Impact of new cancer medicine - real-world evidence from Danish register study of lung cancer patients

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Several new treatments have become available in recent decades, but little research exists on the impact of these on productivity, early retirement and survival for LC patients and their spouses. This study evaluates the effect of new...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta oncologica 2023-03, Vol.62 (3), p.253-260
Hauptverfasser: Rudolfsen, Jan H., Hjortsø, Mads D., Pedersen, Mikkel H., Pilgaard, Trine, Pøhl, Mette
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Several new treatments have become available in recent decades, but little research exists on the impact of these on productivity, early retirement and survival for LC patients and their spouses. This study evaluates the effect of new medicines on productivity, early retirement and survival for LC patients and their spouses. Data from the period 1 January 2004-31 December 2018 were collected from complete Danish registers. LC cases diagnosed before approval of first targeted therapy (19 June 2006, Before patients) were compared with those who received at least one new cancer treatment, diagnosed after this date (After patients). Subgroup analyses based on cancer stage, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation were conducted. Linear regression and cox regression were used to estimate the outcomes including productivity, unemployment, early retirement, and mortality. Spouses of Before and After patients were compared on earnings, sick leave, early retirement, and healthcare utilisation. The study population comprised of 4,350 patient (2,175 After/2,175 Before). Patients who received new treatments had a significantly reduced risk of death (Hazard ratio = 0.76, Confidence interval: 0.71 − 0.82) and reduced risk of early retirement (Hazard ratio: 0.54, Confidence interval: 0.38 − 0.79). No significant differences in earnings, unemployment, or sick leave were found. Spouses of Before patients had a higher cost of healthcare services after diagnosis compared to spouses of After patients. For productivity, early retirement and sick leave, no significant differences were found between the spouse groups. Patients who received innovative new treatments had reduced risk of death and reduced risk of early retirement. Spouses of LC patients who received new treatments had lower healthcare costs in the years following diagnosis. All findings indicate that recipients of new treatments had reduced burden of illness.
ISSN:0284-186X
1651-226X
DOI:10.1080/0284186X.2023.2185104