Solving multi-objective rescheduling problems in dynamic permutation flow shop environments with disruptions
In multi-objective optimisation problems, optimal decisions need to be made in the presence of trade-offs among conflicting objectives which may sometimes be expressed in different units of measure. This makes it difficult to reduce the problem to a single-objective optimisation. Furthermore, when d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of production research 2018-10, Vol.56 (19), p.6363-6377 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6377 |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 6363 |
container_title | International journal of production research |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Valledor, Pablo Gomez, Alberto Priore, Paolo Puente, Javier |
description | In multi-objective optimisation problems, optimal decisions need to be made in the presence of trade-offs among conflicting objectives which may sometimes be expressed in different units of measure. This makes it difficult to reduce the problem to a single-objective optimisation. Furthermore, when disruptive changes emerge in manufacturing environments, such as the arrival of new jobs or machine breakdowns, the scheduling system should be adapted by responding quickly. In this paper, we propose a rescheduling architecture for solving the problem based on a predictive-reactive strategy and a new method to calculate the reactive schedule in each rescheduling period. Additionally, we developed a methodology that allows the use of multi-objective performance metrics to evaluate dispatching rules. These rules are applied at a benchmark specifically designed for this paper considering three objective functions: makespan, total weighted tardiness and stability. Three types of disruptions are also considered: arrivals of new jobs, machine breakdowns and variations in job processing times. Results showed that the RANDOM rule provides a better behaviour compared to other evaluated rules and a lower ratio of non-dominated solutions compared to ATC (apparent tardiness cost) and FIFO (first-in-first-out) rules. Moreover, the behaviour of the hypervolume metric depends on the problem dimensions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00207543.2018.1468095 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00207543_2018_1468095</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2118709057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-8d966fec0e2c30a33d6aed4f7a9c626a5252e259a1cb64ca2d347316b21537f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43pqPTTZ7U4pfIHhQwVtIs1mbkk3WJNvSf-8urVfnMod53pnhAeAaowVGAt0iRFDFSrogCIsFLrlANTsBM0w5L5gQX6dgNjHFBJ2Di5Q2aCwmyhlw78Ftrf-G3eCyLcJqY3S2WwOjSXptmsFNwz6GlTNdgtbDZu9VZzXsTeyGrLINHrYu7GBahx4av7Ux-M74nODO5jVsbIpDP2HpEpy1yiVzdexz8Pn48LF8Ll7fnl6W96-FphXKhWhqzlujkSGaIkVpw5VpyrZSteaEK0YYMYTVCusVL7UiDS0rivmKYEartqRzcHPYO_79M5iU5SYM0Y8nJcFYVKhGrBopdqB0DClF08o-2k7FvcRITmLln1g5iZVHsWPu7pCzvg2xU7sQXSOz2rsQ26i8tknS_1f8ApiQgi4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2118709057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Solving multi-objective rescheduling problems in dynamic permutation flow shop environments with disruptions</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Valledor, Pablo ; Gomez, Alberto ; Priore, Paolo ; Puente, Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Valledor, Pablo ; Gomez, Alberto ; Priore, Paolo ; Puente, Javier</creatorcontrib><description>In multi-objective optimisation problems, optimal decisions need to be made in the presence of trade-offs among conflicting objectives which may sometimes be expressed in different units of measure. This makes it difficult to reduce the problem to a single-objective optimisation. Furthermore, when disruptive changes emerge in manufacturing environments, such as the arrival of new jobs or machine breakdowns, the scheduling system should be adapted by responding quickly. In this paper, we propose a rescheduling architecture for solving the problem based on a predictive-reactive strategy and a new method to calculate the reactive schedule in each rescheduling period. Additionally, we developed a methodology that allows the use of multi-objective performance metrics to evaluate dispatching rules. These rules are applied at a benchmark specifically designed for this paper considering three objective functions: makespan, total weighted tardiness and stability. Three types of disruptions are also considered: arrivals of new jobs, machine breakdowns and variations in job processing times. Results showed that the RANDOM rule provides a better behaviour compared to other evaluated rules and a lower ratio of non-dominated solutions compared to ATC (apparent tardiness cost) and FIFO (first-in-first-out) rules. Moreover, the behaviour of the hypervolume metric depends on the problem dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7543</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-588X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1468095</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>arrival of new jobs ; Breakdown ; Breakdowns ; Dispatching rules ; Job shops ; machine breakdowns ; Mathematical analysis ; multi-objective ; Multiple objective analysis ; Optimization ; Performance measurement ; Permutations ; predictive-reactive ; Production scheduling ; Rescheduling ; stochastic processing times</subject><ispartof>International journal of production research, 2018-10, Vol.56 (19), p.6363-6377</ispartof><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2018</rights><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-8d966fec0e2c30a33d6aed4f7a9c626a5252e259a1cb64ca2d347316b21537f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-8d966fec0e2c30a33d6aed4f7a9c626a5252e259a1cb64ca2d347316b21537f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00207543.2018.1468095$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207543.2018.1468095$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,59623,60412</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valledor, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priore, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puente, Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Solving multi-objective rescheduling problems in dynamic permutation flow shop environments with disruptions</title><title>International journal of production research</title><description>In multi-objective optimisation problems, optimal decisions need to be made in the presence of trade-offs among conflicting objectives which may sometimes be expressed in different units of measure. This makes it difficult to reduce the problem to a single-objective optimisation. Furthermore, when disruptive changes emerge in manufacturing environments, such as the arrival of new jobs or machine breakdowns, the scheduling system should be adapted by responding quickly. In this paper, we propose a rescheduling architecture for solving the problem based on a predictive-reactive strategy and a new method to calculate the reactive schedule in each rescheduling period. Additionally, we developed a methodology that allows the use of multi-objective performance metrics to evaluate dispatching rules. These rules are applied at a benchmark specifically designed for this paper considering three objective functions: makespan, total weighted tardiness and stability. Three types of disruptions are also considered: arrivals of new jobs, machine breakdowns and variations in job processing times. Results showed that the RANDOM rule provides a better behaviour compared to other evaluated rules and a lower ratio of non-dominated solutions compared to ATC (apparent tardiness cost) and FIFO (first-in-first-out) rules. Moreover, the behaviour of the hypervolume metric depends on the problem dimensions.