Pervasive Myths in Teacher Beliefs about Education Law

This article explores common misbeliefs and misconceptions that many teachers have about the law of education, focusing on those that have the greatest potential to cause harm to schools, students, and teachers themselves. The myths fall into three categories: Myths concerning the legal vulnerabilit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Action in teacher education 2008-07, Vol.30 (2), p.88-97
1. Verfasser: Imber, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 97
container_issue 2
container_start_page 88
container_title Action in teacher education
container_volume 30
creator Imber, Michael
description This article explores common misbeliefs and misconceptions that many teachers have about the law of education, focusing on those that have the greatest potential to cause harm to schools, students, and teachers themselves. The myths fall into three categories: Myths concerning the legal vulnerability of schools and teachers, myths concerning the rights of students, and myths concerning the rights of teachers. The major assertions of the article are that many teachers significantly overestimate the likelihood that their school or they personally will be sued by a student; that teachers often fail to recognize the constitutional rights of their students, even as they overestimate the right of parents to control their children's educational programs; and that teachers tend to have an exaggerated view of the protections afforded by academic freedom and "tenure." The article concludes with a discussion of possible ways to dispel some of the myths.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01626620.2008.10463495
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01626620_2008_10463495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ833551</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ833551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-35f483616fb7df6245f5e1231e3f79a4f5980a7392acd97d228f9adb762b6773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj8tOwzAQRS0EEqXwBwj5B1L8iF_LUpUCKoJF99bEsVWjNEF22qp_T6NStqxGmnvPjA5CD5RMKNHkkVDJpGRkwgjRx1UpeWnEBRoxKnQhidGXaDSUiqF1jW5y_iKEUsPFCMlPn3aQ487j90O_zji2eOXBrX3CT76JPmQMVbft8bzeOuhj1-Il7G_RVYAm-7vfOUar5_lq9lIsPxavs-mycKw0fcFFKDWXVIZK1UGyUgThKePU86AMlEEYTUBxw8DVRtWM6WCgrpRklVSKj5E8nXWpyzn5YL9T3EA6WErsIG_P8naQt2f5I3h_An2K7g-av2nOhaDHeHqKYxu6tIF9l5ra9nBouhQStC5my_958QNywGjV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pervasive Myths in Teacher Beliefs about Education Law</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Imber, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Imber, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores common misbeliefs and misconceptions that many teachers have about the law of education, focusing on those that have the greatest potential to cause harm to schools, students, and teachers themselves. The myths fall into three categories: Myths concerning the legal vulnerability of schools and teachers, myths concerning the rights of students, and myths concerning the rights of teachers. The major assertions of the article are that many teachers significantly overestimate the likelihood that their school or they personally will be sued by a student; that teachers often fail to recognize the constitutional rights of their students, even as they overestimate the right of parents to control their children's educational programs; and that teachers tend to have an exaggerated view of the protections afforded by academic freedom and "tenure." The article concludes with a discussion of possible ways to dispel some of the myths.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-6620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2158-6098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2008.10463495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Academic Freedom ; Beliefs ; Compliance (Legal) ; Court Litigation ; Knowledge Level ; Legal Responsibility ; Misconceptions ; School Districts ; School Law ; Student Rights ; Teacher Rights ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>Action in teacher education, 2008-07, Vol.30 (2), p.88-97</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-35f483616fb7df6245f5e1231e3f79a4f5980a7392acd97d228f9adb762b6773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-35f483616fb7df6245f5e1231e3f79a4f5980a7392acd97d228f9adb762b6773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ833551$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Imber, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Pervasive Myths in Teacher Beliefs about Education Law</title><title>Action in teacher education</title><description>This article explores common misbeliefs and misconceptions that many teachers have about the law of education, focusing on those that have the greatest potential to cause harm to schools, students, and teachers themselves. The myths fall into three categories: Myths concerning the legal vulnerability of schools and teachers, myths concerning the rights of students, and myths concerning the rights of teachers. The major assertions of the article are that many teachers significantly overestimate the likelihood that their school or they personally will be sued by a student; that teachers often fail to recognize the constitutional rights of their students, even as they overestimate the right of parents to control their children's educational programs; and that teachers tend to have an exaggerated view of the protections afforded by academic freedom and "tenure." The article concludes with a discussion of possible ways to dispel some of the myths.</description><subject>Academic Freedom</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Compliance (Legal)</subject><subject>Court Litigation</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Legal Responsibility</subject><subject>Misconceptions</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>School Law</subject><subject>Student Rights</subject><subject>Teacher Rights</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>0162-6620</issn><issn>2158-6098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFj8tOwzAQRS0EEqXwBwj5B1L8iF_LUpUCKoJF99bEsVWjNEF22qp_T6NStqxGmnvPjA5CD5RMKNHkkVDJpGRkwgjRx1UpeWnEBRoxKnQhidGXaDSUiqF1jW5y_iKEUsPFCMlPn3aQ487j90O_zji2eOXBrX3CT76JPmQMVbft8bzeOuhj1-Il7G_RVYAm-7vfOUar5_lq9lIsPxavs-mycKw0fcFFKDWXVIZK1UGyUgThKePU86AMlEEYTUBxw8DVRtWM6WCgrpRklVSKj5E8nXWpyzn5YL9T3EA6WErsIG_P8naQt2f5I3h_An2K7g-av2nOhaDHeHqKYxu6tIF9l5ra9nBouhQStC5my_958QNywGjV</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Imber, Michael</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Rowman &amp; Littlefield Education</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Pervasive Myths in Teacher Beliefs about Education Law</title><author>Imber, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-35f483616fb7df6245f5e1231e3f79a4f5980a7392acd97d228f9adb762b6773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Academic Freedom</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Compliance (Legal)</topic><topic>Court Litigation</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Legal Responsibility</topic><topic>Misconceptions</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>School Law</topic><topic>Student Rights</topic><topic>Teacher Rights</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Imber, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Action in teacher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Imber, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ833551</ericid><atitle>Pervasive Myths in Teacher Beliefs about Education Law</atitle><jtitle>Action in teacher education</jtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>88-97</pages><issn>0162-6620</issn><eissn>2158-6098</eissn><abstract>This article explores common misbeliefs and misconceptions that many teachers have about the law of education, focusing on those that have the greatest potential to cause harm to schools, students, and teachers themselves. The myths fall into three categories: Myths concerning the legal vulnerability of schools and teachers, myths concerning the rights of students, and myths concerning the rights of teachers. The major assertions of the article are that many teachers significantly overestimate the likelihood that their school or they personally will be sued by a student; that teachers often fail to recognize the constitutional rights of their students, even as they overestimate the right of parents to control their children's educational programs; and that teachers tend to have an exaggerated view of the protections afforded by academic freedom and "tenure." The article concludes with a discussion of possible ways to dispel some of the myths.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/01626620.2008.10463495</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0162-6620
ispartof Action in teacher education, 2008-07, Vol.30 (2), p.88-97
issn 0162-6620
2158-6098
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01626620_2008_10463495
source Education Source
subjects Academic Freedom
Beliefs
Compliance (Legal)
Court Litigation
Knowledge Level
Legal Responsibility
Misconceptions
School Districts
School Law
Student Rights
Teacher Rights
Teachers
title Pervasive Myths in Teacher Beliefs about Education Law
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T13%3A09%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pervasive%20Myths%20in%20Teacher%20Beliefs%20about%20Education%20Law&rft.jtitle=Action%20in%20teacher%20education&rft.au=Imber,%20Michael&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=88-97&rft.issn=0162-6620&rft.eissn=2158-6098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01626620.2008.10463495&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ833551%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ833551&rfr_iscdi=true