Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches
Research on crowding-related standards of quality increasingly has focused on personal and social norms. Several norm-measurement approaches have been developed. This study compares and evaluates three issues related to alternative norm measurement approaches: numerical versus visual approach, long...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Leisure sciences 1999-06, Vol.21 (2), p.97-115 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 115 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 97 |
container_title | Leisure sciences |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang |
description | Research on crowding-related standards of quality increasingly has focused on personal and social norms. Several norm-measurement approaches have been developed. This study compares and evaluates three issues related to alternative norm measurement approaches: numerical versus visual approach, long versus short question format, and evaluative dimension. Study data are drawn from a multiphase program of research on crowding on the carriage roads of Acadia National Park, Maine. Differences in crowding norms developed from alternative measurement approaches are described and discussed. Study findings suggest that commonly used norm-measurement approaches may lead to crowding-related standards of quality that are overly conservative. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/014904099273174 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_014904099273174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_014904099273174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-650e33f2eab303fc1d6da1d5caf6f8c05c6bc42a65e6bd687c68e488d2def86c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFz81KAzEUhuEgCo7Vtdu5gbEnySST6a4UtULVja5DmpzoyPyRRGvv3pa6Koirs_h4DryEXFO4oaBgCrSsoYS6ZhWnVXlCMioYLUAodUqy_VrsZjgnFzF-AICoqcoIW4Rh45r-LX8aQhdn-bxNGHqTmi_MH9HEz4Ad9imfj2MYjH3HeEnOvGkjXv3eCXm9u31ZLIvV8_3DYr4qLOcyFVIAcu4ZmjUH7i110hnqhDVeemVBWLm2JTNSoFw7qSorFZZKOebQK2n5hEwPf20YYgzo9RiazoStpqD3yfooeSdmB9H0fldjNkNonU5m2w7BB9PbJmr-Nxb_4iOj03fiP7TLbgo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</creator><creatorcontrib>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</creatorcontrib><description>Research on crowding-related standards of quality increasingly has focused on personal and social norms. Several norm-measurement approaches have been developed. This study compares and evaluates three issues related to alternative norm measurement approaches: numerical versus visual approach, long versus short question format, and evaluative dimension. Study data are drawn from a multiphase program of research on crowding on the carriage roads of Acadia National Park, Maine. Differences in crowding norms developed from alternative measurement approaches are described and discussed. Study findings suggest that commonly used norm-measurement approaches may lead to crowding-related standards of quality that are overly conservative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-0400</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-0588</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/014904099273174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Carrying Capacity;Crowding;Crowding Norms;Standards Of Quality</subject><ispartof>Leisure sciences, 1999-06, Vol.21 (2), p.97-115</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-650e33f2eab303fc1d6da1d5caf6f8c05c6bc42a65e6bd687c68e488d2def86c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</creatorcontrib><title>Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches</title><title>Leisure sciences</title><description>Research on crowding-related standards of quality increasingly has focused on personal and social norms. Several norm-measurement approaches have been developed. This study compares and evaluates three issues related to alternative norm measurement approaches: numerical versus visual approach, long versus short question format, and evaluative dimension. Study data are drawn from a multiphase program of research on crowding on the carriage roads of Acadia National Park, Maine. Differences in crowding norms developed from alternative measurement approaches are described and discussed. Study findings suggest that commonly used norm-measurement approaches may lead to crowding-related standards of quality that are overly conservative.</description><subject>Carrying Capacity;Crowding;Crowding Norms;Standards Of Quality</subject><issn>0149-0400</issn><issn>1521-0588</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFz81KAzEUhuEgCo7Vtdu5gbEnySST6a4UtULVja5DmpzoyPyRRGvv3pa6Koirs_h4DryEXFO4oaBgCrSsoYS6ZhWnVXlCMioYLUAodUqy_VrsZjgnFzF-AICoqcoIW4Rh45r-LX8aQhdn-bxNGHqTmi_MH9HEz4Ad9imfj2MYjH3HeEnOvGkjXv3eCXm9u31ZLIvV8_3DYr4qLOcyFVIAcu4ZmjUH7i110hnqhDVeemVBWLm2JTNSoFw7qSorFZZKOebQK2n5hEwPf20YYgzo9RiazoStpqD3yfooeSdmB9H0fldjNkNonU5m2w7BB9PbJmr-Nxb_4iOj03fiP7TLbgo</recordid><startdate>19990601</startdate><enddate>19990601</enddate><creator>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990601</creationdate><title>Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches</title><author>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-650e33f2eab303fc1d6da1d5caf6f8c05c6bc42a65e6bd687c68e488d2def86c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Carrying Capacity;Crowding;Crowding Norms;Standards Of Quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Leisure sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches</atitle><jtitle>Leisure sciences</jtitle><date>1999-06-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>97-115</pages><issn>0149-0400</issn><eissn>1521-0588</eissn><abstract>Research on crowding-related standards of quality increasingly has focused on personal and social norms. Several norm-measurement approaches have been developed. This study compares and evaluates three issues related to alternative norm measurement approaches: numerical versus visual approach, long versus short question format, and evaluative dimension. Study data are drawn from a multiphase program of research on crowding on the carriage roads of Acadia National Park, Maine. Differences in crowding norms developed from alternative measurement approaches are described and discussed. Study findings suggest that commonly used norm-measurement approaches may lead to crowding-related standards of quality that are overly conservative.</abstract><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/014904099273174</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-0400 |
ispartof | Leisure sciences, 1999-06, Vol.21 (2), p.97-115 |
issn | 0149-0400 1521-0588 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_014904099273174 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Carrying Capacity Crowding Crowding Norms Standards Of Quality |
title | Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T06%3A15%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crowding%20Norms:%20Alternative%20Measurement%20Approaches&rft.jtitle=Leisure%20sciences&rft.au=Robert%20E.%20Manning,%20William%20A.%20Valliere,%20Benjamin%20Wang&rft.date=1999-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=97-115&rft.issn=0149-0400&rft.eissn=1521-0588&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/014904099273174&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_014904099273174%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |