How predictable is the current perpendicular to plane magnetoresistance? (invited)

Prior measurements of the current perpendicular to the layer planes (CPP) resistances, taken on Co/Cu/Py/Cu (Py=Ni84Fe16) multilayers with a single pair of Co and Py thicknesses, are extended to three additional pairs of thicknesses. The same parameters, obtained from independent measurements on Co/...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied physics 1996-04, Vol.79 (8), p.5811-5815
Hauptverfasser: Pratt, W. P., Yang, Q., Henry, L. L., Holody, P., Chiang, W.-C., Schroeder, P. A., Bass, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5815
container_issue 8
container_start_page 5811
container_title Journal of applied physics
container_volume 79
creator Pratt, W. P.
Yang, Q.
Henry, L. L.
Holody, P.
Chiang, W.-C.
Schroeder, P. A.
Bass, J.
description Prior measurements of the current perpendicular to the layer planes (CPP) resistances, taken on Co/Cu/Py/Cu (Py=Ni84Fe16) multilayers with a single pair of Co and Py thicknesses, are extended to three additional pairs of thicknesses. The same parameters, obtained from independent measurements on Co/Cu and Py/Cu multilayers that fit the original pair reasonably well, fit the three new pairs almost as well, from which we conclude that there is substantial predictability in the CPP magnetoresistance (MR). Because the predictability is not perfect, we examine the extent to which we can improve the fits to the Co/Cu/Py/Cu data by varying the Py/Cu and Co/Cu parameters within their uncertainties, without substantially weakening the fits to the original Co/Cu and Py/Cu data. We conclude by presenting the first CPP-MR measurements on Co/Ag/Py/Ag multilayers. The data are similar to those for Co/Cu/Py/Cu multilayers, but the Co/Ag/Py/Ag MRs are noticeably larger.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.361845
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_361845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1063_1_361845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-a79c466491c7810ffccf8a8b90e80cf9fe7e81b4519575382edc4ca1fac64aaa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMFKxDAUAIMoWFfBT8hxPXTNa9I2OYks6goLgui5vL6-aKXbliSr-Pcq62kOA3MYIS5BrUBV-hpWugJryiORgbIur8tSHYtMqQJy62p3Ks5i_FAKwGqXiefN9CXnwF1PCduBZR9lemdJ-xB4THLmMPP4a_cDBpkmOQ84stzh28hpChz7mHAkvpHLfvzsE3dX5-LE4xD54p8L8Xp_97Le5Nunh8f17TanwkHKsXZkqso4oNqC8p7IW7StU2wVeee5ZgutKcGVdaltwR0ZQvBIlUFEvRDLQ5fCFGNg38yh32H4bkA1fy8aaA4v9A9vgVJY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>How predictable is the current perpendicular to plane magnetoresistance? (invited)</title><source>AIP Digital Archive</source><creator>Pratt, W. P. ; Yang, Q. ; Henry, L. L. ; Holody, P. ; Chiang, W.-C. ; Schroeder, P. A. ; Bass, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pratt, W. P. ; Yang, Q. ; Henry, L. L. ; Holody, P. ; Chiang, W.-C. ; Schroeder, P. A. ; Bass, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Prior measurements of the current perpendicular to the layer planes (CPP) resistances, taken on Co/Cu/Py/Cu (Py=Ni84Fe16) multilayers with a single pair of Co and Py thicknesses, are extended to three additional pairs of thicknesses. The same parameters, obtained from independent measurements on Co/Cu and Py/Cu multilayers that fit the original pair reasonably well, fit the three new pairs almost as well, from which we conclude that there is substantial predictability in the CPP magnetoresistance (MR). Because the predictability is not perfect, we examine the extent to which we can improve the fits to the Co/Cu/Py/Cu data by varying the Py/Cu and Co/Cu parameters within their uncertainties, without substantially weakening the fits to the original Co/Cu and Py/Cu data. We conclude by presenting the first CPP-MR measurements on Co/Ag/Py/Ag multilayers. The data are similar to those for Co/Cu/Py/Cu multilayers, but the Co/Ag/Py/Ag MRs are noticeably larger.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.361845</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of applied physics, 1996-04, Vol.79 (8), p.5811-5815</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-a79c466491c7810ffccf8a8b90e80cf9fe7e81b4519575382edc4ca1fac64aaa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-a79c466491c7810ffccf8a8b90e80cf9fe7e81b4519575382edc4ca1fac64aaa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pratt, W. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, L. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holody, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, W.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, P. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bass, J.</creatorcontrib><title>How predictable is the current perpendicular to plane magnetoresistance? (invited)</title><title>Journal of applied physics</title><description>Prior measurements of the current perpendicular to the layer planes (CPP) resistances, taken on Co/Cu/Py/Cu (Py=Ni84Fe16) multilayers with a single pair of Co and Py thicknesses, are extended to three additional pairs of thicknesses. The same parameters, obtained from independent measurements on Co/Cu and Py/Cu multilayers that fit the original pair reasonably well, fit the three new pairs almost as well, from which we conclude that there is substantial predictability in the CPP magnetoresistance (MR). Because the predictability is not perfect, we examine the extent to which we can improve the fits to the Co/Cu/Py/Cu data by varying the Py/Cu and Co/Cu parameters within their uncertainties, without substantially weakening the fits to the original Co/Cu and Py/Cu data. We conclude by presenting the first CPP-MR measurements on Co/Ag/Py/Ag multilayers. The data are similar to those for Co/Cu/Py/Cu multilayers, but the Co/Ag/Py/Ag MRs are noticeably larger.</description><issn>0021-8979</issn><issn>1089-7550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkMFKxDAUAIMoWFfBT8hxPXTNa9I2OYks6goLgui5vL6-aKXbliSr-Pcq62kOA3MYIS5BrUBV-hpWugJryiORgbIur8tSHYtMqQJy62p3Ks5i_FAKwGqXiefN9CXnwF1PCduBZR9lemdJ-xB4THLmMPP4a_cDBpkmOQ84stzh28hpChz7mHAkvpHLfvzsE3dX5-LE4xD54p8L8Xp_97Le5Nunh8f17TanwkHKsXZkqso4oNqC8p7IW7StU2wVeee5ZgutKcGVdaltwR0ZQvBIlUFEvRDLQ5fCFGNg38yh32H4bkA1fy8aaA4v9A9vgVJY</recordid><startdate>19960415</startdate><enddate>19960415</enddate><creator>Pratt, W. P.</creator><creator>Yang, Q.</creator><creator>Henry, L. L.</creator><creator>Holody, P.</creator><creator>Chiang, W.-C.</creator><creator>Schroeder, P. A.</creator><creator>Bass, J.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960415</creationdate><title>How predictable is the current perpendicular to plane magnetoresistance? (invited)</title><author>Pratt, W. P. ; Yang, Q. ; Henry, L. L. ; Holody, P. ; Chiang, W.-C. ; Schroeder, P. A. ; Bass, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-a79c466491c7810ffccf8a8b90e80cf9fe7e81b4519575382edc4ca1fac64aaa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pratt, W. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, L. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holody, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, W.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, P. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bass, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pratt, W. P.</au><au>Yang, Q.</au><au>Henry, L. L.</au><au>Holody, P.</au><au>Chiang, W.-C.</au><au>Schroeder, P. A.</au><au>Bass, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How predictable is the current perpendicular to plane magnetoresistance? (invited)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle><date>1996-04-15</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>5811</spage><epage>5815</epage><pages>5811-5815</pages><issn>0021-8979</issn><eissn>1089-7550</eissn><abstract>Prior measurements of the current perpendicular to the layer planes (CPP) resistances, taken on Co/Cu/Py/Cu (Py=Ni84Fe16) multilayers with a single pair of Co and Py thicknesses, are extended to three additional pairs of thicknesses. The same parameters, obtained from independent measurements on Co/Cu and Py/Cu multilayers that fit the original pair reasonably well, fit the three new pairs almost as well, from which we conclude that there is substantial predictability in the CPP magnetoresistance (MR). Because the predictability is not perfect, we examine the extent to which we can improve the fits to the Co/Cu/Py/Cu data by varying the Py/Cu and Co/Cu parameters within their uncertainties, without substantially weakening the fits to the original Co/Cu and Py/Cu data. We conclude by presenting the first CPP-MR measurements on Co/Ag/Py/Ag multilayers. The data are similar to those for Co/Cu/Py/Cu multilayers, but the Co/Ag/Py/Ag MRs are noticeably larger.</abstract><doi>10.1063/1.361845</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8979
ispartof Journal of applied physics, 1996-04, Vol.79 (8), p.5811-5815
issn 0021-8979
1089-7550
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_361845
source AIP Digital Archive
title How predictable is the current perpendicular to plane magnetoresistance? (invited)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A47%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20predictable%20is%20the%20current%20perpendicular%20to%20plane%20magnetoresistance?%20(invited)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20physics&rft.au=Pratt,%20W.%20P.&rft.date=1996-04-15&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=5811&rft.epage=5815&rft.pages=5811-5815&rft.issn=0021-8979&rft.eissn=1089-7550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.361845&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1063_1_361845%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true