Electrostatic discharge sensitivity of giant magnetoresistive recording heads

In this article electrostatic discharge (ESD) damage to giant magnetoresistive (GMR) recording heads is studied for the first time. The ESD failure threshold was measured using an extremely short duration (1 ns) metal contact ESD transient. The failure energy required to melt the GMR recording head...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied physics 1997-04, Vol.81 (8), p.4921-4923
Hauptverfasser: Wallash, Albert J., Kim, Young K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4923
container_issue 8
container_start_page 4921
container_title Journal of applied physics
container_volume 81
creator Wallash, Albert J.
Kim, Young K.
description In this article electrostatic discharge (ESD) damage to giant magnetoresistive (GMR) recording heads is studied for the first time. The ESD failure threshold was measured using an extremely short duration (1 ns) metal contact ESD transient. The failure energy required to melt the GMR recording head was 2.3 nJ, about half of the 5 nJ of energy needed to melt a conventional anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) head design. Scanning electron microscope scans of ESD damaged AMR and GMR heads show localized melting of the sensors. It is concluded that recording heads with GMR sensors, planned for use in the near future, will have significantly lower ESD failure thresholds than AMR recording heads in use today. Finally, scaling arguments show that an AMR head design with the same reduced cross-sectional area of the GMR head has a comparable ESD failure threshold.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.364819
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_364819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1063_1_364819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-cc532dcc87dc537b1d340fa8cbdff2303819f9ef603f96ce00a4875c5c9eb093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LAzEURYMoWKvgT8jSzdT3JvORLKVUK1TcdD9kXl6mkXZGkiD03ztSV_fChcvhCPGIsEJo1DOuVFNpNFdigaBN0dY1XIsFQImFNq25FXcpfQEgamUW4mNzZMpxStnmQNKFRAcbB5aJxxRy-An5LCcvh2DHLE92GDlPkVNI88YyMk3RhXGQB7Yu3Ysbb4-JH_5zKfavm_16W-w-397XL7uCSoO5IKpV6Yh06-bW9uhUBd5q6p33pQI183vDvgHlTUMMYCvd1lST4R6MWoqnyy3N4Cmy775jONl47hC6PwsddhcL6hcWu1Ec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrostatic discharge sensitivity of giant magnetoresistive recording heads</title><source>AIP Digital Archive</source><creator>Wallash, Albert J. ; Kim, Young K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wallash, Albert J. ; Kim, Young K.</creatorcontrib><description>In this article electrostatic discharge (ESD) damage to giant magnetoresistive (GMR) recording heads is studied for the first time. The ESD failure threshold was measured using an extremely short duration (1 ns) metal contact ESD transient. The failure energy required to melt the GMR recording head was 2.3 nJ, about half of the 5 nJ of energy needed to melt a conventional anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) head design. Scanning electron microscope scans of ESD damaged AMR and GMR heads show localized melting of the sensors. It is concluded that recording heads with GMR sensors, planned for use in the near future, will have significantly lower ESD failure thresholds than AMR recording heads in use today. Finally, scaling arguments show that an AMR head design with the same reduced cross-sectional area of the GMR head has a comparable ESD failure threshold.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.364819</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of applied physics, 1997-04, Vol.81 (8), p.4921-4923</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-cc532dcc87dc537b1d340fa8cbdff2303819f9ef603f96ce00a4875c5c9eb093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-cc532dcc87dc537b1d340fa8cbdff2303819f9ef603f96ce00a4875c5c9eb093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wallash, Albert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young K.</creatorcontrib><title>Electrostatic discharge sensitivity of giant magnetoresistive recording heads</title><title>Journal of applied physics</title><description>In this article electrostatic discharge (ESD) damage to giant magnetoresistive (GMR) recording heads is studied for the first time. The ESD failure threshold was measured using an extremely short duration (1 ns) metal contact ESD transient. The failure energy required to melt the GMR recording head was 2.3 nJ, about half of the 5 nJ of energy needed to melt a conventional anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) head design. Scanning electron microscope scans of ESD damaged AMR and GMR heads show localized melting of the sensors. It is concluded that recording heads with GMR sensors, planned for use in the near future, will have significantly lower ESD failure thresholds than AMR recording heads in use today. Finally, scaling arguments show that an AMR head design with the same reduced cross-sectional area of the GMR head has a comparable ESD failure threshold.</description><issn>0021-8979</issn><issn>1089-7550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1LAzEURYMoWKvgT8jSzdT3JvORLKVUK1TcdD9kXl6mkXZGkiD03ztSV_fChcvhCPGIsEJo1DOuVFNpNFdigaBN0dY1XIsFQImFNq25FXcpfQEgamUW4mNzZMpxStnmQNKFRAcbB5aJxxRy-An5LCcvh2DHLE92GDlPkVNI88YyMk3RhXGQB7Yu3Ysbb4-JH_5zKfavm_16W-w-397XL7uCSoO5IKpV6Yh06-bW9uhUBd5q6p33pQI183vDvgHlTUMMYCvd1lST4R6MWoqnyy3N4Cmy775jONl47hC6PwsddhcL6hcWu1Ec</recordid><startdate>19970415</startdate><enddate>19970415</enddate><creator>Wallash, Albert J.</creator><creator>Kim, Young K.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970415</creationdate><title>Electrostatic discharge sensitivity of giant magnetoresistive recording heads</title><author>Wallash, Albert J. ; Kim, Young K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-cc532dcc87dc537b1d340fa8cbdff2303819f9ef603f96ce00a4875c5c9eb093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wallash, Albert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wallash, Albert J.</au><au>Kim, Young K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrostatic discharge sensitivity of giant magnetoresistive recording heads</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle><date>1997-04-15</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4921</spage><epage>4923</epage><pages>4921-4923</pages><issn>0021-8979</issn><eissn>1089-7550</eissn><abstract>In this article electrostatic discharge (ESD) damage to giant magnetoresistive (GMR) recording heads is studied for the first time. The ESD failure threshold was measured using an extremely short duration (1 ns) metal contact ESD transient. The failure energy required to melt the GMR recording head was 2.3 nJ, about half of the 5 nJ of energy needed to melt a conventional anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) head design. Scanning electron microscope scans of ESD damaged AMR and GMR heads show localized melting of the sensors. It is concluded that recording heads with GMR sensors, planned for use in the near future, will have significantly lower ESD failure thresholds than AMR recording heads in use today. Finally, scaling arguments show that an AMR head design with the same reduced cross-sectional area of the GMR head has a comparable ESD failure threshold.</abstract><doi>10.1063/1.364819</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8979
ispartof Journal of applied physics, 1997-04, Vol.81 (8), p.4921-4923
issn 0021-8979
1089-7550
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_364819
source AIP Digital Archive
title Electrostatic discharge sensitivity of giant magnetoresistive recording heads
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A08%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrostatic%20discharge%20sensitivity%20of%20giant%20magnetoresistive%20recording%20heads&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20physics&rft.au=Wallash,%20Albert%20J.&rft.date=1997-04-15&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4921&rft.epage=4923&rft.pages=4921-4923&rft.issn=0021-8979&rft.eissn=1089-7550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.364819&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1063_1_364819%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true