Distinctions between emotion and mood

Most academics agree that emotions and moods are related but distinct phenomena. The present study assessed emotion-mood distinctions among a non-academic population and compared these views with distinctions proposed in the literature. Content analysis of responses from 106 participants identified...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cognition and emotion 2005-09, Vol.19 (6), p.847-878
Hauptverfasser: Beedie, Christopher, Terry, Peter, Lane, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 878
container_issue 6
container_start_page 847
container_title Cognition and emotion
container_volume 19
creator Beedie, Christopher
Terry, Peter
Lane, Andrew
description Most academics agree that emotions and moods are related but distinct phenomena. The present study assessed emotion-mood distinctions among a non-academic population and compared these views with distinctions proposed in the literature. Content analysis of responses from 106 participants identified 16 themes, with cause (65% of respondents), duration (40%), control (25%), experience (15%), and consequences (14%) the most frequently cited distinctions. Among 65 contributions to the academic literature, eight themes were proposed, with duration (62% of authors), intentionality (41%), cause (31percnt;), consequences (31%), and function (18%) the most frequently cited. When the eight themes cited by both academics and non-academics were rank ordered, approximately 60% overlap in opinion was evident. A data-derived summary of emotion-mood distinctions is provided. These data should prove useful to investigators interested in developing a clearer scientific distinction between emotion and mood than is currently available.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02699930541000057
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02699930541000057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57091468</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c4f16f83ec49700d049aacbb52aec8dc7b7f466085345de9be165e23b4042f8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNte6m11svnaBS9SP6HgRc8hm00gsrupSUrtvzelFQ9FzGECmed5mQxClxiuMdRwAxVvmoYAoxjyYeIITTDltAQOcIwm236ZAXyKzmL8yAglFCZodu9icqNOzo-xaE1aGzMWZvDbh0KNXTF4352jE6v6aC729xS9Pz68zZ_LxevTy_xuUWrKIOVqMbc1MZo2AqAD2iil25ZVyui606IVlnIONSOUdaZpDebMVKSlQCtbKzJFV7vcZfCfKxOTHFzUpu_VaPwqSiagyb-qM4h3oA4-xmCsXAY3qLCRGOR2IfJgIdmZ7cNV1Kq3QY3axV9RVDiHV5kTO86N1odBrX3oO5nUpvfhRzpIl-krZfP2X5P8PeA3Se6D9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57091468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distinctions between emotion and mood</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Beedie, Christopher ; Terry, Peter ; Lane, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Beedie, Christopher ; Terry, Peter ; Lane, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Most academics agree that emotions and moods are related but distinct phenomena. The present study assessed emotion-mood distinctions among a non-academic population and compared these views with distinctions proposed in the literature. Content analysis of responses from 106 participants identified 16 themes, with cause (65% of respondents), duration (40%), control (25%), experience (15%), and consequences (14%) the most frequently cited distinctions. Among 65 contributions to the academic literature, eight themes were proposed, with duration (62% of authors), intentionality (41%), cause (31percnt;), consequences (31%), and function (18%) the most frequently cited. When the eight themes cited by both academics and non-academics were rank ordered, approximately 60% overlap in opinion was evident. A data-derived summary of emotion-mood distinctions is provided. These data should prove useful to investigators interested in developing a clearer scientific distinction between emotion and mood than is currently available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0600</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02699930541000057</identifier><identifier>CODEN: COEMEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hove: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Affectivity. Emotion ; Biological and medical sciences ; Causes ; Differentiation ; Duration ; Emotions ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Moods ; Personality. Affectivity ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>Cognition and emotion, 2005-09, Vol.19 (6), p.847-878</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis 2005</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c4f16f83ec49700d049aacbb52aec8dc7b7f466085345de9be165e23b4042f8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c4f16f83ec49700d049aacbb52aec8dc7b7f466085345de9be165e23b4042f8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17219142$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beedie, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terry, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Distinctions between emotion and mood</title><title>Cognition and emotion</title><description>Most academics agree that emotions and moods are related but distinct phenomena. The present study assessed emotion-mood distinctions among a non-academic population and compared these views with distinctions proposed in the literature. Content analysis of responses from 106 participants identified 16 themes, with cause (65% of respondents), duration (40%), control (25%), experience (15%), and consequences (14%) the most frequently cited distinctions. Among 65 contributions to the academic literature, eight themes were proposed, with duration (62% of authors), intentionality (41%), cause (31percnt;), consequences (31%), and function (18%) the most frequently cited. When the eight themes cited by both academics and non-academics were rank ordered, approximately 60% overlap in opinion was evident. A data-derived summary of emotion-mood distinctions is provided. These data should prove useful to investigators interested in developing a clearer scientific distinction between emotion and mood than is currently available.</description><subject>Affectivity. Emotion</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Causes</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Duration</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Moods</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0269-9931</issn><issn>1464-0600</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNte6m11svnaBS9SP6HgRc8hm00gsrupSUrtvzelFQ9FzGECmed5mQxClxiuMdRwAxVvmoYAoxjyYeIITTDltAQOcIwm236ZAXyKzmL8yAglFCZodu9icqNOzo-xaE1aGzMWZvDbh0KNXTF4352jE6v6aC729xS9Pz68zZ_LxevTy_xuUWrKIOVqMbc1MZo2AqAD2iil25ZVyui606IVlnIONSOUdaZpDebMVKSlQCtbKzJFV7vcZfCfKxOTHFzUpu_VaPwqSiagyb-qM4h3oA4-xmCsXAY3qLCRGOR2IfJgIdmZ7cNV1Kq3QY3axV9RVDiHV5kTO86N1odBrX3oO5nUpvfhRzpIl-krZfP2X5P8PeA3Se6D9A</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>Beedie, Christopher</creator><creator>Terry, Peter</creator><creator>Lane, Andrew</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Psychology Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Distinctions between emotion and mood</title><author>Beedie, Christopher ; Terry, Peter ; Lane, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c4f16f83ec49700d049aacbb52aec8dc7b7f466085345de9be165e23b4042f8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Affectivity. Emotion</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Causes</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Duration</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Moods</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beedie, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terry, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beedie, Christopher</au><au>Terry, Peter</au><au>Lane, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distinctions between emotion and mood</atitle><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>847</spage><epage>878</epage><pages>847-878</pages><issn>0269-9931</issn><eissn>1464-0600</eissn><coden>COEMEC</coden><abstract>Most academics agree that emotions and moods are related but distinct phenomena. The present study assessed emotion-mood distinctions among a non-academic population and compared these views with distinctions proposed in the literature. Content analysis of responses from 106 participants identified 16 themes, with cause (65% of respondents), duration (40%), control (25%), experience (15%), and consequences (14%) the most frequently cited distinctions. Among 65 contributions to the academic literature, eight themes were proposed, with duration (62% of authors), intentionality (41%), cause (31percnt;), consequences (31%), and function (18%) the most frequently cited. When the eight themes cited by both academics and non-academics were rank ordered, approximately 60% overlap in opinion was evident. A data-derived summary of emotion-mood distinctions is provided. These data should prove useful to investigators interested in developing a clearer scientific distinction between emotion and mood than is currently available.</abstract><cop>Hove</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/02699930541000057</doi><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-9931
ispartof Cognition and emotion, 2005-09, Vol.19 (6), p.847-878
issn 0269-9931
1464-0600
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02699930541000057
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Affectivity. Emotion
Biological and medical sciences
Causes
Differentiation
Duration
Emotions
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Moods
Personality. Affectivity
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
title Distinctions between emotion and mood
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A59%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distinctions%20between%20emotion%20and%20mood&rft.jtitle=Cognition%20and%20emotion&rft.au=Beedie,%20Christopher&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=847&rft.epage=878&rft.pages=847-878&rft.issn=0269-9931&rft.eissn=1464-0600&rft.coden=COEMEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02699930541000057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57091468%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57091468&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true