General heuristic procedures and solution strategies for FMS scheduling

This paper presents two new heuristic procedures for FMS scheduling. The heuristics decompose the very complex scheduling problem into a series of relatively easily handled subproblems, and solve them using MILP models and heuristics. Unlike traditional 'routing then sequencing' methods, b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of production research 1999-09, Vol.37 (14), p.3305-3333
Hauptverfasser: Liu, J., Maccarthy, B.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3333
container_issue 14
container_start_page 3305
container_title International journal of production research
container_volume 37
creator Liu, J.
Maccarthy, B.L.
description This paper presents two new heuristic procedures for FMS scheduling. The heuristics decompose the very complex scheduling problem into a series of relatively easily handled subproblems, and solve them using MILP models and heuristics. Unlike traditional 'routing then sequencing' methods, both procedures consider constraints not only on machines but also on other critical resources, ensuring practical feasibility of the resulting schedules while reducing complexity in the solution process. The first heuristic, SEDEC, adopts an improved 'routing then sequencing' method with a further step for allocating other resources. The second procedure, CODEC, represents a new scheduling strategy which emphasizes interconnections between subproblems in addition to the solution of the individual subproblems themselves. Computational experiments are carried out in various scheduling environments to compare the performance of the two heuristic procedures with a large MILP model which considers the whole FMS scheduling problem. The results show that the heuristic procedures can generate schedules with optimality close to the solution of the MILP method, in a much shorter time. Comparing the two heuristic approaches, CODEC, representing a new solution strategy, performs significantly better on average than SEDEC, which is based on the traditional strategy. This is observed in all the FMS scheduling environments tested, especially when the problem is large, complex or with tight resource constraints. Analysis of the results also suggests that CODEC may be improved further by investigating the way the subproblems are solved and the way the routing subproblem is reformulated. The CODEC solution strategy provides a general framework for scheduling in a wide range of FMS environments.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/002075499190301
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_002075499190301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_002075499190301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-e1efeaab634a99441adb3621ef3e09d789511154f249a7f80c94dc96b58a23ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKtnr_kDa5NNsk28SbGtUPGggrdlmp20ke1uSVK0_96UeiqIcxl4b76Z4RFyy9kdZ5qNGCvZWEljuGGC8TMy4KKqCqX1xzkZHNwi2-KSXMX4yXIpLQdkNsMOA7R0jbvgY_KWbkNvsdkFjBS6hsa-3SXfdzSmAAlXPuuuD3T6_EqjXefJ1nera3LhoI1489uH5H36-DaZF4uX2dPkYVFYIapUIEeHAMtKSDBGSg7NUlRlVgUy04y1UZxzJV0pDYydZtbIxppqqTSUAlEMyei414Y-xoCu3ga_gbCvOasPOdQnOWRCHQnf5bc38NWHtqkT7Ns-uACd9fGUqdN3ytz9v5z46-gP53R1Lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>General heuristic procedures and solution strategies for FMS scheduling</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Liu, J. ; Maccarthy, B.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, J. ; Maccarthy, B.L.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents two new heuristic procedures for FMS scheduling. The heuristics decompose the very complex scheduling problem into a series of relatively easily handled subproblems, and solve them using MILP models and heuristics. Unlike traditional 'routing then sequencing' methods, both procedures consider constraints not only on machines but also on other critical resources, ensuring practical feasibility of the resulting schedules while reducing complexity in the solution process. The first heuristic, SEDEC, adopts an improved 'routing then sequencing' method with a further step for allocating other resources. The second procedure, CODEC, represents a new scheduling strategy which emphasizes interconnections between subproblems in addition to the solution of the individual subproblems themselves. Computational experiments are carried out in various scheduling environments to compare the performance of the two heuristic procedures with a large MILP model which considers the whole FMS scheduling problem. The results show that the heuristic procedures can generate schedules with optimality close to the solution of the MILP method, in a much shorter time. Comparing the two heuristic approaches, CODEC, representing a new solution strategy, performs significantly better on average than SEDEC, which is based on the traditional strategy. This is observed in all the FMS scheduling environments tested, especially when the problem is large, complex or with tight resource constraints. Analysis of the results also suggests that CODEC may be improved further by investigating the way the subproblems are solved and the way the routing subproblem is reformulated. The CODEC solution strategy provides a general framework for scheduling in a wide range of FMS environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7543</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-588X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/002075499190301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><ispartof>International journal of production research, 1999-09, Vol.37 (14), p.3305-3333</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-e1efeaab634a99441adb3621ef3e09d789511154f249a7f80c94dc96b58a23ee3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/002075499190301$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/002075499190301$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maccarthy, B.L.</creatorcontrib><title>General heuristic procedures and solution strategies for FMS scheduling</title><title>International journal of production research</title><description>This paper presents two new heuristic procedures for FMS scheduling. The heuristics decompose the very complex scheduling problem into a series of relatively easily handled subproblems, and solve them using MILP models and heuristics. Unlike traditional 'routing then sequencing' methods, both procedures consider constraints not only on machines but also on other critical resources, ensuring practical feasibility of the resulting schedules while reducing complexity in the solution process. The first heuristic, SEDEC, adopts an improved 'routing then sequencing' method with a further step for allocating other resources. The second procedure, CODEC, represents a new scheduling strategy which emphasizes interconnections between subproblems in addition to the solution of the individual subproblems themselves. Computational experiments are carried out in various scheduling environments to compare the performance of the two heuristic procedures with a large MILP model which considers the whole FMS scheduling problem. The results show that the heuristic procedures can generate schedules with optimality close to the solution of the MILP method, in a much shorter time. Comparing the two heuristic approaches, CODEC, representing a new solution strategy, performs significantly better on average than SEDEC, which is based on the traditional strategy. This is observed in all the FMS scheduling environments tested, especially when the problem is large, complex or with tight resource constraints. Analysis of the results also suggests that CODEC may be improved further by investigating the way the subproblems are solved and the way the routing subproblem is reformulated. The CODEC solution strategy provides a general framework for scheduling in a wide range of FMS environments.</description><issn>0020-7543</issn><issn>1366-588X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKtnr_kDa5NNsk28SbGtUPGggrdlmp20ke1uSVK0_96UeiqIcxl4b76Z4RFyy9kdZ5qNGCvZWEljuGGC8TMy4KKqCqX1xzkZHNwi2-KSXMX4yXIpLQdkNsMOA7R0jbvgY_KWbkNvsdkFjBS6hsa-3SXfdzSmAAlXPuuuD3T6_EqjXefJ1nera3LhoI1489uH5H36-DaZF4uX2dPkYVFYIapUIEeHAMtKSDBGSg7NUlRlVgUy04y1UZxzJV0pDYydZtbIxppqqTSUAlEMyei414Y-xoCu3ga_gbCvOasPOdQnOWRCHQnf5bc38NWHtqkT7Ns-uACd9fGUqdN3ytz9v5z46-gP53R1Lg</recordid><startdate>19990901</startdate><enddate>19990901</enddate><creator>Liu, J.</creator><creator>Maccarthy, B.L.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990901</creationdate><title>General heuristic procedures and solution strategies for FMS scheduling</title><author>Liu, J. ; Maccarthy, B.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-e1efeaab634a99441adb3621ef3e09d789511154f249a7f80c94dc96b58a23ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maccarthy, B.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of production research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, J.</au><au>Maccarthy, B.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>General heuristic procedures and solution strategies for FMS scheduling</atitle><jtitle>International journal of production research</jtitle><date>1999-09-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>3305</spage><epage>3333</epage><pages>3305-3333</pages><issn>0020-7543</issn><eissn>1366-588X</eissn><abstract>This paper presents two new heuristic procedures for FMS scheduling. The heuristics decompose the very complex scheduling problem into a series of relatively easily handled subproblems, and solve them using MILP models and heuristics. Unlike traditional 'routing then sequencing' methods, both procedures consider constraints not only on machines but also on other critical resources, ensuring practical feasibility of the resulting schedules while reducing complexity in the solution process. The first heuristic, SEDEC, adopts an improved 'routing then sequencing' method with a further step for allocating other resources. The second procedure, CODEC, represents a new scheduling strategy which emphasizes interconnections between subproblems in addition to the solution of the individual subproblems themselves. Computational experiments are carried out in various scheduling environments to compare the performance of the two heuristic procedures with a large MILP model which considers the whole FMS scheduling problem. The results show that the heuristic procedures can generate schedules with optimality close to the solution of the MILP method, in a much shorter time. Comparing the two heuristic approaches, CODEC, representing a new solution strategy, performs significantly better on average than SEDEC, which is based on the traditional strategy. This is observed in all the FMS scheduling environments tested, especially when the problem is large, complex or with tight resource constraints. Analysis of the results also suggests that CODEC may be improved further by investigating the way the subproblems are solved and the way the routing subproblem is reformulated. The CODEC solution strategy provides a general framework for scheduling in a wide range of FMS environments.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/002075499190301</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7543
ispartof International journal of production research, 1999-09, Vol.37 (14), p.3305-3333
issn 0020-7543
1366-588X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_002075499190301
source Taylor & Francis Journals Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
title General heuristic procedures and solution strategies for FMS scheduling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A49%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=General%20heuristic%20procedures%20and%20solution%20strategies%20for%20FMS%20scheduling&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20production%20research&rft.au=Liu,%20J.&rft.date=1999-09-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=3305&rft.epage=3333&rft.pages=3305-3333&rft.issn=0020-7543&rft.eissn=1366-588X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/002075499190301&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_002075499190301%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true