</description><subject>arrival of new jobs</subject><subject>Breakdown</subject><subject>Breakdowns</subject><subject>Dispatching rules</subject><subject>Job shops</subject><subject>machine breakdowns</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>multi-objective</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Performance measurement</subject><subject>Permutations</subject><subject>predictive-reactive</subject><subject>Production scheduling</subject><subject>Rescheduling</subject><subject>stochastic processing times</subject><issn>0020-7543</issn><issn>1366-588X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43pqPTTZ7U4pfIHhQwVtIs1mbkk3WJNvSf-8urVfnMod53pnhAeAaowVGAt0iRFDFSrogCIsFLrlANTsBM0w5L5gQX6dgNjHFBJ2Di5Q2aCwmyhlw78Ftrf-G3eCyLcJqY3S2WwOjSXptmsFNwz6GlTNdgtbDZu9VZzXsTeyGrLINHrYu7GBahx4av7Ux-M74nODO5jVsbIpDP2HpEpy1yiVzdexz8Pn48LF8Ll7fnl6W96-FphXKhWhqzlujkSGaIkVpw5VpyrZSteaEK0YYMYTVCusVL7UiDS0rivmKYEartqRzcHPYO_79M5iU5SYM0Y8nJcFYVKhGrBopdqB0DClF08o-2k7FvcRITmLln1g5iZVHsWPu7pCzvg2xU7sQXSOz2rsQ26i8tknS_1f8ApiQgi4</recordid><startdate>20181002</startdate><enddate>20181002</enddate><creator>Valledor, Pablo</creator><creator>Gomez, Alberto</creator><creator>Priore, Paolo</creator><creator>Puente, Javier</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181002</creationdate><title>Solving multi-objective rescheduling problems in dynamic permutation flow shop environments with disruptions</title><author>Valledor, Pablo ; Gomez, Alberto ; Priore, Paolo ; Puente, Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-8d966fec0e2c30a33d6aed4f7a9c626a5252e259a1cb64ca2d347316b21537f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>arrival of new jobs</topic><topic>Breakdown</topic><topic>Breakdowns</topic><topic>Dispatching rules</topic><topic>Job shops</topic><topic>machine breakdowns</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>multi-objective</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Performance measurement</topic><topic>Permutations</topic><topic>predictive-reactive</topic><topic>Production scheduling</topic><topic>Rescheduling</topic><topic>stochastic processing times</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valledor, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priore, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puente, Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of production research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valledor, Pablo</au><au>Gomez, Alberto</au><au>Priore, Paolo</au><au>Puente, Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Solving multi-objective rescheduling problems in dynamic permutation flow shop environments with disruptions</atitle><jtitle>International journal of production research</jtitle><date>2018-10-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>6363</spage><epage>6377</epage><pages>6363-6377</pages><issn>0020-7543</issn><eissn>1366-588X</eissn><abstract>In multi-objective optimisation problems, optimal decisions need to be made in the presence of trade-offs among conflicting objectives which may sometimes be expressed in different units of measure. This makes it difficult to reduce the problem to a single-objective optimisation. Furthermore, when disruptive changes emerge in manufacturing environments, such as the arrival of new jobs or machine breakdowns, the scheduling system should be adapted by responding quickly. In this paper, we propose a rescheduling architecture for solving the problem based on a predictive-reactive strategy and a new method to calculate the reactive schedule in each rescheduling period. Additionally, we developed a methodology that allows the use of multi-objective performance metrics to evaluate dispatching rules. These rules are applied at a benchmark specifically designed for this paper considering three objective functions: makespan, total weighted tardiness and stability. Three types of disruptions are also considered: arrivals of new jobs, machine breakdowns and variations in job processing times. Results showed that the RANDOM rule provides a better behaviour compared to other evaluated rules and a lower ratio of non-dominated solutions compared to ATC (apparent tardiness cost) and FIFO (first-in-first-out) rules. Moreover, the behaviour of the hypervolume metric depends on the problem dimensions.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00207543.2018.1468095</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7543 |
ispartof | International journal of production research, 2018-10, Vol.56 (19), p.6363-6377 |
issn | 0020-7543 1366-588X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00207543_2018_1468095 |
source | Business Source Complete; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | arrival of new jobs Breakdown Breakdowns Dispatching rules Job shops machine breakdowns Mathematical analysis multi-objective Multiple objective analysis Optimization Performance measurement Permutations predictive-reactive Production scheduling Rescheduling stochastic processing times |
title | Solving multi-objective rescheduling problems in dynamic permutation flow shop environments with disruptions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T22%3A51%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Solving%20multi-objective%20rescheduling%20problems%20in%20dynamic%20permutation%20flow%20shop%20environments%20with%20disruptions&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20production%20research&rft.au=Valledor,%20Pablo&rft.date=2018-10-02&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=6363&rft.epage=6377&rft.pages=6363-6377&rft.issn=0020-7543&rft.eissn=1366-588X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00207543.2018.1468095&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2118709057%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2118709057&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |