Dynamic lot sizing with product returns and remanufacturing
We address the dynamic lot sizing problem for systems with product returns. The demand and return amounts are deterministic over the finite planning horizon. Demands can be satisfied by manufactured new items, but also by remanufactured returned items. The objective is to determine those lot sizes f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of production research 2006-10, Vol.44 (20), p.4377-4400 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4400 |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 4377 |
container_title | International journal of production research |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Teunter, Ruud H. Bayindir, Z. Pelin Den Heuvel, Wilco Van |
description | We address the dynamic lot sizing problem for systems with product returns. The demand and return amounts are deterministic over the finite planning horizon. Demands can be satisfied by manufactured new items, but also by remanufactured returned items. The objective is to determine those lot sizes for manufacturing and remanufacturing that minimize the total cost composed of holding cost for returns and (re)manufactured products and set-up costs. Two different set-up cost schemes are considered: there is either a joint set-up cost for manufacturing and remanufacturing (single production line) or separate set-up costs (dedicated production lines). For the joint set-up cost case, we present an exact, polynomial-time dynamic programming algorithm. For both cases, we suggest modifications of the well-known Silver Meal (SM), Least Unit Cost (LUC) and Part Period Balancing (PPB) heuristics. An extensive numerical study reveals a number of insights. The key ones are that, under both set-up cost schemes: (1) the SM and LUC heuristics perform much better than PPB, (2) increased variation in the demand amounts can lead to reduced cost, showing that predictability is more important than variation, and (3) periods with more returns than demand should, if possible, be avoided by 'matching' demand and return. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00207540600693564 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00207540600693564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1135564781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-d2d0c9c0ed47f27c9bbb28979068643f7be8c1e689926833dda60ab8427b8d863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtr3DAUhUVoINOkP6A7E2ghC6dXsiVLtJshrykMZJNCd0KW5IyCbaWSnGT666th8oCGEG0krr5z7j0Xoc8YjjFw-AZAoKE1MAAmKsrqHTTDFWMl5fz3BzTb_JcZqPbQxxhvIB_K6xn6froe1eB00ftURPfXjdfFvUur4jZ4M-lUBJumMMZCjSa_BzVOndK5lMEDtNupPtpPj_c--nV-dnWyKJeXFz9P5stSU4xTaYgBLTRYUzcdabRo25Zw0QhgnNVV17SWa2wZF4IwXlXGKAaq5TVpWm44q_bR0dZ3pXp5G9ygwlp65eRivpSbWs6CiQB6hzP7dcvm-f9MNiY5uKht36vR-ilKIgjBDZAMHv4H3vgcNOeQBHNGORE0Q3gL6eBjDLZ7bo9BbvYuX-09a748GquoVd8FNWoXX4Q8D0vrDddsOTd2Pgzq3ofeyKTWvQ9PolfuMj2krPzxrrJ6e8B_dISlWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218658295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic lot sizing with product returns and remanufacturing</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Teunter, Ruud H. ; Bayindir, Z. Pelin ; Den Heuvel, Wilco Van</creator><creatorcontrib>Teunter, Ruud H. ; Bayindir, Z. Pelin ; Den Heuvel, Wilco Van</creatorcontrib><description>We address the dynamic lot sizing problem for systems with product returns. The demand and return amounts are deterministic over the finite planning horizon. Demands can be satisfied by manufactured new items, but also by remanufactured returned items. The objective is to determine those lot sizes for manufacturing and remanufacturing that minimize the total cost composed of holding cost for returns and (re)manufactured products and set-up costs. Two different set-up cost schemes are considered: there is either a joint set-up cost for manufacturing and remanufacturing (single production line) or separate set-up costs (dedicated production lines). For the joint set-up cost case, we present an exact, polynomial-time dynamic programming algorithm. For both cases, we suggest modifications of the well-known Silver Meal (SM), Least Unit Cost (LUC) and Part Period Balancing (PPB) heuristics. An extensive numerical study reveals a number of insights. The key ones are that, under both set-up cost schemes: (1) the SM and LUC heuristics perform much better than PPB, (2) increased variation in the demand amounts can lead to reduced cost, showing that predictability is more important than variation, and (3) periods with more returns than demand should, if possible, be avoided by 'matching' demand and return.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7543</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-588X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00207540600693564</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPRB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Applied sciences ; Batch sizing ; Demand ; Exact sciences and technology ; Inventory ; Inventory control, production control. Distribution ; Logistics ; Numerical analysis ; Operational research and scientific management ; Operational research. Management science ; Product returns ; Production costs ; Remanufacturing ; Reverse logistics ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of production research, 2006-10, Vol.44 (20), p.4377-4400</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2006</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group Oct 15, 2006</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-d2d0c9c0ed47f27c9bbb28979068643f7be8c1e689926833dda60ab8427b8d863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-d2d0c9c0ed47f27c9bbb28979068643f7be8c1e689926833dda60ab8427b8d863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00207540600693564$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207540600693564$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18051544$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00512905$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teunter, Ruud H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayindir, Z. Pelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Den Heuvel, Wilco Van</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic lot sizing with product returns and remanufacturing</title><title>International journal of production research</title><description>We address the dynamic lot sizing problem for systems with product returns. The demand and return amounts are deterministic over the finite planning horizon. Demands can be satisfied by manufactured new items, but also by remanufactured returned items. The objective is to determine those lot sizes for manufacturing and remanufacturing that minimize the total cost composed of holding cost for returns and (re)manufactured products and set-up costs. Two different set-up cost schemes are considered: there is either a joint set-up cost for manufacturing and remanufacturing (single production line) or separate set-up costs (dedicated production lines). For the joint set-up cost case, we present an exact, polynomial-time dynamic programming algorithm. For both cases, we suggest modifications of the well-known Silver Meal (SM), Least Unit Cost (LUC) and Part Period Balancing (PPB) heuristics. An extensive numerical study reveals a number of insights. The key ones are that, under both set-up cost schemes: (1) the SM and LUC heuristics perform much better than PPB, (2) increased variation in the demand amounts can lead to reduced cost, showing that predictability is more important than variation, and (3) periods with more returns than demand should, if possible, be avoided by 'matching' demand and return.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Batch sizing</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Inventory control, production control. Distribution</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Operational research and scientific management</subject><subject>Operational research. Management science</subject><subject>Product returns</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Remanufacturing</subject><subject>Reverse logistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0020-7543</issn><issn>1366-588X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtr3DAUhUVoINOkP6A7E2ghC6dXsiVLtJshrykMZJNCd0KW5IyCbaWSnGT666th8oCGEG0krr5z7j0Xoc8YjjFw-AZAoKE1MAAmKsrqHTTDFWMl5fz3BzTb_JcZqPbQxxhvIB_K6xn6froe1eB00ftURPfXjdfFvUur4jZ4M-lUBJumMMZCjSa_BzVOndK5lMEDtNupPtpPj_c--nV-dnWyKJeXFz9P5stSU4xTaYgBLTRYUzcdabRo25Zw0QhgnNVV17SWa2wZF4IwXlXGKAaq5TVpWm44q_bR0dZ3pXp5G9ygwlp65eRivpSbWs6CiQB6hzP7dcvm-f9MNiY5uKht36vR-ilKIgjBDZAMHv4H3vgcNOeQBHNGORE0Q3gL6eBjDLZ7bo9BbvYuX-09a748GquoVd8FNWoXX4Q8D0vrDddsOTd2Pgzq3ofeyKTWvQ9PolfuMj2krPzxrrJ6e8B_dISlWw</recordid><startdate>20061015</startdate><enddate>20061015</enddate><creator>Teunter, Ruud H.</creator><creator>Bayindir, Z. Pelin</creator><creator>Den Heuvel, Wilco Van</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061015</creationdate><title>Dynamic lot sizing with product returns and remanufacturing</title><author>Teunter, Ruud H. ; Bayindir, Z. Pelin ; Den Heuvel, Wilco Van</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-d2d0c9c0ed47f27c9bbb28979068643f7be8c1e689926833dda60ab8427b8d863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Batch sizing</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Inventory control, production control. Distribution</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Operational research and scientific management</topic><topic>Operational research. Management science</topic><topic>Product returns</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Remanufacturing</topic><topic>Reverse logistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teunter, Ruud H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayindir, Z. Pelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Den Heuvel, Wilco Van</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>International journal of production research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teunter, Ruud H.</au><au>Bayindir, Z. Pelin</au><au>Den Heuvel, Wilco Van</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic lot sizing with product returns and remanufacturing</atitle><jtitle>International journal of production research</jtitle><date>2006-10-15</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>4377</spage><epage>4400</epage><pages>4377-4400</pages><issn>0020-7543</issn><eissn>1366-588X</eissn><coden>IJPRB8</coden><abstract>We address the dynamic lot sizing problem for systems with product returns. The demand and return amounts are deterministic over the finite planning horizon. Demands can be satisfied by manufactured new items, but also by remanufactured returned items. The objective is to determine those lot sizes for manufacturing and remanufacturing that minimize the total cost composed of holding cost for returns and (re)manufactured products and set-up costs. Two different set-up cost schemes are considered: there is either a joint set-up cost for manufacturing and remanufacturing (single production line) or separate set-up costs (dedicated production lines). For the joint set-up cost case, we present an exact, polynomial-time dynamic programming algorithm. For both cases, we suggest modifications of the well-known Silver Meal (SM), Least Unit Cost (LUC) and Part Period Balancing (PPB) heuristics. An extensive numerical study reveals a number of insights. The key ones are that, under both set-up cost schemes: (1) the SM and LUC heuristics perform much better than PPB, (2) increased variation in the demand amounts can lead to reduced cost, showing that predictability is more important than variation, and (3) periods with more returns than demand should, if possible, be avoided by 'matching' demand and return.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00207540600693564</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7543 |
ispartof | International journal of production research, 2006-10, Vol.44 (20), p.4377-4400 |
issn | 0020-7543 1366-588X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00207540600693564 |
source | Business Source Complete; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Algorithms Applied sciences Batch sizing Demand Exact sciences and technology Inventory Inventory control, production control. Distribution Logistics Numerical analysis Operational research and scientific management Operational research. Management science Product returns Production costs Remanufacturing Reverse logistics Studies |
title | Dynamic lot sizing with product returns and remanufacturing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A21%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20lot%20sizing%20with%20product%20returns%20and%20remanufacturing&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20production%20research&rft.au=Teunter,%20Ruud%20H.&rft.date=2006-10-15&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=4377&rft.epage=4400&rft.pages=4377-4400&rft.issn=0020-7543&rft.eissn=1366-588X&rft.coden=IJPRB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00207540600693564&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1135564781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218658295&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |