Thermal conductivity and refractive index of hafnia-alumina nanolaminates
Hafnia-alumina nanolaminates show improved smoothness and reduced crystallinity relative to pure hafnia in films formed by atomic layer deposition (ALD). However, typical nanolaminates also show reduced cross-plane thermal conductivity due to the much larger interface density relative to continuous...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied physics 2011-08, Vol.110 (4), p.043526-043526-8 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 043526-8 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 043526 |
container_title | Journal of applied physics |
container_volume | 110 |
creator | Gabriel, Nicholas T. Talghader, Joseph J. |
description | Hafnia-alumina nanolaminates show improved smoothness and reduced crystallinity relative to pure hafnia in films formed by atomic layer deposition (ALD). However, typical nanolaminates also show reduced cross-plane thermal conductivity due to the much larger interface density relative to continuous films. We find that the interface thermal resistance in hafnia-alumina nanolaminates is very low and does not dominate the film thermal conductivity, which is 1.0 to 1.2 W/(m K) at room temperature in 100 nm thin films regardless of the interface density. Measured films had a number of interfaces ranging from 2 to 40, equivalent to interface spacing varying from about 40 to 2 nm. The degree of crystallinity of these films appears to have a much larger effect on thermal conductivity than that of interface density. Cryogenic measurements show good agreement with both the minimum thermal conductivity model for disordered solids and the diffuse mismatch model of interface resistance down to about 80 K before diverging. We find that the films are quite smooth through a 400:5 ratio of hafnia to alumina in terms of ALD cycles, and the refractive index scales as expected with increasing alumina concentration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/1.3626462 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>scitation_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_3626462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jap</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b90cd00569a860ea0b3b6ca3467f77f7a55789c78a7e9a9f306c0bcbf527004c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKxDAQhoMoWFcPvkGuHrJOmiZpLoIsui4seFnPZZombKRNpemK-_Zu2R68CAMzDB8_Px8h9xyWHJR45EuhclWo_IJkHErDtJRwSTKAnLPSaHNNblL6BOC8FCYjm93eDR221PaxOdgxfIfxSDE2dHB-wOnhaIiN-6G9p3v0MSDD9tCFiDRi7FucztGlW3LlsU3ubt4L8vH6slu9se37erN63jIrJIysNmAbAKkMlgocQi1qZVEUSnt9GpRSl8bqErUzaLwAZaG2tZe5BiisWJCHc64d-pROLauvIXQ4HCsO1eSg4tXs4MQ-ndlkw4hj6OP_8Cyi-itC_AJzQmTT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thermal conductivity and refractive index of hafnia-alumina nanolaminates</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>AIP Digital Archive</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gabriel, Nicholas T. ; Talghader, Joseph J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Nicholas T. ; Talghader, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><description>Hafnia-alumina nanolaminates show improved smoothness and reduced crystallinity relative to pure hafnia in films formed by atomic layer deposition (ALD). However, typical nanolaminates also show reduced cross-plane thermal conductivity due to the much larger interface density relative to continuous films. We find that the interface thermal resistance in hafnia-alumina nanolaminates is very low and does not dominate the film thermal conductivity, which is 1.0 to 1.2 W/(m K) at room temperature in 100 nm thin films regardless of the interface density. Measured films had a number of interfaces ranging from 2 to 40, equivalent to interface spacing varying from about 40 to 2 nm. The degree of crystallinity of these films appears to have a much larger effect on thermal conductivity than that of interface density. Cryogenic measurements show good agreement with both the minimum thermal conductivity model for disordered solids and the diffuse mismatch model of interface resistance down to about 80 K before diverging. We find that the films are quite smooth through a 400:5 ratio of hafnia to alumina in terms of ALD cycles, and the refractive index scales as expected with increasing alumina concentration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.3626462</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Institute of Physics</publisher><ispartof>Journal of applied physics, 2011-08, Vol.110 (4), p.043526-043526-8</ispartof><rights>2011 American Institute of Physics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b90cd00569a860ea0b3b6ca3467f77f7a55789c78a7e9a9f306c0bcbf527004c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b90cd00569a860ea0b3b6ca3467f77f7a55789c78a7e9a9f306c0bcbf527004c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jap/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.3626462$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,794,1559,4512,27924,27925,76384,76390</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Nicholas T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talghader, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><title>Thermal conductivity and refractive index of hafnia-alumina nanolaminates</title><title>Journal of applied physics</title><description>Hafnia-alumina nanolaminates show improved smoothness and reduced crystallinity relative to pure hafnia in films formed by atomic layer deposition (ALD). However, typical nanolaminates also show reduced cross-plane thermal conductivity due to the much larger interface density relative to continuous films. We find that the interface thermal resistance in hafnia-alumina nanolaminates is very low and does not dominate the film thermal conductivity, which is 1.0 to 1.2 W/(m K) at room temperature in 100 nm thin films regardless of the interface density. Measured films had a number of interfaces ranging from 2 to 40, equivalent to interface spacing varying from about 40 to 2 nm. The degree of crystallinity of these films appears to have a much larger effect on thermal conductivity than that of interface density. Cryogenic measurements show good agreement with both the minimum thermal conductivity model for disordered solids and the diffuse mismatch model of interface resistance down to about 80 K before diverging. We find that the films are quite smooth through a 400:5 ratio of hafnia to alumina in terms of ALD cycles, and the refractive index scales as expected with increasing alumina concentration.</description><issn>0021-8979</issn><issn>1089-7550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKxDAQhoMoWFcPvkGuHrJOmiZpLoIsui4seFnPZZombKRNpemK-_Zu2R68CAMzDB8_Px8h9xyWHJR45EuhclWo_IJkHErDtJRwSTKAnLPSaHNNblL6BOC8FCYjm93eDR221PaxOdgxfIfxSDE2dHB-wOnhaIiN-6G9p3v0MSDD9tCFiDRi7FucztGlW3LlsU3ubt4L8vH6slu9se37erN63jIrJIysNmAbAKkMlgocQi1qZVEUSnt9GpRSl8bqErUzaLwAZaG2tZe5BiisWJCHc64d-pROLauvIXQ4HCsO1eSg4tXs4MQ-ndlkw4hj6OP_8Cyi-itC_AJzQmTT</recordid><startdate>20110815</startdate><enddate>20110815</enddate><creator>Gabriel, Nicholas T.</creator><creator>Talghader, Joseph J.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110815</creationdate><title>Thermal conductivity and refractive index of hafnia-alumina nanolaminates</title><author>Gabriel, Nicholas T. ; Talghader, Joseph J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b90cd00569a860ea0b3b6ca3467f77f7a55789c78a7e9a9f306c0bcbf527004c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Nicholas T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talghader, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gabriel, Nicholas T.</au><au>Talghader, Joseph J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thermal conductivity and refractive index of hafnia-alumina nanolaminates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle><date>2011-08-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>043526</spage><epage>043526-8</epage><pages>043526-043526-8</pages><issn>0021-8979</issn><eissn>1089-7550</eissn><coden>JAPIAU</coden><abstract>Hafnia-alumina nanolaminates show improved smoothness and reduced crystallinity relative to pure hafnia in films formed by atomic layer deposition (ALD). However, typical nanolaminates also show reduced cross-plane thermal conductivity due to the much larger interface density relative to continuous films. We find that the interface thermal resistance in hafnia-alumina nanolaminates is very low and does not dominate the film thermal conductivity, which is 1.0 to 1.2 W/(m K) at room temperature in 100 nm thin films regardless of the interface density. Measured films had a number of interfaces ranging from 2 to 40, equivalent to interface spacing varying from about 40 to 2 nm. The degree of crystallinity of these films appears to have a much larger effect on thermal conductivity than that of interface density. Cryogenic measurements show good agreement with both the minimum thermal conductivity model for disordered solids and the diffuse mismatch model of interface resistance down to about 80 K before diverging. We find that the films are quite smooth through a 400:5 ratio of hafnia to alumina in terms of ALD cycles, and the refractive index scales as expected with increasing alumina concentration.</abstract><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.3626462</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8979 |
ispartof | Journal of applied physics, 2011-08, Vol.110 (4), p.043526-043526-8 |
issn | 0021-8979 1089-7550 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_3626462 |
source | AIP Journals Complete; AIP Digital Archive; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Thermal conductivity and refractive index of hafnia-alumina nanolaminates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A50%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scitation_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thermal%20conductivity%20and%20refractive%20index%20of%20hafnia-alumina%20nanolaminates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20physics&rft.au=Gabriel,%20Nicholas%20T.&rft.date=2011-08-15&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=043526&rft.epage=043526-8&rft.pages=043526-043526-8&rft.issn=0021-8979&rft.eissn=1089-7550&rft.coden=JAPIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.3626462&rft_dat=%3Cscitation_cross%3Ejap%3C/scitation_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |