Comparison of measured and self-reported anthropometric information among firefighters: implications and applications

This study evaluated the accuracy of self-reported body weight and height compared to measured values among firefighters and identified factors associated with reporting error. A total of 863 male and 88 female firefighters in four US regions participated in the study. The results showed that both m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ergonomics 2014-12, Vol.57 (12), p.1886-1897
Hauptverfasser: Hsiao, Hongwei, Weaver, Darlene, Hsiao, James, Whitestone, Jennifer, Kau, Tsui-Ying, Whisler, Richard, Ferri, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1897
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1886
container_title Ergonomics
container_volume 57
creator Hsiao, Hongwei
Weaver, Darlene
Hsiao, James
Whitestone, Jennifer
Kau, Tsui-Ying
Whisler, Richard
Ferri, Robert
description This study evaluated the accuracy of self-reported body weight and height compared to measured values among firefighters and identified factors associated with reporting error. A total of 863 male and 88 female firefighters in four US regions participated in the study. The results showed that both men and women underestimated their body weight ( − 0.4 ± 4.1, − 1.1 ± 3.6 kg) and overestimated their height (29 ± 18 , 17 ± 16 mm). Women underestimated more than men on weight (p = 0.022) and men overestimated more than women on height (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00140139.2014.952351
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00140139_2014_952351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1651407594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-4d582c7e34cdf8877f63018bce6acc2408ec0aef98469535625098364b1a134b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuLFDEQx4Mo7rj6DUQaRPDSY94PDyvL4AsWvOg5ZNLJTJZOp026lf32m3ntqgfZU5KqX_1JVf0BeIngEkEJ30GIKERELXG9LBXDhKFHYIEI5y2TVDwGix3S7pgz8KyU6_okSOGn4AwzpCTkaAHmVYqjyaGkoUm-ic6UObuuMUPXFNf7Nrsx5WkfmbY5jSm6KQfbhMGnHM0UaqGJadg0PmTnw2Y7uVzeNyGOfbD7fNmrmfE-8Bw88aYv7sXxPAc_Pn38vvrSXn37_HV1edVaJuXU0o5JbIUj1HZeSiE8JxDJtXXcWIsplM5C47ySlCtGGMcMKkk4XSODCF2Tc3Bx0B3ndXSddcOUTa_HHKLJNzqZoP_ODGGrN-mXpoIKSEgVeHsUyOnn7MqkYyjW9b0ZXJqLRpxRLiFU_CFoXZhgij4AxQIKVUUr-vof9DrNeahDqxQRnOLadKXogbI5lVLXcNcignrnFn1yi965RR_cUste_Tmeu6KTPSrw5giYYk3vsxlsKPecqmJk3_uHA3d0xe-U-05P5qZP-VRE_vuVW4G13KU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1637642625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of measured and self-reported anthropometric information among firefighters: implications and applications</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Hsiao, Hongwei ; Weaver, Darlene ; Hsiao, James ; Whitestone, Jennifer ; Kau, Tsui-Ying ; Whisler, Richard ; Ferri, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Hsiao, Hongwei ; Weaver, Darlene ; Hsiao, James ; Whitestone, Jennifer ; Kau, Tsui-Ying ; Whisler, Richard ; Ferri, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the accuracy of self-reported body weight and height compared to measured values among firefighters and identified factors associated with reporting error. A total of 863 male and 88 female firefighters in four US regions participated in the study. The results showed that both men and women underestimated their body weight ( − 0.4 ± 4.1, − 1.1 ± 3.6 kg) and overestimated their height (29 ± 18 , 17 ± 16 mm). Women underestimated more than men on weight (p = 0.022) and men overestimated more than women on height (p &lt; 0.001). Reporting errors on weight were increased with overweight status (p &lt; 0.001) and were disproportionate among subgroups. About 27% men and 24% women had reporting errors on weight greater than ± 2.2 kg, and 59% men and 28% women had reporting errors on height greater than 25 mm. Practitioner Summary: This study along with literature revealed that the self-reported approach is not a sustainable option for anthropometric surveys, even for gathering data from physically active professional groups, such as firefighters, who presumably are knowledgeable of their body dimensions. Self-reported anthropometric information is undependable in important population subgroups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2014.952351</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25198061</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERGOAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Anthropometry ; Anthropometry - methods ; Applied physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Height ; Body Weight ; Comparative analysis ; Ergonomics ; Ergonomics. Human factors ; Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology ; Error analysis ; Errors ; Female ; firefighter ; Firefighters ; Firefighters - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; height ; Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Men ; Middle Aged ; obesity ; Occupational psychology ; Overweight - psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reporting ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Report ; self-reported ; Sex Factors ; Subgroups ; Weight ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 2014-12, Vol.57 (12), p.1886-1897</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor &amp; Francis 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-4d582c7e34cdf8877f63018bce6acc2408ec0aef98469535625098364b1a134b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-4d582c7e34cdf8877f63018bce6acc2408ec0aef98469535625098364b1a134b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00140139.2014.952351$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00140139.2014.952351$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=29014396$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25198061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hsiao, Hongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Darlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiao, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitestone, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kau, Tsui-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whisler, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferri, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of measured and self-reported anthropometric information among firefighters: implications and applications</title><title>Ergonomics</title><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the accuracy of self-reported body weight and height compared to measured values among firefighters and identified factors associated with reporting error. A total of 863 male and 88 female firefighters in four US regions participated in the study. The results showed that both men and women underestimated their body weight ( − 0.4 ± 4.1, − 1.1 ± 3.6 kg) and overestimated their height (29 ± 18 , 17 ± 16 mm). Women underestimated more than men on weight (p = 0.022) and men overestimated more than women on height (p &lt; 0.001). Reporting errors on weight were increased with overweight status (p &lt; 0.001) and were disproportionate among subgroups. About 27% men and 24% women had reporting errors on weight greater than ± 2.2 kg, and 59% men and 28% women had reporting errors on height greater than 25 mm. Practitioner Summary: This study along with literature revealed that the self-reported approach is not a sustainable option for anthropometric surveys, even for gathering data from physically active professional groups, such as firefighters, who presumably are knowledgeable of their body dimensions. Self-reported anthropometric information is undependable in important population subgroups.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Anthropometry - methods</subject><subject>Applied physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Height</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Human factors</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>firefighter</subject><subject>Firefighters</subject><subject>Firefighters - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>height</subject><subject>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>obesity</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Overweight - psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reporting</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>self-reported</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuLFDEQx4Mo7rj6DUQaRPDSY94PDyvL4AsWvOg5ZNLJTJZOp026lf32m3ntqgfZU5KqX_1JVf0BeIngEkEJ30GIKERELXG9LBXDhKFHYIEI5y2TVDwGix3S7pgz8KyU6_okSOGn4AwzpCTkaAHmVYqjyaGkoUm-ic6UObuuMUPXFNf7Nrsx5WkfmbY5jSm6KQfbhMGnHM0UaqGJadg0PmTnw2Y7uVzeNyGOfbD7fNmrmfE-8Bw88aYv7sXxPAc_Pn38vvrSXn37_HV1edVaJuXU0o5JbIUj1HZeSiE8JxDJtXXcWIsplM5C47ySlCtGGMcMKkk4XSODCF2Tc3Bx0B3ndXSddcOUTa_HHKLJNzqZoP_ODGGrN-mXpoIKSEgVeHsUyOnn7MqkYyjW9b0ZXJqLRpxRLiFU_CFoXZhgij4AxQIKVUUr-vof9DrNeahDqxQRnOLadKXogbI5lVLXcNcignrnFn1yi965RR_cUste_Tmeu6KTPSrw5giYYk3vsxlsKPecqmJk3_uHA3d0xe-U-05P5qZP-VRE_vuVW4G13KU</recordid><startdate>20141202</startdate><enddate>20141202</enddate><creator>Hsiao, Hongwei</creator><creator>Weaver, Darlene</creator><creator>Hsiao, James</creator><creator>Whitestone, Jennifer</creator><creator>Kau, Tsui-Ying</creator><creator>Whisler, Richard</creator><creator>Ferri, Robert</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141202</creationdate><title>Comparison of measured and self-reported anthropometric information among firefighters: implications and applications</title><author>Hsiao, Hongwei ; Weaver, Darlene ; Hsiao, James ; Whitestone, Jennifer ; Kau, Tsui-Ying ; Whisler, Richard ; Ferri, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-4d582c7e34cdf8877f63018bce6acc2408ec0aef98469535625098364b1a134b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Anthropometry - methods</topic><topic>Applied physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Height</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Human factors</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>firefighter</topic><topic>Firefighters</topic><topic>Firefighters - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>height</topic><topic>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>obesity</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Overweight - psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reporting</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>self-reported</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hsiao, Hongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Darlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiao, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitestone, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kau, Tsui-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whisler, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferri, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hsiao, Hongwei</au><au>Weaver, Darlene</au><au>Hsiao, James</au><au>Whitestone, Jennifer</au><au>Kau, Tsui-Ying</au><au>Whisler, Richard</au><au>Ferri, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of measured and self-reported anthropometric information among firefighters: implications and applications</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><date>2014-12-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1886</spage><epage>1897</epage><pages>1886-1897</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><coden>ERGOAX</coden><abstract>This study evaluated the accuracy of self-reported body weight and height compared to measured values among firefighters and identified factors associated with reporting error. A total of 863 male and 88 female firefighters in four US regions participated in the study. The results showed that both men and women underestimated their body weight ( − 0.4 ± 4.1, − 1.1 ± 3.6 kg) and overestimated their height (29 ± 18 , 17 ± 16 mm). Women underestimated more than men on weight (p = 0.022) and men overestimated more than women on height (p &lt; 0.001). Reporting errors on weight were increased with overweight status (p &lt; 0.001) and were disproportionate among subgroups. About 27% men and 24% women had reporting errors on weight greater than ± 2.2 kg, and 59% men and 28% women had reporting errors on height greater than 25 mm. Practitioner Summary: This study along with literature revealed that the self-reported approach is not a sustainable option for anthropometric surveys, even for gathering data from physically active professional groups, such as firefighters, who presumably are knowledgeable of their body dimensions. Self-reported anthropometric information is undependable in important population subgroups.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>25198061</pmid><doi>10.1080/00140139.2014.952351</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-0139
ispartof Ergonomics, 2014-12, Vol.57 (12), p.1886-1897
issn 0014-0139
1366-5847
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00140139_2014_952351
source Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles); MEDLINE
subjects Accuracy
Adolescent
Adult
Anthropometry
Anthropometry - methods
Applied physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Body Height
Body Weight
Comparative analysis
Ergonomics
Ergonomics. Human factors
Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology
Error analysis
Errors
Female
firefighter
Firefighters
Firefighters - statistics & numerical data
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
height
Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Men
Middle Aged
obesity
Occupational psychology
Overweight - psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reporting
Reproducibility of Results
Self Report
self-reported
Sex Factors
Subgroups
Weight
Young Adult
title Comparison of measured and self-reported anthropometric information among firefighters: implications and applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A06%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20measured%20and%20self-reported%20anthropometric%20information%20among%20firefighters:%20implications%20and%20applications&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=Hsiao,%20Hongwei&rft.date=2014-12-02&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1886&rft.epage=1897&rft.pages=1886-1897&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft.coden=ERGOAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140139.2014.952351&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1651407594%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1637642625&rft_id=info:pmid/25198061&rfr_iscdi=true