Distinctions between emotion and mood
Most academics agree that emotions and moods are related but distinct phenomena. The present study assessed emotion-mood distinctions among a non-academic population and compared these views with distinctions proposed in the literature. Content analysis of responses from 106 participants identified...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cognition and emotion 2005-09, Vol.19 (6), p.847-878 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 878 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 847 |
container_title | Cognition and emotion |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Beedie, Christopher Terry, Peter Lane, Andrew |
description | Most academics agree that emotions and moods are related but distinct phenomena. The present study assessed emotion-mood distinctions among a non-academic population and compared these views with distinctions proposed in the literature. Content analysis of responses from 106 participants identified 16 themes, with cause (65% of respondents), duration (40%), control (25%), experience (15%), and consequences (14%) the most frequently cited distinctions. Among 65 contributions to the academic literature, eight themes were proposed, with duration (62% of authors), intentionality (41%), cause (31percnt;), consequences (31%), and function (18%) the most frequently cited. When the eight themes cited by both academics and non-academics were rank ordered, approximately 60% overlap in opinion was evident. A data-derived summary of emotion-mood distinctions is provided. These data should prove useful to investigators interested in developing a clearer scientific distinction between emotion and mood than is currently available. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02699930541000057 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02699930541000057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57091468</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c4f16f83ec49700d049aacbb52aec8dc7b7f466085345de9be165e23b4042f8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNte6m11svnaBS9SP6HgRc8hm00gsrupSUrtvzelFQ9FzGECmed5mQxClxiuMdRwAxVvmoYAoxjyYeIITTDltAQOcIwm236ZAXyKzmL8yAglFCZodu9icqNOzo-xaE1aGzMWZvDbh0KNXTF4352jE6v6aC729xS9Pz68zZ_LxevTy_xuUWrKIOVqMbc1MZo2AqAD2iil25ZVyui606IVlnIONSOUdaZpDebMVKSlQCtbKzJFV7vcZfCfKxOTHFzUpu_VaPwqSiagyb-qM4h3oA4-xmCsXAY3qLCRGOR2IfJgIdmZ7cNV1Kq3QY3axV9RVDiHV5kTO86N1odBrX3oO5nUpvfhRzpIl-krZfP2X5P8PeA3Se6D9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57091468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distinctions between emotion and mood</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Beedie, Christopher ; Terry, Peter ; Lane, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Beedie, Christopher ; Terry, Peter ; Lane, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Most academics agree that emotions and moods are related but distinct phenomena. The present study assessed emotion-mood distinctions among a non-academic population and compared these views with distinctions proposed in the literature. Content analysis of responses from 106 participants identified 16 themes, with cause (65% of respondents), duration (40%), control (25%), experience (15%), and consequences (14%) the most frequently cited distinctions. Among 65 contributions to the academic literature, eight themes were proposed, with duration (62% of authors), intentionality (41%), cause (31percnt;), consequences (31%), and function (18%) the most frequently cited. When the eight themes cited by both academics and non-academics were rank ordered, approximately 60% overlap in opinion was evident. A data-derived summary of emotion-mood distinctions is provided. These data should prove useful to investigators interested in developing a clearer scientific distinction between emotion and mood than is currently available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0600</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02699930541000057</identifier><identifier>CODEN: COEMEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hove: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Affectivity. Emotion ; Biological and medical sciences ; Causes ; Differentiation ; Duration ; Emotions ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Moods ; Personality. Affectivity ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>Cognition and emotion, 2005-09, Vol.19 (6), p.847-878</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis 2005</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c4f16f83ec49700d049aacbb52aec8dc7b7f466085345de9be165e23b4042f8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c4f16f83ec49700d049aacbb52aec8dc7b7f466085345de9be165e23b4042f8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17219142$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beedie, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terry, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Distinctions between emotion and mood</title><title>Cognition and emotion</title><description>Most academics agree that emotions and moods are related but distinct phenomena. The present study