Investigation of models to estimate flight performance of gliding birds from wakes
Mathematical models based on inviscid flow theory are effective at predicting the aerodynamic forces on large-scale aircraft. Avian flight, however, is characterized by smaller sizes, slower speeds, and increased influence of viscous effects associated with lower Reynolds numbers. Therefore, invisci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physics of fluids (1994) 2024-09, Vol.36 (9), p.091912 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 091912 |
container_title | Physics of fluids (1994) |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Song, Jialei Chen, Changyao Cheney, Jorn A. Usherwood, James R. Bomphrey, Richard J. |
description | Mathematical models based on inviscid flow theory are effective at predicting the aerodynamic forces on large-scale aircraft. Avian flight, however, is characterized by smaller sizes, slower speeds, and increased influence of viscous effects associated with lower Reynolds numbers. Therefore, inviscid mathematical models of avian flight should be used with caution. The assumptions used in such models, such as thin wings and streamlined bodies, may be violated by birds, potentially introducing additional error. To investigate the applicability of the existing models to calculate the aerodynamic performance of bird flight, we compared predictions using simulated wakes with those calculated directly from forces on the bird surface, both derived from computational fluid dynamics of a high-fidelity barn owl geometry in free gliding flight. Two lift models and two drag models are assessed. We show that the generalized Kutta–Joukowski model, corrected by the streamwise velocity, can predict not only the lift but also span loading well. Drag was predicted best by a drag model based on the conservation of fluid momentum in a control volume. Finally, we estimated force production for three raptor species across nine gliding flights by applying the best lift model to wake flow fields measured with particle tracking velocimetry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/5.0226182 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_5_0226182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3109431129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-6772dbd6d44e394a3ee61b78602ddb44b38245fcf90e8c7ffc98e65128a662db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKxDAUBuAgiqOjC19AAm5U6Jhb02Qpg5eBAUF0XdJcase2GZNW8e1tndGFC1cnHL78HH4ATjCaYcTpVTpDhHAsyA44wEjIJOOc747vDCWcUzwBhzGuEEJUEr4PJlRSLBFGB-Bx0b7b2FWl6irfQu9g442tI-w8HPeN6ix0dVW-dHBtg_OhUa22IyzrylRtCYsqmAhd8A38UK82HoE9p-poj7dzCp5vb57m98ny4W4xv14mmlDRJTzLiCkMN4xZKpmi1nJcZIIjYkzBWEEFYanTTiIrdOaclsLyFBOhOB9-0ik43-Sug3_rh2Pzpora1rVqre9jTjGSjGJM5EDP_tCV70M7XDeqNCU4Y6O62CgdfIzBunwdhgLCZ45RPhadp_m26MGebhP7orHmV_40O4DLDYi66r7L_SftC7c_hII</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3105521749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of models to estimate flight performance of gliding birds from wakes</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Song, Jialei ; Chen, Changyao ; Cheney, Jorn A. ; Usherwood, James R. ; Bomphrey, Richard J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, Jialei ; Chen, Changyao ; Cheney, Jorn A. ; Usherwood, James R. ; Bomphrey, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><description>Mathematical models based on inviscid flow theory are effective at predicting the aerodynamic forces on large-scale aircraft. Avian flight, however, is characterized by smaller sizes, slower speeds, and increased influence of viscous effects associated with lower Reynolds numbers. Therefore, inviscid mathematical models of avian flight should be used with caution. The assumptions used in such models, such as thin wings and streamlined bodies, may be violated by birds, potentially introducing additional error. To investigate the applicability of the existing models to calculate the aerodynamic performance of bird flight, we compared predictions using simulated wakes with those calculated directly from forces on the bird surface, both derived from computational fluid dynamics of a high-fidelity barn owl geometry in free gliding flight. Two lift models and two drag models are assessed. We show that the generalized Kutta–Joukowski model, corrected by the streamwise velocity, can predict not only the lift but also span loading well. Drag was predicted best by a drag model based on the conservation of fluid momentum in a control volume. Finally, we estimated force production for three raptor species across nine gliding flights by applying the best lift model to wake flow fields measured with particle tracking velocimetry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-6631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7666</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0226182</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39319010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHFLE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Aerodynamic forces ; Aerodynamics ; Aircraft performance ; Aircraft wakes ; Birds ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Drag ; Error analysis ; Error correction ; Flight characteristics ; Flow theory ; Fluid flow ; Gliding ; Inviscid flow ; Lift ; Mathematical models ; Particle tracking ; Particle tracking velocimetry ; Performance prediction ; Predictive control ; Reynolds number ; Streamlined bodies ; Thin wings ; Velocity measurement ; Wildlife conservation ; Wings (aircraft)</subject><ispartof>Physics of fluids (1994), 2024-09, Vol.36 (9), p.091912</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s).</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-6772dbd6d44e394a3ee61b78602ddb44b38245fcf90e8c7ffc98e65128a662db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3244-7766 ; 0000-0002-4748-0510 ; 0000-0002-9952-2612 ; 0000-0001-8794-4677</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,790,4498,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39319010$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, Jialei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Changyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheney, Jorn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usherwood, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomphrey, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of models to estimate flight performance of gliding birds from wakes</title><title>Physics of fluids (1994)</title><addtitle>Phys Fluids (1994)</addtitle><description>Mathematical models based on inviscid flow theory are effective at predicting the aerodynamic forces on large-scale aircraft. Avian flight, however, is characterized by smaller sizes, slower speeds, and increased influence of viscous effects associated with lower Reynolds numbers. Therefore, inviscid mathematical models of avian flight should be used with caution. The assumptions used in such models, such as thin wings and streamlined bodies, may be violated by birds, potentially introducing additional error. To investigate the applicability of the existing models to calculate the aerodynamic performance of bird flight, we compared predictions using simulated wakes with those calculated directly from forces on the bird surface, both derived from computational fluid dynamics of a high-fidelity barn owl geometry in free gliding flight. Two lift models and two drag models are assessed. We show that the generalized Kutta–Joukowski model, corrected by the streamwise velocity, can predict not only the lift but also span loading well. Drag was predicted best by a drag model based on the conservation of fluid momentum in a control volume. Finally, we estimated force production for three raptor species across nine gliding flights by applying the best lift model to wake flow fields measured with particle tracking velocimetry.</description><subject>Aerodynamic forces</subject><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Aircraft performance</subject><subject>Aircraft wakes</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Drag</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Error correction</subject><subject>Flight characteristics</subject><subject>Flow theory</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Gliding</subject><subject>Inviscid flow</subject><subject>Lift</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Particle tracking</subject><subject>Particle tracking velocimetry</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Predictive control</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>Streamlined bodies</subject><subject>Thin wings</subject><subject>Velocity measurement</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wings (aircraft)</subject><issn>1070-6631</issn><issn>1089-7666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MtKxDAUBuAgiqOjC19AAm5U6Jhb02Qpg5eBAUF0XdJcase2GZNW8e1tndGFC1cnHL78HH4ATjCaYcTpVTpDhHAsyA44wEjIJOOc747vDCWcUzwBhzGuEEJUEr4PJlRSLBFGB-Bx0b7b2FWl6irfQu9g442tI-w8HPeN6ix0dVW-dHBtg_OhUa22IyzrylRtCYsqmAhd8A38UK82HoE9p-poj7dzCp5vb57m98ny4W4xv14mmlDRJTzLiCkMN4xZKpmi1nJcZIIjYkzBWEEFYanTTiIrdOaclsLyFBOhOB9-0ik43-Sug3_rh2Pzpora1rVqre9jTjGSjGJM5EDP_tCV70M7XDeqNCU4Y6O62CgdfIzBunwdhgLCZ45RPhadp_m26MGebhP7orHmV_40O4DLDYi66r7L_SftC7c_hII</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Song, Jialei</creator><creator>Chen, Changyao</creator><creator>Cheney, Jorn A.</creator><creator>Usherwood, James R.</creator><creator>Bomphrey, Richard J.