To Be a Heterodox Economist: The Contested Landscape of American Economics, 1960s and 1970s
This article is an attempt to partially answer the question of what it was like to be a heterodox economist in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s. A brief description is given of the hegemony of neoclassical economics and the general attitude of neoclassical economists toward heterodox economi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic issues 2004-09, Vol.38 (3), p.747-763 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 763 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 747 |
container_title | Journal of economic issues |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Lee, Frederic S. |
description | This article is an attempt to partially answer the question of what it was like to be a heterodox economist in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s. A brief description is given of the hegemony of neoclassical economics and the general attitude of neoclassical economists toward heterodox economics and economists. A more detailed inquiry follows into the bullying of, harassment of, and discrimination against inquisitive, open-minded graduate students and young heterodox professors by mainstream economists. It is concluded that life among the econ tribe for heterodox economists was often short (for ostracism was widely practiced) and difficult and brutish for the survivors. The second part of the article examines the efforts by heterodox economists to build heterodoxy, focusing on localized efforts to create supportive academic and social environments. In particular, the efforts to make heterodox economics major, minor, or field components in Ph.D. programs are documented. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00213624.2004.11506727 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00213624_2004_11506727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4228055</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4228055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-7ea3c1457e0cc2acf33b5bb285055c8ebecae4f1d736d0d727661a059677eb903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKvfQCR4duvk_663WqoVCl4qCB5CNpvFLe2mJivab2-WtV49zcD83sybh9AVgQmBHG4BKGGS8gkF4BNCBEhF1REakYLLjFH5eoxGPZT11Ck6i3ENAIILMUJvK4_vHTZ44ToXfOW_8dz61m-b2N3h1bvDM992LnauwkvTVtGancO-xtOtC4017QG38QaTQkLEiUqdgniOTmqzie7it47Ry8N8NVtky-fHp9l0mVlOSZcpZ5glXCgH1lJja8ZKUZY0FyCEzV3prHG8JpVisoIq_SYlMSAKqZQrC2BjdD3s3QX_8Zm86rX_DG06qSnkuaJUFQmSA2SDjzG4Wu9CszVhrwnoPkd9yFH3OepDjkl4OQjXsfPhT8UpzZO_NJ4O46atfdiaLx82le7MfuNDHUxrm6jZPyd-AJjegJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208872279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To Be a Heterodox Economist: The Contested Landscape of American Economics, 1960s and 1970s</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lee, Frederic S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Frederic S.</creatorcontrib><description>This article is an attempt to partially answer the question of what it was like to be a heterodox economist in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s. A brief description is given of the hegemony of neoclassical economics and the general attitude of neoclassical economists toward heterodox economics and economists. A more detailed inquiry follows into the bullying of, harassment of, and discrimination against inquisitive, open-minded graduate students and young heterodox professors by mainstream economists. It is concluded that life among the econ tribe for heterodox economists was often short (for ostracism was widely practiced) and difficult and brutish for the survivors. The second part of the article examines the efforts by heterodox economists to build heterodoxy, focusing on localized efforts to create supportive academic and social environments. In particular, the efforts to make heterodox economics major, minor, or field components in Ph.D. programs are documented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-3624</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1946-326X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2004.11506727</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECIAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lincoln: Routledge</publisher><subject>Academic freedom ; Decades ; Economic research ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Economics education ; Economists ; Graduate students ; Harassment ; Heterodox economics ; Marxian economics ; Neoclassical economics ; Political economy ; Radicalism ; Social activism ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic issues, 2004-09, Vol.38 (3), p.747-763</ispartof><rights>2004 by Journal of Economic Issues-Association for Evolutionary Economics. 2004</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 Journal of Economic Issues-Association for Evolutionary Economics</rights><rights>Copyright Association for Evolutionary Economics Sep 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-7ea3c1457e0cc2acf33b5bb285055c8ebecae4f1d736d0d727661a059677eb903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-7ea3c1457e0cc2acf33b5bb285055c8ebecae4f1d736d0d727661a059677eb903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4228055$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4228055$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Frederic S.</creatorcontrib><title>To Be a Heterodox Economist: The Contested Landscape of American Economics, 1960s and 1970s</title><title>Journal of economic issues</title><description>This article is an attempt to partially answer the question of what it was like to be a heterodox economist in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s. A brief description is given of the hegemony of neoclassical economics and the general attitude of neoclassical economists toward heterodox economics and economists. A more detailed inquiry follows into the bullying of, harassment of, and discrimination against inquisitive, open-minded graduate students and young heterodox professors by mainstream economists. It is concluded that life among the econ tribe for heterodox economists was often short (for ostracism was widely practiced) and difficult and brutish for the survivors. The second part of the article examines the efforts by heterodox economists to build heterodoxy, focusing on localized efforts to create supportive academic and social environments. In particular, the efforts to make heterodox economics major, minor, or field components in Ph.D. programs are documented.</description><subject>Academic freedom</subject><subject>Decades</subject><subject>Economic research</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics education</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Graduate students</subject><subject>Harassment</subject><subject>Heterodox economics</subject><subject>Marxian economics</subject><subject>Neoclassical economics</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0021-3624</issn><issn>1946-326X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKvfQCR4duvk_663WqoVCl4qCB5CNpvFLe2mJivab2-WtV49zcD83sybh9AVgQmBHG4BKGGS8gkF4BNCBEhF1REakYLLjFH5eoxGPZT11Ck6i3ENAIILMUJvK4_vHTZ44ToXfOW_8dz61m-b2N3h1bvDM992LnauwkvTVtGancO-xtOtC4017QG38QaTQkLEiUqdgniOTmqzie7it47Ry8N8NVtky-fHp9l0mVlOSZcpZ5glXCgH1lJja8ZKUZY0FyCEzV3prHG8JpVisoIq_SYlMSAKqZQrC2BjdD3s3QX_8Zm86rX_DG06qSnkuaJUFQmSA2SDjzG4Wu9CszVhrwnoPkd9yFH3OepDjkl4OQjXsfPhT8UpzZO_NJ4O46atfdiaLx82le7MfuNDHUxrm6jZPyd-AJjegJ0</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Lee, Frederic S.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Association for Evolutionary Economics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>To Be a Heterodox Economist: The Contested Landscape of American Economics, 1960s and 1970s</title><author>Lee, Frederic S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-7ea3c1457e0cc2acf33b5bb285055c8ebecae4f1d736d0d727661a059677eb903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Academic freedom</topic><topic>Decades</topic><topic>Economic research</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics education</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Graduate students</topic><topic>Harassment</topic><topic>Heterodox economics</topic><topic>Marxian economics</topic><topic>Neoclassical economics</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Frederic S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Frederic S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>To Be a Heterodox Economist: The Contested Landscape of American Economics, 1960s and 1970s</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic issues</jtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>747</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>747-763</pages><issn>0021-3624</issn><eissn>1946-326X</eissn><coden>JECIAR</coden><abstract>This article is an attempt to partially answer the question of what it was like to be a heterodox economist in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s. A brief description is given of the hegemony of neoclassical economics and the general attitude of neoclassical economists toward heterodox economics and economists. A more detailed inquiry follows into the bullying of, harassment of, and discrimination against inquisitive, open-minded graduate students and young heterodox professors by mainstream economists. It is concluded that life among the econ tribe for heterodox economists was often short (for ostracism was widely practiced) and difficult and brutish for the survivors. The second part of the article examines the efforts by heterodox economists to build heterodoxy, focusing on localized efforts to create supportive academic and social environments. In particular, the efforts to make heterodox economics major, minor, or field components in Ph.D. programs are documented.</abstract><cop>Lincoln</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00213624.2004.11506727</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-3624 |
ispartof | Journal of economic issues, 2004-09, Vol.38 (3), p.747-763 |
issn | 0021-3624 1946-326X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00213624_2004_11506727 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Academic freedom Decades Economic research Economic theory Economics Economics education Economists Graduate students Harassment Heterodox economics Marxian economics Neoclassical economics Political economy Radicalism Social activism Studies |
title | To Be a Heterodox Economist: The Contested Landscape of American Economics, 1960s and 1970s |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A57%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20Be%20a%20Heterodox%20Economist:%20The%20Contested%20Landscape%20of%20American%20Economics,%201960s%20and%201970s&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20issues&rft.au=Lee,%20Frederic%20S.&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=747&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=747-763&rft.issn=0021-3624&rft.eissn=1946-326X&rft.coden=JECIAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00213624.2004.11506727&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E4228055%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208872279&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4228055&rfr_iscdi=true |