Malpractice through the Looking Glass

To the Editor: "How could you limit it to $250,000?" asked the Walrus. "What if it were a blind child?" "How can we go on dealing with these amounts?" replied the Carpenter. "They are increasing in a geometric progression." (He fancied himself a scientist.) &q...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 1986-05, Vol.314 (20), p.1325-1325
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1325
container_issue 20
container_start_page 1325
container_title The New England journal of medicine
container_volume 314
description To the Editor: "How could you limit it to $250,000?" asked the Walrus. "What if it were a blind child?" "How can we go on dealing with these amounts?" replied the Carpenter. "They are increasing in a geometric progression." (He fancied himself a scientist.) "What's the difference to two blind children," asked the Oyster, "whether one's blind because of something no one could prevent and the other's blind because of something for which you may be able to blame someone? Do the two have different needs? Why should they be treated differently?" "One might be lucky and win the lottery," . . . No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.
doi_str_mv 10.1056/NEJM198605153142024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>mms_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJM198605153142024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>NJ198605153142024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-c08e308037470060ad2cc7ea695d56c9198deecb922dd03cfd626f3c3b73b2743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9T71OwzAYtBBIhMITsGRhQoHP_vwTj6gqBZTCAnPk2E6bkjSVHQbevkZlRNxyN9yd7gi5pnBHQcj718XLiupSgqACKWfA-AnJksaCc5CnJANgZcGVxnNyEeMWEijXGblZmX4fjJ066_NpE8av9Saxz6tx_Ox263zZmxgvyVlr-uivfnlGPh4X7_OnonpbPs8fqsIyFFNhofQIJaDiCkCCccxa5Y3UwglpdZrovLeNZsw5QNs6yWSLFhuFDVMcZwSPvTaMMQbf1vvQDSZ81xTqn6f1H09T6vaYGoZY7_x2-Nd9AJYVUSI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Malpractice through the Looking Glass</title><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><description>To the Editor: "How could you limit it to $250,000?" asked the Walrus. "What if it were a blind child?" "How can we go on dealing with these amounts?" replied the Carpenter. "They are increasing in a geometric progression." (He fancied himself a scientist.) "What's the difference to two blind children," asked the Oyster, "whether one's blind because of something no one could prevent and the other's blind because of something for which you may be able to blame someone? Do the two have different needs? Why should they be treated differently?" "One might be lucky and win the lottery," . . . No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198605153142024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 1986-05, Vol.314 (20), p.1325-1325</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><title>Malpractice through the Looking Glass</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><description>To the Editor: "How could you limit it to $250,000?" asked the Walrus. "What if it were a blind child?" "How can we go on dealing with these amounts?" replied the Carpenter. "They are increasing in a geometric progression." (He fancied himself a scientist.) "What's the difference to two blind children," asked the Oyster, "whether one's blind because of something no one could prevent and the other's blind because of something for which you may be able to blame someone? Do the two have different needs? Why should they be treated differently?" "One might be lucky and win the lottery," . . . No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</description><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9T71OwzAYtBBIhMITsGRhQoHP_vwTj6gqBZTCAnPk2E6bkjSVHQbevkZlRNxyN9yd7gi5pnBHQcj718XLiupSgqACKWfA-AnJksaCc5CnJANgZcGVxnNyEeMWEijXGblZmX4fjJ066_NpE8av9Saxz6tx_Ox263zZmxgvyVlr-uivfnlGPh4X7_OnonpbPs8fqsIyFFNhofQIJaDiCkCCccxa5Y3UwglpdZrovLeNZsw5QNs6yWSLFhuFDVMcZwSPvTaMMQbf1vvQDSZ81xTqn6f1H09T6vaYGoZY7_x2-Nd9AJYVUSI</recordid><startdate>19860515</startdate><enddate>19860515</enddate><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860515</creationdate><title>Malpractice through the Looking Glass</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-c08e308037470060ad2cc7ea695d56c9198deecb922dd03cfd626f3c3b73b2743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Malpractice through the Looking Glass</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><date>1986-05-15</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>314</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>1325</spage><epage>1325</epage><pages>1325-1325</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>To the Editor: "How could you limit it to $250,000?" asked the Walrus. "What if it were a blind child?" "How can we go on dealing with these amounts?" replied the Carpenter. "They are increasing in a geometric progression." (He fancied himself a scientist.) "What's the difference to two blind children," asked the Oyster, "whether one's blind because of something no one could prevent and the other's blind because of something for which you may be able to blame someone? Do the two have different needs? Why should they be treated differently?" "One might be lucky and win the lottery," . . . No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</abstract><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><doi>10.1056/NEJM198605153142024</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-4793
ispartof The New England journal of medicine, 1986-05, Vol.314 (20), p.1325-1325
issn 0028-4793
1533-4406
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJM198605153142024
source ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
title Malpractice through the Looking Glass
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A44%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-mms_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Malpractice%20through%20the%20Looking%20Glass&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.date=1986-05-15&rft.volume=314&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=1325&rft.epage=1325&rft.pages=1325-1325&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJM198605153142024&rft_dat=%3Cmms_cross%3ENJ198605153142024%3C/mms_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true