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3244-7766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-0510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-2612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8794-4677</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Investigation of models to estimate flight performance of gliding birds from wakes</title><author>Song, Jialei ; Chen, Changyao ; Cheney, Jorn A. ; Usherwood, James R. ; Bomphrey, Richard J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-6772dbd6d44e394a3ee61b78602ddb44b38245fcf90e8c7ffc98e65128a662db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamic forces</topic><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Aircraft performance</topic><topic>Aircraft wakes</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Drag</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Error correction</topic><topic>Flight characteristics</topic><topic>Flow theory</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Gliding</topic><topic>Inviscid flow</topic><topic>Lift</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Particle tracking</topic><topic>Particle tracking velocimetry</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Predictive control</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>Streamlined bodies</topic><topic>Thin wings</topic><topic>Velocity measurement</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wings (aircraft)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Jialei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Changyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheney, Jorn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usherwood, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomphrey, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics of fluids (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Jialei</au><au>Chen, Changyao</au><au>Cheney, Jorn A.</au><au>Usherwood, James R.</au><au>Bomphrey, Richard J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of models to estimate flight performance of gliding birds from wakes</atitle><jtitle>Physics of fluids (1994)</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Fluids (1994)</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>091912</spage><pages>091912-</pages><issn>1070-6631</issn><eissn>1089-7666</eissn><coden>PHFLE6</coden><abstract>Mathematical models based on inviscid flow theory are effective at predicting the aerodynamic forces on large-scale aircraft. Avian flight, however, is characterized by smaller sizes, slower speeds, and increased influence of viscous effects associated with lower Reynolds numbers. Therefore, inviscid mathematical models of avian flight should be used with caution. The assumptions used in such models, such as thin wings and streamlined bodies, may be violated by birds, potentially introducing additional error. To investigate the applicability of the existing models to calculate the aerodynamic performance of bird flight, we compared predictions using simulated wakes with those calculated directly from forces on the bird surface, both derived from computational fluid dynamics of a high-fidelity barn owl geometry in free gliding flight. Two lift models and two drag models are assessed. We show that the generalized Kutta–Joukowski model, corrected by the streamwise velocity, can predict not only the lift but also span loading well. Drag was predicted best by a drag model based on the conservation of fluid momentum in a control volume. Finally, we estimated force production for three raptor species across nine gliding flights by applying the best lift model to wake flow fields measured with particle tracking velocimetry.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><pmid>39319010</pmid><doi>10.1063/5.0226182</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3244-7766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-0510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-2612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8794-4677</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1070-6631 |
ispartof | Physics of fluids (1994), 2024-09, Vol.36 (9), p.091912 |
issn | 1070-6631 1089-7666 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_5_0226182 |
source | AIP Journals Complete |
subjects | Aerodynamic forces Aerodynamics Aircraft performance Aircraft wakes Birds Computational fluid dynamics Drag Error analysis Error correction Flight characteristics Flow theory Fluid flow Gliding Inviscid flow Lift Mathematical models Particle tracking Particle tracking velocimetry Performance prediction Predictive control Reynolds number Streamlined bodies Thin wings Velocity measurement Wildlife conservation Wings (aircraft) |
title | Investigation of models to estimate flight performance of gliding birds from wakes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T07%3A29%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20models%20to%20estimate%20flight%20performance%20of%20gliding%20birds%20from%20wakes&rft.jtitle=Physics%20of%20fluids%20(1994)&rft.au=Song,%20Jialei&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=091912&rft.pages=091912-&rft.issn=1070-6631&rft.eissn=1089-7666&rft.coden=PHFLE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0226182&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3109431129%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3105521749&rft_id=info:pmid/39319010&rfr_iscdi=true |