Intake and long-term cysteine supplementation change wool characteristics of Romney sheep

Sulfur amino acid supplementation increases wool production in sheep at low planes of nutrition but it is unclear whether there is any benefit of supplementation at planes of nutrition above maintenance and what implications this might have for wool quality characteristics. This experiment directly...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian journal of agricultural research 2001, Vol.52 (1), p.29-36
Hauptverfasser: SHERLOCK, R. G, HARRIS, P. M, LEE, J, WICKHAM, G. A, WOODS, J. L, MCCUTCHEON, S. N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 29
container_title Australian journal of agricultural research
container_volume 52
creator SHERLOCK, R. G
HARRIS, P. M
LEE, J
WICKHAM, G. A
WOODS, J. L
MCCUTCHEON, S. N
description Sulfur amino acid supplementation increases wool production in sheep at low planes of nutrition but it is unclear whether there is any benefit of supplementation at planes of nutrition above maintenance and what implications this might have for wool quality characteristics. This experiment directly investigated the interaction between sulfur supplementation and plane of nutrition in terms of wool growth and fibre characteristics. Twenty-four Romney ewes, acclimatised in individual metabolism units over a 7-week pre-treatment period, were allocated to 1 of 4 treatment groups based on a 22 factorial arrangement. Groups were low (L) or high (H) intake (0.8 or 1.3 maintenance, respectively) with continuous intravenous infusion of either saline (–Cys) or cysteine (+Cys, 2 g/day). During the 3-month treatment period, measurements were obtained for liveweight, plasma cysteine concentration, wool sulfur concentration and output, clean wool growth, mean fibre diameter (MFD), length growth rate (LGR), colour, loose wool bulk, handle, and crimp frequency and character. Clean wool growth response ( P < 0.05) to cysteine supplementation was greater for the L sheep (6.06 v . 4.31 g/100 cm 2 ) than the H sheep (7.20 v . 6.13 g/100 cm 2 ). The response to supplementation in LGR ( P < 0.01) was similar in both H (14%) and L (20%) sheep. There was no response in MFD due to sulfur supplementation, although fibre diameter measurements made along the fibres suggest that there was a response in L but not H sheep ( P < 0.1). Wool sulfur concentration and output increased as a result of cysteine supplementation but concentration increased more in L (30.6 v . 24.5 mg S/g; P < 0.01) than in H sheep (28.4 v . 26.2 mg S/g). Qualitative electrophoresis analyses suggested that the increase in wool sulfur was achieved primarily by an increase in ultra-high-sulfur proteins. Crimp frequency and character were both significantly ( P < 0.01) enhanced by cysteine supplementation. It is concluded that cysteine supplementation, at feed intakes that commonly occur in the commercial situation, can produce a useful increase in wool growth. This growth increase is primarily accomplished by increasing length growth rate rather than fibre diameter, which should also improve the value of the wool fibre produced. Keywords: wool quality, wool sulfur, wool protein. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52(1) 29 - 36 Full text doi:10.1071/AR00031 © CSIRO 2001
doi_str_mv 10.1071/AR00031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pascalfrancis_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1071_AR00031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>829602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f62b8ea15191f0d7cb3ae5e21bc12ef60b86247f87970db65823c39f57ae5b333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_oWAB0-r-dgkm2MpfhQKQtGDpyWbTtrV3WRJItJ_79aWnmaYeXgPL0K3lDxQoujjbEUI4fQMTWjFZSGUFudoMt7KQpdEX6KrlL4IkaWgcoI-Fz6bb8DGr3EX_KbIEHtsdylD6wGnn2HooIcR5TZ4bLfGbwD_htDt92js6NuUW5twcHgVeg87nLYAwzW6cKZLcHOcU_Tx_PQ-fy2Wby-L-WxZWE7LXDjJmgoMFVRTR9bKNtyAAEYbSxk4SZpKslK5SmlF1o0UFeOWayfUyBrO-RTdH3JtDClFcPUQ297EXU1JvW-kPjYyyruDHEyypnPReNumE6-YloSNCh_zUhvD6Wvif0i9zT3_Ay9ga88</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intake and long-term cysteine supplementation change wool characteristics of Romney sheep</title><source>CSIRO Publishing Journals</source><creator>SHERLOCK, R. G ; HARRIS, P. M ; LEE, J ; WICKHAM, G. A ; WOODS, J. L ; MCCUTCHEON, S. N</creator><creatorcontrib>SHERLOCK, R. G ; HARRIS, P. M ; LEE, J ; WICKHAM, G. A ; WOODS, J. L ; MCCUTCHEON, S. N</creatorcontrib><description>Sulfur amino acid supplementation increases wool production in sheep at low planes of nutrition but it is unclear whether there is any benefit of supplementation at planes of nutrition above maintenance and what implications this might have for wool quality characteristics. This experiment directly investigated the interaction between sulfur supplementation and plane of nutrition in terms of wool growth and fibre characteristics. Twenty-four Romney ewes, acclimatised in individual metabolism units over a 7-week pre-treatment period, were allocated to 1 of 4 treatment groups based on a 22 factorial arrangement. Groups were low (L) or high (H) intake (0.8 or 1.3 maintenance, respectively) with continuous intravenous infusion of either saline (–Cys) or cysteine (+Cys, 2 g/day). During the 3-month treatment period, measurements were obtained for liveweight, plasma cysteine concentration, wool sulfur concentration and output, clean wool growth, mean fibre diameter (MFD), length growth rate (LGR), colour, loose wool bulk, handle, and crimp frequency and character. Clean wool growth response ( P &lt; 0.05) to cysteine supplementation was greater for the L sheep (6.06 v . 