjL1xvAZ_-3Yfkq60-RZwGvE5x1iBWfGbdGOoBb2yXMvbxgb-EFHwH2QZ8E_0d5OLr4QveTtL61oYAk3fO-T760M8l1xPf2zxRuIN6DxDxFuKYocc29vgyxebpfyx8j94MNhT48HhP0M3Z6XZ93mx-_rhYf9s0jhNRG7Ar6XjPpGwFEOiIlazj0LuegBSOuWFQ0rbKtlSzQQ8d05JbrbiAttNEsxP06Zi7z-nPCKWanS8OQrAR0lgMFYrQFVXihShfaSFegLZSEsLYnMqPqMuplAyD2We_s_lgKDHzzuZpZzPvbI47T7avR5uPQ8o7e59y6E21h5DykG10vhj2bMJ_lC6xHQ</recordid><startdate>20141002</startdate><enddate>20141002</enddate><creator>Schwartz, Joseph M.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141002</creationdate><title>Resisting the Exploitation of Contingent Faculty Labor in the Neoliberal University: The Challenge of Building Solidarity between Tenured and Non-Tenured Faculty</title><author>Schwartz, Joseph M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ea57c4d37726e0eb0a73b4edcd0e76c3cff87a28a2193f9fb3974a9846e2b9093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic Tenure</topic><topic>Administrators</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Labour</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Public Buildings</topic><topic>Public education</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Solidarity</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Work Environment</topic><topic>Working Conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>New political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwartz, Joseph M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resisting the Exploitation of Contingent Faculty Labor in the Neoliberal University: The Challenge of Building Solidarity between Tenured and Non-Tenured Faculty</atitle><jtitle>New political science</jtitle><date>2014-10-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>504</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>504-522</pages><issn>0739-3148</issn><eissn>1469-9931</eissn><coden>NPSCD9</coden><abstract>This article explores why tenured faculty, particularly at major public and private research universities, often have failed to engage in collective resistance to the rise of the neoliberal university and the exploitation of "casualized" academic labor. Thirty years of steady federal and state cuts in the funding of higher education have led to the quasi-privatization of public higher education, with both public and private universities viewing themselves as corporate entities that must maximize student tuition and corporate and philanthropic revenues while minimizing costs. This has led to a massive increase in the number of exploited contingent faculty whose precarious working conditions are akin to those of low-wage, temporary workers in the rest of the economy. This article explores various reasons behind the failure of most tenured faculty-particularly the eighty percent not in faculty unions-to engage in overt, sustained protest at the radical expansion in casualized faculty labor. The article also examines the rise of professional administrators as the new governing class of neoliberal universities which compete for "student customers" on the basis of amenities and "student life" rather than on the basis of educational quality. These administrators' drive for "measurable metrics" has contributed to an increase in self-interested behavior on the part of a tenured faculty who are increasingly rewarded on the basis of "research productivity." While in the short run such a retreat from public life by tenured faculty may be rational, in the long run such behavior threatens the future existence of tenure, except in the most prestigious and well-endowed of private and public institutions. Thus those remaining tenured faculty committed to higher education providing a quality intellectual experience for all students must work politically to ensure that all faculty have humane and secure working conditions and manageable teaching loads. In short, tenured faculty committed to a future for democratic public education must take up the challenge of building solidarity across faculty rank and status.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/07393148.2014.954803</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0739-3148
ispartof New political science, 2014-10, Vol.36 (4), p.504-522
issn 0739-3148
1469-9931
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07393148_2014_954803
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete
subjects Academic Tenure
Administrators
College Faculty
College Students
Exploitation
Higher Education
Labour
Neoliberalism
Productivity
Public Buildings
Public education
Resistance
Solidarity
Students
Universities
Work Environment
Working Conditions
title Resisting the Exploitation of Contingent Faculty Labor in the Neoliberal University: The Challenge of Building Solidarity between Tenured and Non-Tenured Faculty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A24%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resisting%20the%20Exploitation%20of%20Contingent%20Faculty%20Labor%20in%20the%20Neoliberal%20University:%20The%20Challenge%20of%20Building%20Solidarity%20between%20Tenured%20and%20Non-Tenured%20Faculty&rft.jtitle=New%20political%20science&rft.au=Schwartz,%20Joseph%20M.&rft.date=2014-10-02&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=504&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=504-522&rft.issn=0739-3148&rft.eissn=1469-9931&rft.coden=NPSCD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07393148.2014.954803&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1680145966%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1627700339&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true