Permissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors: A clarification of theoretical explanations

Theory and research regarding permissive or nonpermissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors have contained apparent contradictions: Those maintaining that men and women differ in permissiveness rely on differential socialization theory; those maintaining that men and women share a common level of pe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of sex research 1978-08, Vol.14 (3), p.137-144
Hauptverfasser: Laner, Mary Riege, Laner, Roy H., Palmer, C. Eddie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 144
container_issue 3
container_start_page 137
container_title The Journal of sex research
container_volume 14
creator Laner, Mary Riege
Laner, Roy H.
Palmer, C. Eddie
description Theory and research regarding permissive or nonpermissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors have contained apparent contradictions: Those maintaining that men and women differ in permissiveness rely on differential socialization theory; those maintaining that men and women share a common level of permissiveness suggest new cohort-wide values as the explanation; and, discounting male/female differences, permissiveness has been held to vary by degree of involvement in familial or courtship processes. Questionnaire responses of 138 college students' attitudes toward seven sexual situations were analyzed by respondents' sex, class standing, attitude toward divorce, courtship status, and perception of parents' marital happiness. Results provided support for each of the theoretical explanations. Permissiveness varied by each of the independent variables and by specific sexual behaviors (e.g., premarital sexual intercourse, cohabitation, communal living, the nexus between pre- and extramarital sex and marital happiness, and the connection between each spouse's infidelity and divorce). Thus, simple theoretical explanations of permissiveness or its absence appear to be unwarranted. Behaviors must be specified and background variables must be taken into account.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00224497809551003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00224497809551003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3812240</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3812240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6f6f2017599e597bd2764ab21c5e53ae1d4e7c79b26faf2d9b3cdac9b9e4d6423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaLgOPoBgous3FXzaNpG3AziCwZ0oQtXJU1vmAydyZik8_h7M1bciHdz4Z4H5x6Ezim5oqQi14QwlueyrIgUghLCD9CICiGzSlB5iEZ7PEsEeYxOQpiTNLSUI_TxCn5hQ7BrwCpGG_sWAo5uo3yLA2x71eEGZmptnQ83eIJ1p7w1Vqto3RI7g-MMnIeYLh2G7apTy28onKIjo7oAZz97jN4f7t_unrLpy-Pz3WSaaZ5XMStMYVjKIqQEIcumZWWRq4ZRLUBwBbTNodSlbFhhlGGtbLhulZaNhLwtcsbH6HLwXXn32UOIdfpHQ5eCgOtDXZCC84LyRKQDUXsXggdTr7xdKL-rKan3JdZ_Skyai0EzD9H5XwGvaGKSBN8OsF0a5xdq43zX1lHtOueNV0ttQ83_d_8Co5iCmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60633613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Permissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors: A clarification of theoretical explanations</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Laner, Mary Riege ; Laner, Roy H. ; Palmer, C. Eddie</creator><creatorcontrib>Laner, Mary Riege ; Laner, Roy H. ; Palmer, C. Eddie</creatorcontrib><description>Theory and research regarding permissive or nonpermissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors have contained apparent contradictions: Those maintaining that men and women differ in permissiveness rely on differential socialization theory; those maintaining that men and women share a common level of permissiveness suggest new cohort-wide values as the explanation; and, discounting male/female differences, permissiveness has been held to vary by degree of involvement in familial or courtship processes. Questionnaire responses of 138 college students' attitudes toward seven sexual situations were analyzed by respondents' sex, class standing, attitude toward divorce, courtship status, and perception of parents' marital happiness. Results provided support for each of the theoretical explanations. Permissiveness varied by each of the independent variables and by specific sexual behaviors (e.g., premarital sexual intercourse, cohabitation, communal living, the nexus between pre- and extramarital sex and marital happiness, and the connection between each spouse's infidelity and divorce). Thus, simple theoretical explanations of permissiveness or its absence appear to be unwarranted. Behaviors must be specified and background variables must be taken into account.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-8519</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00224497809551003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSXRAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Behavior/Behavioral ; College students ; Contradict/Contradicts/Contradiction/ Contradictions/ Contradictory ; Courtship ; Divorce ; Happiness ; Human sexual behavior ; Men ; Parents ; Permissiveness ; Premarital sex ; Sexual/Sexuality/Sexually ; Socialization ; Theory/Theories/Theorem/ Theorizing</subject><ispartof>The Journal of sex research, 1978-08, Vol.14 (3), p.137-144</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1978</rights><rights>Copyright 1978 The Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6f6f2017599e597bd2764ab21c5e53ae1d4e7c79b26faf2d9b3cdac9b9e4d6423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6f6f2017599e597bd2764ab21c5e53ae1d4e7c79b26faf2d9b3cdac9b9e4d6423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3812240$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3812240$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,33754,57995,58228,59623,60412</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laner, Mary Riege</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laner, Roy H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, C. Eddie</creatorcontrib><title>Permissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors: A clarification of theoretical explanations</title><title>The Journal of sex research</title><description>Theory and research regarding permissive or nonpermissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors have contained apparent contradictions: Those maintaining that men and women differ in permissiveness rely on differential socialization theory; those maintaining that men and women share a common level of permissiveness suggest new cohort-wide values as the explanation; and, discounting male/female differences, permissiveness has been held to vary by degree of involvement in familial or courtship processes. Questionnaire responses of 138 college students' attitudes toward seven sexual situations were analyzed by respondents' sex, class standing, attitude toward divorce, courtship status, and perception of parents' marital happiness. Results provided support for each of the theoretical explanations. Permissiveness varied by each of the independent variables and by specific sexual behaviors (e.g., premarital sexual intercourse, cohabitation, communal living, the nexus between pre- and extramarital sex and marital happiness, and the connection between each spouse's infidelity and divorce). Thus, simple theoretical explanations of permissiveness or its absence appear to be unwarranted. Behaviors must be specified and background variables must be taken into account.</description><subject>Behavior/Behavioral</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Contradict/Contradicts/Contradiction/ Contradictions/ Contradictory</subject><subject>Courtship</subject><subject>Divorce</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Human sexual behavior</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Permissiveness</subject><subject>Premarital sex</subject><subject>Sexual/Sexuality/Sexually</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Theory/Theories/Theorem/ Theorizing</subject><issn>0022-4499</issn><issn>1559-8519</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1978</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaLgOPoBgous3FXzaNpG3AziCwZ0oQtXJU1vmAydyZik8_h7M1bciHdz4Z4H5x6Ezim5oqQi14QwlueyrIgUghLCD9CICiGzSlB5iEZ7PEsEeYxOQpiTNLSUI_TxCn5hQ7BrwCpGG_sWAo5uo3yLA2x71eEGZmptnQ83eIJ1p7w1Vqto3RI7g-MMnIeYLh2G7apTy28onKIjo7oAZz97jN4f7t_unrLpy-Pz3WSaaZ5XMStMYVjKIqQEIcumZWWRq4ZRLUBwBbTNodSlbFhhlGGtbLhulZaNhLwtcsbH6HLwXXn32UOIdfpHQ5eCgOtDXZCC84LyRKQDUXsXggdTr7xdKL-rKan3JdZ_Skyai0EzD9H5XwGvaGKSBN8OsF0a5xdq43zX1lHtOueNV0ttQ83_d_8Co5iCmQ</recordid><startdate>19780801</startdate><enddate>19780801</enddate><creator>Laner, Mary Riege</creator><creator>Laner, Roy H.</creator><creator>Palmer, C. Eddie</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Society for the Scientific Study of Sex</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19780801</creationdate><title>Permissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors: A clarification of theoretical explanations</title><author>Laner, Mary Riege ; Laner, Roy H. ; Palmer, C. Eddie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-6f6f2017599e597bd2764ab21c5e53ae1d4e7c79b26faf2d9b3cdac9b9e4d6423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1978</creationdate><topic>Behavior/Behavioral</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Contradict/Contradicts/Contradiction/ Contradictions/ Contradictory</topic><topic>Courtship</topic><topic>Divorce</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Human sexual behavior</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Permissiveness</topic><topic>Premarital sex</topic><topic>Sexual/Sexuality/Sexually</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Theory/Theories/Theorem/ Theorizing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laner, Mary Riege</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laner, Roy H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, C. Eddie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of sex research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laner, Mary Riege</au><au>Laner, Roy H.</au><au>Palmer, C. Eddie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Permissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors: A clarification of theoretical explanations</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of sex research</jtitle><date>1978-08-01</date><risdate>1978</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>137-144</pages><issn>0022-4499</issn><eissn>1559-8519</eissn><coden>JSXRAJ</coden><abstract>Theory and research regarding permissive or nonpermissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors have contained apparent contradictions: Those maintaining that men and women differ in permissiveness rely on differential socialization theory; those maintaining that men and women share a common level of permissiveness suggest new cohort-wide values as the explanation; and, discounting male/female differences, permissiveness has been held to vary by degree of involvement in familial or courtship processes. Questionnaire responses of 138 college students' attitudes toward seven sexual situations were analyzed by respondents' sex, class standing, attitude toward divorce, courtship status, and perception of parents' marital happiness. Results provided support for each of the theoretical explanations. Permissiveness varied by each of the independent variables and by specific sexual behaviors (e.g., premarital sexual intercourse, cohabitation, communal living, the nexus between pre- and extramarital sex and marital happiness, and the connection between each spouse's infidelity and divorce). Thus, simple theoretical explanations of permissiveness or its absence appear to be unwarranted. Behaviors must be specified and background variables must be taken into account.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00224497809551003</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4499
ispartof The Journal of sex research, 1978-08, Vol.14 (3), p.137-144
issn 0022-4499
1559-8519
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00224497809551003
source Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Behavior/Behavioral
College students
Contradict/Contradicts/Contradiction/ Contradictions/ Contradictory
Courtship
Divorce
Happiness
Human sexual behavior
Men
Parents
Permissiveness
Premarital sex
Sexual/Sexuality/Sexually
Socialization
Theory/Theories/Theorem/ Theorizing
title Permissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors: A clarification of theoretical explanations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T16%3A17%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Permissive%20attitudes%20toward%20sexual%20behaviors:%20A%20clarification%20of%20theoretical%20explanations&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20sex%20research&rft.au=Laner,%20Mary%20Riege&rft.date=1978-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=137-144&rft.issn=0022-4499&rft.eissn=1559-8519&rft.coden=JSXRAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00224497809551003&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3812240%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60633613&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3812240&rfr_iscdi=true