Defining Disputes and Characterizing Claims: Subject-Matter Jurisdiction in Law of the Sea Convention Litigation
The Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) is well-known for containing a compulsory dispute settlement system in Part XV, which allows most disputes to be submitted to binding adjudication or arbitration. Yet, the ability to bring a claim under the LOSC is premised upon meeting certain conditions contain...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ocean development and international law 2017-10, Vol.48 (3-4), p.269-283 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 283 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3-4 |
| container_start_page | 269 |
| container_title | Ocean development and international law |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Harrison, James |
| description | The Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) is well-known for containing a compulsory dispute settlement system in Part XV, which allows most disputes to be submitted to binding adjudication or arbitration. Yet, the ability to bring a claim under the LOSC is premised upon meeting certain conditions contained in the Convention's compromissory clause. This article examines those requirements relating to jurisdiction ratione materiae or subject-matter jurisdiction under LOSC and how they have been interpreted in the recent jurisprudence of courts and tribunals. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00908320.2017.1328924 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00908320_2017_1328924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20180555</informt_id><sourcerecordid>1993381401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-4152b42d4adaa342726f33d1d94eb71f4a295b7bd67b943bca3083d9db35aa6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1O3DAUha2KSh1oH6GSJdYZ_JufrkABCtVUXdCurZvYmfFoxg62A6JPX4fAtitf6Xz3-OpD6Csla0pqckFIQ2rOyJoRWq0pZ3XDxAe0opLRgpSCnaDVzBQz9AmdxrgnhAhRyhUar81gnXVbfG3jOCUTMTiN2x0E6JMJ9u-ctQewx_gNP0zd3vSp-AkpZ_jHFGzUtk_WO2wd3sAz9gNOO4MfDODWuyfjXsONTXYL8_gZfRzgEM2Xt_cM_bm9-d3eFZtf3-_bq03RS1KmQuTjO8G0AA3ABatYOXCuqW6E6So6CGCN7KpOl1XXCN71wLMD3eiOS4DMnqHzpXcM_nEyMam9n4LLXyraNJzXVBCaKblQffAxBjOoMdgjhBdFiZrlqne5apar3uTmvdtlLxxtUrDN7pLapTRGpSGBsm7wr5EPW6W9nes4p-U7mstqIqXMRZdL0bIBzz4ctErwcvBhCOB6GxX__y3_AD7ymnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993381401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining Disputes and Characterizing Claims: Subject-Matter Jurisdiction in Law of the Sea Convention Litigation</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Harrison, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Harrison, James</creatorcontrib><description>The Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) is well-known for containing a compulsory dispute settlement system in Part XV, which allows most disputes to be submitted to binding adjudication or arbitration. Yet, the ability to bring a claim under the LOSC is premised upon meeting certain conditions contained in the Convention's compromissory clause. This article examines those requirements relating to jurisdiction ratione materiae or subject-matter jurisdiction under LOSC and how they have been interpreted in the recent jurisprudence of courts and tribunals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-0642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00908320.2017.1328924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Adjudication ; Admissibility ; ARBITRATION ; Claims ; compromissory clause ; Conflict resolution ; Conflicts ; Courts ; DISPUTE RESOLUTION ; dispute settlement ; Disputes ; Federal court decisions ; International law ; JURISDICTION ; jurisdiction ratione materiae ; Jurisprudence ; LAW OF THE SEA ; Litigation ; MARITIME LAW ; Sea law ; subject-matter jurisdiction ; Tribunals & commissions ; UNITED NATIONS</subject><ispartof>Ocean development and international law, 2017-10, Vol.48 (3-4), p.269-283</ispartof><rights>2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2017</rights><rights>2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-4152b42d4adaa342726f33d1d94eb71f4a295b7bd67b943bca3083d9db35aa6f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harrison, James</creatorcontrib><title>Defining Disputes and Characterizing Claims: Subject-Matter Jurisdiction in Law of the Sea Convention Litigation</title><title>Ocean development and international law</title><description>The Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) is well-known for containing a compulsory dispute settlement system in Part XV, which allows most disputes to be submitted to binding adjudication or arbitration. Yet, the ability to bring a claim under the LOSC is premised upon meeting certain conditions contained in the Convention's compromissory clause. This article examines those requirements relating to jurisdiction ratione materiae or subject-matter jurisdiction under LOSC and how they have been interpreted in the recent jurisprudence of courts and tribunals.</description><subject>Adjudication</subject><subject>Admissibility</subject><subject>ARBITRATION</subject><subject>Claims</subject><subject>compromissory clause</subject><subject>Conflict resolution</subject><subject>Conflicts</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>DISPUTE RESOLUTION</subject><subject>dispute settlement</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>JURISDICTION</subject><subject>jurisdiction ratione materiae</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>LAW OF THE SEA</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>MARITIME LAW</subject><subject>Sea law</subject><subject>subject-matter jurisdiction</subject><subject>Tribunals & commissions</subject><subject>UNITED NATIONS</subject><issn>0090-8320</issn><issn>1521-0642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1O3DAUha2KSh1oH6GSJdYZ_JufrkABCtVUXdCurZvYmfFoxg62A6JPX4fAtitf6Xz3-OpD6Csla0pqckFIQ2rOyJoRWq0pZ3XDxAe0opLRgpSCnaDVzBQz9AmdxrgnhAhRyhUar81gnXVbfG3jOCUTMTiN2x0E6JMJ9u-ctQewx_gNP0zd3vSp-AkpZ_jHFGzUtk_WO2wd3sAz9gNOO4MfDODWuyfjXsONTXYL8_gZfRzgEM2Xt_cM_bm9-d3eFZtf3-_bq03RS1KmQuTjO8G0AA3ABatYOXCuqW6E6So6CGCN7KpOl1XXCN71wLMD3eiOS4DMnqHzpXcM_nEyMam9n4LLXyraNJzXVBCaKblQffAxBjOoMdgjhBdFiZrlqne5apar3uTmvdtlLxxtUrDN7pLapTRGpSGBsm7wr5EPW6W9nes4p-U7mstqIqXMRZdL0bIBzz4ctErwcvBhCOB6GxX__y3_AD7ymnA</recordid><startdate>20171002</startdate><enddate>20171002</enddate><creator>Harrison, James</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171002</creationdate><title>Defining Disputes and Characterizing Claims: Subject-Matter Jurisdiction in Law of the Sea Convention Litigation</title><author>Harrison, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-4152b42d4adaa342726f33d1d94eb71f4a295b7bd67b943bca3083d9db35aa6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adjudication</topic><topic>Admissibility</topic><topic>ARBITRATION</topic><topic>Claims</topic><topic>compromissory clause</topic><topic>Conflict resolution</topic><topic>Conflicts</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>DISPUTE RESOLUTION</topic><topic>dispute settlement</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>JURISDICTION</topic><topic>jurisdiction ratione materiae</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>LAW OF THE SEA</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>MARITIME LAW</topic><topic>Sea law</topic><topic>subject-matter jurisdiction</topic><topic>Tribunals & commissions</topic><topic>UNITED NATIONS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harrison, James</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ocean development and international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harrison, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining Disputes and Characterizing Claims: Subject-Matter Jurisdiction in Law of the Sea Convention Litigation</atitle><jtitle>Ocean development and international law</jtitle><date>2017-10-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>269-283</pages><issn>0090-8320</issn><eissn>1521-0642</eissn><abstract>The Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) is well-known for containing a compulsory dispute settlement system in Part XV, which allows most disputes to be submitted to binding adjudication or arbitration. Yet, the ability to bring a claim under the LOSC is premised upon meeting certain conditions contained in the Convention's compromissory clause. This article examines those requirements relating to jurisdiction ratione materiae or subject-matter jurisdiction under LOSC and how they have been interpreted in the recent jurisprudence of courts and tribunals.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00908320.2017.1328924</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-8320 |
| ispartof | Ocean development and international law, 2017-10, Vol.48 (3-4), p.269-283 |
| issn | 0090-8320 1521-0642 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00908320_2017_1328924 |
| source | PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Adjudication Admissibility ARBITRATION Claims compromissory clause Conflict resolution Conflicts Courts DISPUTE RESOLUTION dispute settlement Disputes Federal court decisions International law JURISDICTION jurisdiction ratione materiae Jurisprudence LAW OF THE SEA Litigation MARITIME LAW Sea law subject-matter jurisdiction Tribunals & commissions UNITED NATIONS |
| title | Defining Disputes and Characterizing Claims: Subject-Matter Jurisdiction in Law of the Sea Convention Litigation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A43%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20Disputes%20and%20Characterizing%20Claims:%20Subject-Matter%20Jurisdiction%20in%20Law%20of%20the%20Sea%20Convention%20Litigation&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20development%20and%20international%20law&rft.au=Harrison,%20James&rft.date=2017-10-02&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=269-283&rft.issn=0090-8320&rft.eissn=1521-0642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00908320.2017.1328924&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1993381401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993381401&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20180555&rfr_iscdi=true |