Understanding student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: an interpretive study in the UK higher education context
This article represents a cross-sectional study of undergraduate students across two north-west university business schools in the UK. A purposefully designed questionnaire was collected from 350 students. The student experience was described in the form of hand-written narratives by first and final...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) 2015-02, Vol.40 (2), p.329-349 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 349 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 329 |
container_title | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Douglas, Jacqueline Ann Douglas, Alexander McClelland, Robert James Davies, John |
description | This article represents a cross-sectional study of undergraduate students across two north-west university business schools in the UK. A purposefully designed questionnaire was collected from 350 students. The student experience was described in the form of hand-written narratives by first and final year students and had been identified by the respondents themselves as being satisfying or dissatisfying with the areas of teaching and learning and the supporting service environment. The study also assessed whether their experiences were likely to influence their loyalty behaviours with respect to remaining on their chosen course of study; recommending the university; and continuing at a higher level of study. The data were captured and analysed using the qualitative critical incident technique to capture the voice of the student and identified the critical determinants of quality within higher education, i.e. those areas that would influence loyalty behaviour, as being Access; Attentiveness; Availability; and Communication. A number of new determinants of quality have been identified out of the research by three independent judges, namely motivation, reward, social inclusion, usefulness, value for money and fellow student behaviour. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03075079.2013.842217 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_03075079_2013_842217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1048388</ericid><sourcerecordid>1648073971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-b5b11f7c91f171c1d65e222614c02c4592882ab13cae400edea288f8f9504d993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxRtRcFz9BgoBL156rEqnO2kvIsvqri54ccBbyOTPTpaeZEzSq_PtzWyriAdPBe_9XlXBa5rnCGsEAa-hA94DH9cUsFsLRinyB80KGYcWOfv6sFmdkPbEPG6e5HwLAAMXbNUcNsHYlIsKxocbkstsbCgkq-KzU7r4GEj1iPH5b-1NFYkPxaZDssXf2fvksUqk7CzZfCI7f7OziVgza3W_RceK_yhPm0dOTdk--zXPms37iy_nl-315w9X5--uW93DUNptv0V0XI_okKNGM_SWUjog00A160cqBFVb7LSyDMAaq6rihBt7YGYcu7Pm1bL3kOK32eYi9z5rO00q2DhniQMTwLuRY0Vf_oPexjmF-l2lehyAM04rxRZKp5hzsk4ekt-rdJQI8lSD_F2DPNUglxpq7MUSs8nrP5GLjwhMdEJU_-3i--Bi2qvvMU1GFnWcYnJJBe2z7P574Sdz1Jjh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1651607472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: an interpretive study in the UK higher education context</title><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><creator>Douglas, Jacqueline Ann ; Douglas, Alexander ; McClelland, Robert James ; Davies, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Jacqueline Ann ; Douglas, Alexander ; McClelland, Robert James ; Davies, John</creatorcontrib><description>This article represents a cross-sectional study of undergraduate students across two north-west university business schools in the UK. A purposefully designed questionnaire was collected from 350 students. The student experience was described in the form of hand-written narratives by first and final year students and had been identified by the respondents themselves as being satisfying or dissatisfying with the areas of teaching and learning and the supporting service environment. The study also assessed whether their experiences were likely to influence their loyalty behaviours with respect to remaining on their chosen course of study; recommending the university; and continuing at a higher level of study. The data were captured and analysed using the qualitative critical incident technique to capture the voice of the student and identified the critical determinants of quality within higher education, i.e. those areas that would influence loyalty behaviour, as being Access; Attentiveness; Availability; and Communication. A number of new determinants of quality have been identified out of the research by three independent judges, namely motivation, reward, social inclusion, usefulness, value for money and fellow student behaviour.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-5079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2013.842217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Academic Persistence ; Business Administration Education ; Business schools ; critical incident technique ; Critical Incidents Method ; Determinants ; Educational Attitudes ; Educational Quality ; Educational services ; Foreign Countries ; Higher education ; Loyalty ; Qualitative Research ; Quality of service ; Questionnaires ; Satisfaction ; service quality ; Social integration ; Statistical Analysis ; Student Attitudes ; Student behavior ; Student Experience ; Students ; Undergraduate Students ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2015-02, Vol.40 (2), p.329-349</ispartof><rights>2014 Society for Research into Higher Education 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-b5b11f7c91f171c1d65e222614c02c4592882ab13cae400edea288f8f9504d993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-b5b11f7c91f171c1d65e222614c02c4592882ab13cae400edea288f8f9504d993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1048388$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Jacqueline Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClelland, Robert James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, John</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: an interpretive study in the UK higher education context</title><title>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</title><description>This article represents a cross-sectional study of undergraduate students across two north-west university business schools in the UK. A purposefully designed questionnaire was collected from 350 students. The student experience was described in the form of hand-written narratives by first and final year students and had been identified by the respondents themselves as being satisfying or dissatisfying with the areas of teaching and learning and the supporting service environment. The study also assessed whether their experiences were likely to influence their loyalty behaviours with respect to remaining on their chosen course of study; recommending the university; and continuing at a higher level of study. The data were captured and analysed using the qualitative critical incident technique to capture the voice of the student and identified the critical determinants of quality within higher education, i.e. those areas that would influence loyalty behaviour, as being Access; Attentiveness; Availability; and Communication. A number of new determinants of quality have been identified out of the research by three independent judges, namely motivation, reward, social inclusion, usefulness, value for money and fellow student behaviour.</description><subject>Academic Persistence</subject><subject>Business Administration Education</subject><subject>Business schools</subject><subject>critical incident technique</subject><subject>Critical Incidents Method</subject><subject>Determinants</subject><subject>Educational Attitudes</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Educational services</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Loyalty</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality of service</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>service quality</subject><subject>Social integration</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student behavior</subject><subject>Student Experience</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0307-5079</issn><issn>1470-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxRtRcFz9BgoBL156rEqnO2kvIsvqri54ccBbyOTPTpaeZEzSq_PtzWyriAdPBe_9XlXBa5rnCGsEAa-hA94DH9cUsFsLRinyB80KGYcWOfv6sFmdkPbEPG6e5HwLAAMXbNUcNsHYlIsKxocbkstsbCgkq-KzU7r4GEj1iPH5b-1NFYkPxaZDssXf2fvksUqk7CzZfCI7f7OziVgza3W_RceK_yhPm0dOTdk--zXPms37iy_nl-315w9X5--uW93DUNptv0V0XI_okKNGM_SWUjog00A160cqBFVb7LSyDMAaq6rihBt7YGYcu7Pm1bL3kOK32eYi9z5rO00q2DhniQMTwLuRY0Vf_oPexjmF-l2lehyAM04rxRZKp5hzsk4ekt-rdJQI8lSD_F2DPNUglxpq7MUSs8nrP5GLjwhMdEJU_-3i--Bi2qvvMU1GFnWcYnJJBe2z7P574Sdz1Jjh</recordid><startdate>20150207</startdate><enddate>20150207</enddate><creator>Douglas, Jacqueline Ann</creator><creator>Douglas, Alexander</creator><creator>McClelland, Robert James</creator><creator>Davies, John</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150207</creationdate><title>Understanding student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: an interpretive study in the UK higher education context</title><author>Douglas, Jacqueline Ann ; Douglas, Alexander ; McClelland, Robert James ; Davies, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-b5b11f7c91f171c1d65e222614c02c4592882ab13cae400edea288f8f9504d993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Academic Persistence</topic><topic>Business Administration Education</topic><topic>Business schools</topic><topic>critical incident technique</topic><topic>Critical Incidents Method</topic><topic>Determinants</topic><topic>Educational Attitudes</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Educational services</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Loyalty</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality of service</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>service quality</topic><topic>Social integration</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student behavior</topic><topic>Student Experience</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Jacqueline Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClelland, Robert James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, John</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Douglas, Jacqueline Ann</au><au>Douglas, Alexander</au><au>McClelland, Robert James</au><au>Davies, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1048388</ericid><atitle>Understanding student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: an interpretive study in the UK higher education context</atitle><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle><date>2015-02-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>329</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>329-349</pages><issn>0307-5079</issn><eissn>1470-174X</eissn><abstract>This article represents a cross-sectional study of undergraduate students across two north-west university business schools in the UK. A purposefully designed questionnaire was collected from 350 students. The student experience was described in the form of hand-written narratives by first and final year students and had been identified by the respondents themselves as being satisfying or dissatisfying with the areas of teaching and learning and the supporting service environment. The study also assessed whether their experiences were likely to influence their loyalty behaviours with respect to remaining on their chosen course of study; recommending the university; and continuing at a higher level of study. The data were captured and analysed using the qualitative critical incident technique to capture the voice of the student and identified the critical determinants of quality within higher education, i.e. those areas that would influence loyalty behaviour, as being Access; Attentiveness; Availability; and Communication. A number of new determinants of quality have been identified out of the research by three independent judges, namely motivation, reward, social inclusion, usefulness, value for money and fellow student behaviour.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03075079.2013.842217</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0307-5079 |
ispartof | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2015-02, Vol.40 (2), p.329-349 |
issn | 0307-5079 1470-174X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_03075079_2013_842217 |
source | Education Source (EBSCOhost) |
subjects | Academic Persistence Business Administration Education Business schools critical incident technique Critical Incidents Method Determinants Educational Attitudes Educational Quality Educational services Foreign Countries Higher education Loyalty Qualitative Research Quality of service Questionnaires Satisfaction service quality Social integration Statistical Analysis Student Attitudes Student behavior Student Experience Students Undergraduate Students United Kingdom |
title | Understanding student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: an interpretive study in the UK higher education context |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A07%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20student%20satisfaction%20and%20dissatisfaction:%20an%20interpretive%20study%20in%20the%20UK%20higher%20education%20context&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20higher%20education%20(Dorchester-on-Thames)&rft.au=Douglas,%20Jacqueline%20Ann&rft.date=2015-02-07&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=329-349&rft.issn=0307-5079&rft.eissn=1470-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03075079.2013.842217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1648073971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1651607472&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1048388&rfr_iscdi=true |