Financing strategy analysis for a multi-sided platform with blockchain technology

Thanks to the credibility and transparency of blockchain technology, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) can use self-guarantee to obtain loans from financial institutions. Unlike the well-developed supply chain finance (SCF) using guarantees provided by a core enterprise, the effectiveness of SCF w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of production research 2021-08, Vol.59 (15), p.4513-4532
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Yugang, Huang, Ganquan, Guo, Xiaolong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4532
container_issue 15
container_start_page 4513
container_title International journal of production research
container_volume 59
creator Yu, Yugang
Huang, Ganquan
Guo, Xiaolong
description Thanks to the credibility and transparency of blockchain technology, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) can use self-guarantee to obtain loans from financial institutions. Unlike the well-developed supply chain finance (SCF) using guarantees provided by a core enterprise, the effectiveness of SCF with self-guarantee is unclear, especially in a multi-sided market setting. The current paper explores this effectiveness by building an analytical model involving four kinds of players: a multi-sided platform, a customer, a bank, and multiple transportation service providers. In this setting, a traditional SCF model with Platform Undertakes Guarantee (PUG) and a novel SCF strategy with self-guarantee (i.e. Customer Undertakes Guarantee (CUG)) are analysed. The results indicate that CUG can bring a Pareto improvement for the market compared to PUG. Although CUG displays higher efficiency, it is not always beneficial to the platform when the customer's opportunity cost rate is higher than the platform's. Furthermore, to mitigate credit risk caused by a low-credit customer, the platform may employ a prepayment strategy. Analytical results of this study indicate that the prepayment ratio does not affect the customer's cost, and thus, providing a high prepayment ratio but a relatively low service fee rate to low-credit customers is suggested to the platform.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00207543.2020.1766718
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00207543_2020_1766718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2553133270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-9eb642122ccadefb4e347fc9864510aa9700b61399d9742f0bc4a5cc54b5a4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43ppsvnZvSvELCiL04C1ks9k2NU1qklL237tLK97MZcLwvDPDA8AtRjOMKnSPUIkEo2RWDp8ZFpwLXJ2BCSacF6yqPs_BZGSKEboEVylt0PBYRSfg49l65bX1K5hyVNmseqi8cn2yCXYhQgW3e5dtkWxrWrhzKg_dLTzYvIaNC_pLr5X1MBu99sGFVX8NLjrlkrk51SlYPj8t56_F4v3lbf64KDSpWS5q03Ba4rLUWrWma6ghVHS6rjhlGClVC4Qajkldt7WgZYcaTRXTmtGGKdqSKbg7jt3F8L03KctN2Mfh8iRLxggmpBRooNiR0jGkFE0nd9FuVewlRnKUJ3_lyVGePMkbcvCYMzp4m_5SgpNaYFrhAXk4ItaPRtQhRNfKrHoXYhdHp0mS_7f8APVtgP8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553133270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Financing strategy analysis for a multi-sided platform with blockchain technology</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Yu, Yugang ; Huang, Ganquan ; Guo, Xiaolong</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yugang ; Huang, Ganquan ; Guo, Xiaolong</creatorcontrib><description>Thanks to the credibility and transparency of blockchain technology, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) can use self-guarantee to obtain loans from financial institutions. Unlike the well-developed supply chain finance (SCF) using guarantees provided by a core enterprise, the effectiveness of SCF with self-guarantee is unclear, especially in a multi-sided market setting. The current paper explores this effectiveness by building an analytical model involving four kinds of players: a multi-sided platform, a customer, a bank, and multiple transportation service providers. In this setting, a traditional SCF model with Platform Undertakes Guarantee (PUG) and a novel SCF strategy with self-guarantee (i.e. Customer Undertakes Guarantee (CUG)) are analysed. The results indicate that CUG can bring a Pareto improvement for the market compared to PUG. Although CUG displays higher efficiency, it is not always beneficial to the platform when the customer's opportunity cost rate is higher than the platform's. Furthermore, to mitigate credit risk caused by a low-credit customer, the platform may employ a prepayment strategy. Analytical results of this study indicate that the prepayment ratio does not affect the customer's cost, and thus, providing a high prepayment ratio but a relatively low service fee rate to low-credit customers is suggested to the platform.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7543</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-588X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1766718</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Alliances ; Blockchain ; blockchain technology ; Cryptography ; Customer services ; Customers ; Financing ; financing strategy ; Guarantees ; Loans ; Mathematical models ; multi-sided markets ; Prepayments ; Small &amp; medium sized enterprises-SME ; Small business ; Strategy ; supply chain finance ; Supply chains ; Transportation services</subject><ispartof>International journal of production research, 2021-08, Vol.59 (15), p.4513-4532</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-9eb642122ccadefb4e347fc9864510aa9700b61399d9742f0bc4a5cc54b5a4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-9eb642122ccadefb4e347fc9864510aa9700b61399d9742f0bc4a5cc54b5a4d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1261-6852</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00207543.2020.1766718$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207543.2020.1766718$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,59645,60434</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yugang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ganquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xiaolong</creatorcontrib><title>Financing strategy analysis for a multi-sided platform with blockchain technology</title><title>International journal of production research</title><description>Thanks to the credibility and transparency of blockchain technology, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) can use self-guarantee to obtain loans from financial institutions. Unlike the well-developed supply chain finance (SCF) using guarantees provided by a core enterprise, the effectiveness of SCF with self-guarantee is unclear, especially in a multi-sided market setting. The current paper explores this effectiveness by building an analytical model involving four kinds of players: a multi-sided platform, a customer, a bank, and multiple transportation service providers. In this setting, a traditional SCF model with Platform Undertakes Guarantee (PUG) and a novel SCF strategy with self-guarantee (i.e. Customer Undertakes Guarantee (CUG)) are analysed. The results indicate that CUG can bring a Pareto improvement for the market compared to PUG. Although CUG displays higher efficiency, it is not always beneficial to the platform when the customer's opportunity cost rate is higher than the platform's. Furthermore, to mitigate credit risk caused by a low-credit customer, the platform may employ a prepayment strategy. Analytical results of this study indicate that the prepayment ratio does not affect the customer's cost, and thus, providing a high prepayment ratio but a relatively low service fee rate to low-credit customers is suggested to the platform.</description><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Blockchain</subject><subject>blockchain technology</subject><subject>Cryptography</subject><subject>Customer services</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>financing strategy</subject><subject>Guarantees</subject><subject>Loans</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>multi-sided markets</subject><subject>Prepayments</subject><subject>Small &amp; medium sized enterprises-SME</subject><subject>Small business</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>supply chain finance</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Transportation services</subject><issn>0020-7543</issn><issn>1366-588X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43ppsvnZvSvELCiL04C1ks9k2NU1qklL237tLK97MZcLwvDPDA8AtRjOMKnSPUIkEo2RWDp8ZFpwLXJ2BCSacF6yqPs_BZGSKEboEVylt0PBYRSfg49l65bX1K5hyVNmseqi8cn2yCXYhQgW3e5dtkWxrWrhzKg_dLTzYvIaNC_pLr5X1MBu99sGFVX8NLjrlkrk51SlYPj8t56_F4v3lbf64KDSpWS5q03Ba4rLUWrWma6ghVHS6rjhlGClVC4Qajkldt7WgZYcaTRXTmtGGKdqSKbg7jt3F8L03KctN2Mfh8iRLxggmpBRooNiR0jGkFE0nd9FuVewlRnKUJ3_lyVGePMkbcvCYMzp4m_5SgpNaYFrhAXk4ItaPRtQhRNfKrHoXYhdHp0mS_7f8APVtgP8</recordid><startdate>20210803</startdate><enddate>20210803</enddate><creator>Yu, Yugang</creator><creator>Huang, Ganquan</creator><creator>Guo, Xiaolong</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1261-6852</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210803</creationdate><title>Financing strategy analysis for a multi-sided platform with blockchain technology</title><author>Yu, Yugang ; Huang, Ganquan ; Guo, Xiaolong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-9eb642122ccadefb4e347fc9864510aa9700b61399d9742f0bc4a5cc54b5a4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Blockchain</topic><topic>blockchain technology</topic><topic>Cryptography</topic><topic>Customer services</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>financing strategy</topic><topic>Guarantees</topic><topic>Loans</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>multi-sided markets</topic><topic>Prepayments</topic><topic>Small &amp; medium sized enterprises-SME</topic><topic>Small business</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>supply chain finance</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Transportation services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yugang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ganquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xiaolong</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of production research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Yugang</au><au>Huang, Ganquan</au><au>Guo, Xiaolong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Financing strategy analysis for a multi-sided platform with blockchain technology</atitle><jtitle>International journal of production research</jtitle><date>2021-08-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>4513</spage><epage>4532</epage><pages>4513-4532</pages><issn>0020-7543</issn><eissn>1366-588X</eissn><abstract>Thanks to the credibility and transparency of blockchain technology, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) can use self-guarantee to obtain loans from financial institutions. Unlike the well-developed supply chain finance (SCF) using guarantees provided by a core enterprise, the effectiveness of SCF with self-guarantee is unclear, especially in a multi-sided market setting. The current paper explores this effectiveness by building an analytical model involving four kinds of players: a multi-sided platform, a customer, a bank, and multiple transportation service providers. In this setting, a traditional SCF model with Platform Undertakes Guarantee (PUG) and a novel SCF strategy with self-guarantee (i.e. Customer Undertakes Guarantee (CUG)) are analysed. The results indicate that CUG can bring a Pareto improvement for the market compared to PUG. Although CUG displays higher efficiency, it is not always beneficial to the platform when the customer's opportunity cost rate is higher than the platform's. Furthermore, to mitigate credit risk caused by a low-credit customer, the platform may employ a prepayment strategy. Analytical results of this study indicate that the prepayment ratio does not affect the customer's cost, and thus, providing a high prepayment ratio but a relatively low service fee rate to low-credit customers is suggested to the platform.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00207543.2020.1766718</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1261-6852</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7543
ispartof International journal of production research, 2021-08, Vol.59 (15), p.4513-4532
issn 0020-7543
1366-588X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00207543_2020_1766718
source Business Source Complete; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Alliances
Blockchain
blockchain technology
Cryptography
Customer services
Customers
Financing
financing strategy
Guarantees
Loans
Mathematical models
multi-sided markets
Prepayments
Small & medium sized enterprises-SME
Small business
Strategy
supply chain finance
Supply chains
Transportation services
title Financing strategy analysis for a multi-sided platform with blockchain technology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A05%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Financing%20strategy%20analysis%20for%20a%20multi-sided%20platform%20with%20blockchain%20technology&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20production%20research&rft.au=Yu,%20Yugang&rft.date=2021-08-03&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=4513&rft.epage=4532&rft.pages=4513-4532&rft.issn=0020-7543&rft.eissn=1366-588X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00207543.2020.1766718&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2553133270%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553133270&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true