The Lorentz Transformations

The Lorentz Transformations

Sir Harold Jeffreys (1958) has asserted that my analysis of the clock paradox (Builder 1957) is based on concealed hypotheses; but the hypotheses to which he refers are ones that he claims are involved in the derivation of the Lorentz transformations and in the currently accepted methods of using th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian journal of physics 1959, Vol.12 (3), p.300
1. Verfasser: Builder, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 300
container_title Australian journal of physics
container_volume 12
creator Builder, G
description Sir Harold Jeffreys (1958) has asserted that my analysis of the clock paradox (Builder 1957) is based on concealed hypotheses; but the hypotheses to which he refers are ones that he claims are involved in the derivation of the Lorentz transformations and in the currently accepted methods of using them. He holds that the transformations cannot be shown to be unique and he infers that predictions based on them are not necessarily correct and " cannot be right ill any case" when applied to systems that are inertial at the time considered but that have been subject to acceleration at some other time.
doi_str_mv 10.1071/PH590300
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1071_PH590300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1071_PH590300</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1720-3cd6d8f7c43f4de965cf02352e295df74ca8edc9cf3c04f8b4f221202153df743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1jzFvwjAQRj1QqZRWYu-SkSXlfLaTeESIFqRIZQhzZM4-FVSSys5Sfj2glukNn_T0PSGmEt4klHK-XRsLCmAkxgCgc2ugeBRPKR0BUErEsXhtvkJW9zF0wzlrousS9_HkhkPfpWfxwO47hZd_TsTufdUs13n9-bFZLuqcZImQK_KFr7gkrVj7YAtDDKgMBrTGc6nJVcGTJVYEmqu9ZkSJ1wdG3WY1EbM_L8U-pRi4_YmHk4u_rYT2FtLeQ9QFSgc7VA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Lorentz Transformations</title><source>CSIRO Publishing Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Builder, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Builder, G</creatorcontrib><description>Sir Harold Jeffreys (1958) has asserted that my analysis of the clock paradox (Builder 1957) is based on concealed hypotheses; but the hypotheses to which he refers are ones that he claims are involved in the derivation of the Lorentz transformations and in the currently accepted methods of using them. He holds that the transformations cannot be shown to be unique and he infers that predictions based on them are not necessarily correct and " cannot be right ill any case" when applied to systems that are inertial at the time considered but that have been subject to acceleration at some other time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-9506</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1071/PH590300</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Australian journal of physics, 1959, Vol.12 (3), p.300</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1720-3cd6d8f7c43f4de965cf02352e295df74ca8edc9cf3c04f8b4f221202153df743</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3348,4021,27921,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Builder, G</creatorcontrib><title>The Lorentz Transformations</title><title>Australian journal of physics</title><description>Sir Harold Jeffreys (1958) has asserted that my analysis of the clock paradox (Builder 1957) is based on concealed hypotheses; but the hypotheses to which he refers are ones that he claims are involved in the derivation of the Lorentz transformations and in the currently accepted methods of using them. He holds that the transformations cannot be shown to be unique and he infers that predictions based on them are not necessarily correct and " cannot be right ill any case" when applied to systems that are inertial at the time considered but that have been subject to acceleration at some other time.</description><issn>0004-9506</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1959</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1jzFvwjAQRj1QqZRWYu-SkSXlfLaTeESIFqRIZQhzZM4-FVSSys5Sfj2glukNn_T0PSGmEt4klHK-XRsLCmAkxgCgc2ugeBRPKR0BUErEsXhtvkJW9zF0wzlrousS9_HkhkPfpWfxwO47hZd_TsTufdUs13n9-bFZLuqcZImQK_KFr7gkrVj7YAtDDKgMBrTGc6nJVcGTJVYEmqu9ZkSJ1wdG3WY1EbM_L8U-pRi4_YmHk4u_rYT2FtLeQ9QFSgc7VA</recordid><startdate>1959</startdate><enddate>1959</enddate><creator>Builder, G</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1959</creationdate><title>The Lorentz Transformations</title><author>Builder, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1720-3cd6d8f7c43f4de965cf02352e295df74ca8edc9cf3c04f8b4f221202153df743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1959</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Builder, G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Australian journal of physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Builder, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Lorentz Transformations</atitle><jtitle>Australian journal of physics</jtitle><date>1959</date><risdate>1959</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>300</spage><pages>300-</pages><issn>0004-9506</issn><abstract>Sir Harold Jeffreys (1958) has asserted that my analysis of the clock paradox (Builder 1957) is based on concealed hypotheses; but the hypotheses to which he refers are ones that he claims are involved in the derivation of the Lorentz transformations and in the currently accepted methods of using them. He holds that the transformations cannot be shown to be unique and he infers that predictions based on them are not necessarily correct and " cannot be right ill any case" when applied to systems that are inertial at the time considered but that have been subject to acceleration at some other time.</abstract><doi>10.1071/PH590300</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-9506
ispartof Australian journal of physics, 1959, Vol.12 (3), p.300
issn 0004-9506
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1071_PH590300
source CSIRO Publishing Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title The Lorentz Transformations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T08%3A03%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Lorentz%20Transformations&rft.jtitle=Australian%20journal%20of%20physics&rft.au=Builder,%20G&rft.date=1959&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=300&rft.pages=300-&rft.issn=0004-9506&rft_id=info:doi/10.1071/PH590300&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1071_PH590300%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true