Pervasive Myths in Teacher Beliefs about Education Law
This article explores common misbeliefs and misconceptions that many teachers have about the law of education, focusing on those that have the greatest potential to cause harm to schools, students, and teachers themselves. The myths fall into three categories: Myths concerning the legal vulnerabilit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Action in teacher education 2008-07, Vol.30 (2), p.88-97 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 97 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 88 |
container_title | Action in teacher education |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Imber, Michael |
description | This article explores common misbeliefs and misconceptions that many teachers have about the law of education, focusing on those that have the greatest potential to cause harm to schools, students, and teachers themselves. The myths fall into three categories: Myths concerning the legal vulnerability of schools and teachers, myths concerning the rights of students, and myths concerning the rights of teachers. The major assertions of the article are that many teachers significantly overestimate the likelihood that their school or they personally will be sued by a student; that teachers often fail to recognize the constitutional rights of their students, even as they overestimate the right of parents to control their children's educational programs; and that teachers tend to have an exaggerated view of the protections afforded by academic freedom and "tenure." The article concludes with a discussion of possible ways to dispel some of the myths. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01626620.2008.10463495 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01626620_2008_10463495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ833551</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ833551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-35f483616fb7df6245f5e1231e3f79a4f5980a7392acd97d228f9adb762b6773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj8tOwzAQRS0EEqXwBwj5B1L8iF_LUpUCKoJF99bEsVWjNEF22qp_T6NStqxGmnvPjA5CD5RMKNHkkVDJpGRkwgjRx1UpeWnEBRoxKnQhidGXaDSUiqF1jW5y_iKEUsPFCMlPn3aQ487j90O_zji2eOXBrX3CT76JPmQMVbft8bzeOuhj1-Il7G_RVYAm-7vfOUar5_lq9lIsPxavs-mycKw0fcFFKDWXVIZK1UGyUgThKePU86AMlEEYTUBxw8DVRtWM6WCgrpRklVSKj5E8nXWpyzn5YL9T3EA6WErsIG_P8naQt2f5I3h_An2K7g-av2nOhaDHeHqKYxu6tIF9l5ra9nBouhQStC5my_958QNywGjV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pervasive Myths in Teacher Beliefs about Education Law</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Imber, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Imber, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores common misbeliefs and misconceptions that many teachers have about the law of education, focusing on those that have the greatest potential to cause harm to schools, students, and teachers themselves. The myths fall into three categories: Myths concerning the legal vulnerability of schools and teachers, myths concerning the rights of students, and myths concerning the rights of teachers. The major assertions of the article are that many teachers significantly overestimate the likelihood that their school or they personally will be sued by a student; that teachers often fail to recognize the constitutional rights of their students, even as they overestimate the right of parents to control their children's educational programs; and that teachers tend to have an exaggerated view of the protections afforded by academic freedom and "tenure." The article concludes with a discussion of possible ways to dispel some of the myths.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-6620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2158-6098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2008.10463495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Academic Freedom ; Beliefs ; Compliance (Legal) ; Court Litigation ; Knowledge Level ; Legal Responsibility ; Misconceptions ; School Districts ; School Law ; Student Rights ; Teacher Rights ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>Action in teacher education, 2008-07, Vol.30 (2), p.88-97</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-35f483616fb7df6245f5e1231e3f79a4f5980a7392acd97d228f9adb762b6773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-35f483616fb7df6245f5e1231e3f79a4f5980a7392acd97d228f9adb762b6773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ833551$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Imber, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Pervasive Myths in Teacher Beliefs about Education Law</title><title>Action in teacher education</title><description>This article explores common misbeliefs and misconceptions that many teachers have about the law of education, focusing on those that have the greatest potential to cause harm to schools, students, and teachers themselves. The myths fall into three categories: Myths concerning the legal vulnerability of schools and teachers, myths concerning the rights of students, and myths concerning the rights of teachers. The major assertions of the article are that many teachers significantly overestimate the likelihood that their school or they personally will be sued by a student; that teachers often fail to recognize the constitutional rights of their students, even as they overestimate the right of parents to control their children's educational programs; and that teachers tend to have an exaggerated view of the protections afforded by academic freedom and "tenure." The article concludes with a discussion of possible ways to dispel some of the myths.</description><subject>Academic Freedom</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Compliance (Legal)</subject><subject>Court Litigation</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Legal Responsibility</subject><subject>Misconceptions</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>School Law</subject><subject>Student Rights</subject><subject>Teacher Rights</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>0162-6620</issn><issn>2158-6098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFj8tOwzAQRS0EEqXwBwj5B1L8iF_LUpUCKoJF99bEsVWjNEF22qp_T6NStqxGmnvPjA5CD5RMKNHkkVDJpGRkwgjRx1UpeWnEBRoxKnQhidGXaDSUiqF1jW5y_iKEUsPFCMlPn3aQ487j90O_zji2eOXBrX3CT76JPmQMVbft8bzeOuhj1-Il7G_RVYAm-7vfOUar5_lq9lIsPxavs-mycKw0fcFFKDWXVIZK1UGyUgThKePU86AMlEEYTUBxw8DVRtWM6WCgrpRklVSKj5E8nXWpyzn5YL9T3EA6WErsIG_P8naQt2f5I3h_An2K7g-av2nOhaDHeHqKYxu6tIF9l5ra9nBouhQStC5my_958QNywGjV</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Imber, Michael</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Rowman & Littlefield Education</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Pervasive Myths in Teacher Beliefs about Education Law</title><author>Imber, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-35f483616fb7df6245f5e1231e3f79a4f5980a7392acd97d228f9adb762b6773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Academic Freedom</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Compliance (Legal)</topic><topic>Court Litigation</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Legal Responsibility</topic><topic>Misconceptions</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>School Law</topic><topic>Student Rights</topic><topic>Teacher Rights</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Imber, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Action in teacher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Imber, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ833551</ericid><atitle>Pervasive Myths in Teacher Beliefs about Education Law</atitle><jtitle>Action in teacher education</jtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>88-97</pages><issn>0162-6620</issn><eissn>2158-6098</eissn><abstract>This article explores common misbeliefs and misconceptions that many teachers have about the law of education, focusing on those that have the greatest potential to cause harm to schools, students, and teachers themselves. The myths fall into three categories: Myths concerning the legal vulnerability of schools and teachers, myths concerning the rights of students, and myths concerning the rights of teachers. The major assertions of the article are that many teachers significantly overestimate the likelihood that their school or they personally will be sued by a student; that teachers often fail to recognize the constitutional rights of their students, even as they overestimate the right of parents to control their children's educational programs; and that teachers tend to have an exaggerated view of the protections afforded by academic freedom and "tenure." The article concludes with a discussion of possible ways to dispel some of the myths.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/01626620.2008.10463495</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0162-6620 |
ispartof | Action in teacher education, 2008-07, Vol.30 (2), p.88-97 |
issn | 0162-6620 2158-6098 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01626620_2008_10463495 |
source | Education Source |
subjects | Academic Freedom Beliefs Compliance (Legal) Court Litigation Knowledge Level Legal Responsibility Misconceptions School Districts School Law Student Rights Teacher Rights Teachers |
title | Pervasive Myths in Teacher Beliefs about Education Law |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T13%3A09%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pervasive%20Myths%20in%20Teacher%20Beliefs%20about%20Education%20Law&rft.jtitle=Action%20in%20teacher%20education&rft.au=Imber,%20Michael&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=88-97&rft.issn=0162-6620&rft.eissn=2158-6098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01626620.2008.10463495&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ833551%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ833551&rfr_iscdi=true |