4.31 g/100 cm 2 ) than the H sheep (7.20 v . 6.13 g/100 cm 2 ). The response to supplementation in LGR ( P &lt; 0.01) was similar in both H (14%) and L (20%) sheep. There was no response in MFD due to sulfur supplementation, although fibre diameter measurements made along the fibres suggest that there was a response in L but not H sheep ( P &lt; 0.1). Wool sulfur concentration and output increased as a result of cysteine supplementation but concentration increased more in L (30.6 v . 24.5 mg S/g; P &lt; 0.01) than in H sheep (28.4 v . 26.2 mg S/g). Qualitative electrophoresis analyses suggested that the increase in wool sulfur was achieved primarily by an increase in ultra-high-sulfur proteins. Crimp frequency and character were both significantly ( P &lt; 0.01) enhanced by cysteine supplementation. It is concluded that cysteine supplementation, at feed intakes that commonly occur in the commercial situation, can produce a useful increase in wool growth. This growth increase is primarily accomplished by increasing length growth rate rather than fibre diameter, which should also improve the value of the wool fibre produced. Keywords: wool quality, wool sulfur, wool protein. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52(1) 29 - 36 Full text doi:10.1071/AR00031 © CSIRO 2001</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-9409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1836-5795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1071/AR00031</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJAEA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Collingwood: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization</publisher><subject>Animal productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Australian journal of agricultural research, 2001, Vol.52 (1), p.29-36</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f62b8ea15191f0d7cb3ae5e21bc12ef60b86247f87970db65823c39f57ae5b333</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3337,3338,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=829602$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHERLOCK, R. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRIS, P. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEE, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WICKHAM, G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOODS, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCUTCHEON, S. N</creatorcontrib><title>Intake and long-term cysteine supplementation change wool characteristics of Romney sheep</title><title>Australian journal of agricultural research</title><description>Sulfur amino acid supplementation increases wool production in sheep at low planes of nutrition but it is unclear whether there is any benefit of supplementation at planes of nutrition above maintenance and what implications this might have for wool quality characteristics. This experiment directly investigated the interaction between sulfur supplementation and plane of nutrition in terms of wool growth and fibre characteristics. Twenty-four Romney ewes, acclimatised in individual metabolism units over a 7-week pre-treatment period, were allocated to 1 of 4 treatment groups based on a 22 factorial arrangement. Groups were low (L) or high (H) intake (0.8 or 1.3 maintenance, respectively) with continuous intravenous infusion of either saline (–Cys) or cysteine (+Cys, 2 g/day). During the 3-month treatment period, measurements were obtained for liveweight, plasma cysteine concentration, wool sulfur concentration and output, clean wool growth, mean fibre diameter (MFD), length growth rate (LGR), colour, loose wool bulk, handle, and crimp frequency and character. Clean wool growth response ( P &lt; 0.05) to cysteine supplementation was greater for the L sheep (6.06 v . 4.31 g/100 cm 2 ) than the H sheep (7.20 v . 6.13 g/100 cm 2 ). The response to supplementation in LGR ( P &lt; 0.01) was similar in both H (14%) and L (20%) sheep. There was no response in MFD due to sulfur supplementation, although fibre diameter measurements made along the fibres suggest that there was a response in L but not H sheep ( P &lt; 0.1). Wool sulfur concentration and output increased as a result of cysteine supplementation but concentration increased more in L (30.6 v . 24.5 mg S/g; P &lt; 0.01) than in H sheep (28.4 v . 26.2 mg S/g). Qualitative electrophoresis analyses suggested that the increase in wool sulfur was achieved primarily by an increase in ultra-high-sulfur proteins. Crimp frequency and character were both significantly ( P &lt; 0.01) enhanced by cysteine supplementation. It is concluded that cysteine supplementation, at feed intakes that commonly occur in the commercial situation, can produce a useful increase in wool growth. This growth increase is primarily accomplished by increasing length growth rate rather than fibre diameter, which should also improve the value of the wool fibre produced. Keywords: wool quality, wool sulfur, wool protein. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52(1) 29 - 36 Full text doi:10.1071/AR00031 © CSIRO 2001</description><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0004-9409</issn><issn>1836-5795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_oWAB0-r-dgkm2MpfhQKQtGDpyWbTtrV3WRJItJ_79aWnmaYeXgPL0K3lDxQoujjbEUI4fQMTWjFZSGUFudoMt7KQpdEX6KrlL4IkaWgcoI-Fz6bb8DGr3EX_KbIEHtsdylD6wGnn2HooIcR5TZ4bLfGbwD_htDt92js6NuUW5twcHgVeg87nLYAwzW6cKZLcHOcU_Tx_PQ-fy2Wby-L-WxZWE7LXDjJmgoMFVRTR9bKNtyAAEYbSxk4SZpKslK5SmlF1o0UFeOWayfUyBrO-RTdH3JtDClFcPUQ297EXU1JvW-kPjYyyruDHEyypnPReNumE6-YloSNCh_zUhvD6Wvif0i9zT3_Ay9ga88</recordid><startdate>2001</startdate><enddate>2001</enddate><creator>SHERLOCK, R. G</creator><creator>HARRIS, P. M</creator><creator>LEE, J</creator><creator>WICKHAM, G. A</creator><creator>WOODS, J. L</creator><creator>MCCUTCHEON, S. N</creator><general>Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2001</creationdate><title>Intake and long-term cysteine supplementation change wool characteristics of Romney sheep</title><author>SHERLOCK, R. G ; HARRIS, P. M ; LEE, J ; WICKHAM, G. A ; WOODS, J. L ; MCCUTCHEON, S. N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f62b8ea15191f0d7cb3ae5e21bc12ef60b86247f87970db65823c39f57ae5b333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHERLOCK, R. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRIS, P. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEE, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WICKHAM, G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOODS, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCUTCHEON, S. N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Australian journal of agricultural research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHERLOCK, R. G</au><au>HARRIS, P. M</au><au>LEE, J</au><au>WICKHAM, G. A</au><au>WOODS, J. L</au><au>MCCUTCHEON, S. N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intake and long-term cysteine supplementation change wool characteristics of Romney sheep</atitle><jtitle>Australian journal of agricultural research</jtitle><date>2001</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>29-36</pages><issn>0004-9409</issn><eissn>1836-5795</eissn><coden>AJAEA9</coden><abstract>Sulfur amino acid supplementation increases wool production in sheep at low planes of nutrition but it is unclear whether there is any benefit of supplementation at planes of nutrition above maintenance and what implications this might have for wool quality characteristics. This experiment directly investigated the interaction between sulfur supplementation and plane of nutrition in terms of wool growth and fibre characteristics. Twenty-four Romney ewes, acclimatised in individual metabolism units over a 7-week pre-treatment period, were allocated to 1 of 4 treatment groups based on a 22 factorial arrangement. Groups were low (L) or high (H) intake (0.8 or 1.3 maintenance, respectively) with continuous intravenous infusion of either saline (–Cys) or cysteine (+Cys, 2 g/day). During the 3-month treatment period, measurements were obtained for liveweight, plasma cysteine concentration, wool sulfur concentration and output, clean wool growth, mean fibre diameter (MFD), length growth rate (LGR), colour, loose wool bulk, handle, and crimp frequency and character. Clean wool growth response ( P &lt; 0.05) to cysteine supplementation was greater for the L sheep (6.06 v . 4.31 g/100 cm 2 ) than the H sheep (7.20 v . 6.13 g/100 cm 2 ). The response to supplementation in LGR ( P &lt; 0.01) was similar in both H (14%) and L (20%) sheep. There was no response in MFD due to sulfur supplementation, although fibre diameter measurements made along the fibres suggest that there was a response in L but not H sheep ( P &lt; 0.1). Wool sulfur concentration and output increased as a result of cysteine supplementation but concentration increased more in L (30.6 v . 24.5 mg S/g; P &lt; 0.01) than in H sheep (28.4 v . 26.2 mg S/g). Qualitative electrophoresis analyses suggested that the increase in wool sulfur was achieved primarily by an increase in ultra-high-sulfur proteins. Crimp frequency and character were both significantly ( P &lt; 0.01) enhanced by cysteine supplementation. It is concluded that cysteine supplementation, at feed intakes that commonly occur in the commercial situation, can produce a useful increase in wool growth. This growth increase is primarily accomplished by increasing length growth rate rather than fibre diameter, which should also improve the value of the wool fibre produced. Keywords: wool quality, wool sulfur, wool protein. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52(1) 29 - 36 Full text doi:10.1071/AR00031 © CSIRO 2001</abstract><cop>Collingwood</cop><pub>Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization</pub><doi>10.1071/AR00031</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-9409
ispartof Australian journal of agricultural research, 2001, Vol.52 (1), p.29-36
issn 0004-9409
1836-5795
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1071_AR00031
source CSIRO Publishing Journals
subjects Animal productions
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Terrestrial animal productions
Vertebrates
title Intake and long-term cysteine supplementation change wool characteristics of Romney sheep
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A48%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pascalfrancis_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intake%20and%20long-term%20cysteine%20supplementation%20change%20wool%20characteristics%20of%20Romney%20sheep&rft.jtitle=Australian%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20research&rft.au=SHERLOCK,%20R.%20G&rft.date=2001&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=29-36&rft.issn=0004-9409&rft.eissn=1836-5795&rft.coden=AJAEA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1071/AR00031&rft_dat=%3Cpascalfrancis_cross%3E829602%3C/pascalfrancis_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true