Comparison of full multiple spawning, trajectory surface hopping, and converged quantum mechanics for electronically nonadiabatic dynamics

We present calculations employing the simplest version of the full multiple spawning method, FMS-M or minimal FMS, for electronically nonadiabatic quantum dynamics using three model potential energy matrices with different strengths and ranges for the diabatic coupling. We first demonstrate stabilit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of chemical physics 2001-07, Vol.115 (3), p.1172-1186
Hauptverfasser: Hack, Michael D., Wensmann, Amanda M., Truhlar, Donald G., Ben-Nun, M., Martı́nez, Todd J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1186
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1172
container_title The Journal of chemical physics
container_volume 115
creator Hack, Michael D.
Wensmann, Amanda M.
Truhlar, Donald G.
Ben-Nun, M.
Martı́nez, Todd J.
description We present calculations employing the simplest version of the full multiple spawning method, FMS-M or minimal FMS, for electronically nonadiabatic quantum dynamics using three model potential energy matrices with different strengths and ranges for the diabatic coupling. We first demonstrate stability of the branching probabilities and final energy distributions with respect to the parameters in the FMS-M method. We then compare the method to a variety of other semiclassical methods, as well as to accurate quantum mechanical results for three-dimensional atom–diatom reactions and quenching processes; the deviations of the semiclassical results from the accurate quantum mechanical ones are averaged over nine cases. In the adiabatic electronic representation, the FMS-M method provides some improvement over Tully’s fewest switches trajectory surface hopping method. However, both methods, irrespective of electronic representation, systematically overpredict the extent of reaction in comparison to the exact quantum mechanical results. The present work provides a baseline for understanding the simplest member of the hierarchy of FMS methods and its relationship to established surface hopping methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.1377030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_1377030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1063_1_1377030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-1ade99e1140381ceb8aa59017f9ca2f0898dba42894ba5120e06c611707363a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUMtKxDAUDaLgOLrwD7IV7Hhv02mbpQy-YMCNrsttmsx0SJOatEp_wa-26qwOh_OAcxi7Rlgh5OIOVyiKAgScsAVCKZMil3DKFgApJjKH_JxdxHgAACzSbMG-N77rKbTRO-4NN6O1vBvt0PZW89jTl2vd7pYPgQ5aDT5MPI7BkNJ87_v-TyPXcOXdpw473fCPkdwwdrzTak-uVZEbH7i2czr4mZO1E3feUdNSTUOreDM56mbjJTszZKO-OuKSvT8-vG2ek-3r08vmfpuoVIohQWq0lBoxA1Gi0nVJtJbzHCMVpWbeXDY1ZWkps5rWmIKGXOWIBRQiF7QWS3bz36uCjzFoU_Wh7ShMFUL1e2KF1fFE8QP3B2dJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of full multiple spawning, trajectory surface hopping, and converged quantum mechanics for electronically nonadiabatic dynamics</title><source>美国小型学会期刊集(AIP Scitation平台)</source><source>AIP_美国物理联合会期刊回溯(NSTL购买)</source><creator>Hack, Michael D. ; Wensmann, Amanda M. ; Truhlar, Donald G. ; Ben-Nun, M. ; Martı́nez, Todd J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hack, Michael D. ; Wensmann, Amanda M. ; Truhlar, Donald G. ; Ben-Nun, M. ; Martı́nez, Todd J.</creatorcontrib><description>We present calculations employing the simplest version of the full multiple spawning method, FMS-M or minimal FMS, for electronically nonadiabatic quantum dynamics using three model potential energy matrices with different strengths and ranges for the diabatic coupling. We first demonstrate stability of the branching probabilities and final energy distributions with respect to the parameters in the FMS-M method. We then compare the method to a variety of other semiclassical methods, as well as to accurate quantum mechanical results for three-dimensional atom–diatom reactions and quenching processes; the deviations of the semiclassical results from the accurate quantum mechanical ones are averaged over nine cases. In the adiabatic electronic representation, the FMS-M method provides some improvement over Tully’s fewest switches trajectory surface hopping method. However, both methods, irrespective of electronic representation, systematically overpredict the extent of reaction in comparison to the exact quantum mechanical results. The present work provides a baseline for understanding the simplest member of the hierarchy of FMS methods and its relationship to established surface hopping methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.1377030</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of chemical physics, 2001-07, Vol.115 (3), p.1172-1186</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-1ade99e1140381ceb8aa59017f9ca2f0898dba42894ba5120e06c611707363a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-1ade99e1140381ceb8aa59017f9ca2f0898dba42894ba5120e06c611707363a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hack, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wensmann, Amanda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truhlar, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Nun, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martı́nez, Todd J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of full multiple spawning, trajectory surface hopping, and converged quantum mechanics for electronically nonadiabatic dynamics</title><title>The Journal of chemical physics</title><description>We present calculations employing the simplest version of the full multiple spawning method, FMS-M or minimal FMS, for electronically nonadiabatic quantum dynamics using three model potential energy matrices with different strengths and ranges for the diabatic coupling. We first demonstrate stability of the branching probabilities and final energy distributions with respect to the parameters in the FMS-M method. We then compare the method to a variety of other semiclassical methods, as well as to accurate quantum mechanical results for three-dimensional atom–diatom reactions and quenching processes; the deviations of the semiclassical results from the accurate quantum mechanical ones are averaged over nine cases. In the adiabatic electronic representation, the FMS-M method provides some improvement over Tully’s fewest switches trajectory surface hopping method. However, both methods, irrespective of electronic representation, systematically overpredict the extent of reaction in comparison to the exact quantum mechanical results. The present work provides a baseline for understanding the simplest member of the hierarchy of FMS methods and its relationship to established surface hopping methods.</description><issn>0021-9606</issn><issn>1089-7690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotUMtKxDAUDaLgOLrwD7IV7Hhv02mbpQy-YMCNrsttmsx0SJOatEp_wa-26qwOh_OAcxi7Rlgh5OIOVyiKAgScsAVCKZMil3DKFgApJjKH_JxdxHgAACzSbMG-N77rKbTRO-4NN6O1vBvt0PZW89jTl2vd7pYPgQ5aDT5MPI7BkNJ87_v-TyPXcOXdpw473fCPkdwwdrzTak-uVZEbH7i2czr4mZO1E3feUdNSTUOreDM56mbjJTszZKO-OuKSvT8-vG2ek-3r08vmfpuoVIohQWq0lBoxA1Gi0nVJtJbzHCMVpWbeXDY1ZWkps5rWmIKGXOWIBRQiF7QWS3bz36uCjzFoU_Wh7ShMFUL1e2KF1fFE8QP3B2dJ</recordid><startdate>20010715</startdate><enddate>20010715</enddate><creator>Hack, Michael D.</creator><creator>Wensmann, Amanda M.</creator><creator>Truhlar, Donald G.</creator><creator>Ben-Nun, M.</creator><creator>Martı́nez, Todd J.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010715</creationdate><title>Comparison of full multiple spawning, trajectory surface hopping, and converged quantum mechanics for electronically nonadiabatic dynamics</title><author>Hack, Michael D. ; Wensmann, Amanda M. ; Truhlar, Donald G. ; Ben-Nun, M. ; Martı́nez, Todd J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-1ade99e1140381ceb8aa59017f9ca2f0898dba42894ba5120e06c611707363a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hack, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wensmann, Amanda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truhlar, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Nun, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martı́nez, Todd J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hack, Michael D.</au><au>Wensmann, Amanda M.</au><au>Truhlar, Donald G.</au><au>Ben-Nun, M.</au><au>Martı́nez, Todd J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of full multiple spawning, trajectory surface hopping, and converged quantum mechanics for electronically nonadiabatic dynamics</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle><date>2001-07-15</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1172</spage><epage>1186</epage><pages>1172-1186</pages><issn>0021-9606</issn><eissn>1089-7690</eissn><abstract>We present calculations employing the simplest version of the full multiple spawning method, FMS-M or minimal FMS, for electronically nonadiabatic quantum dynamics using three model potential energy matrices with different strengths and ranges for the diabatic coupling. We first demonstrate stability of the branching probabilities and final energy distributions with respect to the parameters in the FMS-M method. We then compare the method to a variety of other semiclassical methods, as well as to accurate quantum mechanical results for three-dimensional atom–diatom reactions and quenching processes; the deviations of the semiclassical results from the accurate quantum mechanical ones are averaged over nine cases. In the adiabatic electronic representation, the FMS-M method provides some improvement over Tully’s fewest switches trajectory surface hopping method. However, both methods, irrespective of electronic representation, systematically overpredict the extent of reaction in comparison to the exact quantum mechanical results. The present work provides a baseline for understanding the simplest member of the hierarchy of FMS methods and its relationship to established surface hopping methods.</abstract><doi>10.1063/1.1377030</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9606
ispartof The Journal of chemical physics, 2001-07, Vol.115 (3), p.1172-1186
issn 0021-9606
1089-7690
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_1377030
source 美国小型学会期刊集(AIP Scitation平台); AIP_美国物理联合会期刊回溯(NSTL购买)
title Comparison of full multiple spawning, trajectory surface hopping, and converged quantum mechanics for electronically nonadiabatic dynamics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T06%3A57%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20full%20multiple%20spawning,%20trajectory%20surface%20hopping,%20and%20converged%20quantum%20mechanics%20for%20electronically%20nonadiabatic%20dynamics&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20chemical%20physics&rft.au=Hack,%20Michael%20D.&rft.date=2001-07-15&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1172&rft.epage=1186&rft.pages=1172-1186&rft.issn=0021-9606&rft.eissn=1089-7690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.1377030&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1063_1_1377030%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true