Investigation of models to estimate flight performance of gliding birds from wakes

Mathematical models based on inviscid flow theory are effective at predicting the aerodynamic forces on large-scale aircraft. Avian flight, however, is characterized by smaller sizes, slower speeds, and increased influence of viscous effects associated with lower Reynolds numbers. Therefore, invisci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics of fluids (1994) 2024-09, Vol.36 (9), p.091912
Hauptverfasser: Song, Jialei, Chen, Changyao, Cheney, Jorn A., Usherwood, James R., Bomphrey, Richard J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 091912
container_title Physics of fluids (1994)
container_volume 36
creator Song, Jialei
Chen, Changyao
Cheney, Jorn A.
Usherwood, James R.
Bomphrey, Richard J.
description Mathematical models based on inviscid flow theory are effective at predicting the aerodynamic forces on large-scale aircraft. Avian flight, however, is characterized by smaller sizes, slower speeds, and increased influence of viscous effects associated with lower Reynolds numbers. Therefore, inviscid mathematical models of avian flight should be used with caution. The assumptions used in such models, such as thin wings and streamlined bodies, may be violated by birds, potentially introducing additional error. To investigate the applicability of the existing models to calculate the aerodynamic performance of bird flight, we compared predictions using simulated wakes with those calculated directly from forces on the bird surface, both derived from computational fluid dynamics of a high-fidelity barn owl geometry in free gliding flight. Two lift models and two drag models are assessed. We show that the generalized Kutta–Joukowski model, corrected by the streamwise velocity, can predict not only the lift but also span loading well. Drag was predicted best by a drag model based on the conservation of fluid momentum in a control volume. Finally, we estimated force production for three raptor species across nine gliding flights by applying the best lift model to wake flow fields measured with particle tracking velocimetry.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0226182
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_5_0226182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3109431129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-6772dbd6d44e394a3ee61b78602ddb44b38245fcf90e8c7ffc98e65128a662db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKxDAUBuAgiqOjC19AAm5U6Jhb02Qpg5eBAUF0XdJcase2GZNW8e1tndGFC1cnHL78HH4ATjCaYcTpVTpDhHAsyA44wEjIJOOc747vDCWcUzwBhzGuEEJUEr4PJlRSLBFGB-Bx0b7b2FWl6irfQu9g442tI-w8HPeN6ix0dVW-dHBtg_OhUa22IyzrylRtCYsqmAhd8A38UK82HoE9p-poj7dzCp5vb57m98ny4W4xv14mmlDRJTzLiCkMN4xZKpmi1nJcZIIjYkzBWEEFYanTTiIrdOaclsLyFBOhOB9-0ik43-Sug3_rh2Pzpora1rVqre9jTjGSjGJM5EDP_tCV70M7XDeqNCU4Y6O62CgdfIzBunwdhgLCZ45RPhadp_m26MGebhP7orHmV_40O4DLDYi66r7L_SftC7c_hII</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3105521749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of models to estimate flight performance of gliding birds from wakes</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Song, Jialei ; Chen, Changyao ; Cheney, Jorn A. ; Usherwood, James R. ; Bomphrey, Richard J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, Jialei ; Chen, Changyao ; Cheney, Jorn A. ; Usherwood, James R. ; Bomphrey, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><description>Mathematical models based on inviscid flow theory are effective at predicting the aerodynamic forces on large-scale aircraft. Avian flight, however, is characterized by smaller sizes, slower speeds, and increased influence of viscous effects associated with lower Reynolds numbers. Therefore, inviscid mathematical models of avian flight should be used with caution. The assumptions used in such models, such as thin wings and streamlined bodies, may be violated by birds, potentially introducing additional error. To investigate the applicability of the existing models to calculate the aerodynamic performance of bird flight, we compared predictions using simulated wakes with those calculated directly from forces on the bird surface, both derived from computational fluid dynamics of a high-fidelity barn owl geometry in free gliding flight. Two lift models and two drag models are assessed. We show that the generalized Kutta–Joukowski model, corrected by the streamwise velocity, can predict not only the lift but also span loading well. Drag was predicted best by a drag model based on the conservation of fluid momentum in a control volume. Finally, we estimated force production for three raptor species across nine gliding flights by applying the best lift model to wake flow fields measured with particle tracking velocimetry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-6631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7666</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0226182</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39319010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHFLE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Aerodynamic forces ; Aerodynamics ; Aircraft performance ; Aircraft wakes ; Birds ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Drag ; Error analysis ; Error correction ; Flight characteristics ; Flow theory ; Fluid flow ; Gliding ; Inviscid flow ; Lift ; Mathematical models ; Particle tracking ; Particle tracking velocimetry ; Performance prediction ; Predictive control ; Reynolds number ; Streamlined bodies ; Thin wings ; Velocity measurement ; Wildlife conservation ; Wings (aircraft)</subject><ispartof>Physics of fluids (1994), 2024-09, Vol.36 (9), p.091912</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s).</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-6772dbd6d44e394a3ee61b78602ddb44b38245fcf90e8c7ffc98e65128a662db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3244-7766 ; 0000-0002-4748-0510 ; 0000-0002-9952-2612 ; 0000-0001-8794-4677</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,790,4498,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39319010$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, Jialei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Changyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheney, Jorn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usherwood, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomphrey, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of models to estimate flight performance of gliding birds from wakes</title><title>Physics of fluids (1994)</title><addtitle>Phys Fluids (1994)</addtitle><description>Mathematical models based on inviscid flow theory are effective at predicting the aerodynamic forces on large-scale aircraft. Avian flight, however, is characterized by smaller sizes, slower speeds, and increased influence of viscous effects associated with lower Reynolds numbers. Therefore, inviscid mathematical models of avian flight should be used with caution. The assumptions used in such models, such as thin wings and streamlined bodies, may be violated by birds, potentially introducing additional error. To investigate the applicability of the existing models to calculate the aerodynamic performance of bird flight, we compared predictions using simulated wakes with those calculated directly from forces on the bird surface, both derived from computational fluid dynamics of a high-fidelity barn owl geometry in free gliding flight. Two lift models and two drag models are assessed. We show that the generalized Kutta–Joukowski model, corrected by the streamwise velocity, can predict not only the lift but also span loading well. Drag was predicted best by a drag model based on the conservation of fluid momentum in a control volume. Finally, we estimated force production for three raptor species across nine gliding flights by applying the best lift model to wake flow fields measured with particle tracking velocimetry.</description><subject>Aerodynamic forces</subject><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Aircraft performance</subject><subject>Aircraft wakes</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Drag</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Error correction</subject><subject>Flight characteristics</subject><subject>Flow theory</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Gliding</subject><subject>Inviscid flow</subject><subject>Lift</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Particle tracking</subject><subject>Particle tracking velocimetry</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Predictive control</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>Streamlined bodies</subject><subject>Thin wings</subject><subject>Velocity measurement</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wings (aircraft)</subject><issn>1070-6631</issn><issn>1089-7666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MtKxDAUBuAgiqOjC19AAm5U6Jhb02Qpg5eBAUF0XdJcase2GZNW8e1tndGFC1cnHL78HH4ATjCaYcTpVTpDhHAsyA44wEjIJOOc747vDCWcUzwBhzGuEEJUEr4PJlRSLBFGB-Bx0b7b2FWl6irfQu9g442tI-w8HPeN6ix0dVW-dHBtg_OhUa22IyzrylRtCYsqmAhd8A38UK82HoE9p-poj7dzCp5vb57m98ny4W4xv14mmlDRJTzLiCkMN4xZKpmi1nJcZIIjYkzBWEEFYanTTiIrdOaclsLyFBOhOB9-0ik43-Sug3_rh2Pzpora1rVqre9jTjGSjGJM5EDP_tCV70M7XDeqNCU4Y6O62CgdfIzBunwdhgLCZ45RPhadp_m26MGebhP7orHmV_40O4DLDYi66r7L_SftC7c_hII</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Song, Jialei</creator><creator>Chen, Changyao</creator><creator>Cheney, Jorn A.</creator><creator>Usherwood, James R.</creator><creator>Bomphrey, Richard J.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3244-7766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-0510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-2612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8794-4677</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Investigation of models to estimate flight performance of gliding birds from wakes</title><author>Song, Jialei ; Chen, Changyao ; Cheney, Jorn A. ; Usherwood, James R. ; Bomphrey, Richard J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-6772dbd6d44e394a3ee61b78602ddb44b38245fcf90e8c7ffc98e65128a662db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamic forces</topic><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Aircraft performance</topic><topic>Aircraft wakes</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Drag</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Error correction</topic><topic>Flight characteristics</topic><topic>Flow theory</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Gliding</topic><topic>Inviscid flow</topic><topic>Lift</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Particle tracking</topic><topic>Particle tracking velocimetry</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Predictive control</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>Streamlined bodies</topic><topic>Thin wings</topic><topic>Velocity measurement</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wings (aircraft)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Jialei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Changyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheney, Jorn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usherwood, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomphrey, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics of fluids (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Jialei</au><au>Chen, Changyao</au><au>Cheney, Jorn A.</au><au>Usherwood, James R.</au><au>Bomphrey, Richard J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of models to estimate flight performance of gliding birds from wakes</atitle><jtitle>Physics of fluids (1994)</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Fluids (1994)</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>091912</spage><pages>091912-</pages><issn>1070-6631</issn><eissn>1089-7666</eissn><coden>PHFLE6</coden><abstract>Mathematical models based on inviscid flow theory are effective at predicting the aerodynamic forces on large-scale aircraft. Avian flight, however, is characterized by smaller sizes, slower speeds, and increased influence of viscous effects associated with lower Reynolds numbers. Therefore, inviscid mathematical models of avian flight should be used with caution. The assumptions used in such models, such as thin wings and streamlined bodies, may be violated by birds, potentially introducing additional error. To investigate the applicability of the existing models to calculate the aerodynamic performance of bird flight, we compared predictions using simulated wakes with those calculated directly from forces on the bird surface, both derived from computational fluid dynamics of a high-fidelity barn owl geometry in free gliding flight. Two lift models and two drag models are assessed. We show that the generalized Kutta–Joukowski model, corrected by the streamwise velocity, can predict not only the lift but also span loading well. Drag was predicted best by a drag model based on the conservation of fluid momentum in a control volume. Finally, we estimated force production for three raptor species across nine gliding flights by applying the best lift model to wake flow fields measured with particle tracking velocimetry.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><pmid>39319010</pmid><doi>10.1063/5.0226182</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3244-7766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-0510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-2612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8794-4677</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1070-6631
ispartof Physics of fluids (1994), 2024-09, Vol.36 (9), p.091912
issn 1070-6631
1089-7666
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_5_0226182
source AIP Journals Complete
subjects Aerodynamic forces
Aerodynamics
Aircraft performance
Aircraft wakes
Birds
Computational fluid dynamics
Drag
Error analysis
Error correction
Flight characteristics
Flow theory
Fluid flow
Gliding
Inviscid flow
Lift
Mathematical models
Particle tracking
Particle tracking velocimetry
Performance prediction
Predictive control
Reynolds number
Streamlined bodies
Thin wings
Velocity measurement
Wildlife conservation
Wings (aircraft)
title Investigation of models to estimate flight performance of gliding birds from wakes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T07%3A29%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20models%20to%20estimate%20flight%20performance%20of%20gliding%20birds%20from%20wakes&rft.jtitle=Physics%20of%20fluids%20(1994)&rft.au=Song,%20Jialei&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=091912&rft.pages=091912-&rft.issn=1070-6631&rft.eissn=1089-7666&rft.coden=PHFLE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0226182&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3109431129%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3105521749&rft_id=info:pmid/39319010&rfr_iscdi=true