Violence and Violation: Women and Secure Settings 1
This article focuses on service provision for women who are involuntarily referred under the UK Mental Health Act (1983) into medium and high security care in England and Wales. We explore how physical and procedural security in such settings is prioritized over relational care (see also Fallon Repo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Feminist review 2001-08, Vol.68 (1), p.68-88 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 88 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 68 |
container_title | Feminist review |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Aitken, Gill Women, Kate Noble |
description | This article focuses on service provision for women who are involuntarily referred under the UK Mental Health Act (1983) into medium and high security care in England and Wales. We explore how physical and procedural security in such settings is prioritized over relational care (see also Fallon Report, Department of Health, 1999a and NHS Executive, 2000 – Tilt Report). We are not arguing against the importance of protecting the public from the acts of dangerous members of our society. However, we are arguing that many of the women in our secure services are inappropriately placed and receive inappropriate forms of treatment and care. Rather than physical security, it is high relational care, which the women require. Further, we argue that current service provision often re-produces forms of violence and violation which have marked many of women's lives prior to their entry into the secure system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01417780110042400 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01417780110042400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_01417780110042400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c900-a7ceb7038eabdcc1d1f240161ff97935b20448286198623d168b0dffb7adb5b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplT8tKAzEUDaLgWP0Ad_MD0XuTNA93UtQKBReWdjnkKSNtRpJx4d87o-5cHc6DwzmEXCPcIGi4BRSolAZEAMEEwAlpUEhJBddwSprZp1PAnJOLWt8BQEkmG8J3_XCI2cfW5tDOxI79kO_a_XCM-Ud8jf6zxAnGsc9vtcVLcpbsocarP1yQ7ePDdrWmm5en59X9hnoDQK3y0SngOloXvMeAadqFElMyyvClYyCEZlqi0ZLxgFI7CCk5ZYNbOuQLgr-1vgy1lpi6j9IfbfnqELr5dPfvNP8GllxH2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Violence and Violation: Women and Secure Settings 1</title><source>SAGE Publications</source><source>SpringerLink</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Aitken, Gill ; Women, Kate Noble</creator><creatorcontrib>Aitken, Gill ; Women, Kate Noble</creatorcontrib><description>This article focuses on service provision for women who are involuntarily referred under the UK Mental Health Act (1983) into medium and high security care in England and Wales. We explore how physical and procedural security in such settings is prioritized over relational care (see also Fallon Report, Department of Health, 1999a and NHS Executive, 2000 – Tilt Report). We are not arguing against the importance of protecting the public from the acts of dangerous members of our society. However, we are arguing that many of the women in our secure services are inappropriately placed and receive inappropriate forms of treatment and care. Rather than physical security, it is high relational care, which the women require. Further, we argue that current service provision often re-produces forms of violence and violation which have marked many of women's lives prior to their entry into the secure system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-7789</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01417780110042400</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Feminist review, 2001-08, Vol.68 (1), p.68-88</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c900-a7ceb7038eabdcc1d1f240161ff97935b20448286198623d168b0dffb7adb5b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c900-a7ceb7038eabdcc1d1f240161ff97935b20448286198623d168b0dffb7adb5b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aitken, Gill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Women, Kate Noble</creatorcontrib><title>Violence and Violation: Women and Secure Settings 1</title><title>Feminist review</title><description>This article focuses on service provision for women who are involuntarily referred under the UK Mental Health Act (1983) into medium and high security care in England and Wales. We explore how physical and procedural security in such settings is prioritized over relational care (see also Fallon Report, Department of Health, 1999a and NHS Executive, 2000 – Tilt Report). We are not arguing against the importance of protecting the public from the acts of dangerous members of our society. However, we are arguing that many of the women in our secure services are inappropriately placed and receive inappropriate forms of treatment and care. Rather than physical security, it is high relational care, which the women require. Further, we argue that current service provision often re-produces forms of violence and violation which have marked many of women's lives prior to their entry into the secure system.</description><issn>0141-7789</issn><issn>1466-4380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplT8tKAzEUDaLgWP0Ad_MD0XuTNA93UtQKBReWdjnkKSNtRpJx4d87o-5cHc6DwzmEXCPcIGi4BRSolAZEAMEEwAlpUEhJBddwSprZp1PAnJOLWt8BQEkmG8J3_XCI2cfW5tDOxI79kO_a_XCM-Ud8jf6zxAnGsc9vtcVLcpbsocarP1yQ7ePDdrWmm5en59X9hnoDQK3y0SngOloXvMeAadqFElMyyvClYyCEZlqi0ZLxgFI7CCk5ZYNbOuQLgr-1vgy1lpi6j9IfbfnqELr5dPfvNP8GllxH2Q</recordid><startdate>200108</startdate><enddate>200108</enddate><creator>Aitken, Gill</creator><creator>Women, Kate Noble</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200108</creationdate><title>Violence and Violation: Women and Secure Settings 1</title><author>Aitken, Gill ; Women, Kate Noble</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c900-a7ceb7038eabdcc1d1f240161ff97935b20448286198623d168b0dffb7adb5b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aitken, Gill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Women, Kate Noble</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Feminist review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aitken, Gill</au><au>Women, Kate Noble</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Violence and Violation: Women and Secure Settings 1</atitle><jtitle>Feminist review</jtitle><date>2001-08</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>68</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>68-88</pages><issn>0141-7789</issn><eissn>1466-4380</eissn><abstract>This article focuses on service provision for women who are involuntarily referred under the UK Mental Health Act (1983) into medium and high security care in England and Wales. We explore how physical and procedural security in such settings is prioritized over relational care (see also Fallon Report, Department of Health, 1999a and NHS Executive, 2000 – Tilt Report). We are not arguing against the importance of protecting the public from the acts of dangerous members of our society. However, we are arguing that many of the women in our secure services are inappropriately placed and receive inappropriate forms of treatment and care. Rather than physical security, it is high relational care, which the women require. Further, we argue that current service provision often re-produces forms of violence and violation which have marked many of women's lives prior to their entry into the secure system.</abstract><doi>10.1080/01417780110042400</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-7789 |
ispartof | Feminist review, 2001-08, Vol.68 (1), p.68-88 |
issn | 0141-7789 1466-4380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01417780110042400 |
source | SAGE Publications; SpringerLink; JSTOR |
title | Violence and Violation: Women and Secure Settings 1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A30%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Violence%20and%20Violation:%20Women%20and%20Secure%20Settings%201&rft.jtitle=Feminist%20review&rft.au=Aitken,%20Gill&rft.date=2001-08&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=68-88&rft.issn=0141-7789&rft.eissn=1466-4380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01417780110042400&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1080_01417780110042400%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |