The Personality Assessment Inventory in U.S. Case Law: A Survey and Examination of Relevance to Legal Proceedings

The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a popular measure of personality, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, has demonstrated utility to address various psycholegal questions. This case law review examines a large sample of randomly selected published U.S. case law decisions to asce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personality assessment 2022-03, Vol.104 (2), p.179-191
Hauptverfasser: Meaux, Lauren, Cox, Jennifer, Edens, John F., DeMatteo, David, Martinez, Alexandra, Bownes, Elizabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 191
container_issue 2
container_start_page 179
container_title Journal of personality assessment
container_volume 104
creator Meaux, Lauren
Cox, Jennifer
Edens, John F.
DeMatteo, David
Martinez, Alexandra
Bownes, Elizabeth
description The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a popular measure of personality, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, has demonstrated utility to address various psycholegal questions. This case law review examines a large sample of randomly selected published U.S. case law decisions to ascertain how the PAI has been applied and considered by legal decision makers. The review indicates the instrument is popular in criminal and civil legal settings, particularly in preadjudication forensic mental health evaluations (e.g., competency to proceed) and cases considering social security disability benefits. Forensic evaluators and legal actors primarily consider the results of the PAI as indicators of examinee impression management, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, although this varied by psycholegal context. The admissibility of the instrument was rarely challenged, although some challenges to the forensic evaluator's interpretation and conclusions emerged. Despite the PAI's popularity, the utility of the instrument is determined by specific, empirically supported, contexts. As such, forensic evaluators must consider how the PAI may inform decision making given examinee characteristics and the psycholegal question.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00223891.2021.1975723
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00223891_2021_1975723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2635103128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e132ee25cb20cbd83a7c6243c7c5e14a05eae0f6094b236cf09e21009766f943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAURS0EosPATwBZYsMm4fk5zgcrRqMClUaiosPa8jgvJVVit3YyJf-eRDNlwYLV3Zx3n3QPY28FpAJK-AiAKMtKpAgoUlEVqkD5jK2EkpgUhcLnbLUwyQJdsFcx3gGAEBm-ZBcyU5Ajwoo97H8Rv6YQvTNdO0x8EyPF2JMb-JU7zuHDxFvHf6Y3Kd-aSHxnHj_xDb8Zw5EmblzNL3-bvnVmaL3jvuE_qKOjcZb44PmObk3Hr4O3RHXrbuNr9qIxXaQ351yz_ZfL_fZbsvv-9Wq72SVWVtmQkJBIhMoeEOyhLqUpbI6ZtIVVJDIDigxBk0OVHVDmtoGKUABURZ43VSbX7MOp9j74h5HioPs2Wuo648iPUaMqRIXlstqavf8HvfNjmPeYqVwqAVJgOVPqRNngYwzU6PvQ9iZMWoBelOgnJXpRos9K5rt35_bx0FP99-rJwQx8PgGta3zozaMPXa0HM3U-NGHesY1a_v_HH_tYmQI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2635103128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Personality Assessment Inventory in U.S. Case Law: A Survey and Examination of Relevance to Legal Proceedings</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Meaux, Lauren ; Cox, Jennifer ; Edens, John F. ; DeMatteo, David ; Martinez, Alexandra ; Bownes, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Meaux, Lauren ; Cox, Jennifer ; Edens, John F. ; DeMatteo, David ; Martinez, Alexandra ; Bownes, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a popular measure of personality, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, has demonstrated utility to address various psycholegal questions. This case law review examines a large sample of randomly selected published U.S. case law decisions to ascertain how the PAI has been applied and considered by legal decision makers. The review indicates the instrument is popular in criminal and civil legal settings, particularly in preadjudication forensic mental health evaluations (e.g., competency to proceed) and cases considering social security disability benefits. Forensic evaluators and legal actors primarily consider the results of the PAI as indicators of examinee impression management, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, although this varied by psycholegal context. The admissibility of the instrument was rarely challenged, although some challenges to the forensic evaluator's interpretation and conclusions emerged. Despite the PAI's popularity, the utility of the instrument is determined by specific, empirically supported, contexts. As such, forensic evaluators must consider how the PAI may inform decision making given examinee characteristics and the psycholegal question.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1975723</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34506220</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Case law ; Criminals ; Decision makers ; Decision making ; Disability ; Forensic psychiatry ; Humans ; Impression management ; Mental health ; Personality ; Personality Assessment ; Personality Disorders ; Personality Inventory ; Personality tests ; Popularity ; Psychopathology ; Social functioning ; Social security</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality assessment, 2022-03, Vol.104 (2), p.179-191</ispartof><rights>2021 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2021</rights><rights>2021 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e132ee25cb20cbd83a7c6243c7c5e14a05eae0f6094b236cf09e21009766f943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e132ee25cb20cbd83a7c6243c7c5e14a05eae0f6094b236cf09e21009766f943</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5075-7461 ; 0000-0001-6267-5714 ; 0000-0002-2218-0650</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34506220$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meaux, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edens, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMatteo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bownes, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>The Personality Assessment Inventory in U.S. Case Law: A Survey and Examination of Relevance to Legal Proceedings</title><title>Journal of personality assessment</title><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><description>The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a popular measure of personality, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, has demonstrated utility to address various psycholegal questions. This case law review examines a large sample of randomly selected published U.S. case law decisions to ascertain how the PAI has been applied and considered by legal decision makers. The review indicates the instrument is popular in criminal and civil legal settings, particularly in preadjudication forensic mental health evaluations (e.g., competency to proceed) and cases considering social security disability benefits. Forensic evaluators and legal actors primarily consider the results of the PAI as indicators of examinee impression management, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, although this varied by psycholegal context. The admissibility of the instrument was rarely challenged, although some challenges to the forensic evaluator's interpretation and conclusions emerged. Despite the PAI's popularity, the utility of the instrument is determined by specific, empirically supported, contexts. As such, forensic evaluators must consider how the PAI may inform decision making given examinee characteristics and the psycholegal question.