Factor Structure and Incremental Validity of the Original and Modified Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz & Roemer, 2004 ) is a self-report measure that assesses six facets of emotion dysregulation. A modified version of the DERS (M-DERS) was developed to address psychometric limitations of the original measure (Bardeen, Fergus, Hannan, &...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality assessment 2019-11, Vol.101 (6), p.598-608 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 608 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 598 |
container_title | Journal of personality assessment |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Benfer, Natasha Bardeen, Joseph R. Fergus, Thomas A. Rogers, Travis A. |
description | The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz & Roemer,
2004
) is a self-report measure that assesses six facets of emotion dysregulation. A modified version of the DERS (M-DERS) was developed to address psychometric limitations of the original measure (Bardeen, Fergus, Hannan, & Orcutt,
2016
). Although the factor structure of the M-DERS (i.e., two models: correlated trait and second-order models) has been supported via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the tenability of a bifactor model of the M-DERS has yet to be examined. Preliminary research suggests that a bifactor model of the M-DERS is tenable. In this study (Ns of 993 and 578), results from a series of CFAs indicated adequate fit of the M-DERS and poor fit of the original DERS across several tested models (e.g., correlated trait, second-order, bifactor). Although a considerable amount of variance was accounted for by the general factor, statistical indexes from the bifactor model supported a multidimensional conceptualization of the M-DERS. The Nonacceptance and Goals subscales evidenced incremental utility, after accounting for the general factor, in predicting general distress (Nonacceptance only) and intolerance of uncertainty. Implications for future use of the DERS and M-DERS are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00223891.2018.1492927 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00223891_2018_1492927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2093398072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-f7351961be24f2b3690b47fe7d4dedd54daca2e95bbe662e98775ca7761108723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFnwCyxIVLFn8kcXID9YtKrSq10Kvl2OPiyomL7Qjtib-O093lwKGnGWmeGcvvg9B7StaUdOQzIYzxrqdrRmi3pnXPeiZeoRVtOKuEaNhrtFqYaoEO0VFKj4QQSmv2Bh1yUionzQr9OVc6h4jvcpx1niNgNRl8OekII0xZeXyvvDMub3CwOP8EfBPdg5vKYAGvg3HWgcH3EJMLU9pTp85ap2efHSTsJnw2hlzm-BYeZq-e2zutPLxFB1b5BO929Rj9OD_7fvKturq5uDz5elVp3te5soI3tG_pAKy2bOBtT4ZaWBCmNmBMUxulFYO-GQZo29J0JQKthGhpSUswfow-be8-xfBrhpTl6JIG79UEYU6SkZ7zviPP6Mf_0Mcwx_LjQnFakus60haq2VI6hpQiWPkU3ajiRlIiF0Nyb0guhuTOUNn7sLs-DyOYf1t7JQX4sgXcZEMc1e8QvZFZbXyINqpJuyT5y2_8BdJ2n_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2310148806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factor Structure and Incremental Validity of the Original and Modified Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Benfer, Natasha ; Bardeen, Joseph R. ; Fergus, Thomas A. ; Rogers, Travis A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Benfer, Natasha ; Bardeen, Joseph R. ; Fergus, Thomas A. ; Rogers, Travis A.</creatorcontrib><description>The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz & Roemer,
2004
) is a self-report measure that assesses six facets of emotion dysregulation. A modified version of the DERS (M-DERS) was developed to address psychometric limitations of the original measure (Bardeen, Fergus, Hannan, & Orcutt,
2016
). Although the factor structure of the M-DERS (i.e., two models: correlated trait and second-order models) has been supported via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the tenability of a bifactor model of the M-DERS has yet to be examined. Preliminary research suggests that a bifactor model of the M-DERS is tenable. In this study (Ns of 993 and 578), results from a series of CFAs indicated adequate fit of the M-DERS and poor fit of the original DERS across several tested models (e.g., correlated trait, second-order, bifactor). Although a considerable amount of variance was accounted for by the general factor, statistical indexes from the bifactor model supported a multidimensional conceptualization of the M-DERS. The Nonacceptance and Goals subscales evidenced incremental utility, after accounting for the general factor, in predicting general distress (Nonacceptance only) and intolerance of uncertainty. Implications for future use of the DERS and M-DERS are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1492927</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30142305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adult ; Affective Symptoms - psychology ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Discriminant analysis ; Emotional Regulation ; Emotions ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; General factor ; Humans ; Male ; Psychological distress ; Psychometrics - methods ; Self Report ; Uncertainty ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality assessment, 2019-11, Vol.101 (6), p.598-608</ispartof><rights>2018 Taylor & Francis 2018</rights><rights>2018 Taylor & Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-f7351961be24f2b3690b47fe7d4dedd54daca2e95bbe662e98775ca7761108723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-f7351961be24f2b3690b47fe7d4dedd54daca2e95bbe662e98775ca7761108723</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4786-109X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30142305$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benfer, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardeen, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fergus, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Travis A.</creatorcontrib><title>Factor Structure and Incremental Validity of the Original and Modified Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale</title><title>Journal of personality assessment</title><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><description>The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz & Roemer,
2004
) is a self-report measure that assesses six facets of emotion dysregulation. A modified version of the DERS (M-DERS) was developed to address psychometric limitations of the original measure (Bardeen, Fergus, Hannan, & Orcutt,
