The Personality Assessment Inventory in U.S. Case Law: A Survey and Examination of Relevance to Legal Proceedings
The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a popular measure of personality, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, has demonstrated utility to address various psycholegal questions. This case law review examines a large sample of randomly selected published U.S. case law decisions to asce...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality assessment 2022-03, Vol.104 (2), p.179-191 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 191 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 179 |
container_title | Journal of personality assessment |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Meaux, Lauren Cox, Jennifer Edens, John F. DeMatteo, David Martinez, Alexandra Bownes, Elizabeth |
description | The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a popular measure of personality, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, has demonstrated utility to address various psycholegal questions. This case law review examines a large sample of randomly selected published U.S. case law decisions to ascertain how the PAI has been applied and considered by legal decision makers. The review indicates the instrument is popular in criminal and civil legal settings, particularly in preadjudication forensic mental health evaluations (e.g., competency to proceed) and cases considering social security disability benefits. Forensic evaluators and legal actors primarily consider the results of the PAI as indicators of examinee impression management, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, although this varied by psycholegal context. The admissibility of the instrument was rarely challenged, although some challenges to the forensic evaluator's interpretation and conclusions emerged. Despite the PAI's popularity, the utility of the instrument is determined by specific, empirically supported, contexts. As such, forensic evaluators must consider how the PAI may inform decision making given examinee characteristics and the psycholegal question. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00223891.2021.1975723 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00223891_2021_1975723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2635103128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e132ee25cb20cbd83a7c6243c7c5e14a05eae0f6094b236cf09e21009766f943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAURS0EosPATwBZYsMm4fk5zgcrRqMClUaiosPa8jgvJVVit3YyJf-eRDNlwYLV3Zx3n3QPY28FpAJK-AiAKMtKpAgoUlEVqkD5jK2EkpgUhcLnbLUwyQJdsFcx3gGAEBm-ZBcyU5Ajwoo97H8Rv6YQvTNdO0x8EyPF2JMb-JU7zuHDxFvHf6Y3Kd-aSHxnHj_xDb8Zw5EmblzNL3-bvnVmaL3jvuE_qKOjcZb44PmObk3Hr4O3RHXrbuNr9qIxXaQ351yz_ZfL_fZbsvv-9Wq72SVWVtmQkJBIhMoeEOyhLqUpbI6ZtIVVJDIDigxBk0OVHVDmtoGKUABURZ43VSbX7MOp9j74h5HioPs2Wuo648iPUaMqRIXlstqavf8HvfNjmPeYqVwqAVJgOVPqRNngYwzU6PvQ9iZMWoBelOgnJXpRos9K5rt35_bx0FP99-rJwQx8PgGta3zozaMPXa0HM3U-NGHesY1a_v_HH_tYmQI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2635103128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Personality Assessment Inventory in U.S. Case Law: A Survey and Examination of Relevance to Legal Proceedings</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Meaux, Lauren ; Cox, Jennifer ; Edens, John F. ; DeMatteo, David ; Martinez, Alexandra ; Bownes, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Meaux, Lauren ; Cox, Jennifer ; Edens, John F. ; DeMatteo, David ; Martinez, Alexandra ; Bownes, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a popular measure of personality, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, has demonstrated utility to address various psycholegal questions. This case law review examines a large sample of randomly selected published U.S. case law decisions to ascertain how the PAI has been applied and considered by legal decision makers. The review indicates the instrument is popular in criminal and civil legal settings, particularly in preadjudication forensic mental health evaluations (e.g., competency to proceed) and cases considering social security disability benefits. Forensic evaluators and legal actors primarily consider the results of the PAI as indicators of examinee impression management, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, although this varied by psycholegal context. The admissibility of the instrument was rarely challenged, although some challenges to the forensic evaluator's interpretation and conclusions emerged. Despite the PAI's popularity, the utility of the instrument is determined by specific, empirically supported, contexts. As such, forensic evaluators must consider how the PAI may inform decision making given examinee characteristics and the psycholegal question.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1975723</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34506220</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Case law ; Criminals ; Decision makers ; Decision making ; Disability ; Forensic psychiatry ; Humans ; Impression management ; Mental health ; Personality ; Personality Assessment ; Personality Disorders ; Personality Inventory ; Personality tests ; Popularity ; Psychopathology ; Social functioning ; Social security</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality assessment, 2022-03, Vol.104 (2), p.179-191</ispartof><rights>2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2021</rights><rights>2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e132ee25cb20cbd83a7c6243c7c5e14a05eae0f6094b236cf09e21009766f943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e132ee25cb20cbd83a7c6243c7c5e14a05eae0f6094b236cf09e21009766f943</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5075-7461 ; 0000-0001-6267-5714 ; 0000-0002-2218-0650</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34506220$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meaux, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edens, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMatteo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bownes, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>The Personality Assessment Inventory in U.S. Case Law: A Survey and Examination of Relevance to Legal Proceedings</title><title>Journal of personality assessment</title><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><description>The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a popular measure of personality, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, has demonstrated utility to address various psycholegal questions. This case law review examines a large sample of randomly selected published U.S. case law decisions to ascertain how the PAI has been applied and considered by legal decision makers. The review indicates the instrument is popular in criminal and civil legal settings, particularly in preadjudication forensic mental health evaluations (e.g., competency to proceed) and cases considering social security disability benefits. Forensic evaluators and legal actors primarily consider the results of the PAI as indicators of examinee impression management, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, although this varied by psycholegal context. The admissibility of the instrument was rarely challenged, although some challenges to the forensic evaluator's interpretation and conclusions emerged. Despite the PAI's popularity, the utility of the instrument is determined by specific, empirically supported, contexts. As such, forensic evaluators must consider how the PAI may inform decision making given examinee characteristics and the psycholegal question.</description><subject>Case law</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Decision makers</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Forensic psychiatry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impression management</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality Assessment</subject><subject>Personality Disorders</subject><subject>Personality Inventory</subject><subject>Personality tests</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Social functioning</subject><subject>Social security</subject><issn>0022-3891</issn><issn>1532-7752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAURS0EosPATwBZYsMm4fk5zgcrRqMClUaiosPa8jgvJVVit3YyJf-eRDNlwYLV3Zx3n3QPY28FpAJK-AiAKMtKpAgoUlEVqkD5jK2EkpgUhcLnbLUwyQJdsFcx3gGAEBm-ZBcyU5Ajwoo97H8Rv6YQvTNdO0x8EyPF2JMb-JU7zuHDxFvHf6Y3Kd-aSHxnHj_xDb8Zw5EmblzNL3-bvnVmaL3jvuE_qKOjcZb44PmObk3Hr4O3RHXrbuNr9qIxXaQ351yz_ZfL_fZbsvv-9Wq72SVWVtmQkJBIhMoeEOyhLqUpbI6ZtIVVJDIDigxBk0OVHVDmtoGKUABURZ43VSbX7MOp9j74h5HioPs2Wuo648iPUaMqRIXlstqavf8HvfNjmPeYqVwqAVJgOVPqRNngYwzU6PvQ9iZMWoBelOgnJXpRos9K5rt35_bx0FP99-rJwQx8PgGta3zozaMPXa0HM3U-NGHesY1a_v_HH_tYmQI</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Meaux, Lauren</creator><creator>Cox, Jennifer</creator><creator>Edens, John F.</creator><creator>DeMatteo, David</creator><creator>Martinez, Alexandra</creator><creator>Bownes, Elizabeth</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-7461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-5714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2218-0650</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>The Personality Assessment Inventory in U.S. Case Law: A Survey and Examination of Relevance to Legal Proceedings</title><author>Meaux, Lauren ; Cox, Jennifer ; Edens, John F. ; DeMatteo, David ; Martinez, Alexandra ; Bownes, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e132ee25cb20cbd83a7c6243c7c5e14a05eae0f6094b236cf09e21009766f943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Case law</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Decision makers</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Forensic psychiatry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impression management</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality Assessment</topic><topic>Personality Disorders</topic><topic>Personality Inventory</topic><topic>Personality tests</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Social functioning</topic><topic>Social security</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meaux, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edens, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMatteo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bownes, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meaux, Lauren</au><au>Cox, Jennifer</au><au>Edens, John F.</au><au>DeMatteo, David</au><au>Martinez, Alexandra</au><au>Bownes, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Personality Assessment Inventory in U.S. Case Law: A Survey and Examination of Relevance to Legal Proceedings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>179-191</pages><issn>0022-3891</issn><eissn>1532-7752</eissn><abstract>The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a popular measure of personality, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, has demonstrated utility to address various psycholegal questions. This case law review examines a large sample of randomly selected published U.S. case law decisions to ascertain how the PAI has been applied and considered by legal decision makers. The review indicates the instrument is popular in criminal and civil legal settings, particularly in preadjudication forensic mental health evaluations (e.g., competency to proceed) and cases considering social security disability benefits. Forensic evaluators and legal actors primarily consider the results of the PAI as indicators of examinee impression management, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, although this varied by psycholegal context. The admissibility of the instrument was rarely challenged, although some challenges to the forensic evaluator's interpretation and conclusions emerged. Despite the PAI's popularity, the utility of the instrument is determined by specific, empirically supported, contexts. As such, forensic evaluators must consider how the PAI may inform decision making given examinee characteristics and the psycholegal question.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>34506220</pmid><doi>10.1080/00223891.2021.1975723</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-7461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-5714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2218-0650</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3891 |
ispartof | Journal of personality assessment, 2022-03, Vol.104 (2), p.179-191 |
issn | 0022-3891 1532-7752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00223891_2021_1975723 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Case law Criminals Decision makers Decision making Disability Forensic psychiatry Humans Impression management Mental health Personality Personality Assessment Personality Disorders Personality Inventory Personality tests Popularity Psychopathology Social functioning Social security |
title | The Personality Assessment Inventory in U.S. Case Law: A Survey and Examination of Relevance to Legal Proceedings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A50%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Personality%20Assessment%20Inventory%20in%20U.S.%20Case%20Law:%20A%20Survey%20and%20Examination%20of%20Relevance%20to%20Legal%20Proceedings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20assessment&rft.au=Meaux,%20Lauren&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=179-191&rft.issn=0022-3891&rft.eissn=1532-7752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00223891.2021.1975723&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2635103128%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2635103128&rft_id=info:pmid/34506220&rfr_iscdi=true |