Phenomenography - a "good-for-nothing brother" of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis
This article will argue that five different ways of doing phenomenography can be found amongst the works of Gothenburg phenomenographers: Discursive, Experimental, Naturalistic, Hermeneutic and Phenomenological. Commenting on an earlier version of phenomenography, Jacob Needleman stated that it was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Higher education research and development 1997-06, Vol.16 (2), p.191-202 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 202 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 191 |
container_title | Higher education research and development |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Hasselgren, Biörn Beach, Dennis |
description | This article will argue that five different ways of doing phenomenography can be found amongst the works of Gothenburg phenomenographers: Discursive, Experimental, Naturalistic, Hermeneutic and Phenomenological. Commenting on an earlier version of phenomenography, Jacob Needleman stated that it was "a 'good-for-nothing' brother of phenomenology". We will argue that it is not. It is productive research, even if at times the degree of methodological reflection applied by phenomenographers to their work is found wanting. Two of five forms of Gothenburg phenomenography can be developed by recourse to phenomenology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/0729436970160206 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_0729436970160206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ554081</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.80578</informt_id><sourcerecordid>EJ554081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-43e8f7d1a557f5ea5d25e15bfb576480f7a7e82f8f4cc34decde047ae07abef43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOD72LlwU99WbtmkyuJBhGF8M6EJxGe60SSfSaUoSkf57U6ouBCEhge-ccy-HkDMKlxQEXAHP5kVezjnQEjIo98iMFuU8FXlZ7pPZiNPI4ZAcef8OkOWMZjPy9rxVnd3F2zjst0OSJphcNNbWqbYu7WzYmq5JNi5-lLtIrE76H0drm-EmefoIrenUSLCLB9vBG39CDjS2Xp1-v8fk9Xb1srxP1093D8vFOq0yMQ9xIyU0rykyxjVTyOqMKco2esN4WQjQHLkSmRa6qKq8qFVVKyg4KuC4UbrIjwlMuZWz3julZe_MDt0gKcixGPm3mGg5nyzKmepXvnpkrABBI15M2O1MkKhMH-Q2hN7LGgNK08VeRmJdI2trxjl5TstvpQDGRcy4njImNX5a19Yy4NBapx12lfEy_3fBL7iFimk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phenomenography - a "good-for-nothing brother" of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis</title><source>Access via Taylor & Francis</source><creator>Hasselgren, Biörn ; Beach, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>Hasselgren, Biörn ; Beach, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>This article will argue that five different ways of doing phenomenography can be found amongst the works of Gothenburg phenomenographers: Discursive, Experimental, Naturalistic, Hermeneutic and Phenomenological. Commenting on an earlier version of phenomenography, Jacob Needleman stated that it was "a 'good-for-nothing' brother of phenomenology". We will argue that it is not. It is productive research, even if at times the degree of methodological reflection applied by phenomenographers to their work is found wanting. Two of five forms of Gothenburg phenomenography can be developed by recourse to phenomenology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0729-4360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0729436970160206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Data Collection ; Discourse analysis ; Educational Research ; Epistemology ; Foreign Countries ; Hermeneutics ; Naturalistic research ; Phenomenography ; Phenomenology ; Qualitative Research ; Research Methodology ; University of Gothenburg (Sweden)</subject><ispartof>Higher education research and development, 1997-06, Vol.16 (2), p.191-202</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-43e8f7d1a557f5ea5d25e15bfb576480f7a7e82f8f4cc34decde047ae07abef43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-43e8f7d1a557f5ea5d25e15bfb576480f7a7e82f8f4cc34decde047ae07abef43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0729436970160206$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0729436970160206$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,59652,60441</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ554081$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hasselgren, Biörn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beach, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>Phenomenography - a "good-for-nothing brother" of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis</title><title>Higher education research and development</title><description>This article will argue that five different ways of doing phenomenography can be found amongst the works of Gothenburg phenomenographers: Discursive, Experimental, Naturalistic, Hermeneutic and Phenomenological. Commenting on an earlier version of phenomenography, Jacob Needleman stated that it was "a 'good-for-nothing' brother of phenomenology". We will argue that it is not. It is productive research, even if at times the degree of methodological reflection applied by phenomenographers to their work is found wanting. Two of five forms of Gothenburg phenomenography can be developed by recourse to phenomenology.</description><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Hermeneutics</subject><subject>Naturalistic research</subject><subject>Phenomenography</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>University of Gothenburg (Sweden)</subject><issn>0729-4360</issn><issn>1469-8366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOD72LlwU99WbtmkyuJBhGF8M6EJxGe60SSfSaUoSkf57U6ouBCEhge-ccy-HkDMKlxQEXAHP5kVezjnQEjIo98iMFuU8FXlZ7pPZiNPI4ZAcef8OkOWMZjPy9rxVnd3F2zjst0OSJphcNNbWqbYu7WzYmq5JNi5-lLtIrE76H0drm-EmefoIrenUSLCLB9vBG39CDjS2Xp1-v8fk9Xb1srxP1093D8vFOq0yMQ9xIyU0rykyxjVTyOqMKco2esN4WQjQHLkSmRa6qKq8qFVVKyg4KuC4UbrIjwlMuZWz3julZe_MDt0gKcixGPm3mGg5nyzKmepXvnpkrABBI15M2O1MkKhMH-Q2hN7LGgNK08VeRmJdI2trxjl5TstvpQDGRcy4njImNX5a19Yy4NBapx12lfEy_3fBL7iFimk</recordid><startdate>19970601</startdate><enddate>19970601</enddate><creator>Hasselgren, Biörn</creator><creator>Beach, Dennis</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970601</creationdate><title>Phenomenography - a "good-for-nothing brother" of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis</title><author>Hasselgren, Biörn ; Beach, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-43e8f7d1a557f5ea5d25e15bfb576480f7a7e82f8f4cc34decde047ae07abef43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Hermeneutics</topic><topic>Naturalistic research</topic><topic>Phenomenography</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>University of Gothenburg (Sweden)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hasselgren, Biörn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beach, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Higher education research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hasselgren, Biörn</au><au>Beach, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ554081</ericid><atitle>Phenomenography - a "good-for-nothing brother" of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis</atitle><jtitle>Higher education research and development</jtitle><date>1997-06-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>191-202</pages><issn>0729-4360</issn><eissn>1469-8366</eissn><abstract>This article will argue that five different ways of doing phenomenography can be found amongst the works of Gothenburg phenomenographers: Discursive, Experimental, Naturalistic, Hermeneutic and Phenomenological. Commenting on an earlier version of phenomenography, Jacob Needleman stated that it was "a 'good-for-nothing' brother of phenomenology". We will argue that it is not. It is productive research, even if at times the degree of methodological reflection applied by phenomenographers to their work is found wanting. Two of five forms of Gothenburg phenomenography can be developed by recourse to phenomenology.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/0729436970160206</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0729-4360 |
ispartof | Higher education research and development, 1997-06, Vol.16 (2), p.191-202 |
issn | 0729-4360 1469-8366 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_0729436970160206 |
source | Access via Taylor & Francis |
subjects | Data Collection Discourse analysis Educational Research Epistemology Foreign Countries Hermeneutics Naturalistic research Phenomenography Phenomenology Qualitative Research Research Methodology University of Gothenburg (Sweden) |
title | Phenomenography - a "good-for-nothing brother" of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T13%3A53%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phenomenography%20-%20a%20%22good-for-nothing%20brother%22%20of%20phenomenology?%20Outline%20of%20an%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Higher%20education%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Hasselgren,%20Bi%C3%B6rn&rft.date=1997-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=191-202&rft.issn=0729-4360&rft.eissn=1469-8366&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0729436970160206&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ554081%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ554081&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.80578&rfr_iscdi=true |