2016
). Although the factor structure of the M-DERS (i.e., two models: correlated trait and second-order models) has been supported via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the tenability of a bifactor model of the M-DERS has yet to be examined. Preliminary research suggests that a bifactor model of the M-DERS is tenable. In this study (Ns of 993 and 578), results from a series of CFAs indicated adequate fit of the M-DERS and poor fit of the original DERS across several tested models (e.g., correlated trait, second-order, bifactor). Although a considerable amount of variance was accounted for by the general factor, statistical indexes from the bifactor model supported a multidimensional conceptualization of the M-DERS. The Nonacceptance and Goals subscales evidenced incremental utility, after accounting for the general factor, in predicting general distress (Nonacceptance only) and intolerance of uncertainty. Implications for future use of the DERS and M-DERS are discussed.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Affective Symptoms - psychology</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Emotional Regulation</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General factor</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3891</issn><issn>1532-7752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFnwCyxIVLFn8kcXID9YtKrSq10Kvl2OPiyomL7Qjtib-O093lwKGnGWmeGcvvg9B7StaUdOQzIYzxrqdrRmi3pnXPeiZeoRVtOKuEaNhrtFqYaoEO0VFKj4QQSmv2Bh1yUionzQr9OVc6h4jvcpx1niNgNRl8OekII0xZeXyvvDMub3CwOP8EfBPdg5vKYAGvg3HWgcH3EJMLU9pTp85ap2efHSTsJnw2hlzm-BYeZq-e2zutPLxFB1b5BO929Rj9OD_7fvKturq5uDz5elVp3te5soI3tG_pAKy2bOBtT4ZaWBCmNmBMUxulFYO-GQZo29J0JQKthGhpSUswfow-be8-xfBrhpTl6JIG79UEYU6SkZ7zviPP6Mf_0Mcwx_LjQnFakus60haq2VI6hpQiWPkU3ajiRlIiF0Nyb0guhuTOUNn7sLs-DyOYf1t7JQX4sgXcZEMc1e8QvZFZbXyINqpJuyT5y2_8BdJ2n_Q</recordid><startdate>20191102</startdate><enddate>20191102</enddate><creator>Benfer, Natasha</creator><creator>Bardeen, Joseph R.</creator><creator>Fergus, Thomas A.</creator><creator>Rogers, Travis A.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4786-109X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191102</creationdate><title>Factor Structure and Incremental Validity of the Original and Modified Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale</title><author>Benfer, Natasha ; Bardeen, Joseph R. ; Fergus, Thomas A. ; Rogers, Travis A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-f7351961be24f2b3690b47fe7d4dedd54daca2e95bbe662e98775ca7761108723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Affective Symptoms - psychology</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Emotional Regulation</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General factor</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benfer, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardeen, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fergus, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Travis A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benfer, Natasha</au><au>Bardeen, Joseph R.</au><au>Fergus, Thomas A.</au><au>Rogers, Travis A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factor Structure and Incremental Validity of the Original and Modified Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><date>2019-11-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>598</spage><epage>608</epage><pages>598-608</pages><issn>0022-3891</issn><eissn>1532-7752</eissn><abstract>The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz & Roemer,
2004
) is a self-report measure that assesses six facets of emotion dysregulation. A modified version of the DERS (M-DERS) was developed to address psychometric limitations of the original measure (Bardeen, Fergus, Hannan, & Orcutt,
2016
). Although the factor structure of the M-DERS (i.e., two models: correlated trait and second-order models) has been supported via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the tenability of a bifactor model of the M-DERS has yet to be examined. Preliminary research suggests that a bifactor model of the M-DERS is tenable. In this study (Ns of 993 and 578), results from a series of CFAs indicated adequate fit of the M-DERS and poor fit of the original DERS across several tested models (e.g., correlated trait, second-order, bifactor). Although a considerable amount of variance was accounted for by the general factor, statistical indexes from the bifactor model supported a multidimensional conceptualization of the M-DERS. The Nonacceptance and Goals subscales evidenced incremental utility, after accounting for the general factor, in predicting general distress (Nonacceptance only) and intolerance of uncertainty. Implications for future use of the DERS and M-DERS are discussed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>30142305</pmid><doi>10.1080/00223891.2018.1492927</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4786-109X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3891 |
ispartof | Journal of personality assessment, 2019-11, Vol.101 (6), p.598-608 |
issn | 0022-3891 1532-7752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00223891_2018_1492927 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Adult Affective Symptoms - psychology Confirmatory factor analysis Discriminant analysis Emotional Regulation Emotions Factor Analysis, Statistical Female General factor Humans Male Psychological distress Psychometrics - methods Self Report Uncertainty Young Adult |
title | Factor Structure and Incremental Validity of the Original and Modified Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T16%3A57%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factor%20Structure%20and%20Incremental%20Validity%20of%20the%20Original%20and%20Modified%20Versions%20of%20the%20Difficulties%20in%20Emotion%20Regulation%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20assessment&rft.au=Benfer,%20Natasha&rft.date=2019-11-02&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=598&rft.epage=608&rft.pages=598-608&rft.issn=0022-3891&rft.eissn=1532-7752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00223891.2018.1492927&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2093398072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2310148806&rft_id=info:pmid/30142305&rfr_iscdi=true |