Comparative influence of bias and nucleation layer thickness on the heteroepitaxial growth of InN on AlN-nucleated (111) silicon and (00.1) sapphire

The effects of bias and nucleation layer thickness on heteroepitaxy in thin films of InN grown at 400 °C on semiconducting (111) silicon and insulating (00.1) sapphire are shown to be dramatically different. For example, the thickness of an InN film on nucleated (00.1) sapphire is independent of bia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied physics letters 1993-03, Vol.62 (11), p.1221-1223
Hauptverfasser: KISTENMACHER, T. J, BRYDEN, W. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1223
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1221
container_title Applied physics letters
container_volume 62
creator KISTENMACHER, T. J
BRYDEN, W. A
description The effects of bias and nucleation layer thickness on heteroepitaxy in thin films of InN grown at 400 °C on semiconducting (111) silicon and insulating (00.1) sapphire are shown to be dramatically different. For example, the thickness of an InN film on nucleated (00.1) sapphire is independent of bias, while on nucleated (111) silicon the thickness varies by over a factor of two. Similarly, the excellent epitaxy of the InN films on nucleated (00.1) sapphire is unaffected by bias or AlN layer thickness, while quality epitaxy on nucleated (111) silicon is achieved only in a narrow range of these parameters. Determining the bounds for heteroepitaxial growth on (111) silicon is a crucial first step toward devices incorporating both sources or detectors and processing elements.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.108740
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pascalfrancis_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_108740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4637169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-d694e5cdcb6e1f0725ba2ff10f8fd9318f48e96a7413b3ce20dfa441581084bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqUg8Qg-cCiHgDd2_o5VxU-lqlzgHDnOmhhcJ7JToO_BA-OqFafRzn6aXQ0h18DugOX8HqKUhWAnZAKsKBIOUJ6SCWOMJ3mVwTm5COEjjlnK-YT8LvrNIL0czRdS47TdolNIe00bIwOVrqVuqyxGoHfUyh16OnZGfToMgUZr7JB2OKLvcTCj_DHS0nfff4_dPmTp1ntobtfJMQZbOgOAWxqMNSru9idmLH4fLTkMnfF4Sc60tAGvjjolb48Pr4vnZPXytFzMV4niKRuTNq8EZqpVTY6gWZFmjUy1BqZL3VYcSi1KrHJZCOANV5iyVkshICtjRaLRfEpmh1zl-xA86nrwZiP9rgZW79usoT60GdGbAzrIoKTVXjplwj8vcl5AXvE_IuV0FA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative influence of bias and nucleation layer thickness on the heteroepitaxial growth of InN on AlN-nucleated (111) silicon and (00.1) sapphire</title><source>AIP Digital Archive</source><creator>KISTENMACHER, T. J ; BRYDEN, W. A</creator><creatorcontrib>KISTENMACHER, T. J ; BRYDEN, W. A</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of bias and nucleation layer thickness on heteroepitaxy in thin films of InN grown at 400 °C on semiconducting (111) silicon and insulating (00.1) sapphire are shown to be dramatically different. For example, the thickness of an InN film on nucleated (00.1) sapphire is independent of bias, while on nucleated (111) silicon the thickness varies by over a factor of two. Similarly, the excellent epitaxy of the InN films on nucleated (00.1) sapphire is unaffected by bias or AlN layer thickness, while quality epitaxy on nucleated (111) silicon is achieved only in a narrow range of these parameters. Determining the bounds for heteroepitaxial growth on (111) silicon is a crucial first step toward devices incorporating both sources or detectors and processing elements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6951</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1077-3118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.108740</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APPLAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties ; Exact sciences and technology ; Physics ; Solid surfaces and solid-solid interfaces ; Surface and interface dynamics and vibrations ; Surfaces and interfaces; thin films and whiskers (structure and nonelectronic properties) ; Thin film structure and morphology</subject><ispartof>Applied physics letters, 1993-03, Vol.62 (11), p.1221-1223</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-d694e5cdcb6e1f0725ba2ff10f8fd9318f48e96a7413b3ce20dfa441581084bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-d694e5cdcb6e1f0725ba2ff10f8fd9318f48e96a7413b3ce20dfa441581084bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4637169$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KISTENMACHER, T. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRYDEN, W. A</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative influence of bias and nucleation layer thickness on the heteroepitaxial growth of InN on AlN-nucleated (111) silicon and (00.1) sapphire</title><title>Applied physics letters</title><description>The effects of bias and nucleation layer thickness on heteroepitaxy in thin films of InN grown at 400 °C on semiconducting (111) silicon and insulating (00.1) sapphire are shown to be dramatically different. For example, the thickness of an InN film on nucleated (00.1) sapphire is independent of bias, while on nucleated (111) silicon the thickness varies by over a factor of two. Similarly, the excellent epitaxy of the InN films on nucleated (00.1) sapphire is unaffected by bias or AlN layer thickness, while quality epitaxy on nucleated (111) silicon is achieved only in a narrow range of these parameters. Determining the bounds for heteroepitaxial growth on (111) silicon is a crucial first step toward devices incorporating both sources or detectors and processing elements.</description><subject>Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Solid surfaces and solid-solid interfaces</subject><subject>Surface and interface dynamics and vibrations</subject><subject>Surfaces and interfaces; thin films and whiskers (structure and nonelectronic properties)</subject><subject>Thin film structure and morphology</subject><issn>0003-6951</issn><issn>1077-3118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqUg8Qg-cCiHgDd2_o5VxU-lqlzgHDnOmhhcJ7JToO_BA-OqFafRzn6aXQ0h18DugOX8HqKUhWAnZAKsKBIOUJ6SCWOMJ3mVwTm5COEjjlnK-YT8LvrNIL0czRdS47TdolNIe00bIwOVrqVuqyxGoHfUyh16OnZGfToMgUZr7JB2OKLvcTCj_DHS0nfff4_dPmTp1ntobtfJMQZbOgOAWxqMNSru9idmLH4fLTkMnfF4Sc60tAGvjjolb48Pr4vnZPXytFzMV4niKRuTNq8EZqpVTY6gWZFmjUy1BqZL3VYcSi1KrHJZCOANV5iyVkshICtjRaLRfEpmh1zl-xA86nrwZiP9rgZW79usoT60GdGbAzrIoKTVXjplwj8vcl5AXvE_IuV0FA</recordid><startdate>19930315</startdate><enddate>19930315</enddate><creator>KISTENMACHER, T. J</creator><creator>BRYDEN, W. A</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930315</creationdate><title>Comparative influence of bias and nucleation layer thickness on the heteroepitaxial growth of InN on AlN-nucleated (111) silicon and (00.1) sapphire</title><author>KISTENMACHER, T. J ; BRYDEN, W. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-d694e5cdcb6e1f0725ba2ff10f8fd9318f48e96a7413b3ce20dfa441581084bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Solid surfaces and solid-solid interfaces</topic><topic>Surface and interface dynamics and vibrations</topic><topic>Surfaces and interfaces; thin films and whiskers (structure and nonelectronic properties)</topic><topic>Thin film structure and morphology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KISTENMACHER, T. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRYDEN, W. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Applied physics letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KISTENMACHER, T. J</au><au>BRYDEN, W. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative influence of bias and nucleation layer thickness on the heteroepitaxial growth of InN on AlN-nucleated (111) silicon and (00.1) sapphire</atitle><jtitle>Applied physics letters</jtitle><date>1993-03-15</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1221</spage><epage>1223</epage><pages>1221-1223</pages><issn>0003-6951</issn><eissn>1077-3118</eissn><coden>APPLAB</coden><abstract>The effects of bias and nucleation layer thickness on heteroepitaxy in thin films of InN grown at 400 °C on semiconducting (111) silicon and insulating (00.1) sapphire are shown to be dramatically different. For example, the thickness of an InN film on nucleated (00.1) sapphire is independent of bias, while on nucleated (111) silicon the thickness varies by over a factor of two. Similarly, the excellent epitaxy of the InN films on nucleated (00.1) sapphire is unaffected by bias or AlN layer thickness, while quality epitaxy on nucleated (111) silicon is achieved only in a narrow range of these parameters. Determining the bounds for heteroepitaxial growth on (111) silicon is a crucial first step toward devices incorporating both sources or detectors and processing elements.</abstract><cop>Melville, NY</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.108740</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-6951
ispartof Applied physics letters, 1993-03, Vol.62 (11), p.1221-1223
issn 0003-6951
1077-3118
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_108740
source AIP Digital Archive
subjects Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties
Exact sciences and technology
Physics
Solid surfaces and solid-solid interfaces
Surface and interface dynamics and vibrations
Surfaces and interfaces
thin films and whiskers (structure and nonelectronic properties)
Thin film structure and morphology
title Comparative influence of bias and nucleation layer thickness on the heteroepitaxial growth of InN on AlN-nucleated (111) silicon and (00.1) sapphire
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T07%3A20%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pascalfrancis_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20influence%20of%20bias%20and%20nucleation%20layer%20thickness%20on%20the%20heteroepitaxial%20growth%20of%20InN%20on%20AlN-nucleated%20(111)%20silicon%20and%20(00.1)%20sapphire&rft.jtitle=Applied%20physics%20letters&rft.au=KISTENMACHER,%20T.%20J&rft.date=1993-03-15&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1221&rft.epage=1223&rft.pages=1221-1223&rft.issn=0003-6951&rft.eissn=1077-3118&rft.coden=APPLAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.108740&rft_dat=%3Cpascalfrancis_cross%3E4637169%3C/pascalfrancis_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true