The National Health Survey 2001: usefulness to inform a discussion on access to and use of quality primary health care using type 2 diabetes mellitus as an example
Introduction: This paper explores the usefulness of the 2001 Australian Bureau of Statistics National Health Survey (2001 NHS) for examining access to and use of quality primary health care (PHC) in Australia, using diabetes as an example. Methods: Potential indicators of access to and use of qualit...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Australian health review 2006-11, Vol.30 (4), p.496-506 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 506 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 496 |
| container_title | Australian health review |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Comino, Elizabeth J Harris, Mark F Harris, Elizabeth Powell Davies, Gawaine Chey, Tien Lillioja, Stephen |
| description | Introduction: This paper explores the usefulness of the 2001 Australian Bureau of Statistics National Health Survey (2001 NHS) for examining access to and use of quality primary health care (PHC) in Australia, using diabetes as an example. Methods: Potential indicators of access to and use of quality diabetes care were investigated (diagnosis, preventive pharmacotherapy, complication screening, multidisciplinary care and hospitalisation), and their association with various factors including socioeconomic and diabetes-related health status was assessed. Results: Older Australian-born females were more likely to receive preventive pharmacotherapy, whereas complication screening was associated with duration of disease. Multidisciplinary care was associated with recent hospitalisation and not health need assessed by presence of comorbidity. Conclusions: This novel use of the 2001 NHS provided information on patterns of access to and use of diabetes-related PHC that were consistent with previous research. It suggests a new role for survey data in monitoring access to and use of PHC over time and complementing other population health data collections in this area. (author abstract) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1071/AH060496 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1071_AH060496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A166935290</galeid><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.392901499754560</informt_id><sourcerecordid>A166935290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-3b4e33839fb535e21ee26d5928ffd47d88dce6fe2ee06f23a7a105e0a69b804d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkd9qFDEUxgdR7FoFn0CCF-LN1mQykz-9W4q6StEL63U4mznZnWVmsk0y4j5PX7QZZovSG5EEAie_78vJ-YriNaMXjEr2YbWmglZaPCkWrKr0UumqelosKKvFspZKnRUvYtxTynStxPPijEkqeV3Vi-LuZofkG6TWD9CRNUKXduTHGH7hkZRZcEnGiG7sBoyRJE_awfnQEyBNG-0YY9aRvMHaEwBDM0mId-R2hK5NR3IIbQ_hSHazu4WAGWmHLUnHA5Iye8EGE0bSY5cVYySQ90DwN_SHDl8Wzxx0EV-dzvPi56ePN1fr5fX3z1-uVtdLWwmZlnxTIeeKa7epeY0lQyxFU-tSOddUslGqsSgclohUuJKDBEZrpCD0RtGq4efFu9n3EPztiDGZPn8ytwQD-jEaofNApRIZfPsI3Psx5AFGU3ImS6lqlaGLGdpCh2aaWwpg82qwb60f0LW5vmJCaF6XmmbB-1lgg48xoDOnwRlGzRSzeYg5o29ODYybHps_4CnXDFzOQOjbZKzvOrRTxnEPKU5-nDNhWuzgAIbr_DyrtJZZKqZG1n-JM-GSiQjB7swcf676sDWNb_9t9fX_rR4uHpvdA0Tz5vs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231727858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The National Health Survey 2001: usefulness to inform a discussion on access to and use of quality primary health care using type 2 diabetes mellitus as an example</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>CSIRO Publishing Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Comino, Elizabeth J ; Harris, Mark F ; Harris, Elizabeth ; Powell Davies, Gawaine ; Chey, Tien ; Lillioja, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Comino, Elizabeth J ; Harris, Mark F ; Harris, Elizabeth ; Powell Davies, Gawaine ; Chey, Tien ; Lillioja, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: This paper explores the usefulness of the 2001 Australian Bureau of Statistics National Health Survey (2001 NHS) for examining access to and use of quality primary health care (PHC) in Australia, using diabetes as an example. Methods: Potential indicators of access to and use of quality diabetes care were investigated (diagnosis, preventive pharmacotherapy, complication screening, multidisciplinary care and hospitalisation), and their association with various factors including socioeconomic and diabetes-related health status was assessed. Results: Older Australian-born females were more likely to receive preventive pharmacotherapy, whereas complication screening was associated with duration of disease. Multidisciplinary care was associated with recent hospitalisation and not health need assessed by presence of comorbidity. Conclusions: This novel use of the 2001 NHS provided information on patterns of access to and use of diabetes-related PHC that were consistent with previous research. It suggests a new role for survey data in monitoring access to and use of PHC over time and complementing other population health data collections in this area. (author abstract)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0156-5788</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1449-8944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1071/AH060496</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17073545</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association</publisher><subject>2001 AD ; Age ; Aged ; Antihypertensives ; Cardiovascular disease ; Care and treatment ; Chronic illnesses ; Comorbidity ; Country of birth ; Data collection ; Demographic surveys ; Diabetes ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Dietitians ; Disease prevention ; Drug therapy ; Exercise ; Family income ; Female ; Health administration ; Health care access ; Health Services Accessibility ; Health Surveys ; Hospitalization ; Households ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Male ; Medical care surveys ; Middle Aged ; National Health Programs ; New South Wales ; Obesity ; Polls & surveys ; Primary care ; Primary health care ; Primary Health Care - utilization ; Quality of care ; Quality of Health Care ; Regression analysis ; Risk factors ; Socioeconomic factors ; Statistics ; Studies ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Australian health review, 2006-11, Vol.30 (4), p.496-506</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2006 Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association</rights><rights>Copyright Australian Healthcare Association Nov 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-3b4e33839fb535e21ee26d5928ffd47d88dce6fe2ee06f23a7a105e0a69b804d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3337,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17073545$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Comino, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Mark F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell Davies, Gawaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chey, Tien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillioja, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>The National Health Survey 2001: usefulness to inform a discussion on access to and use of quality primary health care using type 2 diabetes mellitus as an example</title><title>Australian health review</title><addtitle>Aust Health Rev</addtitle><description>Introduction: This paper explores the usefulness of the 2001 Australian Bureau of Statistics National Health Survey (2001 NHS) for examining access to and use of quality primary health care (PHC) in Australia, using diabetes as an example. Methods: Potential indicators of access to and use of quality diabetes care were investigated (diagnosis, preventive pharmacotherapy, complication screening, multidisciplinary care and hospitalisation), and their association with various factors including socioeconomic and diabetes-related health status was assessed. Results: Older Australian-born females were more likely to receive preventive pharmacotherapy, whereas complication screening was associated with duration of disease. Multidisciplinary care was associated with recent hospitalisation and not health need assessed by presence of comorbidity. Conclusions: This novel use of the 2001 NHS provided information on patterns of access to and use of diabetes-related PHC that were consistent with previous research. It suggests a new role for survey data in monitoring access to and use of PHC over time and complementing other population health data collections in this area. (author abstract)</description><subject>2001 AD</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antihypertensives</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Country of birth</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Demographic surveys</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</subject><subject>Dietitians</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care surveys</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>National Health Programs</subject><subject>New South Wales</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - utilization</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0156-5788</issn><issn>1449-8944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkd9qFDEUxgdR7FoFn0CCF-LN1mQykz-9W4q6StEL63U4mznZnWVmsk0y4j5PX7QZZovSG5EEAie_78vJ-YriNaMXjEr2YbWmglZaPCkWrKr0UumqelosKKvFspZKnRUvYtxTynStxPPijEkqeV3Vi-LuZofkG6TWD9CRNUKXduTHGH7hkZRZcEnGiG7sBoyRJE_awfnQEyBNG-0YY9aRvMHaEwBDM0mId-R2hK5NR3IIbQ_hSHazu4WAGWmHLUnHA5Iye8EGE0bSY5cVYySQ90DwN_SHDl8Wzxx0EV-dzvPi56ePN1fr5fX3z1-uVtdLWwmZlnxTIeeKa7epeY0lQyxFU-tSOddUslGqsSgclohUuJKDBEZrpCD0RtGq4efFu9n3EPztiDGZPn8ytwQD-jEaofNApRIZfPsI3Psx5AFGU3ImS6lqlaGLGdpCh2aaWwpg82qwb60f0LW5vmJCaF6XmmbB-1lgg48xoDOnwRlGzRSzeYg5o29ODYybHps_4CnXDFzOQOjbZKzvOrRTxnEPKU5-nDNhWuzgAIbr_DyrtJZZKqZG1n-JM-GSiQjB7swcf676sDWNb_9t9fX_rR4uHpvdA0Tz5vs</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Comino, Elizabeth J</creator><creator>Harris, Mark F</creator><creator>Harris, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Powell Davies, Gawaine</creator><creator>Chey, Tien</creator><creator>Lillioja, Stephen</creator><general>Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association</general><general>CSIRO</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>The National Health Survey 2001: usefulness to inform a discussion on access to and use of quality primary health care using type 2 diabetes mellitus as an example</title><author>Comino, Elizabeth J ; Harris, Mark F ; Harris, Elizabeth ; Powell Davies, Gawaine ; Chey, Tien ; Lillioja, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-3b4e33839fb535e21ee26d5928ffd47d88dce6fe2ee06f23a7a105e0a69b804d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>2001 AD</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antihypertensives</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Country of birth</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Demographic surveys</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</topic><topic>Dietitians</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care surveys</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>National Health Programs</topic><topic>New South Wales</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - utilization</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Comino, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Mark F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell Davies, Gawaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chey, Tien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillioja, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian health review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Comino, Elizabeth J</au><au>Harris, Mark F</au><au>Harris, Elizabeth</au><au>Powell Davies, Gawaine</au><au>Chey, Tien</au><au>Lillioja, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The National Health Survey 2001: usefulness to inform a discussion on access to and use of quality primary health care using type 2 diabetes mellitus as an example</atitle><jtitle>Australian health review</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Health Rev</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>496</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>496-506</pages><issn>0156-5788</issn><eissn>1449-8944</eissn><abstract>Introduction: This paper explores the usefulness of the 2001 Australian Bureau of Statistics National Health Survey (2001 NHS) for examining access to and use of quality primary health care (PHC) in Australia, using diabetes as an example. Methods: Potential indicators of access to and use of quality diabetes care were investigated (diagnosis, preventive pharmacotherapy, complication screening, multidisciplinary care and hospitalisation), and their association with various factors including socioeconomic and diabetes-related health status was assessed. Results: Older Australian-born females were more likely to receive preventive pharmacotherapy, whereas complication screening was associated with duration of disease. Multidisciplinary care was associated with recent hospitalisation and not health need assessed by presence of comorbidity. Conclusions: This novel use of the 2001 NHS provided information on patterns of access to and use of diabetes-related PHC that were consistent with previous research. It suggests a new role for survey data in monitoring access to and use of PHC over time and complementing other population health data collections in this area. (author abstract)</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association</pub><pmid>17073545</pmid><doi>10.1071/AH060496</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0156-5788 |
| ispartof | Australian health review, 2006-11, Vol.30 (4), p.496-506 |
| issn | 0156-5788 1449-8944 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1071_AH060496 |
| source | MEDLINE; CSIRO Publishing Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | 2001 AD Age Aged Antihypertensives Cardiovascular disease Care and treatment Chronic illnesses Comorbidity Country of birth Data collection Demographic surveys Diabetes Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Dietitians Disease prevention Drug therapy Exercise Family income Female Health administration Health care access Health Services Accessibility Health Surveys Hospitalization Households Humans Hypertension Male Medical care surveys Middle Aged National Health Programs New South Wales Obesity Polls & surveys Primary care Primary health care Primary Health Care - utilization Quality of care Quality of Health Care Regression analysis Risk factors Socioeconomic factors Statistics Studies Womens health |
| title | The National Health Survey 2001: usefulness to inform a discussion on access to and use of quality primary health care using type 2 diabetes mellitus as an example |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T13%3A09%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20National%20Health%20Survey%202001:%20usefulness%20to%20inform%20a%20discussion%20on%20access%20to%20and%20use%20of%20quality%20primary%20health%20care%20using%20type%202%20diabetes%20mellitus%20as%20an%20example&rft.jtitle=Australian%20health%20review&rft.au=Comino,%20Elizabeth%20J&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=496&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=496-506&rft.issn=0156-5788&rft.eissn=1449-8944&rft_id=info:doi/10.1071/AH060496&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA166935290%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231727858&rft_id=info:pmid/17073545&rft_galeid=A166935290&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.392901499754560&rfr_iscdi=true |