assessed emotion-mood distinctions among a non-academic population and compared these views with distinctions proposed in the literature. Content analysis of responses from 106 participants identified 16 themes, with cause (65% of respondents), duration (40%), control (25%), experience (15%), and consequences (14%) the most frequently cited distinctions. Among 65 contributions to the academic literature, eight themes were proposed, with duration (62% of authors), intentionality (41%), cause (31percnt;), consequences (31%), and function (18%) the most frequently cited. When the eight themes cited by both academics and non-academics were rank ordered, approximately 60% overlap in opinion was evident. A data-derived summary of emotion-mood distinctions is provided. These data should prove useful to investigators interested in developing a clearer scientific distinction between emotion and mood than is currently available.</description><subject>Affectivity. Emotion</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Causes</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Duration</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Moods</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0269-9931</issn><issn>1464-0600</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNte6m11svnaBS9SP6HgRc8hm00gsrupSUrtvzelFQ9FzGECmed5mQxClxiuMdRwAxVvmoYAoxjyYeIITTDltAQOcIwm236ZAXyKzmL8yAglFCZodu9icqNOzo-xaE1aGzMWZvDbh0KNXTF4352jE6v6aC729xS9Pz68zZ_LxevTy_xuUWrKIOVqMbc1MZo2AqAD2iil25ZVyui606IVlnIONSOUdaZpDebMVKSlQCtbKzJFV7vcZfCfKxOTHFzUpu_VaPwqSiagyb-qM4h3oA4-xmCsXAY3qLCRGOR2IfJgIdmZ7cNV1Kq3QY3axV9RVDiHV5kTO86N1odBrX3oO5nUpvfhRzpIl-krZfP2X5P8PeA3Se6D9A</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>Beedie, Christopher</creator><creator>Terry, Peter</creator><creator>Lane, Andrew</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Psychology Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Distinctions between emotion and mood</title><author>Beedie, Christopher ; Terry, Peter ; Lane, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c4f16f83ec49700d049aacbb52aec8dc7b7f466085345de9be165e23b4042f8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Affectivity. Emotion</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Causes</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Duration</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Moods</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beedie, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terry, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beedie, Christopher</au><au>Terry, Peter</au><au>Lane, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distinctions between emotion and mood</atitle><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>847</spage><epage>878</epage><pages>847-878</pages><issn>0269-9931</issn><eissn>1464-0600</eissn><coden>COEMEC</coden><abstract>Most academics agree that emotions and moods are related but distinct phenomena. The present study assessed emotion-mood distinctions among a non-academic population and compared these views with distinctions proposed in the literature. Content analysis of responses from 106 participants identified 16 themes, with cause (65% of respondents), duration (40%), control (25%), experience (15%), and consequences (14%) the most frequently cited distinctions. Among 65 contributions to the academic literature, eight themes were proposed, with duration (62% of authors), intentionality (41%), cause (31percnt;), consequences (31%), and function (18%) the most frequently cited. When the eight themes cited by both academics and non-academics were rank ordered, approximately 60% overlap in opinion was evident. A data-derived summary of emotion-mood distinctions is provided. These data should prove useful to investigators interested in developing a clearer scientific distinction between emotion and mood than is currently available.</abstract><cop>Hove</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/02699930541000057</doi><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-9931 |
ispartof | Cognition and emotion, 2005-09, Vol.19 (6), p.847-878 |
issn | 0269-9931 1464-0600 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02699930541000057 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Affectivity. Emotion Biological and medical sciences Causes Differentiation Duration Emotions Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Moods Personality. Affectivity Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology |
title | Distinctions between emotion and mood |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A59%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distinctions%20between%20emotion%20and%20mood&rft.jtitle=Cognition%20and%20emotion&rft.au=Beedie,%20Christopher&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=847&rft.epage=878&rft.pages=847-878&rft.issn=0269-9931&rft.eissn=1464-0600&rft.coden=COEMEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02699930541000057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57091468%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57091468&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |