Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches

Research on crowding-related standards of quality increasingly has focused on personal and social norms. Several norm-measurement approaches have been developed. This study compares and evaluates three issues related to alternative norm measurement approaches: numerical versus visual approach, long...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Leisure sciences 1999-06, Vol.21 (2), p.97-115
1. Verfasser: Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 115
container_issue 2
container_start_page 97
container_title Leisure sciences
container_volume 21
creator Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang
description Research on crowding-related standards of quality increasingly has focused on personal and social norms. Several norm-measurement approaches have been developed. This study compares and evaluates three issues related to alternative norm measurement approaches: numerical versus visual approach, long versus short question format, and evaluative dimension. Study data are drawn from a multiphase program of research on crowding on the carriage roads of Acadia National Park, Maine. Differences in crowding norms developed from alternative measurement approaches are described and discussed. Study findings suggest that commonly used norm-measurement approaches may lead to crowding-related standards of quality that are overly conservative.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/014904099273174
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_014904099273174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_014904099273174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-650e33f2eab303fc1d6da1d5caf6f8c05c6bc42a65e6bd687c68e488d2def86c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFz81KAzEUhuEgCo7Vtdu5gbEnySST6a4UtULVja5DmpzoyPyRRGvv3pa6Koirs_h4DryEXFO4oaBgCrSsoYS6ZhWnVXlCMioYLUAodUqy_VrsZjgnFzF-AICoqcoIW4Rh45r-LX8aQhdn-bxNGHqTmi_MH9HEz4Ad9imfj2MYjH3HeEnOvGkjXv3eCXm9u31ZLIvV8_3DYr4qLOcyFVIAcu4ZmjUH7i110hnqhDVeemVBWLm2JTNSoFw7qSorFZZKOebQK2n5hEwPf20YYgzo9RiazoStpqD3yfooeSdmB9H0fldjNkNonU5m2w7BB9PbJmr-Nxb_4iOj03fiP7TLbgo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</creator><creatorcontrib>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</creatorcontrib><description>Research on crowding-related standards of quality increasingly has focused on personal and social norms. Several norm-measurement approaches have been developed. This study compares and evaluates three issues related to alternative norm measurement approaches: numerical versus visual approach, long versus short question format, and evaluative dimension. Study data are drawn from a multiphase program of research on crowding on the carriage roads of Acadia National Park, Maine. Differences in crowding norms developed from alternative measurement approaches are described and discussed. Study findings suggest that commonly used norm-measurement approaches may lead to crowding-related standards of quality that are overly conservative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-0400</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-0588</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/014904099273174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Carrying Capacity;Crowding;Crowding Norms;Standards Of Quality</subject><ispartof>Leisure sciences, 1999-06, Vol.21 (2), p.97-115</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-650e33f2eab303fc1d6da1d5caf6f8c05c6bc42a65e6bd687c68e488d2def86c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</creatorcontrib><title>Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches</title><title>Leisure sciences</title><description>Research on crowding-related standards of quality increasingly has focused on personal and social norms. Several norm-measurement approaches have been developed. This study compares and evaluates three issues related to alternative norm measurement approaches: numerical versus visual approach, long versus short question format, and evaluative dimension. Study data are drawn from a multiphase program of research on crowding on the carriage roads of Acadia National Park, Maine. Differences in crowding norms developed from alternative measurement approaches are described and discussed. Study findings suggest that commonly used norm-measurement approaches may lead to crowding-related standards of quality that are overly conservative.</description><subject>Carrying Capacity;Crowding;Crowding Norms;Standards Of Quality</subject><issn>0149-0400</issn><issn>1521-0588</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFz81KAzEUhuEgCo7Vtdu5gbEnySST6a4UtULVja5DmpzoyPyRRGvv3pa6Koirs_h4DryEXFO4oaBgCrSsoYS6ZhWnVXlCMioYLUAodUqy_VrsZjgnFzF-AICoqcoIW4Rh45r-LX8aQhdn-bxNGHqTmi_MH9HEz4Ad9imfj2MYjH3HeEnOvGkjXv3eCXm9u31ZLIvV8_3DYr4qLOcyFVIAcu4ZmjUH7i110hnqhDVeemVBWLm2JTNSoFw7qSorFZZKOebQK2n5hEwPf20YYgzo9RiazoStpqD3yfooeSdmB9H0fldjNkNonU5m2w7BB9PbJmr-Nxb_4iOj03fiP7TLbgo</recordid><startdate>19990601</startdate><enddate>19990601</enddate><creator>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990601</creationdate><title>Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches</title><author>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-650e33f2eab303fc1d6da1d5caf6f8c05c6bc42a65e6bd687c68e488d2def86c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Carrying Capacity;Crowding;Crowding Norms;Standards Of Quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Leisure sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robert E. Manning, William A. Valliere, Benjamin Wang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches</atitle><jtitle>Leisure sciences</jtitle><date>1999-06-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>97-115</pages><issn>0149-0400</issn><eissn>1521-0588</eissn><abstract>Research on crowding-related standards of quality increasingly has focused on personal and social norms. Several norm-measurement approaches have been developed. This study compares and evaluates three issues related to alternative norm measurement approaches: numerical versus visual approach, long versus short question format, and evaluative dimension. Study data are drawn from a multiphase program of research on crowding on the carriage roads of Acadia National Park, Maine. Differences in crowding norms developed from alternative measurement approaches are described and discussed. Study findings suggest that commonly used norm-measurement approaches may lead to crowding-related standards of quality that are overly conservative.</abstract><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/014904099273174</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-0400
ispartof Leisure sciences, 1999-06, Vol.21 (2), p.97-115
issn 0149-0400
1521-0588
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_014904099273174
source Business Source Complete
subjects Carrying Capacity
Crowding
Crowding Norms
Standards Of Quality
title Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T06%3A15%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crowding%20Norms:%20Alternative%20Measurement%20Approaches&rft.jtitle=Leisure%20sciences&rft.au=Robert%20E.%20Manning,%20William%20A.%20Valliere,%20Benjamin%20Wang&rft.date=1999-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=97-115&rft.issn=0149-0400&rft.eissn=1521-0588&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/014904099273174&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_014904099273174%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true