Eukaryogenesis, how special really?
Eukaryogenesis is widely viewed as an improbable evolutionary transition uniquely affecting the evolution of life on this planet. However, scientific and popular rhetoric extolling this event as a singularity lacks rigorous evidential and statistical support. Here, we question several of the usual c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2015-08, Vol.112 (33), p.10278-10285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10285 |
---|---|
container_issue | 33 |
container_start_page | 10278 |
container_title | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Booth, Austin W. Ford Doolittle |
description | Eukaryogenesis is widely viewed as an improbable evolutionary transition uniquely affecting the evolution of life on this planet. However, scientific and popular rhetoric extolling this event as a singularity lacks rigorous evidential and statistical support. Here, we question several of the usual claims about the specialness of eukaryogenesis, focusing on both eukaryogenesis as a process and its outcome, the eukaryotic cell. We argue in favor of four ideas. First, the criteria by which we judge eukaryogenesis to have required a genuinely unlikely series of events 2 billion years in the making are being eroded by discoveries that fill in the gaps of the prokaryote:eukaryote “discontinuity.” Second, eukaryogenesis confronts evolutionary theory in ways not different from other evolutionary transitions in individuality; parallel systems can be found at several hierarchical levels. Third, identifying which of several complex cellular features confer on eukaryotes a putative richer evolutionary potential remains an area of speculation: various keys to success have been proposed and rejected over the five-decade history of research in this area. Fourth, and perhaps most importantly, it is difficult and may be impossible to eliminate eukaryocentric bias from the measures by which eukaryotes as a whole are judged to have achieved greater success than prokaryotes as a whole. Overall, we question whether premises of existing theories about the uniqueness of eukaryogenesis and the greater evolutionary potential of eukaryotes have been objectively formulated and whether, despite widespread acceptance that eukaryogenesis was “special,” any such notion has more than rhetorical value. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1073/pnas.1421376112 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1421376112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26464886</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26464886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-6c5e42c2200538c710b86c0fb5b1d9f8fd883a8b2b8a611692ac74ffa0af141d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1PGzEURS1UBCntmhVtJDZdMPCev2fTqkIUkJC6ANaWx7HDpJNxamda8e_rUdLQsvLiHR_f50vIMcI5gmIXq97mc-QUmZKIdI9MEGqsJK_hDZkAUFVpTvkheZvzAgBqoeGAHFKhNaNSTcjp1fDDpuc4973PbT6bPsXf07zyrrXdNHnbdc9f3pH9YLvs32_PI_L47erh8qa6-359e_n1rnJC6HUlnfCcOkoBBNNOITRaOgiNaHBWBx1m5VGrG9poW8LKmlqneAgWbECOM3ZEPm-8q6FZ-pnz_TrZzqxSuywRTbSt-X_St09mHn8ZLriitSqCT1tBij8Hn9dm2Wbnu872Pg7ZoAKhGOdMF_T0FbqIQ-rLeiMlC4aKFepiQ7kUc04-7MIgmLEAMxZgXgooNz78u8OO__vjBZhugfHmTofUMFaUVI3ZTjbIIq9jelFILrnWssw_bubBRmPnqc3m8Z4CytJ3EXDN_gDlqZ12</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1706573173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eukaryogenesis, how special really?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Booth, Austin ; W. Ford Doolittle</creator><creatorcontrib>Booth, Austin ; W. Ford Doolittle</creatorcontrib><description>Eukaryogenesis is widely viewed as an improbable evolutionary transition uniquely affecting the evolution of life on this planet. However, scientific and popular rhetoric extolling this event as a singularity lacks rigorous evidential and statistical support. Here, we question several of the usual claims about the specialness of eukaryogenesis, focusing on both eukaryogenesis as a process and its outcome, the eukaryotic cell. We argue in favor of four ideas. First, the criteria by which we judge eukaryogenesis to have required a genuinely unlikely series of events 2 billion years in the making are being eroded by discoveries that fill in the gaps of the prokaryote:eukaryote “discontinuity.” Second, eukaryogenesis confronts evolutionary theory in ways not different from other evolutionary transitions in individuality; parallel systems can be found at several hierarchical levels. Third, identifying which of several complex cellular features confer on eukaryotes a putative richer evolutionary potential remains an area of speculation: various keys to success have been proposed and rejected over the five-decade history of research in this area. Fourth, and perhaps most importantly, it is difficult and may be impossible to eliminate eukaryocentric bias from the measures by which eukaryotes as a whole are judged to have achieved greater success than prokaryotes as a whole. Overall, we question whether premises of existing theories about the uniqueness of eukaryogenesis and the greater evolutionary potential of eukaryotes have been objectively formulated and whether, despite widespread acceptance that eukaryogenesis was “special,” any such notion has more than rhetorical value.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1421376112</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25883267</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological Evolution ; Biological Sciences ; Cellular biology ; endosymbiosis ; Energy Metabolism ; Escherichia coli - metabolism ; eukaryogenesis ; Eukaryota - metabolism ; Eukaryotes ; eukaryotic cells ; Eukaryotic Cells - cytology ; evolution ; Evolution, Molecular ; Evolutionary biology ; evolutionary theory ; Genetics ; Genome, Bacterial ; Humans ; Introns ; major transitions ; Mitochondria - metabolism ; Mitochondria - physiology ; Origin of Life ; Phenotype ; Phylogeny ; Plants ; Prokaryotes ; prokaryotic cells ; Prokaryotic Cells - cytology ; Spliceosomes - physiology ; Symbioses Becoming Permanent: The Origins and Evolutionary Trajectories of Organelles Sackler</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2015-08, Vol.112 (33), p.10278-10285</ispartof><rights>Volumes 1–89 and 106–112, copyright as a collective work only; author(s) retains copyright to individual articles</rights><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Aug 18, 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-6c5e42c2200538c710b86c0fb5b1d9f8fd883a8b2b8a611692ac74ffa0af141d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-6c5e42c2200538c710b86c0fb5b1d9f8fd883a8b2b8a611692ac74ffa0af141d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.pnas.org/content/112/33.cover.gif</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26464886$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26464886$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25883267$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Booth, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>W. Ford Doolittle</creatorcontrib><title>Eukaryogenesis, how special really?</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>Eukaryogenesis is widely viewed as an improbable evolutionary transition uniquely affecting the evolution of life on this planet. However, scientific and popular rhetoric extolling this event as a singularity lacks rigorous evidential and statistical support. Here, we question several of the usual claims about the specialness of eukaryogenesis, focusing on both eukaryogenesis as a process and its outcome, the eukaryotic cell. We argue in favor of four ideas. First, the criteria by which we judge eukaryogenesis to have required a genuinely unlikely series of events 2 billion years in the making are being eroded by discoveries that fill in the gaps of the prokaryote:eukaryote “discontinuity.” Second, eukaryogenesis confronts evolutionary theory in ways not different from other evolutionary transitions in individuality; parallel systems can be found at several hierarchical levels. Third, identifying which of several complex cellular features confer on eukaryotes a putative richer evolutionary potential remains an area of speculation: various keys to success have been proposed and rejected over the five-decade history of research in this area. Fourth, and perhaps most importantly, it is difficult and may be impossible to eliminate eukaryocentric bias from the measures by which eukaryotes as a whole are judged to have achieved greater success than prokaryotes as a whole. Overall, we question whether premises of existing theories about the uniqueness of eukaryogenesis and the greater evolutionary potential of eukaryotes have been objectively formulated and whether, despite widespread acceptance that eukaryogenesis was “special,” any such notion has more than rhetorical value.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>endosymbiosis</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - metabolism</subject><subject>eukaryogenesis</subject><subject>Eukaryota - metabolism</subject><subject>Eukaryotes</subject><subject>eukaryotic cells</subject><subject>Eukaryotic Cells - cytology</subject><subject>evolution</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>evolutionary theory</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genome, Bacterial</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Introns</subject><subject>major transitions</subject><subject>Mitochondria - metabolism</subject><subject>Mitochondria - physiology</subject><subject>Origin of Life</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Prokaryotes</subject><subject>prokaryotic cells</subject><subject>Prokaryotic Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Spliceosomes - physiology</subject><subject>Symbioses Becoming Permanent: The Origins and Evolutionary Trajectories of Organelles Sackler</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1PGzEURS1UBCntmhVtJDZdMPCev2fTqkIUkJC6ANaWx7HDpJNxamda8e_rUdLQsvLiHR_f50vIMcI5gmIXq97mc-QUmZKIdI9MEGqsJK_hDZkAUFVpTvkheZvzAgBqoeGAHFKhNaNSTcjp1fDDpuc4973PbT6bPsXf07zyrrXdNHnbdc9f3pH9YLvs32_PI_L47erh8qa6-359e_n1rnJC6HUlnfCcOkoBBNNOITRaOgiNaHBWBx1m5VGrG9poW8LKmlqneAgWbECOM3ZEPm-8q6FZ-pnz_TrZzqxSuywRTbSt-X_St09mHn8ZLriitSqCT1tBij8Hn9dm2Wbnu872Pg7ZoAKhGOdMF_T0FbqIQ-rLeiMlC4aKFepiQ7kUc04-7MIgmLEAMxZgXgooNz78u8OO__vjBZhugfHmTofUMFaUVI3ZTjbIIq9jelFILrnWssw_bubBRmPnqc3m8Z4CytJ3EXDN_gDlqZ12</recordid><startdate>20150818</startdate><enddate>20150818</enddate><creator>Booth, Austin</creator><creator>W. Ford Doolittle</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><general>National Acad Sciences</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150818</creationdate><title>Eukaryogenesis, how special really?</title><author>Booth, Austin ; W. Ford Doolittle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-6c5e42c2200538c710b86c0fb5b1d9f8fd883a8b2b8a611692ac74ffa0af141d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>endosymbiosis</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - metabolism</topic><topic>eukaryogenesis</topic><topic>Eukaryota - metabolism</topic><topic>Eukaryotes</topic><topic>eukaryotic cells</topic><topic>Eukaryotic Cells - cytology</topic><topic>evolution</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>evolutionary theory</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genome, Bacterial</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Introns</topic><topic>major transitions</topic><topic>Mitochondria - metabolism</topic><topic>Mitochondria - physiology</topic><topic>Origin of Life</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Prokaryotes</topic><topic>prokaryotic cells</topic><topic>Prokaryotic Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Spliceosomes - physiology</topic><topic>Symbioses Becoming Permanent: The Origins and Evolutionary Trajectories of Organelles Sackler</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Booth, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>W. Ford Doolittle</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Booth, Austin</au><au>W. Ford Doolittle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eukaryogenesis, how special really?</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2015-08-18</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>33</issue><spage>10278</spage><epage>10285</epage><pages>10278-10285</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Eukaryogenesis is widely viewed as an improbable evolutionary transition uniquely affecting the evolution of life on this planet. However, scientific and popular rhetoric extolling this event as a singularity lacks rigorous evidential and statistical support. Here, we question several of the usual claims about the specialness of eukaryogenesis, focusing on both eukaryogenesis as a process and its outcome, the eukaryotic cell. We argue in favor of four ideas. First, the criteria by which we judge eukaryogenesis to have required a genuinely unlikely series of events 2 billion years in the making are being eroded by discoveries that fill in the gaps of the prokaryote:eukaryote “discontinuity.” Second, eukaryogenesis confronts evolutionary theory in ways not different from other evolutionary transitions in individuality; parallel systems can be found at several hierarchical levels. Third, identifying which of several complex cellular features confer on eukaryotes a putative richer evolutionary potential remains an area of speculation: various keys to success have been proposed and rejected over the five-decade history of research in this area. Fourth, and perhaps most importantly, it is difficult and may be impossible to eliminate eukaryocentric bias from the measures by which eukaryotes as a whole are judged to have achieved greater success than prokaryotes as a whole. Overall, we question whether premises of existing theories about the uniqueness of eukaryogenesis and the greater evolutionary potential of eukaryotes have been objectively formulated and whether, despite widespread acceptance that eukaryogenesis was “special,” any such notion has more than rhetorical value.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>25883267</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.1421376112</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-8424 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2015-08, Vol.112 (33), p.10278-10285 |
issn | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1421376112 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Animals Biological Evolution Biological Sciences Cellular biology endosymbiosis Energy Metabolism Escherichia coli - metabolism eukaryogenesis Eukaryota - metabolism Eukaryotes eukaryotic cells Eukaryotic Cells - cytology evolution Evolution, Molecular Evolutionary biology evolutionary theory Genetics Genome, Bacterial Humans Introns major transitions Mitochondria - metabolism Mitochondria - physiology Origin of Life Phenotype Phylogeny Plants Prokaryotes prokaryotic cells Prokaryotic Cells - cytology Spliceosomes - physiology Symbioses Becoming Permanent: The Origins and Evolutionary Trajectories of Organelles Sackler |
title | Eukaryogenesis, how special really? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A06%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eukaryogenesis,%20how%20special%20really?&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Booth,%20Austin&rft.date=2015-08-18&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=33&rft.spage=10278&rft.epage=10285&rft.pages=10278-10285&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.1421376112&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26464886%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1706573173&rft_id=info:pmid/25883267&rft_jstor_id=26464886&rfr_iscdi=true |