COMPARISON OF B-MODE, TISSUE HARMONIC IMAGING AND CONTRAST ENHANCED LOW MECHANICAL INDEX ULTRASOUND IN PANCREATIC LESIONS

COMPARISON OF B-MODE, TISSUE HARMONIC IMAGING AND CONTRAST ENHANCED LOW MECHANICAL INDEX ULTRASOUND IN PANCREATIC LESIONS

Problemstellung: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and imaging quality of conventional B-mode US, tissue enhanced imaging (TEI) and contrast enhanced low MI Real Time Ultrasound (Cn-Ti) plus SonoVue® (Bracco) for the evaluation of pancreatic lesions. Method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Teusch, C, Remplik, P, Demharter, J, Bücklein, W, Roemer, FW, Bohndorf, K
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:ger
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue S 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 26
creator Teusch, C
Remplik, P
Demharter, J
Bücklein, W
Roemer, FW
Bohndorf, K
description Problemstellung: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and imaging quality of conventional B-mode US, tissue enhanced imaging (TEI) and contrast enhanced low MI Real Time Ultrasound (Cn-Ti) plus SonoVue® (Bracco) for the evaluation of pancreatic lesions. Methoden: In a prospective study, 35 patients with known pancreatic lesions underwent an US examination of the pancreas in B-mode, TEI and contrast enhanced US. Contrast enhanced CTs or histological examinations were obtained from all patients as diagnostic references. The US examinations were performed using the Esaote Technos MPX (Italy). The whole examination was blinded regarding the patients' data. The analysis was then done by way of filming on digital video. Two independent radiologists evaluated the imaging material in terms of imaging quality, lesion type, lesion size and vascular infiltration. The portal vein, the superior mesenteric vein, the superior mesenteric artery, and the splenic vein were evaluated for vascular infiltration. Ergebnisse: In 35 patients a total of 40 pancreatic lesions (23 adeno-carcinomas, 1 carcinoid, 1 kystadenoma, 3 lymphomas, 2 metastases of other carcinomas, 6 cysts, 3 cases of acute pancreatitis, 1 chronic pancreatitis) were diagnosed by CT. A histological correlation was performed in 26 lesions (17 adeno-carcinomas, 3 lymphomas, 2 metastases, 1 carcinoid, 2 acute pancreatitises and 1 chronic pancreatitis). All other lesions were classified by a CT follow-up examination. Regarding the differentiation between a benign or malignant process, the comparison between B-mode, TEI and contrast enhanced low MI Real Time US and the diagnostic reference showed sensitivities of 75.8% vs. 80.7% vs. 90.3% respectively, and specificities of 85% vs. 90% vs. 95% respectively. The evaluation of vascular infiltration showed a significantly better sensitivity for contrast enhanced examination than for B-mode and TEI examination (88.1% vs. 45.2% vs. 61.9% respectively; Cn-Ti vs. TEI p=0.042, Cn-Ti vs. B-Mode: p
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-2005-917290
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>thieme_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1055_s_2005_917290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1055_s_2005_917290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c750-127ba2aaa7a12dbd0b252f748e2329e7892e85d633b74b992fb6105f611cc9bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZO8PqMF2Ho6XJnEbS4ldJalgF-UpWlGKYlj073FUtqxGMzr3anQAeCT4ieAgeLaIYhwgThjl-AosiO9FKGIRvQYL7I7ID4l_C-6sPWCMOQnwApxjk29FoUqjoVnDF5SbRK5gpcpyJ2EqitxoFUOVi43SGyh0AmOjq0KUFZQ6FTqWCczMK8xl7DYViwwqncg3uMtmyuxcQmm4dWQhReW6Mlkqo8t7cDM2H3Z4-JtLUK1lFacoM5u5BnUswIhQ1ja0aRrWENq3PW5pQEfmRwP1KB9YxOkQBX3oeS3zW87p2IZOxhgS0nW87b0lQJfabjpZOw1j_TXtj810rgmuZ221rWdt9UWb41cX_vt9PxyH-nD6mT7df__gv3GMY0Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>COMPARISON OF B-MODE, TISSUE HARMONIC IMAGING AND CONTRAST ENHANCED LOW MECHANICAL INDEX ULTRASOUND IN PANCREATIC LESIONS</title><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Teusch, C ; Remplik, P ; Demharter, J ; Bücklein, W ; Roemer, FW ; Bohndorf, K</creator><creatorcontrib>Teusch, C ; Remplik, P ; Demharter, J ; Bücklein, W ; Roemer, FW ; Bohndorf, K</creatorcontrib><description>Problemstellung: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and imaging quality of conventional B-mode US, tissue enhanced imaging (TEI) and contrast enhanced low MI Real Time Ultrasound (Cn-Ti) plus SonoVue® (Bracco) for the evaluation of pancreatic lesions. Methoden: In a prospective study, 35 patients with known pancreatic lesions underwent an US examination of the pancreas in B-mode, TEI and contrast enhanced US. Contrast enhanced CTs or histological examinations were obtained from all patients as diagnostic references. The US examinations were performed using the Esaote Technos MPX (Italy). The whole examination was blinded regarding the patients' data. The analysis was then done by way of filming on digital video. Two independent radiologists evaluated the imaging material in terms of imaging quality, lesion type, lesion size and vascular infiltration. The portal vein, the superior mesenteric vein, the superior mesenteric artery, and the splenic vein were evaluated for vascular infiltration. Ergebnisse: In 35 patients a total of 40 pancreatic lesions (23 adeno-carcinomas, 1 carcinoid, 1 kystadenoma, 3 lymphomas, 2 metastases of other carcinomas, 6 cysts, 3 cases of acute pancreatitis, 1 chronic pancreatitis) were diagnosed by CT. A histological correlation was performed in 26 lesions (17 adeno-carcinomas, 3 lymphomas, 2 metastases, 1 carcinoid, 2 acute pancreatitises and 1 chronic pancreatitis). All other lesions were classified by a CT follow-up examination. Regarding the differentiation between a benign or malignant process, the comparison between B-mode, TEI and contrast enhanced low MI Real Time US and the diagnostic reference showed sensitivities of 75.8% vs. 80.7% vs. 90.3% respectively, and specificities of 85% vs. 90% vs. 95% respectively. The evaluation of vascular infiltration showed a significantly better sensitivity for contrast enhanced examination than for B-mode and TEI examination (88.1% vs. 45.2% vs. 61.9% respectively; Cn-Ti vs. TEI p=0.042, Cn-Ti vs. B-Mode: p&lt;0.001). Consequently contrast enhanced US is significantly better in terms of the correct diagnosis of operability than the other modalities. Imaging quality of TEI significantly exceeds the imaging quality of Cn-Ti (p=0.046). Schlussfolgerungen: Contrast enhanced US is significantly better than B-mode or tissue enhanced imaging in the preoperative staging of pancreatic lesions regarding vascular infiltration. There is no benefit in the differentiation between lesion types. Contrast enhanced US has to be combined with other imaging modalities like TEI because of the significantly worse image quality of Cn-Ti imaging on its own.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0172-4614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8782</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-917290</identifier><language>ger</language><ispartof>Ultraschall in der Medizin, 2005, Vol.26 (S 1)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3017,3018,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teusch, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remplik, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demharter, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bücklein, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roemer, FW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohndorf, K</creatorcontrib><title>COMPARISON OF B-MODE, TISSUE HARMONIC IMAGING AND CONTRAST ENHANCED LOW MECHANICAL INDEX ULTRASOUND IN PANCREATIC LESIONS</title><title>Ultraschall in der Medizin</title><addtitle>Ultraschall in Med</addtitle><description>Problemstellung: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and imaging quality of conventional B-mode US, tissue enhanced imaging (TEI) and contrast enhanced low MI Real Time Ultrasound (Cn-Ti) plus SonoVue® (Bracco) for the evaluation of pancreatic lesions. Methoden: In a prospective study, 35 patients with known pancreatic lesions underwent an US examination of the pancreas in B-mode, TEI and contrast enhanced US. Contrast enhanced CTs or histological examinations were obtained from all patients as diagnostic references. The US examinations were performed using the Esaote Technos MPX (Italy). The whole examination was blinded regarding the patients' data. The analysis was then done by way of filming on digital video. Two independent radiologists evaluated the imaging material in terms of imaging quality, lesion type, lesion size and vascular infiltration. The portal vein, the superior mesenteric vein, the superior mesenteric artery, and the splenic vein were evaluated for vascular infiltration. Ergebnisse: In 35 patients a total of 40 pancreatic lesions (23 adeno-carcinomas, 1 carcinoid, 1 kystadenoma, 3 lymphomas, 2 metastases of other carcinomas, 6 cysts, 3 cases of acute pancreatitis, 1 chronic pancreatitis) were diagnosed by CT. A histological correlation was performed in 26 lesions (17 adeno-carcinomas, 3 lymphomas, 2 metastases, 1 carcinoid, 2 acute pancreatitises and 1 chronic pancreatitis). All other lesions were classified by a CT follow-up examination. Regarding the differentiation between a benign or malignant process, the comparison between B-mode, TEI and contrast enhanced low MI Real Time US and the diagnostic reference showed sensitivities of 75.8% vs. 80.7% vs. 90.3% respectively, and specificities of 85% vs. 90% vs. 95% respectively. The evaluation of vascular infiltration showed a significantly better sensitivity for contrast enhanced examination than for B-mode and TEI examination (88.1% vs. 45.2% vs. 61.9% respectively; Cn-Ti vs. TEI p=0.042, Cn-Ti vs. B-Mode: p&lt;0.001). Consequently contrast enhanced US is significantly better in terms of the correct diagnosis of operability than the other modalities. Imaging quality of TEI significantly exceeds the imaging quality of Cn-Ti (p=0.046). Schlussfolgerungen: Contrast enhanced US is significantly better than B-mode or tissue enhanced imaging in the preoperative staging of pancreatic lesions regarding vascular infiltration. There is no benefit in the differentiation between lesion types. Contrast enhanced US has to be combined with other imaging modalities like TEI because of the significantly worse image quality of Cn-Ti imaging on its own.</description><issn>0172-4614</issn><issn>1438-8782</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>0U6</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZO8PqMF2Ho6XJnEbS4ldJalgF-UpWlGKYlj073FUtqxGMzr3anQAeCT4ieAgeLaIYhwgThjl-AosiO9FKGIRvQYL7I7ID4l_C-6sPWCMOQnwApxjk29FoUqjoVnDF5SbRK5gpcpyJ2EqitxoFUOVi43SGyh0AmOjq0KUFZQ6FTqWCczMK8xl7DYViwwqncg3uMtmyuxcQmm4dWQhReW6Mlkqo8t7cDM2H3Z4-JtLUK1lFacoM5u5BnUswIhQ1ja0aRrWENq3PW5pQEfmRwP1KB9YxOkQBX3oeS3zW87p2IZOxhgS0nW87b0lQJfabjpZOw1j_TXtj810rgmuZ221rWdt9UWb41cX_vt9PxyH-nD6mT7df__gv3GMY0Y</recordid><startdate>20050914</startdate><enddate>20050914</enddate><creator>Teusch, C</creator><creator>Remplik, P</creator><creator>Demharter, J</creator><creator>Bücklein, W</creator><creator>Roemer, FW</creator><creator>Bohndorf, K</creator><scope>0U6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050914</creationdate><title>COMPARISON OF B-MODE, TISSUE HARMONIC IMAGING AND CONTRAST ENHANCED LOW MECHANICAL INDEX ULTRASOUND IN PANCREATIC LESIONS</title><author>Teusch, C ; Remplik, P ; Demharter, J ; Bücklein, W ; Roemer, FW ; Bohndorf, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c750-127ba2aaa7a12dbd0b252f748e2329e7892e85d633b74b992fb6105f611cc9bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teusch, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remplik, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demharter, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bücklein, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roemer, FW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohndorf, K</creatorcontrib><collection>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teusch, C</au><au>Remplik, P</au><au>Demharter, J</au><au>Bücklein, W</au><au>Roemer, FW</au><au>Bohndorf, K</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>COMPARISON OF B-MODE, TISSUE HARMONIC IMAGING AND CONTRAST ENHANCED LOW MECHANICAL INDEX ULTRASOUND IN PANCREATIC LESIONS</atitle><btitle>Ultraschall in der Medizin</btitle><addtitle>Ultraschall in Med</addtitle><date>2005-09-14</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>S 1</issue><issn>0172-4614</issn><eissn>1438-8782</eissn><abstract>Problemstellung: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and imaging quality of conventional B-mode US, tissue enhanced imaging (TEI) and contrast enhanced low MI Real Time Ultrasound (Cn-Ti) plus SonoVue® (Bracco) for the evaluation of pancreatic lesions. Methoden: In a prospective study, 35 patients with known pancreatic lesions underwent an US examination of the pancreas in B-mode, TEI and contrast enhanced US. Contrast enhanced CTs or histological examinations were obtained from all patients as diagnostic references. The US examinations were performed using the Esaote Technos MPX (Italy). The whole examination was blinded regarding the patients' data. The analysis was then done by way of filming on digital video. Two independent radiologists evaluated the imaging material in terms of imaging quality, lesion type, lesion size and vascular infiltration. The portal vein, the superior mesenteric vein, the superior mesenteric artery, and the splenic vein were evaluated for vascular infiltration. Ergebnisse: In 35 patients a total of 40 pancreatic lesions (23 adeno-carcinomas, 1 carcinoid, 1 kystadenoma, 3 lymphomas, 2 metastases of other carcinomas, 6 cysts, 3 cases of acute pancreatitis, 1 chronic pancreatitis) were diagnosed by CT. A histological correlation was performed in 26 lesions (17 adeno-carcinomas, 3 lymphomas, 2 metastases, 1 carcinoid, 2 acute pancreatitises and 1 chronic pancreatitis). All other lesions were classified by a CT follow-up examination. Regarding the differentiation between a benign or malignant process, the comparison between B-mode, TEI and contrast enhanced low MI Real Time US and the diagnostic reference showed sensitivities of 75.8% vs. 80.7% vs. 90.3% respectively, and specificities of 85% vs. 90% vs. 95% respectively. The evaluation of vascular infiltration showed a significantly better sensitivity for contrast enhanced examination than for B-mode and TEI examination (88.1% vs. 45.2% vs. 61.9% respectively; Cn-Ti vs. TEI p=0.042, Cn-Ti vs. B-Mode: p&lt;0.001). Consequently contrast enhanced US is significantly better in terms of the correct diagnosis of operability than the other modalities. Imaging quality of TEI significantly exceeds the imaging quality of Cn-Ti (p=0.046). Schlussfolgerungen: Contrast enhanced US is significantly better than B-mode or tissue enhanced imaging in the preoperative staging of pancreatic lesions regarding vascular infiltration. There is no benefit in the differentiation between lesion types. Contrast enhanced US has to be combined with other imaging modalities like TEI because of the significantly worse image quality of Cn-Ti imaging on its own.</abstract><doi>10.1055/s-2005-917290</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0172-4614
ispartof Ultraschall in der Medizin, 2005, Vol.26 (S 1)
issn 0172-4614
1438-8782
language ger
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1055_s_2005_917290
source Thieme Connect Journals
title COMPARISON OF B-MODE, TISSUE HARMONIC IMAGING AND CONTRAST ENHANCED LOW MECHANICAL INDEX ULTRASOUND IN PANCREATIC LESIONS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A38%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-thieme_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=COMPARISON%20OF%20B-MODE,%20TISSUE%20HARMONIC%20IMAGING%20AND%20CONTRAST%20ENHANCED%20LOW%20MECHANICAL%20INDEX%20ULTRASOUND%20IN%20PANCREATIC%20LESIONS&rft.btitle=Ultraschall%20in%20der%20Medizin&rft.au=Teusch,%20C&rft.date=2005-09-14&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=S%201&rft.issn=0172-4614&rft.eissn=1438-8782&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2005-917290&rft_dat=%3Cthieme_cross%3E10_1055_s_2005_917290%3C/thieme_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true