Mental load and work stress as two types of energy mobilization

A conceptual framework is presented in which mental load and stress are regarded as two distinct biobehavioural states in the work environment that differ in energy mobilization, mood and coping strategy. The framework combines two types of theory that are based on human performance research using l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Work and stress 1994-04, Vol.8 (2), p.141-152
Hauptverfasser: Gaillard, A. W. K., Wientjes, C. J. E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 152
container_issue 2
container_start_page 141
container_title Work and stress
container_volume 8
creator Gaillard, A. W. K.
Wientjes, C. J. E.
description A conceptual framework is presented in which mental load and stress are regarded as two distinct biobehavioural states in the work environment that differ in energy mobilization, mood and coping strategy. The framework combines two types of theory that are based on human performance research using laboratory tasks on the one hand and applied research in the work environment on the other. A high workload is regarded as an important but not a critical factor in the development of stress symptoms. Even under unfavourable conditions it is possible to work intensively and to be highly activated without feelings of strain or psychosomatic complaints. In contrast, working conditions that provide few possibilities for control and little social support or are associated with reduced well-being and increased health risks. The two states differ in activation, coping style and mood. A proper distinction is important not only for theory building but also for the reconstruction of the work environment. It may lead to recommendations that aim to enhance the work efficiency of employees while reducing the probability that stress responses will occur.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02678379408259986
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02678379408259986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57532468</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-dfa0bc98c9db16eea46217007e373a7e35047d8c464c628f6110a005c3f48d013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKBDEQRYMoOD4-wF1W7lornWeDIDL4ghE3ug6ZdCKt6c6YZBjar7eHcSfipmpR5xaXg9AZgQsCCi6hFlJR2TBQNW8aJfbQjDDBKk4p30ez7b2aAHqIjnJ-BwDGGjJD109uKCbgEE2LzdDiTUwfOJfkcsYm47KJuIwrl3H02A0uvY24j8sudF-mdHE4QQfehOxOf_Yxer27fZk_VIvn-8f5zaKytaSlar2BpW2UbdolEc4ZJmoiAaSbKplpcmCyVXZqbEWtvCAEDAC31DPVAqHH6Hz3d5Xi59rlovsuWxeCGVxcZ80lpzUT6l-QCEFJQ_kEkh1oU8w5Oa9XqetNGjUBvXWqfzmdMle7TDf4mHozyQqtLmYMMflkBttlTf-OfwP033s1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16631935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mental load and work stress as two types of energy mobilization</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><creator>Gaillard, A. W. K. ; Wientjes, C. J. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaillard, A. W. K. ; Wientjes, C. J. E.</creatorcontrib><description>A conceptual framework is presented in which mental load and stress are regarded as two distinct biobehavioural states in the work environment that differ in energy mobilization, mood and coping strategy. The framework combines two types of theory that are based on human performance research using laboratory tasks on the one hand and applied research in the work environment on the other. A high workload is regarded as an important but not a critical factor in the development of stress symptoms. Even under unfavourable conditions it is possible to work intensively and to be highly activated without feelings of strain or psychosomatic complaints. In contrast, working conditions that provide few possibilities for control and little social support or are associated with reduced well-being and increased health risks. The two states differ in activation, coping style and mood. A proper distinction is important not only for theory building but also for the reconstruction of the work environment. It may lead to recommendations that aim to enhance the work efficiency of employees while reducing the probability that stress responses will occur.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-8373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5335</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02678379408259986</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WOSTEH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Health ; Mental fatigue ; Mental load ; Occupational stress ; Reactivity ; Relationship ; Work stress</subject><ispartof>Work and stress, 1994-04, Vol.8 (2), p.141-152</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-dfa0bc98c9db16eea46217007e373a7e35047d8c464c628f6110a005c3f48d013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-dfa0bc98c9db16eea46217007e373a7e35047d8c464c628f6110a005c3f48d013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02678379408259986$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02678379408259986$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,30983,59628,60417</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaillard, A. W. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wientjes, C. J. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Mental load and work stress as two types of energy mobilization</title><title>Work and stress</title><description>A conceptual framework is presented in which mental load and stress are regarded as two distinct biobehavioural states in the work environment that differ in energy mobilization, mood and coping strategy. The framework combines two types of theory that are based on human performance research using laboratory tasks on the one hand and applied research in the work environment on the other. A high workload is regarded as an important but not a critical factor in the development of stress symptoms. Even under unfavourable conditions it is possible to work intensively and to be highly activated without feelings of strain or psychosomatic complaints. In contrast, working conditions that provide few possibilities for control and little social support or are associated with reduced well-being and increased health risks. The two states differ in activation, coping style and mood. A proper distinction is important not only for theory building but also for the reconstruction of the work environment. It may lead to recommendations that aim to enhance the work efficiency of employees while reducing the probability that stress responses will occur.</description><subject>Health</subject><subject>Mental fatigue</subject><subject>Mental load</subject><subject>Occupational stress</subject><subject>Reactivity</subject><subject>Relationship</subject><subject>Work stress</subject><issn>0267-8373</issn><issn>1464-5335</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKBDEQRYMoOD4-wF1W7lornWeDIDL4ghE3ug6ZdCKt6c6YZBjar7eHcSfipmpR5xaXg9AZgQsCCi6hFlJR2TBQNW8aJfbQjDDBKk4p30ez7b2aAHqIjnJ-BwDGGjJD109uKCbgEE2LzdDiTUwfOJfkcsYm47KJuIwrl3H02A0uvY24j8sudF-mdHE4QQfehOxOf_Yxer27fZk_VIvn-8f5zaKytaSlar2BpW2UbdolEc4ZJmoiAaSbKplpcmCyVXZqbEWtvCAEDAC31DPVAqHH6Hz3d5Xi59rlovsuWxeCGVxcZ80lpzUT6l-QCEFJQ_kEkh1oU8w5Oa9XqetNGjUBvXWqfzmdMle7TDf4mHozyQqtLmYMMflkBttlTf-OfwP033s1</recordid><startdate>19940401</startdate><enddate>19940401</enddate><creator>Gaillard, A. W. K.</creator><creator>Wientjes, C. J. E.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940401</creationdate><title>Mental load and work stress as two types of energy mobilization</title><author>Gaillard, A. W. K. ; Wientjes, C. J. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-dfa0bc98c9db16eea46217007e373a7e35047d8c464c628f6110a005c3f48d013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Health</topic><topic>Mental fatigue</topic><topic>Mental load</topic><topic>Occupational stress</topic><topic>Reactivity</topic><topic>Relationship</topic><topic>Work stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaillard, A. W. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wientjes, C. J. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Work and stress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaillard, A. W. K.</au><au>Wientjes, C. J. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mental load and work stress as two types of energy mobilization</atitle><jtitle>Work and stress</jtitle><date>1994-04-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>141-152</pages><issn>0267-8373</issn><eissn>1464-5335</eissn><coden>WOSTEH</coden><abstract>A conceptual framework is presented in which mental load and stress are regarded as two distinct biobehavioural states in the work environment that differ in energy mobilization, mood and coping strategy. The framework combines two types of theory that are based on human performance research using laboratory tasks on the one hand and applied research in the work environment on the other. A high workload is regarded as an important but not a critical factor in the development of stress symptoms. Even under unfavourable conditions it is possible to work intensively and to be highly activated without feelings of strain or psychosomatic complaints. In contrast, working conditions that provide few possibilities for control and little social support or are associated with reduced well-being and increased health risks. The two states differ in activation, coping style and mood. A proper distinction is important not only for theory building but also for the reconstruction of the work environment. It may lead to recommendations that aim to enhance the work efficiency of employees while reducing the probability that stress responses will occur.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/02678379408259986</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0267-8373
ispartof Work and stress, 1994-04, Vol.8 (2), p.141-152
issn 0267-8373
1464-5335
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02678379408259986
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor & Francis
subjects Health
Mental fatigue
Mental load
Occupational stress
Reactivity
Relationship
Work stress
title Mental load and work stress as two types of energy mobilization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T03%3A31%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mental%20load%20and%20work%20stress%20as%20two%20types%20of%20energy%20mobilization&rft.jtitle=Work%20and%20stress&rft.au=Gaillard,%20A.%20W.%20K.&rft.date=1994-04-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=141-152&rft.issn=0267-8373&rft.eissn=1464-5335&rft.coden=WOSTEH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02678379408259986&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57532468%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16631935&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true