Economic viability of foreign investment in railways: a case study of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)
Pakistan Railways has faced a severe financial crisis in recent years. Pakistan has recently become a partner with China in a mega-investment project under an agreement called the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Among other things, CPEC also includes a range of investments in Pakistan Railw...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Engineering economist 2020-04, Vol.65 (2), p.158-175 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 175 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 158 |
container_title | The Engineering economist |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Ali, Yousaf Sabir, Muhammad Bilal, Muhammad Ali, Mehnab Khan, Arshad Ali |
description | Pakistan Railways has faced a severe financial crisis in recent years. Pakistan has recently become a partner with China in a mega-investment project under an agreement called the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Among other things, CPEC also includes a range of investments in Pakistan Railways. This particular study focuses on the analysis of US$8.2 billion investment in the upgrade and expansion of the Karachi-Peshawar railways link, which is also known as the ML-1 (Main Line 1). The study found ML-1 as economically viable with a payback period of 10 years. Furthermore, ML-1 project investment is expected to result in uplifting Pakistan Railways, mainly through an increase in freight and passenger transportation. Some risk factors may hinder the expected economic return from the CPEC investment in Pakistan Railways. These factors include consistency in the government policies, the status of the Pakistani economy in upcoming years, and law and order situations in the country. The study has a utility for the governments of both countries and larger business communities have stakes in the trade between the two countries. It is equally beneficial for the international community, businesses (both in China and Pakistan) and locals of the region associated with the CPEC infrastructure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/0013791X.2019.1668096 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_0013791X_2019_1668096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2404454925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-8b2de7c32a9d0d9f6a04b926edbc050ccf5dc3739a5a8c8dcaeb5697e5c36ebb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EUpfCT6hkiQscsowdO445gaLlQ6pED63EzZrYDnXJ2q2dbbX_vl62wI3TzOF539E8hJwxWDPo4T0Aa5VmP9YcmF6zrutBd8_IikmhGq6APSerA9McoBPyspQbABBcyhW529gU0zZYeh9wDHNY9jRNdErZh5-Rhnjvy7L1cakrzRjmB9yXDxSpxeJpWXbuN79cezpch4jNBf4KZcFI_xYPKefgUqZvh4vN8O4VeTHhXPzrp3lKrj5vLoevzfn3L9-GT-eNFUItTT9y55VtOWoHTk8dghg177wbLUiwdpLOtqrVKLG3vbPoR9lp5aVtOz-O7Sl5c-y9zeluV78wN2mXYz1puAAhpNBcVkoeKZtTKdlP5jaHLea9YWAOds0fu-Zg1zzZrTl6zPn6Zij_Uoor0YGUbUU-HpEQq84tPqQ8O7Pgfk55yhhtjbX_v_IIvB-NEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2404454925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic viability of foreign investment in railways: a case study of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Ali, Yousaf ; Sabir, Muhammad ; Bilal, Muhammad ; Ali, Mehnab ; Khan, Arshad Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Ali, Yousaf ; Sabir, Muhammad ; Bilal, Muhammad ; Ali, Mehnab ; Khan, Arshad Ali</creatorcontrib><description>Pakistan Railways has faced a severe financial crisis in recent years. Pakistan has recently become a partner with China in a mega-investment project under an agreement called the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Among other things, CPEC also includes a range of investments in Pakistan Railways. This particular study focuses on the analysis of US$8.2 billion investment in the upgrade and expansion of the Karachi-Peshawar railways link, which is also known as the ML-1 (Main Line 1). The study found ML-1 as economically viable with a payback period of 10 years. Furthermore, ML-1 project investment is expected to result in uplifting Pakistan Railways, mainly through an increase in freight and passenger transportation. Some risk factors may hinder the expected economic return from the CPEC investment in Pakistan Railways. These factors include consistency in the government policies, the status of the Pakistani economy in upcoming years, and law and order situations in the country. The study has a utility for the governments of both countries and larger business communities have stakes in the trade between the two countries. It is equally beneficial for the international community, businesses (both in China and Pakistan) and locals of the region associated with the CPEC infrastructure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-791X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-2701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2019.1668096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Norcross: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis ; CPEC ; Economics ; International financing ; Investment ; ML-1 ; Pakistan Railways ; Payback periods ; Public policy ; Railways ; Risk analysis</subject><ispartof>The Engineering economist, 2020-04, Vol.65 (2), p.158-175</ispartof><rights>2019 Institute of Industrial & Systems Engineers 2019</rights><rights>2019 Institute of Industrial & Systems Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-8b2de7c32a9d0d9f6a04b926edbc050ccf5dc3739a5a8c8dcaeb5697e5c36ebb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-8b2de7c32a9d0d9f6a04b926edbc050ccf5dc3739a5a8c8dcaeb5697e5c36ebb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ali, Yousaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabir, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilal, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Mehnab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Arshad Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Economic viability of foreign investment in railways: a case study of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)</title><title>The Engineering economist</title><description>Pakistan Railways has faced a severe financial crisis in recent years. Pakistan has recently become a partner with China in a mega-investment project under an agreement called the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Among other things, CPEC also includes a range of investments in Pakistan Railways. This particular study focuses on the analysis of US$8.2 billion investment in the upgrade and expansion of the Karachi-Peshawar railways link, which is also known as the ML-1 (Main Line 1). The study found ML-1 as economically viable with a payback period of 10 years. Furthermore, ML-1 project investment is expected to result in uplifting Pakistan Railways, mainly through an increase in freight and passenger transportation. Some risk factors may hinder the expected economic return from the CPEC investment in Pakistan Railways. These factors include consistency in the government policies, the status of the Pakistani economy in upcoming years, and law and order situations in the country. The study has a utility for the governments of both countries and larger business communities have stakes in the trade between the two countries. It is equally beneficial for the international community, businesses (both in China and Pakistan) and locals of the region associated with the CPEC infrastructure.</description><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>CPEC</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>International financing</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>ML-1</subject><subject>Pakistan Railways</subject><subject>Payback periods</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Railways</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><issn>0013-791X</issn><issn>1547-2701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EUpfCT6hkiQscsowdO445gaLlQ6pED63EzZrYDnXJ2q2dbbX_vl62wI3TzOF539E8hJwxWDPo4T0Aa5VmP9YcmF6zrutBd8_IikmhGq6APSerA9McoBPyspQbABBcyhW529gU0zZYeh9wDHNY9jRNdErZh5-Rhnjvy7L1cakrzRjmB9yXDxSpxeJpWXbuN79cezpch4jNBf4KZcFI_xYPKefgUqZvh4vN8O4VeTHhXPzrp3lKrj5vLoevzfn3L9-GT-eNFUItTT9y55VtOWoHTk8dghg177wbLUiwdpLOtqrVKLG3vbPoR9lp5aVtOz-O7Sl5c-y9zeluV78wN2mXYz1puAAhpNBcVkoeKZtTKdlP5jaHLea9YWAOds0fu-Zg1zzZrTl6zPn6Zij_Uoor0YGUbUU-HpEQq84tPqQ8O7Pgfk55yhhtjbX_v_IIvB-NEg</recordid><startdate>20200402</startdate><enddate>20200402</enddate><creator>Ali, Yousaf</creator><creator>Sabir, Muhammad</creator><creator>Bilal, Muhammad</creator><creator>Ali, Mehnab</creator><creator>Khan, Arshad Ali</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Inc</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200402</creationdate><title>Economic viability of foreign investment in railways: a case study of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)</title><author>Ali, Yousaf ; Sabir, Muhammad ; Bilal, Muhammad ; Ali, Mehnab ; Khan, Arshad Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-8b2de7c32a9d0d9f6a04b926edbc050ccf5dc3739a5a8c8dcaeb5697e5c36ebb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>CPEC</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>International financing</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>ML-1</topic><topic>Pakistan Railways</topic><topic>Payback periods</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Railways</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ali, Yousaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabir, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilal, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Mehnab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Arshad Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Engineering economist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ali, Yousaf</au><au>Sabir, Muhammad</au><au>Bilal, Muhammad</au><au>Ali, Mehnab</au><au>Khan, Arshad Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic viability of foreign investment in railways: a case study of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)</atitle><jtitle>The Engineering economist</jtitle><date>2020-04-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>158</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>158-175</pages><issn>0013-791X</issn><eissn>1547-2701</eissn><abstract>Pakistan Railways has faced a severe financial crisis in recent years. Pakistan has recently become a partner with China in a mega-investment project under an agreement called the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Among other things, CPEC also includes a range of investments in Pakistan Railways. This particular study focuses on the analysis of US$8.2 billion investment in the upgrade and expansion of the Karachi-Peshawar railways link, which is also known as the ML-1 (Main Line 1). The study found ML-1 as economically viable with a payback period of 10 years. Furthermore, ML-1 project investment is expected to result in uplifting Pakistan Railways, mainly through an increase in freight and passenger transportation. Some risk factors may hinder the expected economic return from the CPEC investment in Pakistan Railways. These factors include consistency in the government policies, the status of the Pakistani economy in upcoming years, and law and order situations in the country. The study has a utility for the governments of both countries and larger business communities have stakes in the trade between the two countries. It is equally beneficial for the international community, businesses (both in China and Pakistan) and locals of the region associated with the CPEC infrastructure.</abstract><cop>Norcross</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/0013791X.2019.1668096</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-791X |
ispartof | The Engineering economist, 2020-04, Vol.65 (2), p.158-175 |
issn | 0013-791X 1547-2701 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_0013791X_2019_1668096 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Cost-Benefit Analysis CPEC Economics International financing Investment ML-1 Pakistan Railways Payback periods Public policy Railways Risk analysis |
title | Economic viability of foreign investment in railways: a case study of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A05%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20viability%20of%20foreign%20investment%20in%20railways:%20a%20case%20study%20of%20the%20China-Pakistan%20Economic%20Corridor%20(CPEC)&rft.jtitle=The%20Engineering%20economist&rft.au=Ali,%20Yousaf&rft.date=2020-04-02&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=158&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=158-175&rft.issn=0013-791X&rft.eissn=1547-2701&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0013791X.2019.1668096&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2404454925%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2404454925&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |