Botanical Decolonization: Rethinking Native Plants

Botanical Decolonization: Rethinking Native Plants

In this paper we use an apparently marginal topic—‘native plants’—to address two issues of concern to contemporary politics and political theory: the legacy of settler colonialism, and dilemmas of scholarship and activism in the ‘Anthropocene’. Drawing on the writings of Francis Bacon and based on a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environment and planning. D, Society & space Society & space, 2014-04, Vol.32 (2), p.363-380
Hauptverfasser: Mastnak, Tomaz, Elyachar, Julia, Boellstorff, Tom
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 380
container_issue 2
container_start_page 363
container_title Environment and planning. D, Society & space
container_volume 32
creator Mastnak, Tomaz
Elyachar, Julia
Boellstorff, Tom
description In this paper we use an apparently marginal topic—‘native plants’—to address two issues of concern to contemporary politics and political theory: the legacy of settler colonialism, and dilemmas of scholarship and activism in the ‘Anthropocene’. Drawing on the writings of Francis Bacon and based on a case study of California, we argue that planting and displanting humans and plants are elements of the same multispecies colonial endeavor. In contrast to those who equate native plant advocates with antiimmigrant nativism, we see native plant advocacy as part of a broad process of botanical decolonization and a strategic location for ethical action in the Anthropocene.
doi_str_mv 10.1068/d13006p
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1068_d13006p</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1068_d13006p</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1068_d13006p</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-ddc7c27df4ae9e1e20bcfa8ebc50246b8a754f1737f69e9b2d99ca0a4ba4ff4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplj11LwzAYhYMoWKf4F3oheFX35qNN451uOoWhInpd3qTJzKzJaKqgv97KdufVgcPD4TyEnFK4oFDV05ZygGqzRzIqJCu44HyfZMAqXkhZ1ofkKKU1AHAlaEbYdRwweINdPrcmdjH4Hxx8DJf5sx3efHj3YZU_jNWXzZ86DEM6JgcOu2RPdjkhr7c3L7O7Yvm4uJ9dLQvDajkUbWukYbJ1Aq2y1DLQxmFttSmBiUrXKEvhqOTSVcoqzVqlDAIKjcI5ofmEnG93TR9T6q1rNr3_wP67odD8qTY71ZE825IJV7ZZx88-jMf-Yb8B91Ks</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Botanical Decolonization: Rethinking Native Plants</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Mastnak, Tomaz ; Elyachar, Julia ; Boellstorff, Tom</creator><creatorcontrib>Mastnak, Tomaz ; Elyachar, Julia ; Boellstorff, Tom</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we use an apparently marginal topic—‘native plants’—to address two issues of concern to contemporary politics and political theory: the legacy of settler colonialism, and dilemmas of scholarship and activism in the ‘Anthropocene’. Drawing on the writings of Francis Bacon and based on a case study of California, we argue that planting and displanting humans and plants are elements of the same multispecies colonial endeavor. In contrast to those who equate native plant advocates with antiimmigrant nativism, we see native plant advocacy as part of a broad process of botanical decolonization and a strategic location for ethical action in the Anthropocene.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-3433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1068/d13006p</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Environment and planning. D, Society &amp; space, 2014-04, Vol.32 (2), p.363-380</ispartof><rights>2014 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-ddc7c27df4ae9e1e20bcfa8ebc50246b8a754f1737f69e9b2d99ca0a4ba4ff4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-ddc7c27df4ae9e1e20bcfa8ebc50246b8a754f1737f69e9b2d99ca0a4ba4ff4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1068/d13006p$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/d13006p$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mastnak, Tomaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elyachar, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boellstorff, Tom</creatorcontrib><title>Botanical Decolonization: Rethinking Native Plants</title><title>Environment and planning. D, Society &amp; space</title><description>In this paper we use an apparently marginal topic—‘native plants’—to address two issues of concern to contemporary politics and political theory: the legacy of settler colonialism, and dilemmas of scholarship and activism in the ‘Anthropocene’. Drawing on the writings of Francis Bacon and based on a case study of California, we argue that planting and displanting humans and plants are elements of the same multispecies colonial endeavor. In contrast to those who equate native plant advocates with antiimmigrant nativism, we see native plant advocacy as part of a broad process of botanical decolonization and a strategic location for ethical action in the Anthropocene.</description><issn>0263-7758</issn><issn>1472-3433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNplj11LwzAYhYMoWKf4F3oheFX35qNN451uOoWhInpd3qTJzKzJaKqgv97KdufVgcPD4TyEnFK4oFDV05ZygGqzRzIqJCu44HyfZMAqXkhZ1ofkKKU1AHAlaEbYdRwweINdPrcmdjH4Hxx8DJf5sx3efHj3YZU_jNWXzZ86DEM6JgcOu2RPdjkhr7c3L7O7Yvm4uJ9dLQvDajkUbWukYbJ1Aq2y1DLQxmFttSmBiUrXKEvhqOTSVcoqzVqlDAIKjcI5ofmEnG93TR9T6q1rNr3_wP67odD8qTY71ZE825IJV7ZZx88-jMf-Yb8B91Ks</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Mastnak, Tomaz</creator><creator>Elyachar, Julia</creator><creator>Boellstorff, Tom</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Botanical Decolonization: Rethinking Native Plants</title><author>Mastnak, Tomaz ; Elyachar, Julia ; Boellstorff, Tom</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-ddc7c27df4ae9e1e20bcfa8ebc50246b8a754f1737f69e9b2d99ca0a4ba4ff4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mastnak, Tomaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elyachar, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boellstorff, Tom</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Environment and planning. D, Society &amp; space</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mastnak, Tomaz</au><au>Elyachar, Julia</au><au>Boellstorff, Tom</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Botanical Decolonization: Rethinking Native Plants</atitle><jtitle>Environment and planning. D, Society &amp; space</jtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>380</epage><pages>363-380</pages><issn>0263-7758</issn><eissn>1472-3433</eissn><abstract>In this paper we use an apparently marginal topic—‘native plants’—to address two issues of concern to contemporary politics and political theory: the legacy of settler colonialism, and dilemmas of scholarship and activism in the ‘Anthropocene’. Drawing on the writings of Francis Bacon and based on a case study of California, we argue that planting and displanting humans and plants are elements of the same multispecies colonial endeavor. In contrast to those who equate native plant advocates with antiimmigrant nativism, we see native plant advocacy as part of a broad process of botanical decolonization and a strategic location for ethical action in the Anthropocene.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1068/d13006p</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-7758
ispartof Environment and planning. D, Society & space, 2014-04, Vol.32 (2), p.363-380
issn 0263-7758
1472-3433
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1068_d13006p
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Botanical Decolonization: Rethinking Native Plants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A43%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Botanical%20Decolonization:%20Rethinking%20Native%20Plants&rft.jtitle=Environment%20and%20planning.%20D,%20Society%20&%20space&rft.au=Mastnak,%20Tomaz&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=380&rft.pages=363-380&rft.issn=0263-7758&rft.eissn=1472-3433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1068/d13006p&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1068_d13006p%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1068_d13006p&rfr_iscdi=true