Factor Structure and Incremental Validity of the Original and Modified Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale

The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz & Roemer, 2004 ) is a self-report measure that assesses six facets of emotion dysregulation. A modified version of the DERS (M-DERS) was developed to address psychometric limitations of the original measure (Bardeen, Fergus, Hannan, &...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personality assessment 2019-11, Vol.101 (6), p.598-608
Hauptverfasser: Benfer, Natasha, Bardeen, Joseph R., Fergus, Thomas A., Rogers, Travis A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 608
container_issue 6
container_start_page 598
container_title Journal of personality assessment
container_volume 101
creator Benfer, Natasha
Bardeen, Joseph R.
Fergus, Thomas A.
Rogers, Travis A.
description The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz & Roemer, 2004 ) is a self-report measure that assesses six facets of emotion dysregulation. A modified version of the DERS (M-DERS) was developed to address psychometric limitations of the original measure (Bardeen, Fergus, Hannan, & Orcutt, 2016 ). Although the factor structure of the M-DERS (i.e., two models: correlated trait and second-order models) has been supported via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the tenability of a bifactor model of the M-DERS has yet to be examined. Preliminary research suggests that a bifactor model of the M-DERS is tenable. In this study (Ns of 993 and 578), results from a series of CFAs indicated adequate fit of the M-DERS and poor fit of the original DERS across several tested models (e.g., correlated trait, second-order, bifactor). Although a considerable amount of variance was accounted for by the general factor, statistical indexes from the bifactor model supported a multidimensional conceptualization of the M-DERS. The Nonacceptance and Goals subscales evidenced incremental utility, after accounting for the general factor, in predicting general distress (Nonacceptance only) and intolerance of uncertainty. Implications for future use of the DERS and M-DERS are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00223891.2018.1492927
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00223891_2018_1492927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2093398072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-f7351961be24f2b3690b47fe7d4dedd54daca2e95bbe662e98775ca7761108723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFnwCyxIVLFn8kcXID9YtKrSq10Kvl2OPiyomL7Qjtib-O093lwKGnGWmeGcvvg9B7StaUdOQzIYzxrqdrRmi3pnXPeiZeoRVtOKuEaNhrtFqYaoEO0VFKj4QQSmv2Bh1yUionzQr9OVc6h4jvcpx1niNgNRl8OekII0xZeXyvvDMub3CwOP8EfBPdg5vKYAGvg3HWgcH3EJMLU9pTp85ap2efHSTsJnw2hlzm-BYeZq-e2zutPLxFB1b5BO929Rj9OD_7fvKturq5uDz5elVp3te5soI3tG_pAKy2bOBtT4ZaWBCmNmBMUxulFYO-GQZo29J0JQKthGhpSUswfow-be8-xfBrhpTl6JIG79UEYU6SkZ7zviPP6Mf_0Mcwx_LjQnFakus60haq2VI6hpQiWPkU3ajiRlIiF0Nyb0guhuTOUNn7sLs-DyOYf1t7JQX4sgXcZEMc1e8QvZFZbXyINqpJuyT5y2_8BdJ2n_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2310148806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factor Structure and Incremental Validity of the Original and Modified Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Benfer, Natasha ; Bardeen, Joseph R. ; Fergus, Thomas A. ; Rogers, Travis A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Benfer, Natasha ; Bardeen, Joseph R. ; Fergus, Thomas A. ; Rogers, Travis A.</creatorcontrib><description>The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz &amp; Roemer, 2004 ) is a self-report measure that assesses six facets of emotion dysregulation. A modified version of the DERS (M-DERS) was developed to address psychometric limitations of the original measure (Bardeen, Fergus, Hannan, &amp; Orcutt, 2016 ). Although the factor structure of the M-DERS (i.e., two models: correlated trait and second-order models) has been supported via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the tenability of a bifactor model of the M-DERS has yet to be examined. Preliminary research suggests that a bifactor model of the M-DERS is tenable. In this study (Ns of 993 and 578), results from a series of CFAs indicated adequate fit of the M-DERS and poor fit of the original DERS across several tested models (e.g., correlated trait, second-order, bifactor). Although a considerable amount of variance was accounted for by the general factor, statistical indexes from the bifactor model supported a multidimensional conceptualization of the M-DERS. The Nonacceptance and Goals subscales evidenced incremental utility, after accounting for the general factor, in predicting general distress (Nonacceptance only) and intolerance of uncertainty. Implications for future use of the DERS and M-DERS are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1492927</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30142305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adult ; Affective Symptoms - psychology ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Discriminant analysis ; Emotional Regulation ; Emotions ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; General factor ; Humans ; Male ; Psychological distress ; Psychometrics - methods ; Self Report ; Uncertainty ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality assessment, 2019-11, Vol.101 (6), p.598-608</ispartof><rights>2018 Taylor &amp; Francis 2018</rights><rights>2018 Taylor &amp; Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-f7351961be24f2b3690b47fe7d4dedd54daca2e95bbe662e98775ca7761108723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-f7351961be24f2b3690b47fe7d4dedd54daca2e95bbe662e98775ca7761108723</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4786-109X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30142305$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benfer, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardeen, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fergus, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Travis A.</creatorcontrib><title>Factor Structure and Incremental Validity of the Original and Modified Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale</title><title>Journal of personality assessment</title><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><description>The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz &amp; Roemer, 2004 ) is a self-report measure that assesses six facets of emotion dysregulation. A modified version of the DERS (M-DERS) was developed to address psychometric limitations of the original measure (Bardeen, Fergus, Hannan, &amp; Orcutt, 2016 ). Although the factor structure of the M-DERS (i.e., two models: correlated trait and second-order models) has been supported via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the tenability of a bifactor model of the M-DERS has yet to be examined. Preliminary research suggests that a bifactor model of the M-DERS is tenable. In this study (Ns of 993 and 578), results from a series of CFAs indicated adequate fit of the M-DERS and poor fit of the original DERS across several tested models (e.g., correlated trait, second-order, bifactor). Although a considerable amount of variance was accounted for by the general factor, statistical indexes from the bifactor model supported a multidimensional conceptualization of the M-DERS. The Nonacceptance and Goals subscales evidenced incremental utility, after accounting for the general factor, in predicting general distress (Nonacceptance only) and intolerance of uncertainty. Implications for future use of the DERS and M-DERS are discussed.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Affective Symptoms - psychology</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Emotional Regulation</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General factor</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3891</issn><issn>1532-7752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFnwCyxIVLFn8kcXID9YtKrSq10Kvl2OPiyomL7Qjtib-O093lwKGnGWmeGcvvg9B7StaUdOQzIYzxrqdrRmi3pnXPeiZeoRVtOKuEaNhrtFqYaoEO0VFKj4QQSmv2Bh1yUionzQr9OVc6h4jvcpx1niNgNRl8OekII0xZeXyvvDMub3CwOP8EfBPdg5vKYAGvg3HWgcH3EJMLU9pTp85ap2efHSTsJnw2hlzm-BYeZq-e2zutPLxFB1b5BO929Rj9OD_7fvKturq5uDz5elVp3te5soI3tG_pAKy2bOBtT4ZaWBCmNmBMUxulFYO-GQZo29J0JQKthGhpSUswfow-be8-xfBrhpTl6JIG79UEYU6SkZ7zviPP6Mf_0Mcwx_LjQnFakus60haq2VI6hpQiWPkU3ajiRlIiF0Nyb0guhuTOUNn7sLs-DyOYf1t7JQX4sgXcZEMc1e8QvZFZbXyINqpJuyT5y2_8BdJ2n_Q</recordid><startdate>20191102</startdate><enddate>20191102</enddate><creator>Benfer, Natasha</creator><creator>Bardeen, Joseph R.</creator><creator>Fergus, Thomas A.</creator><creator>Rogers, Travis A.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Routledge, Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4786-109X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191102</creationdate><title>Factor Structure and Incremental Validity of the Original and Modified Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale</title><author>Benfer, Natasha ; Bardeen, Joseph R. ; Fergus, Thomas A. ; Rogers, Travis A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-f7351961be24f2b3690b47fe7d4dedd54daca2e95bbe662e98775ca7761108723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Affective Symptoms - psychology</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Emotional Regulation</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General factor</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benfer, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardeen, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fergus, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Travis A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benfer, Natasha</au><au>Bardeen, Joseph R.</au><au>Fergus, Thomas A.</au><au>Rogers, Travis A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factor Structure and Incremental Validity of the Original and Modified Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><date>2019-11-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>598</spage><epage>608</epage><pages>598-608</pages><issn>0022-3891</issn><eissn>1532-7752</eissn><abstract>The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz &amp; Roemer, 2004 ) is a self-report measure that assesses six facets of emotion dysregulation. A modified version of the DERS (M-DERS) was developed to address psychometric limitations of the original measure (Bardeen, Fergus, Hannan, &amp; Orcutt, 2016 ). Although the factor structure of the M-DERS (i.e., two models: correlated trait and second-order models) has been supported via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the tenability of a bifactor model of the M-DERS has yet to be examined. Preliminary research suggests that a bifactor model of the M-DERS is tenable. In this study (Ns of 993 and 578), results from a series of CFAs indicated adequate fit of the M-DERS and poor fit of the original DERS across several tested models (e.g., correlated trait, second-order, bifactor). Although a considerable amount of variance was accounted for by the general factor, statistical indexes from the bifactor model supported a multidimensional conceptualization of the M-DERS. The Nonacceptance and Goals subscales evidenced incremental utility, after accounting for the general factor, in predicting general distress (Nonacceptance only) and intolerance of uncertainty. Implications for future use of the DERS and M-DERS are discussed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>30142305</pmid><doi>10.1080/00223891.2018.1492927</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4786-109X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3891
ispartof Journal of personality assessment, 2019-11, Vol.101 (6), p.598-608
issn 0022-3891
1532-7752
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00223891_2018_1492927
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Business Source Complete
subjects Adaptation, Psychological
Adult
Affective Symptoms - psychology
Confirmatory factor analysis
Discriminant analysis
Emotional Regulation
Emotions
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
General factor
Humans
Male
Psychological distress
Psychometrics - methods
Self Report
Uncertainty
Young Adult
title Factor Structure and Incremental Validity of the Original and Modified Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T16%3A57%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factor%20Structure%20and%20Incremental%20Validity%20of%20the%20Original%20and%20Modified%20Versions%20of%20the%20Difficulties%20in%20Emotion%20Regulation%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20assessment&rft.au=Benfer,%20Natasha&rft.date=2019-11-02&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=598&rft.epage=608&rft.pages=598-608&rft.issn=0022-3891&rft.eissn=1532-7752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00223891.2018.1492927&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2093398072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2310148806&rft_id=info:pmid/30142305&rfr_iscdi=true