</description><subject>Case law</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Decision makers</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Forensic psychiatry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impression management</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality Assessment</subject><subject>Personality Disorders</subject><subject>Personality Inventory</subject><subject>Personality tests</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Social functioning</subject><subject>Social security</subject><issn>0022-3891</issn><issn>1532-7752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAURS0EosPATwBZYsMm4fk5zgcrRqMClUaiosPa8jgvJVVit3YyJf-eRDNlwYLV3Zx3n3QPY28FpAJK-AiAKMtKpAgoUlEVqkD5jK2EkpgUhcLnbLUwyQJdsFcx3gGAEBm-ZBcyU5Ajwoo97H8Rv6YQvTNdO0x8EyPF2JMb-JU7zuHDxFvHf6Y3Kd-aSHxnHj_xDb8Zw5EmblzNL3-bvnVmaL3jvuE_qKOjcZb44PmObk3Hr4O3RHXrbuNr9qIxXaQ351yz_ZfL_fZbsvv-9Wq72SVWVtmQkJBIhMoeEOyhLqUpbI6ZtIVVJDIDigxBk0OVHVDmtoGKUABURZ43VSbX7MOp9j74h5HioPs2Wuo648iPUaMqRIXlstqavf8HvfNjmPeYqVwqAVJgOVPqRNngYwzU6PvQ9iZMWoBelOgnJXpRos9K5rt35_bx0FP99-rJwQx8PgGta3zozaMPXa0HM3U-NGHesY1a_v_HH_tYmQI</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Meaux, Lauren</creator><creator>Cox, Jennifer</creator><creator>Edens, John F.</creator><creator>DeMatteo, David</creator><creator>Martinez, Alexandra</creator><creator>Bownes, Elizabeth</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Routledge, Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-7461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-5714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2218-0650</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>The Personality Assessment Inventory in U.S. Case Law: A Survey and Examination of Relevance to Legal Proceedings</title><author>Meaux, Lauren ; Cox, Jennifer ; Edens, John F. ; DeMatteo, David ; Martinez, Alexandra ; Bownes, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e132ee25cb20cbd83a7c6243c7c5e14a05eae0f6094b236cf09e21009766f943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Case law</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Decision makers</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Forensic psychiatry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impression management</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality Assessment</topic><topic>Personality Disorders</topic><topic>Personality Inventory</topic><topic>Personality tests</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Social functioning</topic><topic>Social security</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meaux, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edens, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMatteo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bownes, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meaux, Lauren</au><au>Cox, Jennifer</au><au>Edens, John F.</au><au>DeMatteo, David</au><au>Martinez, Alexandra</au><au>Bownes, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Personality Assessment Inventory in U.S. Case Law: A Survey and Examination of Relevance to Legal Proceedings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>179-191</pages><issn>0022-3891</issn><eissn>1532-7752</eissn><abstract>The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a popular measure of personality, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, has demonstrated utility to address various psycholegal questions. This case law review examines a large sample of randomly selected published U.S. case law decisions to ascertain how the PAI has been applied and considered by legal decision makers. The review indicates the instrument is popular in criminal and civil legal settings, particularly in preadjudication forensic mental health evaluations (e.g., competency to proceed) and cases considering social security disability benefits. Forensic evaluators and legal actors primarily consider the results of the PAI as indicators of examinee impression management, psychopathology, and interpersonal functioning, although this varied by psycholegal context. The admissibility of the instrument was rarely challenged, although some challenges to the forensic evaluator's interpretation and conclusions emerged. Despite the PAI's popularity, the utility of the instrument is determined by specific, empirically supported, contexts. As such, forensic evaluators must consider how the PAI may inform decision making given examinee characteristics and the psycholegal question.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>34506220</pmid><doi>10.1080/00223891.2021.1975723</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-7461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-5714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2218-0650</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3891
ispartof Journal of personality assessment, 2022-03, Vol.104 (2), p.179-191
issn 0022-3891
1532-7752
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00223891_2021_1975723
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Business Source Complete
subjects Case law
Criminals
Decision makers
Decision making
Disability
Forensic psychiatry
Humans
Impression management
Mental health
Personality
Personality Assessment
Personality Disorders
Personality Inventory
Personality tests
Popularity
Psychopathology
Social functioning
Social security
title The Personality Assessment Inventory in U.S. Case Law: A Survey and Examination of Relevance to Legal Proceedings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A50%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Personality%20Assessment%20Inventory%20in%20U.S.%20Case%20Law:%20A%20Survey%20and%20Examination%20of%20Relevance%20to%20Legal%20Proceedings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20assessment&rft.au=Meaux,%20Lauren&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=179-191&rft.issn=0022-3891&rft.eissn=1532-7752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00223891.2021.1975723&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2635103128%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2635103128&rft_id=info:pmid/34506220&rfr_iscdi=true