Commuting in Transit Versus Automobile Neighborhoods

In recent years, there has been a chorus of calls to redesign America's suburbs so that they are less dependent on automobile access and more conducive to transit riding, walking, and bicycling. This article compares commuting characteristics of transit-oriented and auto-oriented suburban neigh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Planning Association 1995-04, Vol.61 (2), p.210-225
Hauptverfasser: Cervero, Robert, Gorham, Roger
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 225
container_issue 2
container_start_page 210
container_title Journal of the American Planning Association
container_volume 61
creator Cervero, Robert
Gorham, Roger
description In recent years, there has been a chorus of calls to redesign America's suburbs so that they are less dependent on automobile access and more conducive to transit riding, walking, and bicycling. This article compares commuting characteristics of transit-oriented and auto-oriented suburban neighborhoods, in the San Francisco Bay Area and in Southern California. Transit neighborhoods averaged higher densities and had more gridded street patterns compared to their nearby counterparts with auto-oriented physical designs. Neighborhoods were matched in terms of median incomes and, to the extent possible, transit service levels, to control for these effects. For both metropolitan areas, pedestrian modal shares and trip generation rates tended to be considerably higher in transit than in auto-oriented neighborhoods. Transit neighborhoods had decidedly higher rates of bus commuting only in the Bay Area. Islands of transit-oriented neighborhoods in a sea of freeway-oriented suburbs seem to have negligible effects on transit commuting.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01944369508975634
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01944369508975634</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57451058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-648f4877a01de45b354e020282e5385c9235b77d57ebd05292e61994b2f796713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctLw0AQxhdRsD7-AG9BwVt09r0LXkrxBUUv1WvIY9NuSbJ1N0H637uhnpTSucxhft8M830IXWG4w6DgHrBmjArNQWnJBWVHaII11SlgCsdoMs7TCNBTdBbCGmJRLieIzVzbDr3tlontkoXPu2D75NP4MIRkOvSudYVtTPJm7HJVOL9yrgoX6KTOm2Auf_s5-nh6XMxe0vn78-tsOk9LLkmfCqZqpqTMAVeG8YJyZoAAUcRwqnipCeWFlBWXpqiAE02MwFqzgtRSC4npObrd7d149zWY0GetDaVpmrwzbgiZAMk0UYdBLhnHwNVBkCqNuRTiIIijl1KrceP1H3DtBt9FWzJCtMAshhGhm30QHiHAUo038Y4qvQvBmzrbeNvmfpthyMaUs38pR83DTmO72vk2_3a-qbI-3zbO1zHN0san9st_AAR6qDU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229614563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Commuting in Transit Versus Automobile Neighborhoods</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Cervero, Robert ; Gorham, Roger</creator><creatorcontrib>Cervero, Robert ; Gorham, Roger</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, there has been a chorus of calls to redesign America's suburbs so that they are less dependent on automobile access and more conducive to transit riding, walking, and bicycling. This article compares commuting characteristics of transit-oriented and auto-oriented suburban neighborhoods, in the San Francisco Bay Area and in Southern California. Transit neighborhoods averaged higher densities and had more gridded street patterns compared to their nearby counterparts with auto-oriented physical designs. Neighborhoods were matched in terms of median incomes and, to the extent possible, transit service levels, to control for these effects. For both metropolitan areas, pedestrian modal shares and trip generation rates tended to be considerably higher in transit than in auto-oriented neighborhoods. Transit neighborhoods had decidedly higher rates of bus commuting only in the Bay Area. Islands of transit-oriented neighborhoods in a sea of freeway-oriented suburbs seem to have negligible effects on transit commuting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-4363</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-0130</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01944369508975634</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPAD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Automobiles ; California ; Community ; Commute ; Commuting ; Comparative analysis ; Decisions ; Design ; Efficiency ; Factors ; Light rail transportation ; Mass transit ; Metropolitan areas ; Neighborhoods ; Neighbourhoods ; Outdoor air quality ; Pedestrians ; Planning ; Planning methods ; Public transportation ; Roads &amp; highways ; Simulation ; Studies ; Suburban areas ; Subways ; Transportation ; Travel ; United States ; Urban planning ; Vehicles ; World War II</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Planning Association, 1995-04, Vol.61 (2), p.210-225</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1995</rights><rights>Copyright American Planning Association Spring 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-648f4877a01de45b354e020282e5385c9235b77d57ebd05292e61994b2f796713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-648f4877a01de45b354e020282e5385c9235b77d57ebd05292e61994b2f796713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01944369508975634$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01944369508975634$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27847,27850,27905,27906,30981,59626,60415</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cervero, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorham, Roger</creatorcontrib><title>Commuting in Transit Versus Automobile Neighborhoods</title><title>Journal of the American Planning Association</title><description>In recent years, there has been a chorus of calls to redesign America's suburbs so that they are less dependent on automobile access and more conducive to transit riding, walking, and bicycling. This article compares commuting characteristics of transit-oriented and auto-oriented suburban neighborhoods, in the San Francisco Bay Area and in Southern California. Transit neighborhoods averaged higher densities and had more gridded street patterns compared to their nearby counterparts with auto-oriented physical designs. Neighborhoods were matched in terms of median incomes and, to the extent possible, transit service levels, to control for these effects. For both metropolitan areas, pedestrian modal shares and trip generation rates tended to be considerably higher in transit than in auto-oriented neighborhoods. Transit neighborhoods had decidedly higher rates of bus commuting only in the Bay Area. Islands of transit-oriented neighborhoods in a sea of freeway-oriented suburbs seem to have negligible effects on transit commuting.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Commute</subject><subject>Commuting</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Light rail transportation</subject><subject>Mass transit</subject><subject>Metropolitan areas</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Neighbourhoods</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Pedestrians</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Planning methods</subject><subject>Public transportation</subject><subject>Roads &amp; highways</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Suburban areas</subject><subject>Subways</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Vehicles</subject><subject>World War II</subject><issn>0194-4363</issn><issn>1939-0130</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctLw0AQxhdRsD7-AG9BwVt09r0LXkrxBUUv1WvIY9NuSbJ1N0H637uhnpTSucxhft8M830IXWG4w6DgHrBmjArNQWnJBWVHaII11SlgCsdoMs7TCNBTdBbCGmJRLieIzVzbDr3tlontkoXPu2D75NP4MIRkOvSudYVtTPJm7HJVOL9yrgoX6KTOm2Auf_s5-nh6XMxe0vn78-tsOk9LLkmfCqZqpqTMAVeG8YJyZoAAUcRwqnipCeWFlBWXpqiAE02MwFqzgtRSC4npObrd7d149zWY0GetDaVpmrwzbgiZAMk0UYdBLhnHwNVBkCqNuRTiIIijl1KrceP1H3DtBt9FWzJCtMAshhGhm30QHiHAUo038Y4qvQvBmzrbeNvmfpthyMaUs38pR83DTmO72vk2_3a-qbI-3zbO1zHN0san9st_AAR6qDU</recordid><startdate>19950401</startdate><enddate>19950401</enddate><creator>Cervero, Robert</creator><creator>Gorham, Roger</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>American Planning Association</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950401</creationdate><title>Commuting in Transit Versus Automobile Neighborhoods</title><author>Cervero, Robert ; Gorham, Roger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-648f4877a01de45b354e020282e5385c9235b77d57ebd05292e61994b2f796713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Commute</topic><topic>Commuting</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Light rail transportation</topic><topic>Mass transit</topic><topic>Metropolitan areas</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Neighbourhoods</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Pedestrians</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Planning methods</topic><topic>Public transportation</topic><topic>Roads &amp; highways</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Suburban areas</topic><topic>Subways</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Vehicles</topic><topic>World War II</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cervero, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorham, Roger</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Planning Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cervero, Robert</au><au>Gorham, Roger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Commuting in Transit Versus Automobile Neighborhoods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Planning Association</jtitle><date>1995-04-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>210</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>210-225</pages><issn>0194-4363</issn><eissn>1939-0130</eissn><coden>JAPAD9</coden><abstract>In recent years, there has been a chorus of calls to redesign America's suburbs so that they are less dependent on automobile access and more conducive to transit riding, walking, and bicycling. This article compares commuting characteristics of transit-oriented and auto-oriented suburban neighborhoods, in the San Francisco Bay Area and in Southern California. Transit neighborhoods averaged higher densities and had more gridded street patterns compared to their nearby counterparts with auto-oriented physical designs. Neighborhoods were matched in terms of median incomes and, to the extent possible, transit service levels, to control for these effects. For both metropolitan areas, pedestrian modal shares and trip generation rates tended to be considerably higher in transit than in auto-oriented neighborhoods. Transit neighborhoods had decidedly higher rates of bus commuting only in the Bay Area. Islands of transit-oriented neighborhoods in a sea of freeway-oriented suburbs seem to have negligible effects on transit commuting.</abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/01944369508975634</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0194-4363
ispartof Journal of the American Planning Association, 1995-04, Vol.61 (2), p.210-225
issn 0194-4363
1939-0130
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01944369508975634
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Air pollution
Automobiles
California
Community
Commute
Commuting
Comparative analysis
Decisions
Design
Efficiency
Factors
Light rail transportation
Mass transit
Metropolitan areas
Neighborhoods
Neighbourhoods
Outdoor air quality
Pedestrians
Planning
Planning methods
Public transportation
Roads & highways
Simulation
Studies
Suburban areas
Subways
Transportation
Travel
United States
Urban planning
Vehicles
World War II
title Commuting in Transit Versus Automobile Neighborhoods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A20%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commuting%20in%20Transit%20Versus%20Automobile%20Neighborhoods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Planning%20Association&rft.au=Cervero,%20Robert&rft.date=1995-04-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=210&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=210-225&rft.issn=0194-4363&rft.eissn=1939-0130&rft.coden=JAPAD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01944369508975634&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57451058%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229614563&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true