Violence and Violation: Women and Secure Settings 1

This article focuses on service provision for women who are involuntarily referred under the UK Mental Health Act (1983) into medium and high security care in England and Wales. We explore how physical and procedural security in such settings is prioritized over relational care (see also Fallon Repo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Feminist review 2001-08, Vol.68 (1), p.68-88
Hauptverfasser: Aitken, Gill, Women, Kate Noble
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 88
container_issue 1
container_start_page 68
container_title Feminist review
container_volume 68
creator Aitken, Gill
Women, Kate Noble
description This article focuses on service provision for women who are involuntarily referred under the UK Mental Health Act (1983) into medium and high security care in England and Wales. We explore how physical and procedural security in such settings is prioritized over relational care (see also Fallon Report, Department of Health, 1999a and NHS Executive, 2000 – Tilt Report). We are not arguing against the importance of protecting the public from the acts of dangerous members of our society. However, we are arguing that many of the women in our secure services are inappropriately placed and receive inappropriate forms of treatment and care. Rather than physical security, it is high relational care, which the women require. Further, we argue that current service provision often re-produces forms of violence and violation which have marked many of women's lives prior to their entry into the secure system.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01417780110042400
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01417780110042400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_01417780110042400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c900-a7ceb7038eabdcc1d1f240161ff97935b20448286198623d168b0dffb7adb5b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplT8tKAzEUDaLgWP0Ad_MD0XuTNA93UtQKBReWdjnkKSNtRpJx4d87o-5cHc6DwzmEXCPcIGi4BRSolAZEAMEEwAlpUEhJBddwSprZp1PAnJOLWt8BQEkmG8J3_XCI2cfW5tDOxI79kO_a_XCM-Ud8jf6zxAnGsc9vtcVLcpbsocarP1yQ7ePDdrWmm5en59X9hnoDQK3y0SngOloXvMeAadqFElMyyvClYyCEZlqi0ZLxgFI7CCk5ZYNbOuQLgr-1vgy1lpi6j9IfbfnqELr5dPfvNP8GllxH2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Violence and Violation: Women and Secure Settings 1</title><source>SAGE Publications</source><source>SpringerLink</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Aitken, Gill ; Women, Kate Noble</creator><creatorcontrib>Aitken, Gill ; Women, Kate Noble</creatorcontrib><description>This article focuses on service provision for women who are involuntarily referred under the UK Mental Health Act (1983) into medium and high security care in England and Wales. We explore how physical and procedural security in such settings is prioritized over relational care (see also Fallon Report, Department of Health, 1999a and NHS Executive, 2000 – Tilt Report). We are not arguing against the importance of protecting the public from the acts of dangerous members of our society. However, we are arguing that many of the women in our secure services are inappropriately placed and receive inappropriate forms of treatment and care. Rather than physical security, it is high relational care, which the women require. Further, we argue that current service provision often re-produces forms of violence and violation which have marked many of women's lives prior to their entry into the secure system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-7789</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01417780110042400</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Feminist review, 2001-08, Vol.68 (1), p.68-88</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c900-a7ceb7038eabdcc1d1f240161ff97935b20448286198623d168b0dffb7adb5b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c900-a7ceb7038eabdcc1d1f240161ff97935b20448286198623d168b0dffb7adb5b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aitken, Gill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Women, Kate Noble</creatorcontrib><title>Violence and Violation: Women and Secure Settings 1</title><title>Feminist review</title><description>This article focuses on service provision for women who are involuntarily referred under the UK Mental Health Act (1983) into medium and high security care in England and Wales. We explore how physical and procedural security in such settings is prioritized over relational care (see also Fallon Report, Department of Health, 1999a and NHS Executive, 2000 – Tilt Report). We are not arguing against the importance of protecting the public from the acts of dangerous members of our society. However, we are arguing that many of the women in our secure services are inappropriately placed and receive inappropriate forms of treatment and care. Rather than physical security, it is high relational care, which the women require. Further, we argue that current service provision often re-produces forms of violence and violation which have marked many of women's lives prior to their entry into the secure system.</description><issn>0141-7789</issn><issn>1466-4380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplT8tKAzEUDaLgWP0Ad_MD0XuTNA93UtQKBReWdjnkKSNtRpJx4d87o-5cHc6DwzmEXCPcIGi4BRSolAZEAMEEwAlpUEhJBddwSprZp1PAnJOLWt8BQEkmG8J3_XCI2cfW5tDOxI79kO_a_XCM-Ud8jf6zxAnGsc9vtcVLcpbsocarP1yQ7ePDdrWmm5en59X9hnoDQK3y0SngOloXvMeAadqFElMyyvClYyCEZlqi0ZLxgFI7CCk5ZYNbOuQLgr-1vgy1lpi6j9IfbfnqELr5dPfvNP8GllxH2Q</recordid><startdate>200108</startdate><enddate>200108</enddate><creator>Aitken, Gill</creator><creator>Women, Kate Noble</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200108</creationdate><title>Violence and Violation: Women and Secure Settings 1</title><author>Aitken, Gill ; Women, Kate Noble</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c900-a7ceb7038eabdcc1d1f240161ff97935b20448286198623d168b0dffb7adb5b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aitken, Gill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Women, Kate Noble</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Feminist review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aitken, Gill</au><au>Women, Kate Noble</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Violence and Violation: Women and Secure Settings 1</atitle><jtitle>Feminist review</jtitle><date>2001-08</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>68</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>68-88</pages><issn>0141-7789</issn><eissn>1466-4380</eissn><abstract>This article focuses on service provision for women who are involuntarily referred under the UK Mental Health Act (1983) into medium and high security care in England and Wales. We explore how physical and procedural security in such settings is prioritized over relational care (see also Fallon Report, Department of Health, 1999a and NHS Executive, 2000 – Tilt Report). We are not arguing against the importance of protecting the public from the acts of dangerous members of our society. However, we are arguing that many of the women in our secure services are inappropriately placed and receive inappropriate forms of treatment and care. Rather than physical security, it is high relational care, which the women require. Further, we argue that current service provision often re-produces forms of violence and violation which have marked many of women's lives prior to their entry into the secure system.</abstract><doi>10.1080/01417780110042400</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-7789
ispartof Feminist review, 2001-08, Vol.68 (1), p.68-88
issn 0141-7789
1466-4380
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01417780110042400
source SAGE Publications; SpringerLink; JSTOR
title Violence and Violation: Women and Secure Settings 1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A30%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Violence%20and%20Violation:%20Women%20and%20Secure%20Settings%201&rft.jtitle=Feminist%20review&rft.au=Aitken,%20Gill&rft.date=2001-08&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=68-88&rft.issn=0141-7789&rft.eissn=1466-4380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01417780110042400&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1080_01417780110042400%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true