Permissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors: A clarification of theoretical explanations
Theory and research regarding permissive or nonpermissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors have contained apparent contradictions: Those maintaining that men and women differ in permissiveness rely on differential socialization theory; those maintaining that men and women share a common level of pe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of sex research 1978-08, Vol.14 (3), p.137-144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 144 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 137 |
container_title | The Journal of sex research |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Laner, Mary Riege Laner, Roy H. Palmer, C. Eddie |
description | Theory and research regarding permissive or nonpermissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors have contained apparent contradictions: Those maintaining that men and women differ in permissiveness rely on differential socialization theory; those maintaining that men and women share a common level of permissiveness suggest new cohort-wide values as the explanation; and, discounting male/female differences, permissiveness has been held to vary by degree of involvement in familial or courtship processes. Questionnaire responses of 138 college students' attitudes toward seven sexual situations were analyzed by respondents' sex, class standing, attitude toward divorce, courtship status, and perception of parents' marital happiness. Results provided support for each of the theoretical explanations. Permissiveness varied by each of the independent variables and by specific sexual behaviors (e.g., premarital sexual intercourse, cohabitation, communal living, the nexus between pre- and extramarital sex and marital happiness, and the connection between each spouse's infidelity and divorce). Thus, simple theoretical explanations of permissiveness or its absence appear to be unwarranted. Behaviors must be specified and background variables must be taken into account. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00224497809551003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00224497809551003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3812240</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3812240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6f6f2017599e597bd2764ab21c5e53ae1d4e7c79b26faf2d9b3cdac9b9e4d6423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaLgOPoBgous3FXzaNpG3AziCwZ0oQtXJU1vmAydyZik8_h7M1bciHdz4Z4H5x6Ezim5oqQi14QwlueyrIgUghLCD9CICiGzSlB5iEZ7PEsEeYxOQpiTNLSUI_TxCn5hQ7BrwCpGG_sWAo5uo3yLA2x71eEGZmptnQ83eIJ1p7w1Vqto3RI7g-MMnIeYLh2G7apTy28onKIjo7oAZz97jN4f7t_unrLpy-Pz3WSaaZ5XMStMYVjKIqQEIcumZWWRq4ZRLUBwBbTNodSlbFhhlGGtbLhulZaNhLwtcsbH6HLwXXn32UOIdfpHQ5eCgOtDXZCC84LyRKQDUXsXggdTr7xdKL-rKan3JdZ_Skyai0EzD9H5XwGvaGKSBN8OsF0a5xdq43zX1lHtOueNV0ttQ83_d_8Co5iCmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60633613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Permissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors: A clarification of theoretical explanations</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Laner, Mary Riege ; Laner, Roy H. ; Palmer, C. Eddie</creator><creatorcontrib>Laner, Mary Riege ; Laner, Roy H. ; Palmer, C. Eddie</creatorcontrib><description>Theory and research regarding permissive or nonpermissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors have contained apparent contradictions: Those maintaining that men and women differ in permissiveness rely on differential socialization theory; those maintaining that men and women share a common level of permissiveness suggest new cohort-wide values as the explanation; and, discounting male/female differences, permissiveness has been held to vary by degree of involvement in familial or courtship processes. Questionnaire responses of 138 college students' attitudes toward seven sexual situations were analyzed by respondents' sex, class standing, attitude toward divorce, courtship status, and perception of parents' marital happiness. Results provided support for each of the theoretical explanations. Permissiveness varied by each of the independent variables and by specific sexual behaviors (e.g., premarital sexual intercourse, cohabitation, communal living, the nexus between pre- and extramarital sex and marital happiness, and the connection between each spouse's infidelity and divorce). Thus, simple theoretical explanations of permissiveness or its absence appear to be unwarranted. Behaviors must be specified and background variables must be taken into account.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-8519</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00224497809551003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSXRAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Behavior/Behavioral ; College students ; Contradict/Contradicts/Contradiction/ Contradictions/ Contradictory ; Courtship ; Divorce ; Happiness ; Human sexual behavior ; Men ; Parents ; Permissiveness ; Premarital sex ; Sexual/Sexuality/Sexually ; Socialization ; Theory/Theories/Theorem/ Theorizing</subject><ispartof>The Journal of sex research, 1978-08, Vol.14 (3), p.137-144</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1978</rights><rights>Copyright 1978 The Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6f6f2017599e597bd2764ab21c5e53ae1d4e7c79b26faf2d9b3cdac9b9e4d6423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6f6f2017599e597bd2764ab21c5e53ae1d4e7c79b26faf2d9b3cdac9b9e4d6423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3812240$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3812240$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,33754,57995,58228,59623,60412</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laner, Mary Riege</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laner, Roy H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, C. Eddie</creatorcontrib><title>Permissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors: A clarification of theoretical explanations</title><title>The Journal of sex research</title><description>Theory and research regarding permissive or nonpermissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors have contained apparent contradictions: Those maintaining that men and women differ in permissiveness rely on differential socialization theory; those maintaining that men and women share a common level of permissiveness suggest new cohort-wide values as the explanation; and, discounting male/female differences, permissiveness has been held to vary by degree of involvement in familial or courtship processes. Questionnaire responses of 138 college students' attitudes toward seven sexual situations were analyzed by respondents' sex, class standing, attitude toward divorce, courtship status, and perception of parents' marital happiness. Results provided support for each of the theoretical explanations. Permissiveness varied by each of the independent variables and by specific sexual behaviors (e.g., premarital sexual intercourse, cohabitation, communal living, the nexus between pre- and extramarital sex and marital happiness, and the connection between each spouse's infidelity and divorce). Thus, simple theoretical explanations of permissiveness or its absence appear to be unwarranted. Behaviors must be specified and background variables must be taken into account.</description><subject>Behavior/Behavioral</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Contradict/Contradicts/Contradiction/ Contradictions/ Contradictory</subject><subject>Courtship</subject><subject>Divorce</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Human sexual behavior</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Permissiveness</subject><subject>Premarital sex</subject><subject>Sexual/Sexuality/Sexually</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Theory/Theories/Theorem/ Theorizing</subject><issn>0022-4499</issn><issn>1559-8519</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1978</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaLgOPoBgous3FXzaNpG3AziCwZ0oQtXJU1vmAydyZik8_h7M1bciHdz4Z4H5x6Ezim5oqQi14QwlueyrIgUghLCD9CICiGzSlB5iEZ7PEsEeYxOQpiTNLSUI_TxCn5hQ7BrwCpGG_sWAo5uo3yLA2x71eEGZmptnQ83eIJ1p7w1Vqto3RI7g-MMnIeYLh2G7apTy28onKIjo7oAZz97jN4f7t_unrLpy-Pz3WSaaZ5XMStMYVjKIqQEIcumZWWRq4ZRLUBwBbTNodSlbFhhlGGtbLhulZaNhLwtcsbH6HLwXXn32UOIdfpHQ5eCgOtDXZCC84LyRKQDUXsXggdTr7xdKL-rKan3JdZ_Skyai0EzD9H5XwGvaGKSBN8OsF0a5xdq43zX1lHtOueNV0ttQ83_d_8Co5iCmQ</recordid><startdate>19780801</startdate><enddate>19780801</enddate><creator>Laner, Mary Riege</creator><creator>Laner, Roy H.</creator><creator>Palmer, C. Eddie</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Society for the Scientific Study of Sex</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19780801</creationdate><title>Permissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors: A clarification of theoretical explanations</title><author>Laner, Mary Riege ; Laner, Roy H. ; Palmer, C. Eddie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6f6f2017599e597bd2764ab21c5e53ae1d4e7c79b26faf2d9b3cdac9b9e4d6423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1978</creationdate><topic>Behavior/Behavioral</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Contradict/Contradicts/Contradiction/ Contradictions/ Contradictory</topic><topic>Courtship</topic><topic>Divorce</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Human sexual behavior</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Permissiveness</topic><topic>Premarital sex</topic><topic>Sexual/Sexuality/Sexually</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Theory/Theories/Theorem/ Theorizing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laner, Mary Riege</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laner, Roy H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, C. Eddie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of sex research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laner, Mary Riege</au><au>Laner, Roy H.</au><au>Palmer, C. Eddie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Permissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors: A clarification of theoretical explanations</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of sex research</jtitle><date>1978-08-01</date><risdate>1978</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>137-144</pages><issn>0022-4499</issn><eissn>1559-8519</eissn><coden>JSXRAJ</coden><abstract>Theory and research regarding permissive or nonpermissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors have contained apparent contradictions: Those maintaining that men and women differ in permissiveness rely on differential socialization theory; those maintaining that men and women share a common level of permissiveness suggest new cohort-wide values as the explanation; and, discounting male/female differences, permissiveness has been held to vary by degree of involvement in familial or courtship processes. Questionnaire responses of 138 college students' attitudes toward seven sexual situations were analyzed by respondents' sex, class standing, attitude toward divorce, courtship status, and perception of parents' marital happiness. Results provided support for each of the theoretical explanations. Permissiveness varied by each of the independent variables and by specific sexual behaviors (e.g., premarital sexual intercourse, cohabitation, communal living, the nexus between pre- and extramarital sex and marital happiness, and the connection between each spouse's infidelity and divorce). Thus, simple theoretical explanations of permissiveness or its absence appear to be unwarranted. Behaviors must be specified and background variables must be taken into account.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00224497809551003</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4499 |
ispartof | The Journal of sex research, 1978-08, Vol.14 (3), p.137-144 |
issn | 0022-4499 1559-8519 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00224497809551003 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Behavior/Behavioral College students Contradict/Contradicts/Contradiction/ Contradictions/ Contradictory Courtship Divorce Happiness Human sexual behavior Men Parents Permissiveness Premarital sex Sexual/Sexuality/Sexually Socialization Theory/Theories/Theorem/ Theorizing |
title | Permissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors: A clarification of theoretical explanations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T16%3A17%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Permissive%20attitudes%20toward%20sexual%20behaviors:%20A%20clarification%20of%20theoretical%20explanations&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20sex%20research&rft.au=Laner,%20Mary%20Riege&rft.date=1978-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=137-144&rft.issn=0022-4499&rft.eissn=1559-8519&rft.coden=JSXRAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00224497809551003&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3812240%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60633613&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3812240&rfr_iscdi=true |