Adiabatic ionization energies of RuC, RhC, OsC, IrC, and PtC

The ionization energies (IEs) of RuC, RhC, OsC, IrC, and PtC are assigned by the measurement of their two-photon ionization thresholds. Although late transition metal–carbon bonds are of major importance in organometallic chemistry and catalysis, accurate and precise fundamental thermochemical data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of chemical physics 2024-02, Vol.160 (8)
Hauptverfasser: Merriles, Dakota M., Barrera-Casas, Yexalen, Knapp, Annie S., Morse, Michael D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title The Journal of chemical physics
container_volume 160
creator Merriles, Dakota M.
Barrera-Casas, Yexalen
Knapp, Annie S.
Morse, Michael D.
description The ionization energies (IEs) of RuC, RhC, OsC, IrC, and PtC are assigned by the measurement of their two-photon ionization thresholds. Although late transition metal–carbon bonds are of major importance in organometallic chemistry and catalysis, accurate and precise fundamental thermochemical data on these chemical bonds are mainly lacking in the literature. Based on their two-photon ionization thresholds, in this work, we assign IE(RuC) = 7.439(40) eV, IE(RhC) = 7.458(32) eV, IE(OsC) = 8.647(25) eV, IE(IrC) = 8.933(74) eV, and IE(PtC) = 9.397(32) eV. These experimentally derived IEs are further confirmed through quantum chemical calculations using coupled-cluster single double perturbative triple methods that are extrapolated to the complete basis set limit using a three-parameter mixed Gaussian/exponential extrapolation scheme and corrected for spin–orbit effects using a semiempirical method. The electronic structure and chemical bonding of these MC species are discussed in the context of these ionization energy measurements. The IEs of RuC, RhC, OsC, and IrC closely mirror the IEs of the corresponding transition metal atoms, suggesting that for these species, the (n + 1)s electrons of the transition metals are not significantly involved in chemical bonding.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0194848
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_5_0194848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2930972565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-2b6df43a6ed8a1316f12622504bb3dbb468d60b7ec9ed6270f1a9400101c2f4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUw8AdQJCYQKXe248QSSxXxUalSUQVzZMcOpKJJsZMBfj2GFEaW92549N7pIeQUYYog2HUyBZQ849keGSNkMk6FhH0yBqAYSwFiRI68XwMAppQfkhHLmETAbExuZqZWWnV1GdVtU3-GrW0i21j3UlsftVW06vOraPUaYulDzF0I1ZjoscuPyUGl3rw92c0Jeb67fcof4sXyfp7PFnHJELqYamEqzpSwJlPIUFRIBaUJcK2Z0ZqLzAjQqS2lNYKmUKGSPDwLWNKKGzYh50Pv1rXvvfVdsW5714STBZUMZEoTkQTqYqBK13rvbFVsXb1R7qNAKL49FUmx8xTYs11jrzfW_JG_YgJwOQC-rLsfKf-0fQHIKWtq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2930972565</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adiabatic ionization energies of RuC, RhC, OsC, IrC, and PtC</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Merriles, Dakota M. ; Barrera-Casas, Yexalen ; Knapp, Annie S. ; Morse, Michael D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Merriles, Dakota M. ; Barrera-Casas, Yexalen ; Knapp, Annie S. ; Morse, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><description>The ionization energies (IEs) of RuC, RhC, OsC, IrC, and PtC are assigned by the measurement of their two-photon ionization thresholds. Although late transition metal–carbon bonds are of major importance in organometallic chemistry and catalysis, accurate and precise fundamental thermochemical data on these chemical bonds are mainly lacking in the literature. Based on their two-photon ionization thresholds, in this work, we assign IE(RuC) = 7.439(40) eV, IE(RhC) = 7.458(32) eV, IE(OsC) = 8.647(25) eV, IE(IrC) = 8.933(74) eV, and IE(PtC) = 9.397(32) eV. These experimentally derived IEs are further confirmed through quantum chemical calculations using coupled-cluster single double perturbative triple methods that are extrapolated to the complete basis set limit using a three-parameter mixed Gaussian/exponential extrapolation scheme and corrected for spin–orbit effects using a semiempirical method. The electronic structure and chemical bonding of these MC species are discussed in the context of these ionization energy measurements. The IEs of RuC, RhC, OsC, and IrC closely mirror the IEs of the corresponding transition metal atoms, suggesting that for these species, the (n + 1)s electrons of the transition metals are not significantly involved in chemical bonding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0194848</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38391018</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Chemical bonds ; Electronic structure ; Ionization ; Organometallic compounds ; Photons ; Quantum chemistry ; Thresholds ; Transition metals</subject><ispartof>The Journal of chemical physics, 2024-02, Vol.160 (8)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-2b6df43a6ed8a1316f12622504bb3dbb468d60b7ec9ed6270f1a9400101c2f4d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3662-358X ; 0000-0003-1363-1306 ; 0000-0002-2386-7315</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jcp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0194848$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,790,4498,27901,27902,76353</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38391018$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merriles, Dakota M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrera-Casas, Yexalen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Annie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morse, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><title>Adiabatic ionization energies of RuC, RhC, OsC, IrC, and PtC</title><title>The Journal of chemical physics</title><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><description>The ionization energies (IEs) of RuC, RhC, OsC, IrC, and PtC are assigned by the measurement of their two-photon ionization thresholds. Although late transition metal–carbon bonds are of major importance in organometallic chemistry and catalysis, accurate and precise fundamental thermochemical data on these chemical bonds are mainly lacking in the literature. Based on their two-photon ionization thresholds, in this work, we assign IE(RuC) = 7.439(40) eV, IE(RhC) = 7.458(32) eV, IE(OsC) = 8.647(25) eV, IE(IrC) = 8.933(74) eV, and IE(PtC) = 9.397(32) eV. These experimentally derived IEs are further confirmed through quantum chemical calculations using coupled-cluster single double perturbative triple methods that are extrapolated to the complete basis set limit using a three-parameter mixed Gaussian/exponential extrapolation scheme and corrected for spin–orbit effects using a semiempirical method. The electronic structure and chemical bonding of these MC species are discussed in the context of these ionization energy measurements. The IEs of RuC, RhC, OsC, and IrC closely mirror the IEs of the corresponding transition metal atoms, suggesting that for these species, the (n + 1)s electrons of the transition metals are not significantly involved in chemical bonding.</description><subject>Chemical bonds</subject><subject>Electronic structure</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>Organometallic compounds</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Quantum chemistry</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Transition metals</subject><issn>0021-9606</issn><issn>1089-7690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUw8AdQJCYQKXe248QSSxXxUalSUQVzZMcOpKJJsZMBfj2GFEaW92549N7pIeQUYYog2HUyBZQ849keGSNkMk6FhH0yBqAYSwFiRI68XwMAppQfkhHLmETAbExuZqZWWnV1GdVtU3-GrW0i21j3UlsftVW06vOraPUaYulDzF0I1ZjoscuPyUGl3rw92c0Jeb67fcof4sXyfp7PFnHJELqYamEqzpSwJlPIUFRIBaUJcK2Z0ZqLzAjQqS2lNYKmUKGSPDwLWNKKGzYh50Pv1rXvvfVdsW5714STBZUMZEoTkQTqYqBK13rvbFVsXb1R7qNAKL49FUmx8xTYs11jrzfW_JG_YgJwOQC-rLsfKf-0fQHIKWtq</recordid><startdate>20240228</startdate><enddate>20240228</enddate><creator>Merriles, Dakota M.</creator><creator>Barrera-Casas, Yexalen</creator><creator>Knapp, Annie S.</creator><creator>Morse, Michael D.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3662-358X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1363-1306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2386-7315</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240228</creationdate><title>Adiabatic ionization energies of RuC, RhC, OsC, IrC, and PtC</title><author>Merriles, Dakota M. ; Barrera-Casas, Yexalen ; Knapp, Annie S. ; Morse, Michael D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-2b6df43a6ed8a1316f12622504bb3dbb468d60b7ec9ed6270f1a9400101c2f4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Chemical bonds</topic><topic>Electronic structure</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>Organometallic compounds</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Quantum chemistry</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Transition metals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merriles, Dakota M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrera-Casas, Yexalen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Annie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morse, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merriles, Dakota M.</au><au>Barrera-Casas, Yexalen</au><au>Knapp, Annie S.</au><au>Morse, Michael D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adiabatic ionization energies of RuC, RhC, OsC, IrC, and PtC</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><date>2024-02-28</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>160</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>0021-9606</issn><eissn>1089-7690</eissn><coden>JCPSA6</coden><abstract>The ionization energies (IEs) of RuC, RhC, OsC, IrC, and PtC are assigned by the measurement of their two-photon ionization thresholds. Although late transition metal–carbon bonds are of major importance in organometallic chemistry and catalysis, accurate and precise fundamental thermochemical data on these chemical bonds are mainly lacking in the literature. Based on their two-photon ionization thresholds, in this work, we assign IE(RuC) = 7.439(40) eV, IE(RhC) = 7.458(32) eV, IE(OsC) = 8.647(25) eV, IE(IrC) = 8.933(74) eV, and IE(PtC) = 9.397(32) eV. These experimentally derived IEs are further confirmed through quantum chemical calculations using coupled-cluster single double perturbative triple methods that are extrapolated to the complete basis set limit using a three-parameter mixed Gaussian/exponential extrapolation scheme and corrected for spin–orbit effects using a semiempirical method. The electronic structure and chemical bonding of these MC species are discussed in the context of these ionization energy measurements. The IEs of RuC, RhC, OsC, and IrC closely mirror the IEs of the corresponding transition metal atoms, suggesting that for these species, the (n + 1)s electrons of the transition metals are not significantly involved in chemical bonding.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><pmid>38391018</pmid><doi>10.1063/5.0194848</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3662-358X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1363-1306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2386-7315</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9606
ispartof The Journal of chemical physics, 2024-02, Vol.160 (8)
issn 0021-9606
1089-7690
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_5_0194848
source AIP Journals Complete
subjects Chemical bonds
Electronic structure
Ionization
Organometallic compounds
Photons
Quantum chemistry
Thresholds
Transition metals
title Adiabatic ionization energies of RuC, RhC, OsC, IrC, and PtC
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T06%3A34%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adiabatic%20ionization%20energies%20of%20RuC,%20RhC,%20OsC,%20IrC,%20and%20PtC&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20chemical%20physics&rft.au=Merriles,%20Dakota%20M.&rft.date=2024-02-28&rft.volume=160&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=0021-9606&rft.eissn=1089-7690&rft.coden=JCPSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0194848&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2930972565%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2930972565&rft_id=info:pmid/38391018&rfr_iscdi=true