Angling‐Induced Impacts on Recruitment and Contributions to Reproduction in Florida Bass

Black basses Micropterus spp. are the focus of extensive management efforts throughout North America, where they support a multibillion‐dollar recreational sport fishery. Harvest rates in many bass fisheries have declined in recent decades, yet a growing number of studies have proposed that catch‐an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900) 2017-09, Vol.146 (5), p.871-887
Hauptverfasser: Trippel, Nicholas A., Hargrove, John S., Leone, Erin H., Austin, James D., Allen, Micheal S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 887
container_issue 5
container_start_page 871
container_title Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)
container_volume 146
creator Trippel, Nicholas A.
Hargrove, John S.
Leone, Erin H.
Austin, James D.
Allen, Micheal S.
description Black basses Micropterus spp. are the focus of extensive management efforts throughout North America, where they support a multibillion‐dollar recreational sport fishery. Harvest rates in many bass fisheries have declined in recent decades, yet a growing number of studies have proposed that catch‐and‐release angling practices, such as bed‐fishing in which anglers intentionally target bass while the fish are defending their nests, can decrease individual reproductive success. In response, management agencies have restricted fishing during the spawning period in some regions. We evaluated the impacts of catch‐and‐release bed‐fishing on Florida Bass M. salmoides floridanus nest success, reproductive success, production of fall recruits, and the number of parents that contributed to reproduction. Eighteen replicate populations simulating natural Florida lakes were established, and ponds were assigned either a bed‐fishing (n = 10) or a control treatment (n = 8). Snorkel surveys were conducted throughout the spawning period to track nest formation and nesting success rates, and 10 months after establishment all ponds were drained, recruits counted, and fin clips collected for genetic parentage analysis. A series of candidate generalized linear mixed models were compared using Akaike's information criterion and likelihood ratio tests to assess the relative importance of fishing treatment and year, along with other relevant variables in predicting nest success, recruitment, and reproductive success. We observed significant reductions in nest success rates (z = −2.13, P = 0.03) but not recruitment levels (z = −1.31, P = 0.19), in populations that were bed fished relative to control ponds. Capture history poorly predicted individual reproductive success and the number of adults that contributed to fall recruitment did not differ by treatment (χ2 = 0.06, P = 0.81). Results from this study indicated that bed‐fishing practices may have some impacts on individual nest success but did not influence recruitment or overall reproductive success of Florida Bass at the population level. Received October 5, 2016; accepted February 28, 2017 Published online July 5, 2017
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00028487.2017.1301997
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00028487_2017_1301997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>TAFS0871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3051-b013ab7aaebc85f4677938a5d5a8973d6bc82ff475449f33f1e3f18cc2f9b3e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFKAzEUhoMoWKtHEHKBqclkMklwVYutAwVB68ZNyGSSEpkmQzJFuvMIntGTOEPr3sXj8X7-7y0-AG4xmmHE0R1CKOcFZ7McYTbDBGEh2BmYYFrwjJdUnIPJ2MnG0iW4SuljOCkr-QS8z_22dX778_Vd-WavTQOrXad0n2Dw8MXouHf9zvgeKt_ARfB9dPW-d8En2Ieh0MUwYGMAnYfLNkTXKPigUroGF1a1ydyc9hS8LR83i6ds_byqFvN1pgmiOKsRJqpmSplac2qLkjFBuKINVVww0pRDnFtbMFoUwhJisRmGa51bURMjyBTQ418dQ0rRWNlFt1PxIDGSoyD5J0iOguRJ0MDdH7lP15rD_yC5mS9fEWeY_ALi1Wu-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Angling‐Induced Impacts on Recruitment and Contributions to Reproduction in Florida Bass</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Trippel, Nicholas A. ; Hargrove, John S. ; Leone, Erin H. ; Austin, James D. ; Allen, Micheal S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trippel, Nicholas A. ; Hargrove, John S. ; Leone, Erin H. ; Austin, James D. ; Allen, Micheal S.</creatorcontrib><description>Black basses Micropterus spp. are the focus of extensive management efforts throughout North America, where they support a multibillion‐dollar recreational sport fishery. Harvest rates in many bass fisheries have declined in recent decades, yet a growing number of studies have proposed that catch‐and‐release angling practices, such as bed‐fishing in which anglers intentionally target bass while the fish are defending their nests, can decrease individual reproductive success. In response, management agencies have restricted fishing during the spawning period in some regions. We evaluated the impacts of catch‐and‐release bed‐fishing on Florida Bass M. salmoides floridanus nest success, reproductive success, production of fall recruits, and the number of parents that contributed to reproduction. Eighteen replicate populations simulating natural Florida lakes were established, and ponds were assigned either a bed‐fishing (n = 10) or a control treatment (n = 8). Snorkel surveys were conducted throughout the spawning period to track nest formation and nesting success rates, and 10 months after establishment all ponds were drained, recruits counted, and fin clips collected for genetic parentage analysis. A series of candidate generalized linear mixed models were compared using Akaike's information criterion and likelihood ratio tests to assess the relative importance of fishing treatment and year, along with other relevant variables in predicting nest success, recruitment, and reproductive success. We observed significant reductions in nest success rates (z = −2.13, P = 0.03) but not recruitment levels (z = −1.31, P = 0.19), in populations that were bed fished relative to control ponds. Capture history poorly predicted individual reproductive success and the number of adults that contributed to fall recruitment did not differ by treatment (χ2 = 0.06, P = 0.81). Results from this study indicated that bed‐fishing practices may have some impacts on individual nest success but did not influence recruitment or overall reproductive success of Florida Bass at the population level. Received October 5, 2016; accepted February 28, 2017 Published online July 5, 2017</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2017.1301997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><ispartof>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2017-09, Vol.146 (5), p.871-887</ispartof><rights>2017 American Fisheries Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3051-b013ab7aaebc85f4677938a5d5a8973d6bc82ff475449f33f1e3f18cc2f9b3e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3051-b013ab7aaebc85f4677938a5d5a8973d6bc82ff475449f33f1e3f18cc2f9b3e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1080%2F00028487.2017.1301997$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1080%2F00028487.2017.1301997$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trippel, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargrove, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leone, Erin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Micheal S.</creatorcontrib><title>Angling‐Induced Impacts on Recruitment and Contributions to Reproduction in Florida Bass</title><title>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</title><description>Black basses Micropterus spp. are the focus of extensive management efforts throughout North America, where they support a multibillion‐dollar recreational sport fishery. Harvest rates in many bass fisheries have declined in recent decades, yet a growing number of studies have proposed that catch‐and‐release angling practices, such as bed‐fishing in which anglers intentionally target bass while the fish are defending their nests, can decrease individual reproductive success. In response, management agencies have restricted fishing during the spawning period in some regions. We evaluated the impacts of catch‐and‐release bed‐fishing on Florida Bass M. salmoides floridanus nest success, reproductive success, production of fall recruits, and the number of parents that contributed to reproduction. Eighteen replicate populations simulating natural Florida lakes were established, and ponds were assigned either a bed‐fishing (n = 10) or a control treatment (n = 8). Snorkel surveys were conducted throughout the spawning period to track nest formation and nesting success rates, and 10 months after establishment all ponds were drained, recruits counted, and fin clips collected for genetic parentage analysis. A series of candidate generalized linear mixed models were compared using Akaike's information criterion and likelihood ratio tests to assess the relative importance of fishing treatment and year, along with other relevant variables in predicting nest success, recruitment, and reproductive success. We observed significant reductions in nest success rates (z = −2.13, P = 0.03) but not recruitment levels (z = −1.31, P = 0.19), in populations that were bed fished relative to control ponds. Capture history poorly predicted individual reproductive success and the number of adults that contributed to fall recruitment did not differ by treatment (χ2 = 0.06, P = 0.81). Results from this study indicated that bed‐fishing practices may have some impacts on individual nest success but did not influence recruitment or overall reproductive success of Florida Bass at the population level. Received October 5, 2016; accepted February 28, 2017 Published online July 5, 2017</description><issn>0002-8487</issn><issn>1548-8659</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEFKAzEUhoMoWKtHEHKBqclkMklwVYutAwVB68ZNyGSSEpkmQzJFuvMIntGTOEPr3sXj8X7-7y0-AG4xmmHE0R1CKOcFZ7McYTbDBGEh2BmYYFrwjJdUnIPJ2MnG0iW4SuljOCkr-QS8z_22dX778_Vd-WavTQOrXad0n2Dw8MXouHf9zvgeKt_ARfB9dPW-d8En2Ieh0MUwYGMAnYfLNkTXKPigUroGF1a1ydyc9hS8LR83i6ds_byqFvN1pgmiOKsRJqpmSplac2qLkjFBuKINVVww0pRDnFtbMFoUwhJisRmGa51bURMjyBTQ418dQ0rRWNlFt1PxIDGSoyD5J0iOguRJ0MDdH7lP15rD_yC5mS9fEWeY_ALi1Wu-</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Trippel, Nicholas A.</creator><creator>Hargrove, John S.</creator><creator>Leone, Erin H.</creator><creator>Austin, James D.</creator><creator>Allen, Micheal S.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Angling‐Induced Impacts on Recruitment and Contributions to Reproduction in Florida Bass</title><author>Trippel, Nicholas A. ; Hargrove, John S. ; Leone, Erin H. ; Austin, James D. ; Allen, Micheal S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3051-b013ab7aaebc85f4677938a5d5a8973d6bc82ff475449f33f1e3f18cc2f9b3e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trippel, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargrove, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leone, Erin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Micheal S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trippel, Nicholas A.</au><au>Hargrove, John S.</au><au>Leone, Erin H.</au><au>Austin, James D.</au><au>Allen, Micheal S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Angling‐Induced Impacts on Recruitment and Contributions to Reproduction in Florida Bass</atitle><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>871</spage><epage>887</epage><pages>871-887</pages><issn>0002-8487</issn><eissn>1548-8659</eissn><abstract>Black basses Micropterus spp. are the focus of extensive management efforts throughout North America, where they support a multibillion‐dollar recreational sport fishery. Harvest rates in many bass fisheries have declined in recent decades, yet a growing number of studies have proposed that catch‐and‐release angling practices, such as bed‐fishing in which anglers intentionally target bass while the fish are defending their nests, can decrease individual reproductive success. In response, management agencies have restricted fishing during the spawning period in some regions. We evaluated the impacts of catch‐and‐release bed‐fishing on Florida Bass M. salmoides floridanus nest success, reproductive success, production of fall recruits, and the number of parents that contributed to reproduction. Eighteen replicate populations simulating natural Florida lakes were established, and ponds were assigned either a bed‐fishing (n = 10) or a control treatment (n = 8). Snorkel surveys were conducted throughout the spawning period to track nest formation and nesting success rates, and 10 months after establishment all ponds were drained, recruits counted, and fin clips collected for genetic parentage analysis. A series of candidate generalized linear mixed models were compared using Akaike's information criterion and likelihood ratio tests to assess the relative importance of fishing treatment and year, along with other relevant variables in predicting nest success, recruitment, and reproductive success. We observed significant reductions in nest success rates (z = −2.13, P = 0.03) but not recruitment levels (z = −1.31, P = 0.19), in populations that were bed fished relative to control ponds. Capture history poorly predicted individual reproductive success and the number of adults that contributed to fall recruitment did not differ by treatment (χ2 = 0.06, P = 0.81). Results from this study indicated that bed‐fishing practices may have some impacts on individual nest success but did not influence recruitment or overall reproductive success of Florida Bass at the population level. Received October 5, 2016; accepted February 28, 2017 Published online July 5, 2017</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00028487.2017.1301997</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8487
ispartof Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2017-09, Vol.146 (5), p.871-887
issn 0002-8487
1548-8659
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00028487_2017_1301997
source Access via Wiley Online Library
title Angling‐Induced Impacts on Recruitment and Contributions to Reproduction in Florida Bass
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T10%3A29%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Angling%E2%80%90Induced%20Impacts%20on%20Recruitment%20and%20Contributions%20to%20Reproduction%20in%20Florida%20Bass&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20of%20the%20American%20Fisheries%20Society%20(1900)&rft.au=Trippel,%20Nicholas%20A.&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=871&rft.epage=887&rft.pages=871-887&rft.issn=0002-8487&rft.eissn=1548-8659&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00028487.2017.1301997&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ETAFS0871%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true