Characterization of light-absorbing aerosols from a laboratory combustion source with two different photoacoustic techniques

In this study, we characterized a variety of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols generated from a controlled combustion system using two different photoacoustic measurement techniques: the RGB-DPAS instrument operating at 671, 532, and 473 nm with a single optical pass configuration; and the Multi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aerosol science and technology 2021-04, Vol.55 (4), p.387-397
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Zhenhong, Cheng, Zezhen, Magoon, Gregory R., Hajj, Omar El, Saleh, Rawad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 397
container_issue 4
container_start_page 387
container_title Aerosol science and technology
container_volume 55
creator Yu, Zhenhong
Cheng, Zezhen
Magoon, Gregory R.
Hajj, Omar El
Saleh, Rawad
description In this study, we characterized a variety of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols generated from a controlled combustion system using two different photoacoustic measurement techniques: the RGB-DPAS instrument operating at 671, 532, and 473 nm with a single optical pass configuration; and the Multi-PAS III instrument operating at 781, 532, and 422 nm with a multiple optical pass configuration. We calibrated the two instruments using Cab-O-Jet aerosols. The two instruments measured similar absorption coefficients at 532 nm for both brown carbon (BrC) and black carbon (BC) aerosols. The linear fit between the determined aerosol absorption coefficients from the two instruments yielded a linear factor of 1.005 ± 0.029, with a correlation coefficient R 2  = 0.94. The absorption Ångström exponents (AAE), ranging from 1 to 10, measured by the two instruments also agreed well, with a resulting linear fitting factor of 1.021 ± 0.038 and R 2  = 0.92. These results indicate that although the two instruments have significant differences in the acoustic resonator design and optical length within the sample cells, the determined optical properties for BrC and black BC aerosols were nearly identical. We also investigated the effect of difference in calibration scheme on PAS measurements. In addition to Cab-O-Jet, the Multi-PAS III was also calibrated using NO 2 . We found that NO 2 calibration resulted in 24% lower photoacoustic signal response at 532 nm than Cab-O-Jet calibration. The AAE values obtained with NO 2 calibration were 16% smaller than with Cab-O-Jet calibration for BC-dominated aerosols (AAE < 2). However, the difference in AAE decreased with increasing AAE, and the two calibrations yielded almost identical AAE values for AAE > 7.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02786826.2020.1849537
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02786826_2020_1849537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2494716891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b0f8752b01f33240d7276fe452988e804a3e33b9ca1da3fdd9c59a1a3a441c573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9r3DAQxUVJoZs0H6EgyNmp_tgr-dawJGkg0Et7FmNZihW8nu1Iy7IhHz52N7n2NDD83nszj7FvUlxLYcV3oYxdW7W-VkLNK1u3jTaf2Eo2SlZGW3vGVgtTLdAXdp7zsxBCGiVX7HUzAIEvgdILlIQTx8jH9DSUCrqM1KXpiUMgzDhmHgm3HPgIHRIUpCP3uO32-Z8w45584IdUBl4OyPsUY6AwFb4bsCB4XEDPS_DDlP7uQ_7KPkcYc7h8nxfsz93t783P6vHX_cPm5rHyWttSdSJa06hOyKi1qkVvlFnHUDeqtTZYUYMOWnetB9mDjn3f-qYFCRrqWvrG6At2dfLdES65xT3Pt05zpFN1Wxu5tq2cqeZE-fnbTCG6HaUt0NFJ4Zai3UfRbinavRc9636cdGmKSFs4II29K3AckSLB5FN2-v8Wb_PSiAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2494716891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of light-absorbing aerosols from a laboratory combustion source with two different photoacoustic techniques</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Yu, Zhenhong ; Cheng, Zezhen ; Magoon, Gregory R. ; Hajj, Omar El ; Saleh, Rawad</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhenhong ; Cheng, Zezhen ; Magoon, Gregory R. ; Hajj, Omar El ; Saleh, Rawad</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we characterized a variety of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols generated from a controlled combustion system using two different photoacoustic measurement techniques: the RGB-DPAS instrument operating at 671, 532, and 473 nm with a single optical pass configuration; and the Multi-PAS III instrument operating at 781, 532, and 422 nm with a multiple optical pass configuration. We calibrated the two instruments using Cab-O-Jet aerosols. The two instruments measured similar absorption coefficients at 532 nm for both brown carbon (BrC) and black carbon (BC) aerosols. The linear fit between the determined aerosol absorption coefficients from the two instruments yielded a linear factor of 1.005 ± 0.029, with a correlation coefficient R 2  = 0.94. The absorption Ångström exponents (AAE), ranging from 1 to 10, measured by the two instruments also agreed well, with a resulting linear fitting factor of 1.021 ± 0.038 and R 2  = 0.92. These results indicate that although the two instruments have significant differences in the acoustic resonator design and optical length within the sample cells, the determined optical properties for BrC and black BC aerosols were nearly identical. We also investigated the effect of difference in calibration scheme on PAS measurements. In addition to Cab-O-Jet, the Multi-PAS III was also calibrated using NO 2 . We found that NO 2 calibration resulted in 24% lower photoacoustic signal response at 532 nm than Cab-O-Jet calibration. The AAE values obtained with NO 2 calibration were 16% smaller than with Cab-O-Jet calibration for BC-dominated aerosols (AAE &lt; 2). However, the difference in AAE decreased with increasing AAE, and the two calibrations yielded almost identical AAE values for AAE &gt; 7.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6826</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-7388</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2020.1849537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Absorption ; Absorption coefficient ; Absorptivity ; Aerosol absorption ; Aerosol light absorption ; Aerosols ; Black carbon ; Calibration ; Carbon ; Carbon aerosols ; Combustion ; Configurations ; Control equipment ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Electromagnetic absorption ; Hans Moosmüller ; Measurement techniques ; Nitrogen dioxide ; Optical properties</subject><ispartof>Aerosol science and technology, 2021-04, Vol.55 (4), p.387-397</ispartof><rights>2020 Aerodyne Research, Inc 2020</rights><rights>2020 Aerodyne Research, Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b0f8752b01f33240d7276fe452988e804a3e33b9ca1da3fdd9c59a1a3a441c573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b0f8752b01f33240d7276fe452988e804a3e33b9ca1da3fdd9c59a1a3a441c573</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4951-7962 ; 0000-0001-6320-4519 ; 0000-0002-5843-8406</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhenhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Zezhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magoon, Gregory R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hajj, Omar El</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Rawad</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of light-absorbing aerosols from a laboratory combustion source with two different photoacoustic techniques</title><title>Aerosol science and technology</title><description>In this study, we characterized a variety of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols generated from a controlled combustion system using two different photoacoustic measurement techniques: the RGB-DPAS instrument operating at 671, 532, and 473 nm with a single optical pass configuration; and the Multi-PAS III instrument operating at 781, 532, and 422 nm with a multiple optical pass configuration. We calibrated the two instruments using Cab-O-Jet aerosols. The two instruments measured similar absorption coefficients at 532 nm for both brown carbon (BrC) and black carbon (BC) aerosols. The linear fit between the determined aerosol absorption coefficients from the two instruments yielded a linear factor of 1.005 ± 0.029, with a correlation coefficient R 2  = 0.94. The absorption Ångström exponents (AAE), ranging from 1 to 10, measured by the two instruments also agreed well, with a resulting linear fitting factor of 1.021 ± 0.038 and R 2  = 0.92. These results indicate that although the two instruments have significant differences in the acoustic resonator design and optical length within the sample cells, the determined optical properties for BrC and black BC aerosols were nearly identical. We also investigated the effect of difference in calibration scheme on PAS measurements. In addition to Cab-O-Jet, the Multi-PAS III was also calibrated using NO 2 . We found that NO 2 calibration resulted in 24% lower photoacoustic signal response at 532 nm than Cab-O-Jet calibration. The AAE values obtained with NO 2 calibration were 16% smaller than with Cab-O-Jet calibration for BC-dominated aerosols (AAE &lt; 2). However, the difference in AAE decreased with increasing AAE, and the two calibrations yielded almost identical AAE values for AAE &gt; 7.</description><subject>Absorption</subject><subject>Absorption coefficient</subject><subject>Absorptivity</subject><subject>Aerosol absorption</subject><subject>Aerosol light absorption</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Black carbon</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon aerosols</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Control equipment</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Electromagnetic absorption</subject><subject>Hans Moosmüller</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Nitrogen dioxide</subject><subject>Optical properties</subject><issn>0278-6826</issn><issn>1521-7388</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9r3DAQxUVJoZs0H6EgyNmp_tgr-dawJGkg0Et7FmNZihW8nu1Iy7IhHz52N7n2NDD83nszj7FvUlxLYcV3oYxdW7W-VkLNK1u3jTaf2Eo2SlZGW3vGVgtTLdAXdp7zsxBCGiVX7HUzAIEvgdILlIQTx8jH9DSUCrqM1KXpiUMgzDhmHgm3HPgIHRIUpCP3uO32-Z8w45584IdUBl4OyPsUY6AwFb4bsCB4XEDPS_DDlP7uQ_7KPkcYc7h8nxfsz93t783P6vHX_cPm5rHyWttSdSJa06hOyKi1qkVvlFnHUDeqtTZYUYMOWnetB9mDjn3f-qYFCRrqWvrG6At2dfLdES65xT3Pt05zpFN1Wxu5tq2cqeZE-fnbTCG6HaUt0NFJ4Zai3UfRbinavRc9636cdGmKSFs4II29K3AckSLB5FN2-v8Wb_PSiAI</recordid><startdate>20210403</startdate><enddate>20210403</enddate><creator>Yu, Zhenhong</creator><creator>Cheng, Zezhen</creator><creator>Magoon, Gregory R.</creator><creator>Hajj, Omar El</creator><creator>Saleh, Rawad</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KL.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-7962</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6320-4519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5843-8406</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210403</creationdate><title>Characterization of light-absorbing aerosols from a laboratory combustion source with two different photoacoustic techniques</title><author>Yu, Zhenhong ; Cheng, Zezhen ; Magoon, Gregory R. ; Hajj, Omar El ; Saleh, Rawad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b0f8752b01f33240d7276fe452988e804a3e33b9ca1da3fdd9c59a1a3a441c573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Absorption</topic><topic>Absorption coefficient</topic><topic>Absorptivity</topic><topic>Aerosol absorption</topic><topic>Aerosol light absorption</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Black carbon</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon aerosols</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Control equipment</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Electromagnetic absorption</topic><topic>Hans Moosmüller</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Nitrogen dioxide</topic><topic>Optical properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhenhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Zezhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magoon, Gregory R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hajj, Omar El</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Rawad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aerosol science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Zhenhong</au><au>Cheng, Zezhen</au><au>Magoon, Gregory R.</au><au>Hajj, Omar El</au><au>Saleh, Rawad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of light-absorbing aerosols from a laboratory combustion source with two different photoacoustic techniques</atitle><jtitle>Aerosol science and technology</jtitle><date>2021-04-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>397</epage><pages>387-397</pages><issn>0278-6826</issn><eissn>1521-7388</eissn><abstract>In this study, we characterized a variety of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols generated from a controlled combustion system using two different photoacoustic measurement techniques: the RGB-DPAS instrument operating at 671, 532, and 473 nm with a single optical pass configuration; and the Multi-PAS III instrument operating at 781, 532, and 422 nm with a multiple optical pass configuration. We calibrated the two instruments using Cab-O-Jet aerosols. The two instruments measured similar absorption coefficients at 532 nm for both brown carbon (BrC) and black carbon (BC) aerosols. The linear fit between the determined aerosol absorption coefficients from the two instruments yielded a linear factor of 1.005 ± 0.029, with a correlation coefficient R 2  = 0.94. The absorption Ångström exponents (AAE), ranging from 1 to 10, measured by the two instruments also agreed well, with a resulting linear fitting factor of 1.021 ± 0.038 and R 2  = 0.92. These results indicate that although the two instruments have significant differences in the acoustic resonator design and optical length within the sample cells, the determined optical properties for BrC and black BC aerosols were nearly identical. We also investigated the effect of difference in calibration scheme on PAS measurements. In addition to Cab-O-Jet, the Multi-PAS III was also calibrated using NO 2 . We found that NO 2 calibration resulted in 24% lower photoacoustic signal response at 532 nm than Cab-O-Jet calibration. The AAE values obtained with NO 2 calibration were 16% smaller than with Cab-O-Jet calibration for BC-dominated aerosols (AAE &lt; 2). However, the difference in AAE decreased with increasing AAE, and the two calibrations yielded almost identical AAE values for AAE &gt; 7.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/02786826.2020.1849537</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-7962</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6320-4519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5843-8406</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-6826
ispartof Aerosol science and technology, 2021-04, Vol.55 (4), p.387-397
issn 0278-6826
1521-7388
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02786826_2020_1849537
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Absorption
Absorption coefficient
Absorptivity
Aerosol absorption
Aerosol light absorption
Aerosols
Black carbon
Calibration
Carbon
Carbon aerosols
Combustion
Configurations
Control equipment
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Electromagnetic absorption
Hans Moosmüller
Measurement techniques
Nitrogen dioxide
Optical properties
title Characterization of light-absorbing aerosols from a laboratory combustion source with two different photoacoustic techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T22%3A47%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20light-absorbing%20aerosols%20from%20a%20laboratory%20combustion%20source%20with%20two%20different%20photoacoustic%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Aerosol%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Yu,%20Zhenhong&rft.date=2021-04-03&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=397&rft.pages=387-397&rft.issn=0278-6826&rft.eissn=1521-7388&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02786826.2020.1849537&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2494716891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2494716891&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true