The Human Plasma Proteome

The human plasma proteome holds the promise of a revolution in disease diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring provided that major challenges in proteomics and related disciplines can be addressed. Plasma is not only the primary clinical specimen but also represents the largest and deepest version of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular & cellular proteomics 2002-11, Vol.1 (11), p.845-867
Hauptverfasser: Anderson, N. Leigh, Anderson, Norman G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 867
container_issue 11
container_start_page 845
container_title Molecular & cellular proteomics
container_volume 1
creator Anderson, N. Leigh
Anderson, Norman G.
description The human plasma proteome holds the promise of a revolution in disease diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring provided that major challenges in proteomics and related disciplines can be addressed. Plasma is not only the primary clinical specimen but also represents the largest and deepest version of the human proteome present in any sample: in addition to the classical “plasma proteins,” it contains all tissue proteins (as leakage markers) plus very numerous distinct immunoglobulin sequences, and it has an extraordinary dynamic range in that more than 10 orders of magnitude in concentration separate albumin and the rarest proteins now measured clinically. Although the restricted dynamic range of conventional proteomic technology (two-dimensional gels and mass spectrometry) has limited its contribution to the list of 289 proteins (tabulated here) that have been reported in plasma to date, very recent advances in multidimensional survey techniques promise at least double this number in the near future. Abundant scientific evidence, from proteomics and other disciplines, suggests that among these are proteins whose abundances and structures change in ways indicative of many, if not most, human diseases. Nevertheless, only a handful of proteins are currently used in routine clinical diagnosis, and the rate of introduction of new protein tests approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has paradoxically declined over the last decade to less than one new protein diagnostic marker per year. We speculate on the reasons behind this large discrepancy between the expectations arising from proteomics and the realities of clinical diagnostics and suggest approaches by which protein-disease associations may be more effectively translated into diagnostic tools in the future.
doi_str_mv 10.1074/mcp.R200007-MCP200
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>highwire_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1074_mcp_R200007_MCP200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1_11_845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2100-738f6c4cc1ea929a2d1f783a10cdde39d3aadf29b6c28c615193913c5f91657e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j8tKAzEYhYMotlYfQFfzAlPz556lDNoKFQep65Dm4ow0TkkU8e0dmeLZnLP5DnwI3QBeApbsNrnD8oXgMbJ-atpxnaA5cMprzRQ7_d9SzNBFKe8YEwySn6MZEKYUEzBH19suVOuvZD-qdm9LslWbh88wpHCJzqLdl3B17AV6fbjfNut687x6bO42tSOAcS2pisIx5yBYTbQlHqJU1AJ23geqPbXWR6J3whHlBHDQVAN1PGoQXAa6QGT6dXkoJYdoDrlPNv8YwObP04ye5uhpJs8Rqiao69-67z4Hs-sH14VkwAAYxTj9Bb_2Ths</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Human Plasma Proteome</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Anderson, N. Leigh ; Anderson, Norman G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, N. Leigh ; Anderson, Norman G.</creatorcontrib><description>The human plasma proteome holds the promise of a revolution in disease diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring provided that major challenges in proteomics and related disciplines can be addressed. Plasma is not only the primary clinical specimen but also represents the largest and deepest version of the human proteome present in any sample: in addition to the classical “plasma proteins,” it contains all tissue proteins (as leakage markers) plus very numerous distinct immunoglobulin sequences, and it has an extraordinary dynamic range in that more than 10 orders of magnitude in concentration separate albumin and the rarest proteins now measured clinically. Although the restricted dynamic range of conventional proteomic technology (two-dimensional gels and mass spectrometry) has limited its contribution to the list of 289 proteins (tabulated here) that have been reported in plasma to date, very recent advances in multidimensional survey techniques promise at least double this number in the near future. Abundant scientific evidence, from proteomics and other disciplines, suggests that among these are proteins whose abundances and structures change in ways indicative of many, if not most, human diseases. Nevertheless, only a handful of proteins are currently used in routine clinical diagnosis, and the rate of introduction of new protein tests approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has paradoxically declined over the last decade to less than one new protein diagnostic marker per year. We speculate on the reasons behind this large discrepancy between the expectations arising from proteomics and the realities of clinical diagnostics and suggest approaches by which protein-disease associations may be more effectively translated into diagnostic tools in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-9476</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-9484</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1074/mcp.R200007-MCP200</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12488461</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology</publisher><ispartof>Molecular &amp; cellular proteomics, 2002-11, Vol.1 (11), p.845-867</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2100-738f6c4cc1ea929a2d1f783a10cdde39d3aadf29b6c28c615193913c5f91657e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2100-738f6c4cc1ea929a2d1f783a10cdde39d3aadf29b6c28c615193913c5f91657e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, N. Leigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Norman G.</creatorcontrib><title>The Human Plasma Proteome</title><title>Molecular &amp; cellular proteomics</title><description>The human plasma proteome holds the promise of a revolution in disease diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring provided that major challenges in proteomics and related disciplines can be addressed. Plasma is not only the primary clinical specimen but also represents the largest and deepest version of the human proteome present in any sample: in addition to the classical “plasma proteins,” it contains all tissue proteins (as leakage markers) plus very numerous distinct immunoglobulin sequences, and it has an extraordinary dynamic range in that more than 10 orders of magnitude in concentration separate albumin and the rarest proteins now measured clinically. Although the restricted dynamic range of conventional proteomic technology (two-dimensional gels and mass spectrometry) has limited its contribution to the list of 289 proteins (tabulated here) that have been reported in plasma to date, very recent advances in multidimensional survey techniques promise at least double this number in the near future. Abundant scientific evidence, from proteomics and other disciplines, suggests that among these are proteins whose abundances and structures change in ways indicative of many, if not most, human diseases. Nevertheless, only a handful of proteins are currently used in routine clinical diagnosis, and the rate of introduction of new protein tests approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has paradoxically declined over the last decade to less than one new protein diagnostic marker per year. We speculate on the reasons behind this large discrepancy between the expectations arising from proteomics and the realities of clinical diagnostics and suggest approaches by which protein-disease associations may be more effectively translated into diagnostic tools in the future.</description><issn>1535-9476</issn><issn>1535-9484</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j8tKAzEYhYMotlYfQFfzAlPz556lDNoKFQep65Dm4ow0TkkU8e0dmeLZnLP5DnwI3QBeApbsNrnD8oXgMbJ-atpxnaA5cMprzRQ7_d9SzNBFKe8YEwySn6MZEKYUEzBH19suVOuvZD-qdm9LslWbh88wpHCJzqLdl3B17AV6fbjfNut687x6bO42tSOAcS2pisIx5yBYTbQlHqJU1AJ23geqPbXWR6J3whHlBHDQVAN1PGoQXAa6QGT6dXkoJYdoDrlPNv8YwObP04ye5uhpJs8Rqiao69-67z4Hs-sH14VkwAAYxTj9Bb_2Ths</recordid><startdate>20021101</startdate><enddate>20021101</enddate><creator>Anderson, N. Leigh</creator><creator>Anderson, Norman G.</creator><general>American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021101</creationdate><title>The Human Plasma Proteome</title><author>Anderson, N. Leigh ; Anderson, Norman G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2100-738f6c4cc1ea929a2d1f783a10cdde39d3aadf29b6c28c615193913c5f91657e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, N. Leigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Norman G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Molecular &amp; cellular proteomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, N. Leigh</au><au>Anderson, Norman G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Human Plasma Proteome</atitle><jtitle>Molecular &amp; cellular proteomics</jtitle><date>2002-11-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>845</spage><epage>867</epage><pages>845-867</pages><issn>1535-9476</issn><eissn>1535-9484</eissn><abstract>The human plasma proteome holds the promise of a revolution in disease diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring provided that major challenges in proteomics and related disciplines can be addressed. Plasma is not only the primary clinical specimen but also represents the largest and deepest version of the human proteome present in any sample: in addition to the classical “plasma proteins,” it contains all tissue proteins (as leakage markers) plus very numerous distinct immunoglobulin sequences, and it has an extraordinary dynamic range in that more than 10 orders of magnitude in concentration separate albumin and the rarest proteins now measured clinically. Although the restricted dynamic range of conventional proteomic technology (two-dimensional gels and mass spectrometry) has limited its contribution to the list of 289 proteins (tabulated here) that have been reported in plasma to date, very recent advances in multidimensional survey techniques promise at least double this number in the near future. Abundant scientific evidence, from proteomics and other disciplines, suggests that among these are proteins whose abundances and structures change in ways indicative of many, if not most, human diseases. Nevertheless, only a handful of proteins are currently used in routine clinical diagnosis, and the rate of introduction of new protein tests approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has paradoxically declined over the last decade to less than one new protein diagnostic marker per year. We speculate on the reasons behind this large discrepancy between the expectations arising from proteomics and the realities of clinical diagnostics and suggest approaches by which protein-disease associations may be more effectively translated into diagnostic tools in the future.</abstract><pub>American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology</pub><pmid>12488461</pmid><doi>10.1074/mcp.R200007-MCP200</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-9476
ispartof Molecular & cellular proteomics, 2002-11, Vol.1 (11), p.845-867
issn 1535-9476
1535-9484
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1074_mcp_R200007_MCP200
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
title The Human Plasma Proteome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A47%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-highwire_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Human%20Plasma%20Proteome&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20&%20cellular%20proteomics&rft.au=Anderson,%20N.%20Leigh&rft.date=2002-11-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=845&rft.epage=867&rft.pages=845-867&rft.issn=1535-9476&rft.eissn=1535-9484&rft_id=info:doi/10.1074/mcp.R200007-MCP200&rft_dat=%3Chighwire_cross%3E1_11_845%3C/highwire_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/12488461&rfr_iscdi=true