Individual truth judgments or purposeful, collective sensemaking? Rethinking science education's response to the post-truth era
Science education is likely to respond to the post-truth era by focusing on how science education can help individuals use scientists' epistemological tools to tell what is true. This strategy, by itself, is inadequate for three reasons. First, science does not actually offer foundational truth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational psychologist 2020-07, Vol.55 (3), p.155-166 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 166 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 155 |
container_title | Educational psychologist |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Feinstein, Noah Weeth Waddington, David Isaac |
description | Science education is likely to respond to the post-truth era by focusing on how science education can help individuals use scientists' epistemological tools to tell what is true. This strategy, by itself, is inadequate for three reasons. First, science does not actually offer foundational truth, and incautious assertions about scientific truth can make the problems of the post-truth era worse. Second, scientific knowledge offers only part of the solution to personal and policy problems and must be reconstructed in context. Third, people think about and act on science in social context-both as members of their social and cultural groups and with other members of those groups. Taken together, these arguments suggest that we should be focusing on a different question: How can science education help people work together to make appropriate use of science in social context? |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00461520.2020.1780130 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00461520_2020_1780130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1264484</ericid><sourcerecordid>2430976970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f1f8a498f303e87a9923c100aeff89b2b6248163f149a62a1b5b51bd351734873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1u1TAQhSMEEpfCI1SyxIINKeO_xFkBqkopqoRUwdpynHGvL7l2sJ2irvrqTZTCks3MSOc7c6RTVacUzigo-AAgGioZnDFYBm0VUA7Pqh2VnNVNp-Tzarcy9Qq9rF7lfAAASqXcVQ9XYfB3fpjNSEqay54c5uH2iKFkEhOZ5jTFjG4e3xMbxxFt8XdIMoaMR_PLh9uP5AbL3of1Jtl6DBYJDrM1xcfwLpOEeYoLTkokZY9k-VfqLQqTeV29cGbM-OZpn1Q_v1z8OP9aX3-_vDr_fF1b3kCpHXXKiE45DhxVa7qOcUsBDDqnup71DROKNtxR0ZmGGdrLXtJ-4JK2XKiWn1Rvt79Tir9nzEUf4pzCEqmZ4NC1TdfCQsmNsinmnNDpKfmjSfeagl671n-71mvX-qnrxXe6-TB5-89z8Y2yRgglFv3TpvvgYjqaPzGNgy7mfozJJROsz5r_P-IRvX2QnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430976970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individual truth judgments or purposeful, collective sensemaking? Rethinking science education's response to the post-truth era</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Feinstein, Noah Weeth ; Waddington, David Isaac</creator><creatorcontrib>Feinstein, Noah Weeth ; Waddington, David Isaac</creatorcontrib><description>Science education is likely to respond to the post-truth era by focusing on how science education can help individuals use scientists' epistemological tools to tell what is true. This strategy, by itself, is inadequate for three reasons. First, science does not actually offer foundational truth, and incautious assertions about scientific truth can make the problems of the post-truth era worse. Second, scientific knowledge offers only part of the solution to personal and policy problems and must be reconstructed in context. Third, people think about and act on science in social context-both as members of their social and cultural groups and with other members of those groups. Taken together, these arguments suggest that we should be focusing on a different question: How can science education help people work together to make appropriate use of science in social context?</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-1520</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6985</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2020.1780130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Routledge</publisher><subject>Beliefs ; Cultural Influences ; Educational psychology ; Informal Education ; Role of Education ; Science and Society ; Science Education ; Social Influences</subject><ispartof>Educational psychologist, 2020-07, Vol.55 (3), p.155-166</ispartof><rights>2020 Division 15, American Psychological Association 2020</rights><rights>2020 Division 15, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f1f8a498f303e87a9923c100aeff89b2b6248163f149a62a1b5b51bd351734873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f1f8a498f303e87a9923c100aeff89b2b6248163f149a62a1b5b51bd351734873</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5071-7761</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00461520.2020.1780130$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00461520.2020.1780130$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,59632,60421</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1264484$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feinstein, Noah Weeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waddington, David Isaac</creatorcontrib><title>Individual truth judgments or purposeful, collective sensemaking? Rethinking science education's response to the post-truth era</title><title>Educational psychologist</title><description>Science education is likely to respond to the post-truth era by focusing on how science education can help individuals use scientists' epistemological tools to tell what is true. This strategy, by itself, is inadequate for three reasons. First, science does not actually offer foundational truth, and incautious assertions about scientific truth can make the problems of the post-truth era worse. Second, scientific knowledge offers only part of the solution to personal and policy problems and must be reconstructed in context. Third, people think about and act on science in social context-both as members of their social and cultural groups and with other members of those groups. Taken together, these arguments suggest that we should be focusing on a different question: How can science education help people work together to make appropriate use of science in social context?</description><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Cultural Influences</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Informal Education</subject><subject>Role of Education</subject><subject>Science and Society</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><issn>0046-1520</issn><issn>1532-6985</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1u1TAQhSMEEpfCI1SyxIINKeO_xFkBqkopqoRUwdpynHGvL7l2sJ2irvrqTZTCks3MSOc7c6RTVacUzigo-AAgGioZnDFYBm0VUA7Pqh2VnNVNp-Tzarcy9Qq9rF7lfAAASqXcVQ9XYfB3fpjNSEqay54c5uH2iKFkEhOZ5jTFjG4e3xMbxxFt8XdIMoaMR_PLh9uP5AbL3of1Jtl6DBYJDrM1xcfwLpOEeYoLTkokZY9k-VfqLQqTeV29cGbM-OZpn1Q_v1z8OP9aX3-_vDr_fF1b3kCpHXXKiE45DhxVa7qOcUsBDDqnup71DROKNtxR0ZmGGdrLXtJ-4JK2XKiWn1Rvt79Tir9nzEUf4pzCEqmZ4NC1TdfCQsmNsinmnNDpKfmjSfeagl671n-71mvX-qnrxXe6-TB5-89z8Y2yRgglFv3TpvvgYjqaPzGNgy7mfozJJROsz5r_P-IRvX2QnA</recordid><startdate>20200702</startdate><enddate>20200702</enddate><creator>Feinstein, Noah Weeth</creator><creator>Waddington, David Isaac</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5071-7761</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200702</creationdate><title>Individual truth judgments or purposeful, collective sensemaking? Rethinking science education's response to the post-truth era</title><author>Feinstein, Noah Weeth ; Waddington, David Isaac</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f1f8a498f303e87a9923c100aeff89b2b6248163f149a62a1b5b51bd351734873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Cultural Influences</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Informal Education</topic><topic>Role of Education</topic><topic>Science and Society</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feinstein, Noah Weeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waddington, David Isaac</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feinstein, Noah Weeth</au><au>Waddington, David Isaac</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1264484</ericid><atitle>Individual truth judgments or purposeful, collective sensemaking? Rethinking science education's response to the post-truth era</atitle><jtitle>Educational psychologist</jtitle><date>2020-07-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>155-166</pages><issn>0046-1520</issn><eissn>1532-6985</eissn><abstract>Science education is likely to respond to the post-truth era by focusing on how science education can help individuals use scientists' epistemological tools to tell what is true. This strategy, by itself, is inadequate for three reasons. First, science does not actually offer foundational truth, and incautious assertions about scientific truth can make the problems of the post-truth era worse. Second, scientific knowledge offers only part of the solution to personal and policy problems and must be reconstructed in context. Third, people think about and act on science in social context-both as members of their social and cultural groups and with other members of those groups. Taken together, these arguments suggest that we should be focusing on a different question: How can science education help people work together to make appropriate use of science in social context?</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00461520.2020.1780130</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5071-7761</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-1520 |
ispartof | Educational psychologist, 2020-07, Vol.55 (3), p.155-166 |
issn | 0046-1520 1532-6985 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00461520_2020_1780130 |
source | Education Source; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Beliefs Cultural Influences Educational psychology Informal Education Role of Education Science and Society Science Education Social Influences |
title | Individual truth judgments or purposeful, collective sensemaking? Rethinking science education's response to the post-truth era |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A51%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual%20truth%20judgments%20or%20purposeful,%20collective%20sensemaking?%20Rethinking%20science%20education's%20response%20to%20the%20post-truth%20era&rft.jtitle=Educational%20psychologist&rft.au=Feinstein,%20Noah%20Weeth&rft.date=2020-07-02&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=155-166&rft.issn=0046-1520&rft.eissn=1532-6985&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00461520.2020.1780130&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2430976970%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430976970&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1264484&rfr_iscdi=true |