DNA (Cytosine-N4-)- and -(Adenine-N6-)-methyltransferases Have Different Kinetic Mechanisms but the Same Reaction Route

We studied the kinetics of methyl group transfer by the BamHI DNA-(cytosine-N4-)-methyltransferase (MTase) from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens to a 20-mer oligodeoxynucleotide duplex containing the palindromic recognition site GGATCC. Under steady state conditions the BamHI MTase displayed a simple kine...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of biological chemistry 2003-05, Vol.278 (18), p.15713-15719
Hauptverfasser: Malygin, Ernst G., Zinoviev, Victor V., Evdokimov, Alexey A., Lindstrom, William M., Reich, Norbert. O., Hattman, Stanley
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 15719
container_issue 18
container_start_page 15713
container_title The Journal of biological chemistry
container_volume 278
creator Malygin, Ernst G.
Zinoviev, Victor V.
Evdokimov, Alexey A.
Lindstrom, William M.
Reich, Norbert. O.
Hattman, Stanley
description We studied the kinetics of methyl group transfer by the BamHI DNA-(cytosine-N4-)-methyltransferase (MTase) from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens to a 20-mer oligodeoxynucleotide duplex containing the palindromic recognition site GGATCC. Under steady state conditions the BamHI MTase displayed a simple kinetic behavior toward the 20-mer duplex. There was no apparent substrate inhibition at concentrations much higher than the Km for either DNA (100-fold higher) or S-adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet) (20-fold higher); this indicates that dead-end complexes did not form in the course of the methylation reaction. The DNA methylation rate was analyzed as a function of both substrate and product concentrations. It was found to exhibit product inhibition patterns consistent with a steady state random bi-bi mechanism in which the dominant order of substrate binding and product release (methylated DNA, DNAMe, andS-adenosyl-l-homocysteine, AdoHcy) was Ado- Met↓DNA↓DNAMe↑AdoHcy↑. The M.BamHI kinetic scheme was compared with that for the T4 Dam (adenine-N6-)-MTase. The two differed with respect to an effector action of substrates and in the rate-limiting step of the reaction (product inhibition patterns are the same for the both MTases). From this we conclude that the common chemical step in the methylation reaction, methyl transfer from AdoMet to a free exocyclic amino group, is not sufficient to dictate a common kinetic scheme even though both MTases follow the same reaction route.
doi_str_mv 10.1074/jbc.M213213200
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1074_jbc_M213213200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021925819582527</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0021925819582527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2020-94f414675b40120ccb3fd17379b33bcf2c67a2028661d8e3b51f400ffcb308473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtLxDAQxoMouj6unnPwsB6y5tWmPS67vnBV8AHeQppObMS20mRX9r83uoInh4Fhht83M3wIHTM6YVTJs7fKTm45E99J6RYaMVoIIjL2so1GlHJGSp4Ve2g_hDeaQpZsF-0xnpVFJtQIfc7vpng8W8c--A7InSSnBJuuxmQ8raH7meVp1kJs1u9xMF1wMJgAAV-ZFeC5d6mHLuKbxEZv8S3YxnQ-tAFXy4hjA_jRtIAfwNjo-w4_9MsIh2jHmfcAR7_1AD1fnD_Nrsji_vJ6Nl0QyymnpJROMpmrrJKUcWptJVzNlFBlJURlHbe5Moks8pzVBYgqY05S6lwCaSGVOECTzV479CEM4PTH4FszrDWj-ttBnRzUfw4mwclG0PjX5tMPoCvf2wZazVWhWcpMMZGwYoNBen7lYdDBeugs1Elio657_9-FL46uftc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>DNA (Cytosine-N4-)- and -(Adenine-N6-)-methyltransferases Have Different Kinetic Mechanisms but the Same Reaction Route</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Malygin, Ernst G. ; Zinoviev, Victor V. ; Evdokimov, Alexey A. ; Lindstrom, William M. ; Reich, Norbert. O. ; Hattman, Stanley</creator><creatorcontrib>Malygin, Ernst G. ; Zinoviev, Victor V. ; Evdokimov, Alexey A. ; Lindstrom, William M. ; Reich, Norbert. O. ; Hattman, Stanley</creatorcontrib><description>We studied the kinetics of methyl group transfer by the BamHI DNA-(cytosine-N4-)-methyltransferase (MTase) from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens to a 20-mer oligodeoxynucleotide duplex containing the palindromic recognition site GGATCC. Under steady state conditions the BamHI MTase displayed a simple kinetic behavior toward the 20-mer duplex. There was no apparent substrate inhibition at concentrations much higher than the Km for either DNA (100-fold higher) or S-adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet) (20-fold higher); this indicates that dead-end complexes did not form in the course of the methylation reaction. The DNA methylation rate was analyzed as a function of both substrate and product concentrations. It was found to exhibit product inhibition patterns consistent with a steady state random bi-bi mechanism in which the dominant order of substrate binding and product release (methylated DNA, DNAMe, andS-adenosyl-l-homocysteine, AdoHcy) was Ado- Met↓DNA↓DNAMe↑AdoHcy↑. The M.BamHI kinetic scheme was compared with that for the T4 Dam (adenine-N6-)-MTase. The two differed with respect to an effector action of substrates and in the rate-limiting step of the reaction (product inhibition patterns are the same for the both MTases). From this we conclude that the common chemical step in the methylation reaction, methyl transfer from AdoMet to a free exocyclic amino group, is not sufficient to dictate a common kinetic scheme even though both MTases follow the same reaction route.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1083-351X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M213213200</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12598537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of biological chemistry, 2003-05, Vol.278 (18), p.15713-15719</ispartof><rights>2003 © 2003 ASBMB. Currently published by Elsevier Inc; originally published by American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2020-94f414675b40120ccb3fd17379b33bcf2c67a2028661d8e3b51f400ffcb308473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2020-94f414675b40120ccb3fd17379b33bcf2c67a2028661d8e3b51f400ffcb308473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malygin, Ernst G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinoviev, Victor V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evdokimov, Alexey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindstrom, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reich, Norbert. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattman, Stanley</creatorcontrib><title>DNA (Cytosine-N4-)- and -(Adenine-N6-)-methyltransferases Have Different Kinetic Mechanisms but the Same Reaction Route</title><title>The Journal of biological chemistry</title><description>We studied the kinetics of methyl group transfer by the BamHI DNA-(cytosine-N4-)-methyltransferase (MTase) from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens to a 20-mer oligodeoxynucleotide duplex containing the palindromic recognition site GGATCC. Under steady state conditions the BamHI MTase displayed a simple kinetic behavior toward the 20-mer duplex. There was no apparent substrate inhibition at concentrations much higher than the Km for either DNA (100-fold higher) or S-adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet) (20-fold higher); this indicates that dead-end complexes did not form in the course of the methylation reaction. The DNA methylation rate was analyzed as a function of both substrate and product concentrations. It was found to exhibit product inhibition patterns consistent with a steady state random bi-bi mechanism in which the dominant order of substrate binding and product release (methylated DNA, DNAMe, andS-adenosyl-l-homocysteine, AdoHcy) was Ado- Met↓DNA↓DNAMe↑AdoHcy↑. The M.BamHI kinetic scheme was compared with that for the T4 Dam (adenine-N6-)-MTase. The two differed with respect to an effector action of substrates and in the rate-limiting step of the reaction (product inhibition patterns are the same for the both MTases). From this we conclude that the common chemical step in the methylation reaction, methyl transfer from AdoMet to a free exocyclic amino group, is not sufficient to dictate a common kinetic scheme even though both MTases follow the same reaction route.</description><issn>0021-9258</issn><issn>1083-351X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtLxDAQxoMouj6unnPwsB6y5tWmPS67vnBV8AHeQppObMS20mRX9r83uoInh4Fhht83M3wIHTM6YVTJs7fKTm45E99J6RYaMVoIIjL2so1GlHJGSp4Ve2g_hDeaQpZsF-0xnpVFJtQIfc7vpng8W8c--A7InSSnBJuuxmQ8raH7meVp1kJs1u9xMF1wMJgAAV-ZFeC5d6mHLuKbxEZv8S3YxnQ-tAFXy4hjA_jRtIAfwNjo-w4_9MsIh2jHmfcAR7_1AD1fnD_Nrsji_vJ6Nl0QyymnpJROMpmrrJKUcWptJVzNlFBlJURlHbe5Moks8pzVBYgqY05S6lwCaSGVOECTzV479CEM4PTH4FszrDWj-ttBnRzUfw4mwclG0PjX5tMPoCvf2wZazVWhWcpMMZGwYoNBen7lYdDBeugs1Elio657_9-FL46uftc</recordid><startdate>20030502</startdate><enddate>20030502</enddate><creator>Malygin, Ernst G.</creator><creator>Zinoviev, Victor V.</creator><creator>Evdokimov, Alexey A.</creator><creator>Lindstrom, William M.</creator><creator>Reich, Norbert. O.</creator><creator>Hattman, Stanley</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030502</creationdate><title>DNA (Cytosine-N4-)- and -(Adenine-N6-)-methyltransferases Have Different Kinetic Mechanisms but the Same Reaction Route</title><author>Malygin, Ernst G. ; Zinoviev, Victor V. ; Evdokimov, Alexey A. ; Lindstrom, William M. ; Reich, Norbert. O. ; Hattman, Stanley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2020-94f414675b40120ccb3fd17379b33bcf2c67a2028661d8e3b51f400ffcb308473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malygin, Ernst G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinoviev, Victor V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evdokimov, Alexey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindstrom, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reich, Norbert. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattman, Stanley</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of biological chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malygin, Ernst G.</au><au>Zinoviev, Victor V.</au><au>Evdokimov, Alexey A.</au><au>Lindstrom, William M.</au><au>Reich, Norbert. O.</au><au>Hattman, Stanley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DNA (Cytosine-N4-)- and -(Adenine-N6-)-methyltransferases Have Different Kinetic Mechanisms but the Same Reaction Route</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of biological chemistry</jtitle><date>2003-05-02</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>278</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>15713</spage><epage>15719</epage><pages>15713-15719</pages><issn>0021-9258</issn><eissn>1083-351X</eissn><abstract>We studied the kinetics of methyl group transfer by the BamHI DNA-(cytosine-N4-)-methyltransferase (MTase) from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens to a 20-mer oligodeoxynucleotide duplex containing the palindromic recognition site GGATCC. Under steady state conditions the BamHI MTase displayed a simple kinetic behavior toward the 20-mer duplex. There was no apparent substrate inhibition at concentrations much higher than the Km for either DNA (100-fold higher) or S-adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet) (20-fold higher); this indicates that dead-end complexes did not form in the course of the methylation reaction. The DNA methylation rate was analyzed as a function of both substrate and product concentrations. It was found to exhibit product inhibition patterns consistent with a steady state random bi-bi mechanism in which the dominant order of substrate binding and product release (methylated DNA, DNAMe, andS-adenosyl-l-homocysteine, AdoHcy) was Ado- Met↓DNA↓DNAMe↑AdoHcy↑. The M.BamHI kinetic scheme was compared with that for the T4 Dam (adenine-N6-)-MTase. The two differed with respect to an effector action of substrates and in the rate-limiting step of the reaction (product inhibition patterns are the same for the both MTases). From this we conclude that the common chemical step in the methylation reaction, methyl transfer from AdoMet to a free exocyclic amino group, is not sufficient to dictate a common kinetic scheme even though both MTases follow the same reaction route.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12598537</pmid><doi>10.1074/jbc.M213213200</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9258
ispartof The Journal of biological chemistry, 2003-05, Vol.278 (18), p.15713-15719
issn 0021-9258
1083-351X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1074_jbc_M213213200
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
title DNA (Cytosine-N4-)- and -(Adenine-N6-)-methyltransferases Have Different Kinetic Mechanisms but the Same Reaction Route
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T06%3A46%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DNA%20(Cytosine-N4-)-%20and%20-(Adenine-N6-)-methyltransferases%20Have%20Different%20Kinetic%20Mechanisms%20but%20the%20Same%20Reaction%20Route&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20biological%20chemistry&rft.au=Malygin,%20Ernst%20G.&rft.date=2003-05-02&rft.volume=278&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=15713&rft.epage=15719&rft.pages=15713-15719&rft.issn=0021-9258&rft.eissn=1083-351X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1074/jbc.M213213200&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0021925819582527%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/12598537&rft_els_id=S0021925819582527&rfr_iscdi=true