South Africa in Transition - Introduction
In their editorial introduction to the special edition of JSAS commemorating a decade of democracy in South Africa (JSAS, 31, 4 [2005]), Beall, Gelb and Hassim use the phrase ‘fragile stability’ to describe the state of the post-apartheid order. Reading further, it would be fair to say that they inv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of southern African studies 2016-01, Vol.42 (1), p.1-3 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of southern African studies |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Robinson, Jason Steinberg, Jonny Simon, David |
description | In their editorial introduction to the special edition of JSAS commemorating a decade of democracy in South Africa (JSAS, 31, 4 [2005]), Beall, Gelb and Hassim use the phrase ‘fragile stability’ to describe the state of the post-apartheid order. Reading further, it would be fair to say that they invest more faith in the ‘stability’ side of this duo than in the ‘fragile’ side. While they signal that ‘immense social problems … remain a threat to social order’, they none the less diagnose the foundations of South Africa’s democratic order to be fairly secure. ‘The non-racial regime is fully accepted as legitimate’, they write. Moreover, ‘state authority and capacity have been regenerated from a position of severe weakness at the time of the transition to a situation today where it has substantial capabilities in exercising basic functions such as policing, border control and taxation’ (p. 681). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03057070.2016.1134136 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_03057070_2016_1134136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3983924031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-78cc30c4ec6ece6a2b4a6fbb6d1209cde857488adceccada4b5ce5bce8e312023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_ghDw5CF1NvuZm6VYLRQ8WM_LZrLBLW227iZI_70JrVdPw8DzzsdDyD2FGQUNT8BAKFAwK4DKGaWMUyYvyIRyKXKmS3ZJJiOTj9A1uUlpCwCl4HxCHj9C331l8yZ6tJlvs020bfKdD22WZ6u2i6HucWxvyVVjd8ndneuUfC5fNou3fP3-ulrM1zkyLbpcaUQGyB1Kh07aouJWNlUla1pAibXTQnGtbY0O0daWVwKdqNBpxwaiYFPycJp7iOG7d6kz29DHdlhpqFKFVuVw-UCJE4UxpBRdYw7R7208GgpmtGL-rJjRijlbGXLPp5xvmxD39ifEXW06e9yF2Ayvo0-G_T_iF0mxaHk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772879954</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>South Africa in Transition - Introduction</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Robinson, Jason ; Steinberg, Jonny ; Simon, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Jason ; Steinberg, Jonny ; Simon, David</creatorcontrib><description>In their editorial introduction to the special edition of JSAS commemorating a decade of democracy in South Africa (JSAS, 31, 4 [2005]), Beall, Gelb and Hassim use the phrase ‘fragile stability’ to describe the state of the post-apartheid order. Reading further, it would be fair to say that they invest more faith in the ‘stability’ side of this duo than in the ‘fragile’ side. While they signal that ‘immense social problems … remain a threat to social order’, they none the less diagnose the foundations of South Africa’s democratic order to be fairly secure. ‘The non-racial regime is fully accepted as legitimate’, they write. Moreover, ‘state authority and capacity have been regenerated from a position of severe weakness at the time of the transition to a situation today where it has substantial capabilities in exercising basic functions such as policing, border control and taxation’ (p. 681).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2016.1134136</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSASDC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Routledge</publisher><subject>Democracy ; History ; Political systems ; Politics ; Post-apartheid era ; Social conditions & trends ; Social problems</subject><ispartof>Journal of southern African studies, 2016-01, Vol.42 (1), p.1-3</ispartof><rights>2016 The Editorial Board of the Journal of Southern African Studies 2016</rights><rights>2016 The Editorial Board of the Journal of Southern African Studies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-78cc30c4ec6ece6a2b4a6fbb6d1209cde857488adceccada4b5ce5bce8e312023</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Jonny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, David</creatorcontrib><title>South Africa in Transition - Introduction</title><title>Journal of southern African studies</title><description>In their editorial introduction to the special edition of JSAS commemorating a decade of democracy in South Africa (JSAS, 31, 4 [2005]), Beall, Gelb and Hassim use the phrase ‘fragile stability’ to describe the state of the post-apartheid order. Reading further, it would be fair to say that they invest more faith in the ‘stability’ side of this duo than in the ‘fragile’ side. While they signal that ‘immense social problems … remain a threat to social order’, they none the less diagnose the foundations of South Africa’s democratic order to be fairly secure. ‘The non-racial regime is fully accepted as legitimate’, they write. Moreover, ‘state authority and capacity have been regenerated from a position of severe weakness at the time of the transition to a situation today where it has substantial capabilities in exercising basic functions such as policing, border control and taxation’ (p. 681).</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Post-apartheid era</subject><subject>Social conditions & trends</subject><subject>Social problems</subject><issn>0305-7070</issn><issn>1465-3893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_ghDw5CF1NvuZm6VYLRQ8WM_LZrLBLW227iZI_70JrVdPw8DzzsdDyD2FGQUNT8BAKFAwK4DKGaWMUyYvyIRyKXKmS3ZJJiOTj9A1uUlpCwCl4HxCHj9C331l8yZ6tJlvs020bfKdD22WZ6u2i6HucWxvyVVjd8ndneuUfC5fNou3fP3-ulrM1zkyLbpcaUQGyB1Kh07aouJWNlUla1pAibXTQnGtbY0O0daWVwKdqNBpxwaiYFPycJp7iOG7d6kz29DHdlhpqFKFVuVw-UCJE4UxpBRdYw7R7208GgpmtGL-rJjRijlbGXLPp5xvmxD39ifEXW06e9yF2Ayvo0-G_T_iF0mxaHk</recordid><startdate>20160102</startdate><enddate>20160102</enddate><creator>Robinson, Jason</creator><creator>Steinberg, Jonny</creator><creator>Simon, David</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160102</creationdate><title>South Africa in Transition - Introduction</title><author>Robinson, Jason ; Steinberg, Jonny ; Simon, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-78cc30c4ec6ece6a2b4a6fbb6d1209cde857488adceccada4b5ce5bce8e312023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Post-apartheid era</topic><topic>Social conditions & trends</topic><topic>Social problems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Jonny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of southern African studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robinson, Jason</au><au>Steinberg, Jonny</au><au>Simon, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>South Africa in Transition - Introduction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of southern African studies</jtitle><date>2016-01-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>3</epage><pages>1-3</pages><issn>0305-7070</issn><eissn>1465-3893</eissn><coden>JSASDC</coden><abstract>In their editorial introduction to the special edition of JSAS commemorating a decade of democracy in South Africa (JSAS, 31, 4 [2005]), Beall, Gelb and Hassim use the phrase ‘fragile stability’ to describe the state of the post-apartheid order. Reading further, it would be fair to say that they invest more faith in the ‘stability’ side of this duo than in the ‘fragile’ side. While they signal that ‘immense social problems … remain a threat to social order’, they none the less diagnose the foundations of South Africa’s democratic order to be fairly secure. ‘The non-racial regime is fully accepted as legitimate’, they write. Moreover, ‘state authority and capacity have been regenerated from a position of severe weakness at the time of the transition to a situation today where it has substantial capabilities in exercising basic functions such as policing, border control and taxation’ (p. 681).</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03057070.2016.1134136</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-7070 |
ispartof | Journal of southern African studies, 2016-01, Vol.42 (1), p.1-3 |
issn | 0305-7070 1465-3893 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_03057070_2016_1134136 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Political Science Complete |
subjects | Democracy History Political systems Politics Post-apartheid era Social conditions & trends Social problems |
title | South Africa in Transition - Introduction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T11%3A24%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=South%20Africa%20in%20Transition%20-%20Introduction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20southern%20African%20studies&rft.au=Robinson,%20Jason&rft.date=2016-01-02&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=3&rft.pages=1-3&rft.issn=0305-7070&rft.eissn=1465-3893&rft.coden=JSASDC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03057070.2016.1134136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3983924031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772879954&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |