Comparison of short-term solar irradiance forecasting methods when weather conditions are complicated

Although the output of a photovoltaic power generation system is significantly positively correlated with solar irradiance, the latter variable is intermittent, random, and volatile. Volatility in solar irradiance is particularly marked when weather conditions are complex, and so, this factor has pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of renewable and sustainable energy 2018-09, Vol.10 (5)
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Yunjun, Cao, Junfei, Wan, Xiaofeng, Zeng, Fanpeng, Xin, Jianbo, Ji, Qingzhao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title Journal of renewable and sustainable energy
container_volume 10
creator Yu, Yunjun
Cao, Junfei
Wan, Xiaofeng
Zeng, Fanpeng
Xin, Jianbo
Ji, Qingzhao
description Although the output of a photovoltaic power generation system is significantly positively correlated with solar irradiance, the latter variable is intermittent, random, and volatile. Volatility in solar irradiance is particularly marked when weather conditions are complex, and so, this factor has proved to be difficult to predict. A neural network (NN)-based approach is applied for short-term predictions in this study based on a timescale that encompasses the amount of irradiance each hour throughout the next day. Thus, a backpropagation NN (BPNN), a radial basis function NN (RBFNN), and an Elman NN (ENN) were selected for use in this analysis. A predictive model was established to evaluate the accuracy of different approaches, given variable meteorological conditions. To reduce the influence of solar irradiance, samples used for forecasts were subdivided into spring, summer, fall, and winter, and the forecast results of sunny and rainy as well as cloudy days in different seasons were investigated. The results of this study reveal that the predictive accuracies of the BPNN and RBFNN were poor on rainy and cloudy days, while the efficiency of the ENN was high and stable in variable meteorological conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.5041905
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_5041905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2110374228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-e211b9748b3e429c116517729e1a22b80f7bdb2563fcff549f760bec233f44123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90N9LwzAQB_AgCs7pg_9BwCeFzlyaNuujDH_BwBd9Dml6sRlrU5PM4X9vx0QFwae7gw_f446Qc2AzYGV-DbOCCahYcUAmUAnIJAN--Ks_JicxrhgrOSv4hODCd4MOLvqeektj60PKEoaORr_WgboQdON0b5BaH9DomFz_SjtMrW8i3bbY0y3q1GKgxveNS873keqA49gNa2d0wuaUHFm9jnj2Vafk5e72efGQLZ_uHxc3y8zkXKYMOUBdSTGvcxS8MgBlAVLyCkFzXs-ZlXVT86LMrbG2EJWVJavR8Dy3QgDPp-RinzsE_7bBmNTKb0I_rlRjNMul4Hw-qsu9MsHHGNCqIbhOhw8FTO2-qEB9fXG0V3sbjUt6d9w3fvfhB6qhsf_hv8mfPKSA_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2110374228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of short-term solar irradiance forecasting methods when weather conditions are complicated</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Yu, Yunjun ; Cao, Junfei ; Wan, Xiaofeng ; Zeng, Fanpeng ; Xin, Jianbo ; Ji, Qingzhao</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yunjun ; Cao, Junfei ; Wan, Xiaofeng ; Zeng, Fanpeng ; Xin, Jianbo ; Ji, Qingzhao</creatorcontrib><description>Although the output of a photovoltaic power generation system is significantly positively correlated with solar irradiance, the latter variable is intermittent, random, and volatile. Volatility in solar irradiance is particularly marked when weather conditions are complex, and so, this factor has proved to be difficult to predict. A neural network (NN)-based approach is applied for short-term predictions in this study based on a timescale that encompasses the amount of irradiance each hour throughout the next day. Thus, a backpropagation NN (BPNN), a radial basis function NN (RBFNN), and an Elman NN (ENN) were selected for use in this analysis. A predictive model was established to evaluate the accuracy of different approaches, given variable meteorological conditions. To reduce the influence of solar irradiance, samples used for forecasts were subdivided into spring, summer, fall, and winter, and the forecast results of sunny and rainy as well as cloudy days in different seasons were investigated. The results of this study reveal that the predictive accuracies of the BPNN and RBFNN were poor on rainy and cloudy days, while the efficiency of the ENN was high and stable in variable meteorological conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-7012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-7012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.5041905</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRSEBH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Back propagation ; Basis functions ; Economic forecasting ; Irradiance ; Model accuracy ; Neural networks ; Prediction models ; Radial basis function ; Volatility ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Journal of renewable and sustainable energy, 2018-09, Vol.10 (5)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2018 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-e211b9748b3e429c116517729e1a22b80f7bdb2563fcff549f760bec233f44123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-e211b9748b3e429c116517729e1a22b80f7bdb2563fcff549f760bec233f44123</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5862-3102</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jrse/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.5041905$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,790,4498,27901,27902,76127</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yunjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Junfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Fanpeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Jianbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Qingzhao</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of short-term solar irradiance forecasting methods when weather conditions are complicated</title><title>Journal of renewable and sustainable energy</title><description>Although the output of a photovoltaic power generation system is significantly positively correlated with solar irradiance, the latter variable is intermittent, random, and volatile. Volatility in solar irradiance is particularly marked when weather conditions are complex, and so, this factor has proved to be difficult to predict. A neural network (NN)-based approach is applied for short-term predictions in this study based on a timescale that encompasses the amount of irradiance each hour throughout the next day. Thus, a backpropagation NN (BPNN), a radial basis function NN (RBFNN), and an Elman NN (ENN) were selected for use in this analysis. A predictive model was established to evaluate the accuracy of different approaches, given variable meteorological conditions. To reduce the influence of solar irradiance, samples used for forecasts were subdivided into spring, summer, fall, and winter, and the forecast results of sunny and rainy as well as cloudy days in different seasons were investigated. The results of this study reveal that the predictive accuracies of the BPNN and RBFNN were poor on rainy and cloudy days, while the efficiency of the ENN was high and stable in variable meteorological conditions.</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Back propagation</subject><subject>Basis functions</subject><subject>Economic forecasting</subject><subject>Irradiance</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Radial basis function</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>1941-7012</issn><issn>1941-7012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90N9LwzAQB_AgCs7pg_9BwCeFzlyaNuujDH_BwBd9Dml6sRlrU5PM4X9vx0QFwae7gw_f446Qc2AzYGV-DbOCCahYcUAmUAnIJAN--Ks_JicxrhgrOSv4hODCd4MOLvqeektj60PKEoaORr_WgboQdON0b5BaH9DomFz_SjtMrW8i3bbY0y3q1GKgxveNS873keqA49gNa2d0wuaUHFm9jnj2Vafk5e72efGQLZ_uHxc3y8zkXKYMOUBdSTGvcxS8MgBlAVLyCkFzXs-ZlXVT86LMrbG2EJWVJavR8Dy3QgDPp-RinzsE_7bBmNTKb0I_rlRjNMul4Hw-qsu9MsHHGNCqIbhOhw8FTO2-qEB9fXG0V3sbjUt6d9w3fvfhB6qhsf_hv8mfPKSA_Q</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Yu, Yunjun</creator><creator>Cao, Junfei</creator><creator>Wan, Xiaofeng</creator><creator>Zeng, Fanpeng</creator><creator>Xin, Jianbo</creator><creator>Ji, Qingzhao</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5862-3102</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Comparison of short-term solar irradiance forecasting methods when weather conditions are complicated</title><author>Yu, Yunjun ; Cao, Junfei ; Wan, Xiaofeng ; Zeng, Fanpeng ; Xin, Jianbo ; Ji, Qingzhao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-e211b9748b3e429c116517729e1a22b80f7bdb2563fcff549f760bec233f44123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Back propagation</topic><topic>Basis functions</topic><topic>Economic forecasting</topic><topic>Irradiance</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Radial basis function</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yunjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Junfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Fanpeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Jianbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Qingzhao</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of renewable and sustainable energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Yunjun</au><au>Cao, Junfei</au><au>Wan, Xiaofeng</au><au>Zeng, Fanpeng</au><au>Xin, Jianbo</au><au>Ji, Qingzhao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of short-term solar irradiance forecasting methods when weather conditions are complicated</atitle><jtitle>Journal of renewable and sustainable energy</jtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>1941-7012</issn><eissn>1941-7012</eissn><coden>JRSEBH</coden><abstract>Although the output of a photovoltaic power generation system is significantly positively correlated with solar irradiance, the latter variable is intermittent, random, and volatile. Volatility in solar irradiance is particularly marked when weather conditions are complex, and so, this factor has proved to be difficult to predict. A neural network (NN)-based approach is applied for short-term predictions in this study based on a timescale that encompasses the amount of irradiance each hour throughout the next day. Thus, a backpropagation NN (BPNN), a radial basis function NN (RBFNN), and an Elman NN (ENN) were selected for use in this analysis. A predictive model was established to evaluate the accuracy of different approaches, given variable meteorological conditions. To reduce the influence of solar irradiance, samples used for forecasts were subdivided into spring, summer, fall, and winter, and the forecast results of sunny and rainy as well as cloudy days in different seasons were investigated. The results of this study reveal that the predictive accuracies of the BPNN and RBFNN were poor on rainy and cloudy days, while the efficiency of the ENN was high and stable in variable meteorological conditions.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.5041905</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5862-3102</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1941-7012
ispartof Journal of renewable and sustainable energy, 2018-09, Vol.10 (5)
issn 1941-7012
1941-7012
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_5041905
source AIP Journals Complete
subjects Artificial neural networks
Back propagation
Basis functions
Economic forecasting
Irradiance
Model accuracy
Neural networks
Prediction models
Radial basis function
Volatility
Weather forecasting
title Comparison of short-term solar irradiance forecasting methods when weather conditions are complicated
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A33%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20short-term%20solar%20irradiance%20forecasting%20methods%20when%20weather%20conditions%20are%20complicated&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20renewable%20and%20sustainable%20energy&rft.au=Yu,%20Yunjun&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=1941-7012&rft.eissn=1941-7012&rft.coden=JRSEBH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.5041905&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2110374228%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2110374228&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true