Criteria for comparison of single event models

Criteria for comparison of single event models

Methods of assessing the goodness-of-fit of hydrological simulation models are discussed. The methods generally compare the goodness-of-fit of a simulated hydrograph with an observed one and invariably have a bias towards one or another aspect of the hydrograph. It appears that no single parameter i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrological sciences journal 1986, Vol.31 (3), p.395-411
Hauptverfasser: GREEN, I. R. A., STEPHENSON, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Freshwater
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 411
container_issue 3
container_start_page 395
container_title Hydrological sciences journal
container_volume 31
creator GREEN, I. R. A.
STEPHENSON, D.
description Methods of assessing the goodness-of-fit of hydrological simulation models are discussed. The methods generally compare the goodness-of-fit of a simulated hydrograph with an observed one and invariably have a bias towards one or another aspect of the hydrograph. It appears that no single parameter is sufficient to assess adequately the overall measure of fit between a computed and an observed hydrograph, particularly in view of the many objectives behind hydrological modelling. Previous research has concentrated on assessing the goodness-of-fit of long duration hydrographs resulting from continuous simulation. This paper discusses a number of criteria for hydrograph comparison in single event modelling studies and applies them to a specific stormwater modelling exercise. It is shown that particular criteria highlight particular aspects.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02626668609491056
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02626668609491056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14631712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-1cc59d74806380b48672ec285cea33a0bad7ac85df45157347f4e4c17edff6ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqD_C2B_G2NZPvBS9S_IKCFz2HNJtIJLupyVbx37ul1YuInuYwzzsDL0KngGeAFb7ARBAhhBK4YQ1gLvbQhADHNWWU76PJZl-PQB6io1JeMKasEXSCZvMcBpeDqXzKlU3dyuRQUl8lX5XQP0dXuTfXD1WXWhfLMTrwJhZ3sptT9HRz_Ti_qxcPt_fzq0VtGaihBmt500qmsKAKL5kSkjhLFLfOUGrw0rTSWMVbzzhwSZn0zDEL0rXeC-fpFJ1v765yel27MuguFOtiNL1L66IJwxi4YH9CUBQ4kf-ATFCQQEYIW2hzKiU7r1c5dCZ_aMB607X-0fWYOdsdN8Wa6LPpbSjfQSU5EKAju9yy0I9td-Y95djqwXzElL8y9Pcvn2xgj0c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14631712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Criteria for comparison of single event models</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>GREEN, I. R. A. ; STEPHENSON, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>GREEN, I. R. A. ; STEPHENSON, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Methods of assessing the goodness-of-fit of hydrological simulation models are discussed. The methods generally compare the goodness-of-fit of a simulated hydrograph with an observed one and invariably have a bias towards one or another aspect of the hydrograph. It appears that no single parameter is sufficient to assess adequately the overall measure of fit between a computed and an observed hydrograph, particularly in view of the many objectives behind hydrological modelling. Previous research has concentrated on assessing the goodness-of-fit of long duration hydrographs resulting from continuous simulation. This paper discusses a number of criteria for hydrograph comparison in single event modelling studies and applies them to a specific stormwater modelling exercise. It is shown that particular criteria highlight particular aspects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0262-6667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-3435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02626668609491056</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HSJODN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wallingford: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Freshwater ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><ispartof>Hydrological sciences journal, 1986, Vol.31 (3), p.395-411</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1986</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-1cc59d74806380b48672ec285cea33a0bad7ac85df45157347f4e4c17edff6ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-1cc59d74806380b48672ec285cea33a0bad7ac85df45157347f4e4c17edff6ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02626668609491056$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02626668609491056$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904,59623,60412</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8751213$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GREEN, I. R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEPHENSON, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Criteria for comparison of single event models</title><title>Hydrological sciences journal</title><description>Methods of assessing the goodness-of-fit of hydrological simulation models are discussed. The methods generally compare the goodness-of-fit of a simulated hydrograph with an observed one and invariably have a bias towards one or another aspect of the hydrograph. It appears that no single parameter is sufficient to assess adequately the overall measure of fit between a computed and an observed hydrograph, particularly in view of the many objectives behind hydrological modelling. Previous research has concentrated on assessing the goodness-of-fit of long duration hydrographs resulting from continuous simulation. This paper discusses a number of criteria for hydrograph comparison in single event modelling studies and applies them to a specific stormwater modelling exercise. It is shown that particular criteria highlight particular aspects.</description><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><issn>0262-6667</issn><issn>2150-3435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqD_C2B_G2NZPvBS9S_IKCFz2HNJtIJLupyVbx37ul1YuInuYwzzsDL0KngGeAFb7ARBAhhBK4YQ1gLvbQhADHNWWU76PJZl-PQB6io1JeMKasEXSCZvMcBpeDqXzKlU3dyuRQUl8lX5XQP0dXuTfXD1WXWhfLMTrwJhZ3sptT9HRz_Ti_qxcPt_fzq0VtGaihBmt500qmsKAKL5kSkjhLFLfOUGrw0rTSWMVbzzhwSZn0zDEL0rXeC-fpFJ1v765yel27MuguFOtiNL1L66IJwxi4YH9CUBQ4kf-ATFCQQEYIW2hzKiU7r1c5dCZ_aMB607X-0fWYOdsdN8Wa6LPpbSjfQSU5EKAju9yy0I9td-Y95djqwXzElL8y9Pcvn2xgj0c</recordid><startdate>1986</startdate><enddate>1986</enddate><creator>GREEN, I. R. A.</creator><creator>STEPHENSON, D.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>IAHS Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1986</creationdate><title>Criteria for comparison of single event models</title><author>GREEN, I. R. A. ; STEPHENSON, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-1cc59d74806380b48672ec285cea33a0bad7ac85df45157347f4e4c17edff6ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GREEN, I. R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEPHENSON, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological sciences journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GREEN, I. R. A.</au><au>STEPHENSON, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Criteria for comparison of single event models</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological sciences journal</jtitle><date>1986</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>411</epage><pages>395-411</pages><issn>0262-6667</issn><eissn>2150-3435</eissn><coden>HSJODN</coden><abstract>Methods of assessing the goodness-of-fit of hydrological simulation models are discussed. The methods generally compare the goodness-of-fit of a simulated hydrograph with an observed one and invariably have a bias towards one or another aspect of the hydrograph. It appears that no single parameter is sufficient to assess adequately the overall measure of fit between a computed and an observed hydrograph, particularly in view of the many objectives behind hydrological modelling. Previous research has concentrated on assessing the goodness-of-fit of long duration hydrographs resulting from continuous simulation. This paper discusses a number of criteria for hydrograph comparison in single event modelling studies and applies them to a specific stormwater modelling exercise. It is shown that particular criteria highlight particular aspects.</abstract><cop>Wallingford</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/02626668609491056</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0262-6667
ispartof Hydrological sciences journal, 1986, Vol.31 (3), p.395-411
issn 0262-6667
2150-3435
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02626668609491056
source Taylor & Francis Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Freshwater
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
title Criteria for comparison of single event models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T05%3A45%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Criteria%20for%20comparison%20of%20single%20event%20models&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20sciences%20journal&rft.au=GREEN,%20I.%20R.%20A.&rft.date=1986&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=411&rft.pages=395-411&rft.issn=0262-6667&rft.eissn=2150-3435&rft.coden=HSJODN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02626668609491056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14631712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14631712&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true